Can we monitor socioeconomic inequalities in health? A survey of U.S. health departments' data collection and reporting practices.
(33/818)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential for and obstacles to routine monitoring of socioeconomic inequalities in health using U.S. vital statistics and disease registry data, the authors surveyed current data collection and reporting practices for specific socioeconomic variables. METHODS: In 1996 the authors mailed a self-administered survey to all of the 55 health department vital statistics offices reporting data to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) to determine what kinds of socioeconomic data they collected on birth and death certificates and in cancer, AIDS, and tuberculosis (TB) registries and what kinds of socioeconomic data were routinely reported in health department publications. RESULTS: Health departments routinely obtained data on occupation on death certificates and in most cancer registries. They collected data on educational level for both birth and death certificates. None of the databases collected information on income, and few obtained data on employment status, health insurance carrier, or receipt of public assistance. When socioeconomic data were collected, they were usually not included in published reports (except for mothers educational level in birth certificate data). Obstacles cited to collecting and reporting socioeconomic data included lack of resources and concerns about the confidentiality and accuracy of data. All databases, however, included residential addresses, suggesting records could be geocoded and linked to Census-based socioeconomic data. CONCLUSIONS: U.S. state and Federal vital statistics and disease registries should routinely collect and publish socioeconomic data to improve efforts to monitor trends in and reduce social inequalities in health. (+info)
Alzheimer's disease as a cause of death in the United States.
(34/818)
OBJECTIVE: To describe the scope of mortality from and trends in Alzheimer's disease, to show how Alzheimer's disease ranks as a leading cause of death, to describe a methodological change regarding ranking, and to discuss issues related to the reporting of Alzheimer's disease on death certificates. METHODS: The authors analyzed mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System. RESULTS: Alzheimer's disease has increasingly been reported as a cause of death on death certificates in the United States; however, this increase may represent a variety of factors including improved diagnosis and awareness of the disease or changes in the perception of Alzheimer's disease as a cause of death. In 1995, Alzheimer's disease was identified as the underlying cause of 20,606 deaths. Overall, Alzheimer's disease was the 14th leading cause of death in 1995; for people 65 years of age or older, it was the 8th leading cause of death. Both death rates and cause-of-death ranking differed by selected demographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: In recognition of the importance of the condition as a major public health problem, Alzheimer's disease was added to the list of causes eligible to be ranked as leading causes of death in the United States beginning with mortality data for 1994. Several issues need to be kept in mind in interpreting mortality data on Alzheimer's disease, including how diagnoses are made, how the condition is classified, and the purpose of death certificates. (+info)
Accuracy of recorded asthma deaths in Denmark in a 12-months period in 1994/95.
(35/818)
Many studies of asthma mortality rely on official registration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of death certificates, where asthma was coded as cause of death. In a 12-month period, medical information on all subjects with asthma officially coded as the underlying cause of death in Denmark, was obtained by reviewing hospital records, contacting general practitioners and sometimes close relatives. A panel of four pulmonologists each examined the obtained information and independently assessed the cause of death. Of a total of 218 death certificates, 39 were excluded as the cause of death could not be validated. In 16 (9%) of the subjects death from asthma was judged to be the definite cause of death and in 12 (7%) death from asthma was possible. Of 151 non-asthma deaths coded as due to asthma, 109 were judged to have suffered or died from COPD and 14 from heart disease. The accuracy of Danish death certification in asthma deaths is poor, especially in the elderly, where COPD is often classified as asthma. We conclude that the true asthma mortality in Denmark is substantially lower than officially recorded. (+info)
Asthma mortality in Danish children and young adults, 1973-1994: epidemiology and validity of death certificates.
(36/818)
Several reports indicate that asthma mortality has increased during the last few decades. International comparisons reveal some striking differences in the pattern of asthma mortality. The authors investigated the asthma mortality rate in the Danish child and youth population 1973-1994 and studied the validity of death certificates. The authors reviewed all death certificates coded as asthma death in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 8-ICD 10 (1994)) and adjacent respiratory code numbers for the age group 1-19 yrs. Hospital records and autopsy reports were assessed to validate the cause of death. Age-standardized and age-specific mortality rates were calculated. From 1973 to 1987 there was a significant upward trend in the mortality. On subdivision, this trend was limited to the age group 15-19 yrs. Generally the mortality rate decreased from 1988 to 1994. Four per cent coded as asthma were false positive. Twelve per cent were false negative asthma deaths, wrongly coded as due to other causes. Only 62% of all true positive death caused by asthma were appropriately coded. The number of false negative certifications increased with increasing autopsy frequency. Asthma mortality rates in Denmark increased in adolescents during 1973-1987 and decreased from 1988 to 1994. A possible explanation may be an increased awareness of asthma symptoms combined with a steadily improved treatment of asthma. Even in children and young adults under the age of 20 yrs, validity problems still make comparisons between countries difficult; even interpretation of national trends requires caution. (+info)
Comparing Swedish hospital discharge records with death certificates: implications for mortality statistics.
(37/818)
BACKGROUND: The quality of mortality statistics is of crucial importance to epidemiological research. Traditional editing techniques used by statistical offices capture only obvious errors in death certification. In this study we match Swedish hospital discharge data to death certificates and discuss the implications for mortality statistics. METHODS: Swedish death certificates for 1995 were linked to the national hospital discharge register. The resulting database comprised 69 818 individuals (75% of all deaths), 39 872 (43%) of whom died in hospital. The diagnostic statements were compared at Basic Tabulation List level. RESULTS: The last main diagnosis and the underlying cause of death agreed in 46% of cases. Agreement decreased rapidly after discharge. For hospital deaths, the main diagnosis was reported on 83% of the certificates, but only on 46% of certificates for non-hospital deaths. Malignant neoplasms and other dramatic conditions showed the best agreement and were often reported as underlying causes. Conditions that might follow from some other disease were often reported as contributory causes, while symptomatic and some chronic conditions were often omitted. In 13% of cases, an ill-defined main condition was replaced by a more specific cause of death. CONCLUSIONS: There is no apparent reason to question the death certificate if the main diagnosis and underlying cause agree, or if the main diagnosis is a probable complication of the stated underlying cause. However, cases in which the main diagnosis cannot be considered a complication of the reported underlying cause should be investigated, and assessments made of the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of routinely linking hospital records to death certificates. (+info)
What is a natural cause of death? A survey of how coroners in England and Wales approach borderline cases.
(38/818)
AIM: Many deaths fall in the "grey" area between those that are clearly natural and those that are unnatural. There are no guidelines to help doctors in dealing with such cases and death certification is often arbitrary and inconsistent. In an attempt to initiate debate on these difficult areas, and with the ultimate aim of achieving national consensus, the views of coroners in England and Wales were sought. METHODS: Sixteen clinical scenarios, with causes of death, were circulated to all coroners in England and Wales. For each case they were asked to provide a verdict, with explanation. The deaths fell into three groups: (1) postoperative, (2) a combination of trauma and natural disease, and (3) infectious disease. RESULTS: Sixty four questionnaires were returned. There was near consensus (> 80% concordance) in only two of the 16 cases. In five, there was no significant agreement between coroners in the verdicts returned ("natural causes" versus "misadventure/accidental"). These included all three cases in which death resulted from a combination of trauma and natural disease (a fall after a grand mal fit; falls resulting in fractures of bones affected by metastatic carcinoma and osteoporosis), bronchopneumonia after hip replacement for osteoarthritis, and new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The comments made for each case indicate that the variation between coroners in whether or not to hold an inquest, and the verdict arrived at, reflect the lack of a definition for natural causes, together with differences in the personal attitudes of each coroner. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in the way in which coroners approach these borderline cases, many of which are common in clinical practice. This study indicates a need for discussion, working towards a national consensus on such issues. It highlights the importance of good communication between coroners and medical staff at a local level. (+info)
Incomplete and inaccurate death certification--the impact on research.
(39/818)
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the extent of erroneous and/or omitted information on death certificates of patients-implanted with Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave (BSCC) heart valves; (2) to determine whether this information could be associated with a possible under-reporting of acute mechanical failure of this valve. METHODS: A review was carried out of death certificates and clinical notes for patients implanted in the United Kingdom with BSCC valves. This was a multicentre study (38 hospitals) based at the Cardiothoracic Department, NHLI, Imperial College School of Medicine at Hammersmith Hospital, London. The subjects were 478 patients implanted with a BSCC valve between 1979 and 1986 who died in the following years: 1984, 1987, 1990, 1993 and 1996. The main outcome measures were: (1) percentage of death certificates that record the presence of a valve prosthesis; (2) percentage of death certificates that record the presence of a valve prosthesis for patients who had a post mortem; (3) percentage of death certificates that record inaccurate or incomplete information related to the surgery; (4) percentage of death certificates that do not record a post mortem where one is known to have been performed. RESULTS: Twenty-one per cent (101/478) of the total number of death certificates record the presence of the valve prosthesis. Thirty-five per cent (43/123) of the death certificates for patients who had a post mortem record the presence of a valve prosthesis. Six per cent (30/478) of death certificates report inaccurate information related to the valve surgery. Twenty-five per cent (118/478) of the total number of death certificates recorded a single cause of death. Twenty-three per cent (110/478) of all death certificates reviewed recorded only the mode of dying. Eight per cent (10/123) of the total number of death certificates for patients who had a post mortem did not record a post mortem. CONCLUSIONS: The relatively high number of death certificates that do not record the presence of a valve prosthesis and the observed under-reporting of post mortems may lead to inaccurate reporting of the number of BSCC valves that fail. Previous recommendations to improve accuracy in death certification appear to have gone unheeded, and changes in the way certificates are completed for patients with implanted cardiac devices should be considered. (+info)
Cancer registries--future development and uses in Britain.
(40/818)
Cancer registries are a vital source of information on cancer epidemiology and cancer services. Their role has changed dramatically over the past 15 years. A number of factors will affect their future role, including health service changes, information technology, development of clinical datasets and greater demand for both health service and public information. The potential of cancer registration needs to be realized by clinicians and health authorities: how they can use the data, its limitations, and how they can support and influence it through this period of change. A strategic direction is needed so that cancer registries develop into a dynamic, interactive source of knowledge for the twenty-first century. (+info)