An organized procedure carried out by a select committee of professionals in evaluating the performance of other professionals in meeting the standards of their specialty. Review by peers is used by editors in the evaluation of articles and other papers submitted for publication. Peer review is used also in the evaluation of grant applications. It is applied also in evaluating the quality of health care provided to patients.
The concurrent or retrospective review by practicing physicians or other health professionals of the quality and efficiency of patient care practices or services ordered or performed by other physicians or other health professionals (From The Facts On File Dictionary of Health Care Management, 1988).
The evaluation by experts of the quality and pertinence of research or research proposals of other experts in the same field. Peer review is used by editors in deciding which submissions warrant publication, by granting agencies to determine which proposals should be funded, and by academic institutions in tenure decisions.
Group composed of associates of same species, approximately the same age, and usually of similar rank or social status.
Organizations representing designated geographic areas which have contracts under the PRO program to review the medical necessity, appropriateness, quality, and cost-effectiveness of care received by Medicare beneficiaries. Peer Review Improvement Act, PL 97-248, 1982.
Critical and exhaustive investigation or experimentation, having for its aim the discovery of new facts and their correct interpretation, the revision of accepted conclusions, theories, or laws in the light of newly discovered facts, or the practical application of such new or revised conclusions, theories, or laws. (Webster, 3d ed)
The act or practice of literary composition, the occupation of writer, or producing or engaging in literary work as a profession.
The guidelines and policy statements set forth by the editor(s) or editorial board of a publication.
'Medical manuscripts' are written documents that present original research, review articles, case studies, or theoretical discussions in the field of medicine, prepared following specific guidelines and structures for scientific communication, intended for publication in peer-reviewed medical journals.
"The business or profession of the commercial production and issuance of literature" (Webster's 3d). It includes the publisher, publication processes, editing and editors. Production may be by conventional printing methods or by electronic publishing.
Compositions written by hand, as one written before the invention or adoption of printing. A manuscript may also refer to a handwritten copy of an ancient author. A manuscript may be handwritten or typewritten as distinguished from a printed copy, especially the copy of a writer's work from which printed copies are made. (Webster, 3d ed)
A publication issued at stated, more or less regular, intervals.
Financial support of research activities.
The profession of writing. Also the identity of the writer as the creator of a literary production.
A plan for collecting and utilizing data so that desired information can be obtained with sufficient precision or so that an hypothesis can be tested properly.
A specialty concerned with the nature and cause of disease as expressed by changes in cellular or tissue structure and function caused by the disease process.
Passing off as one's own the work of another without credit.
A quantitative measure of the frequency on average with which articles in a journal have been cited in a given period of time.
A system for verifying and maintaining a desired level of quality in a product or process by careful planning, use of proper equipment, continued inspection, and corrective action as required. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed)
Activities and programs intended to assure or improve the quality of care in either a defined medical setting or a program. The concept includes the assessment or evaluation of the quality of care; identification of problems or shortcomings in the delivery of care; designing activities to overcome these deficiencies; and follow-up monitoring to ensure effectiveness of corrective steps.
Copies of a work or document distributed to the public by sale, rental, lease, or lending. (From ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science, 1983, p181)
The science or philosophy of law. Also, the application of the principles of law and justice to health and medicine.
'Hospital Bed Capacity, 300 to 499' is a term used to describe healthcare facilities that have a bed capacity ranging between three hundred to four hundred and ninety-nine beds, which enables them to accommodate and manage a substantial number of patients while providing essential medical services.'
Methods and procedures for the diagnosis of disease or dysfunction by examination of the pathological site or operative field during surgical intervention.
Certification as complying with a standard set by non-governmental organizations, applied for by institutions, programs, and facilities on a voluntary basis.
The moral obligations governing the conduct of research. Used for discussions of research ethics as a general topic.
Participation of employees with management as a labor-management team, in decisions pertaining to the operational activities of the organization or industry.
The integration of epidemiologic, sociological, economic, and other analytic sciences in the study of health services. Health services research is usually concerned with relationships between need, demand, supply, use, and outcome of health services. The aim of the research is evaluation, particularly in terms of structure, process, output, and outcome. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed)
The science concerned with the detection, chemical composition, and biological action of toxic substances or poisons and the treatment and prevention of toxic manifestations.
Those individuals engaged in research.
Insurance providing benefits for the costs of care by a physician which can be comprehensive or limited to surgical expenses or for care provided only in the hospital. It is frequently called "regular medical expense" or "surgical expense".
Research that involves the application of the natural sciences, especially biology and physiology, to medicine.
The term "United States" in a medical context often refers to the country where a patient or study participant resides, and is not a medical term per se, but relevant for epidemiological studies, healthcare policies, and understanding differences in disease prevalence, treatment patterns, and health outcomes across various geographic locations.
The application of industrial management practice to systematically maintain and improve organization-wide performance. Effectiveness and success are determined and assessed by quantitative quality measures.
The teaching staff and members of the administrative staff having academic rank in an educational institution.
The study of natural phenomena by observation, measurement, and experimentation.
An operating division of the US Department of Health and Human Services. It is concerned with the overall planning, promoting, and administering of programs pertaining to health and medical research. Until 1995, it was an agency of the United States PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE.
A situation in which an individual might benefit personally from official or professional actions. It includes a conflict between a person's private interests and official responsibilities in a position of trust. The term is not restricted to government officials. The concept refers both to actual conflict of interest and the appearance or perception of conflict.
The capability to perform the duties of one's profession generally, or to perform a particular professional task, with skill of an acceptable quality.
A detailed review and evaluation of selected clinical records by qualified professional personnel for evaluating quality of medical care.
Research carried out by nurses, generally in clinical settings, in the areas of clinical practice, evaluation, nursing education, nursing administration, and methodology.
Laws and regulations concerning hospitals, which are proposed for enactment or enacted by a legislative body.
All organized methods of funding.
The assessment of the functioning of an employee in relation to work.
A private, voluntary, not-for-profit organization which establishes standards for the operation of health facilities and services, conducts surveys, and awards accreditation.
Conferences, conventions or formal meetings usually attended by delegates representing a special field of interest.
A systematic statement of policy rules or principles. Guidelines may be developed by government agencies at any level, institutions, professional societies, governing boards, or by convening expert panels. The text may be cursive or in outline form but is generally a comprehensive guide to problems and approaches in any field of activity. For guidelines in the field of health care and clinical medicine, PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC is available.
The use of statistical methods in the analysis of a body of literature to reveal the historical development of subject fields and patterns of authorship, publication, and use. Formerly called statistical bibliography. (from The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science, 1983)
The interaction of two or more persons or organizations directed toward a common goal which is mutually beneficial. An act or instance of working or acting together for a common purpose or benefit, i.e., joint action. (From Random House Dictionary Unabridged, 2d ed)
Educational institutions providing facilities for teaching and research and authorized to grant academic degrees.
The educational process of instructing.
The application of discoveries generated by laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and studies in humans. A second area of translational research concerns enhancing the adoption of best practices.
Systematic gathering of data for a particular purpose from various sources, including questionnaires, interviews, observation, existing records, and electronic devices. The process is usually preliminary to statistical analysis of the data.
An organized procedure carried out through committees to review admissions, duration of stay, professional services furnished, and to evaluate the medical necessity of those services and promote their most efficient use.
Societies whose membership is limited to physicians.
The reciprocal interaction of two or more persons.
Predetermined sets of questions used to collect data - clinical data, social status, occupational group, etc. The term is often applied to a self-completed survey instrument.
Research into the cause, transmission, amelioration, elimination, or enhancement of inherited disorders and traits.
Studies determining the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. For drugs and devices, CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DRUG EVALUATION; and DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL are available.
A mechanism of communication within a system in that the input signal generates an output response which returns to influence the continued activity or productivity of that system.
A way of providing health care that is guided by a thoughtful integration of the best available scientific knowledge with clinical expertise. This approach allows the practitioner to critically assess research data, clinical guidelines, and other information resources in order to correctly identify the clinical problem, apply the most high-quality intervention, and re-evaluate the outcome for future improvement.
The process of formulating, improving, and expanding educational, managerial, or service-oriented work plans (excluding computer program development).
Educational programs designed to inform physicians of recent advances in their field.
The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results.
Methods for quantitatively assessing and measuring interpersonal and group relationships.
The capability to perform acceptably those duties directly related to patient care.
A loose confederation of computer communication networks around the world. The networks that make up the Internet are connected through several backbone networks. The Internet grew out of the US Government ARPAnet project and was designed to facilitate information exchange.
Theoretical representations and constructs that describe or explain the structure and hierarchy of relationships and interactions within or between formal organizational entities or informal social groups.

Research, ethics and conflicts of interest. (1/372)

In this paper, I have tried to develop a critique of committee procedures and conflict of interest within research advisory committees and ethical review committees (ERCs). There are specific features of conflict of interest in medical research. Scientists, communities and the subjects of research all have legitimate stakeholdings. The interests of medical scientists are particularly complex, since they are justified by the moral and physical welfare of their research subjects, while the reputations and incomes of scientists depend on the success of their science. Tensions of this kind must at times produce conflict of interest. It is important to recognise that conflicts of interest may unwittingly lead to manipulation of research subjects and their lay representatives on research committees. It is equally important to recognise distinctions between the legal and moral aspects of conflict of interest. Some practical suggestions are made which may go some way towards resolving these difficulties. They indicate what might be needed to ensure the validity of ethical discourse, and to reduce the risks associated with conflict of interest.  (+info)

Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines. (2/372)

OBJECTIVES: To review the characteristics and performance of research ethics committees in Spain in the evaluation of multicentre clinical trial drug protocols. DESIGN: A prospective study of 100 applications. SETTING: Forty-one committees reviewing clinical trial protocols, involving 50 hospitals in 25 cities. MAIN MEASURES: Protocol-related features, characteristics of research ethics committees and evaluation dynamics. RESULTS: The 100 applications involved 15 protocols (of which 12 were multinational) with 12 drugs. Committees met monthly (except one). They had a mean number of 12 members, requested a mean of six complete dossiers and nine additional copies of the protocol with a mean deadline of 14 days before the meeting. All applications were approved except three (two of the three were open-label long-term safety trials rejected by the same committee), which were approved by the other committees involved. The mean time from submission to approval was 64 days. The mean time from submission to arrival of the approval document at our offices was 85 days. Twenty-five committees raised queries for 38 of the 97 finally approved applications. Impact of evaluation fee, number of members, queries raised and experience of committees on timings were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Obtaining ethical approval is time-consuming. There is much diversity in the research ethics committees' performance. A remarkable delay (> 20 days) exists between the decision and the arrival of the written approval, suggesting administrative or organisational problems.  (+info)

Responses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals. (3/372)

BACKGROUND: There is relatively little research concerning the processes whereby Local Research Ethics Committees discharge their responsibilities towards society, potential participants and investigators. OBJECTIVES: To examine the criteria used by LRECs in arriving at their decisions concerning approval of research protocols through an analysis of letters sent to investigators. DESIGN: Four LRECs each provided copies of 50 letters sent to investigators after their submitted proposals had been considered by the committees. These letters were subjected to a content analysis, in which specific comments and requests for additional information and changes in the protocols were recorded and compared. FINDINGS: Overall 24% of proposals were approved without request for changes or clarifications, but this varied by committee: one committee approved only 6% of proposals without change or clarification while the others ranged from 26% to 32%. The content analyses of responses indicated that they could be placed into four categories: (i) further information for the committee to aid in their deliberations; (ii) requests for changes to the design or justification for the design used; (iii) changes to the information sheets provided to potential participants; and (iv) changes to consent procedures. Of these, alterations to information sheets were the most common type of request. These four types of response could be seen as safeguarding the wellbeing of potential participants (the principle of non-maleficence), of promoting the scientific validity of the research (the principle of beneficence), and of enhancing the rights of potential participants (the principle of autonomy). CONCLUSIONS: The committees were consistent in the types of requests they made of investigators, which can be seen as attempts to protect participants' rights and ensure the scientific validity of studies. Without an analysis of the proposals sent to the committees, however, it is difficult to account for the variation in the requirements set by the committees before approval was given.  (+info)

Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review. (4/372)

The objectives of this study were to see whether, in the opinion of authors, blinding or unmasking or a combination of the two affects the quality of reviews and to compare authors' and editors' assessments. In a trial conducted in the British Medical Journal, 527 consecutive manuscripts were randomized into one of three groups, and each was sent to two reviewers, who were randomized to receive a blinded or an unblinded copy of the manuscript. Review quality was assessed by two editors and the corresponding author. There was no significant difference in assessment between groups or between editors and authors. Reviews recommending publication were scored more highly than those recommending rejection.  (+info)

Alternative tests make the grade. (5/372)

Toxicity testing is absolutely necessary for assessing the safety of substances in food, air, and water, in the workplace and at home. Although there are several tried-and-true toxicity assays, the search is always on for methods that can even better predict toxic effects. As scientific understanding of the effects of environmental toxicants grows, new tests are needed to evaluate previously unexamined end points and to take advantage of advances in biotechnology and the growing knowledge of how toxicants work at the molecular and cellular levels. Another issue is how to develop tests that can reliably and accurately assess toxicity using less time, money, and materials, and with greater regard for animal welfare. The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) was established in 1997 to address these needs through the development, validation, acceptance, and harmonization of new and revised toxicological test methods throughout the federal government.  (+info)

Croatian Medical Journal at the turn of the millennium. (6/372)

The turn of the millennium coincided with the inclusion of the Croatian Medical Journal into the bibliographic databases MEDLINE (1998), and Current Contents/Clinical Medicine (1999), which greatly increased the number of submitted manuscripts. The increased pressure on the editorial office prompted us to modify the editorial procedure and sharpen our acceptance criteria. At the same time, we extended our author-friendly policy to all for global medicine and (2) medicine in translational and emerging countries. The Editorial Board and the Advisory Board were critical in developing and improving the Journal and setting the highest standards in all aspects of publication, especially in manuscript selection by high-quality peer review. In this editorial, we finally meet the members of the two Boards in person, or rather, in photographs and short biographies.  (+info)

Biomedicine's electronic publishing paradigm shift: copyright policy and PubMed Central. (7/372)

Biomedical publishing stands at a crossroads. The traditional print, peer-reviewed, subscription journal has served science well but is now being called into question. Because of spiraling print journal costs and the worldwide acceptance of the Internet as a valid publication medium, there is a compelling opportunity to re-examine our current paradigm and future options. This report illustrates the conflicts and restrictions inherent in the current publishing model and examines how the single act of permitting authors to retain copyright of their scholarly manuscripts may preserve the quality-control function of the current journal system while allowing PubMed Central, the Internet archiving system recently proposed by the director of the National Institutes of Health, to simplify and liberate access to the world's biomedical literature.  (+info)

A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy. (8/372)

A study was designed to test the hypothesis that experts who review papers for publication are prejudiced against an unconventional form of therapy. Two versions were produced (A and B) of a 'short report' that related to treatments of obesity, identical except for the nature of the intervention. Version A related to an orthodox treatment, version B to an unconventional treatment. 398 reviewers were randomized to receive one or the other version for peer review. The primary outcomes were the reviewers' rating of 'importance' on a scale of 1-5 and their verdict regarding rejection or acceptance of the paper. Reviewers were unaware that they were taking part in a study. The overall response rate was 41.7%, and 141 assessment forms were suitable for statistical evaluation. After dichotomization of the rating scale, a significant difference in favour of the orthodox version with an odds ratio of 3.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 8.25), was found. This observation mirrored that of the visual analogue scale for which the respective medians and interquartile ranges were 67% (51% to 78.5%) for version A and 57% (29.7% to 72.6%) for version B. Reviewers showed a wide range of responses to both versions of the paper, with a significant bias in favour of the orthodox version. Authors of technically good unconventional papers may therefore be at a disadvantage in the peer review process. Yet the effect is probably too small to preclude publication of their work in peer-reviewed orthodox journals.  (+info)

Peer review is a process in which experts in a field assess the quality and validity of scientific research, scholarly articles, or other professional works prior to publication. In the context of medical research, peer review typically involves one or more researchers with similar expertise evaluating a manuscript or study proposal to ensure that it meets established standards for design, methodology, analysis, and interpretation of results. The goal of peer review is to maintain the integrity and credibility of the scientific record by identifying and correcting errors, biases, or other shortcomings in the research before it is published. Peer review is a standard practice in medical publishing and is considered an essential component of the scientific process.

Peer review in the context of health care is a process used to maintain standards and improve the quality of healthcare practices, research, and publications. It involves the evaluation of work or research conducted by professionals within the same field, who are considered peers. The purpose is to provide an objective assessment of the work, identify any errors or biases, ensure that the methods and conclusions are sound, and offer suggestions for improvement.

In health care, peer review can be applied to various aspects including:

1. Clinical Practice: Healthcare providers regularly review each other's work to maintain quality standards in patient care, diagnoses, treatment plans, and adherence to evidence-based practices.

2. Research: Before research findings are published in medical journals, they undergo a rigorous peer-review process where experts assess the study design, methodology, data analysis, interpretation of results, and conclusions to ensure the validity and reliability of the research.

3. Publications: Medical journals use peer review to evaluate and improve the quality of articles submitted for publication. This helps to maintain the credibility and integrity of the published literature, ensuring that it is accurate, unbiased, and relevant to the field.

4. Education and Training Programs: Peer review is also used in evaluating the content and delivery of medical education programs, continuing professional development courses, and training curricula to ensure they meet established standards and are effective in enhancing the knowledge and skills of healthcare professionals.

5. Healthcare Facilities and Institutions: Accreditation bodies and regulatory authorities use peer review as part of their evaluation processes to assess the quality and safety of healthcare facilities and institutions, identifying areas for improvement and ensuring compliance with regulations and standards.

Peer review in the context of research refers to the evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field. The purpose of peer review is to ensure that the research is rigorous, valid, and relevant to the field. In a peer-review process, experts in the relevant field assess the research article, report, or other type of scholarly work for its accuracy, quality, and significance before it is published or presented at a conference.

The peer-review process typically involves several stages:

1. Submission: The author(s) submit their manuscript to a journal, conference, or other publication venue.
2. Assignment: The editor of the publication assigns the manuscript to one or more reviewers who are experts in the field.
3. Review: The reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as originality, methodology, data analysis, interpretation of results, and contribution to the field. They provide feedback and recommendations to the editor.
4. Decision: Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the editor makes a decision about whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript.
5. Revision: If the manuscript is rejected or requires revisions, the author(s) may have an opportunity to revise and resubmit the manuscript for further consideration.

Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process, as it helps ensure that research is held to high standards of quality and integrity. It also provides a mechanism for identifying and correcting errors or weaknesses in research before it is published or disseminated widely.

In the context of public health and medical research, a peer group is a social group whose members have similar interests, concerns, or social positions. Peer groups can play an important role in shaping individual behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs, particularly during adolescence and young adulthood. In research, studying peer groups can help researchers understand how social norms and influences affect health-related behaviors, such as substance use, sexual behavior, and mental health. It's worth noting that the term "peer group" doesn't have a specific medical definition, but it is widely used in public health and medical research to refer to these types of social groups.

Professional Review Organizations (PROs) are entities that are contracted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the United States to evaluate the performance of healthcare providers and suppliers who participate in the Medicare program. PROs conduct medical review activities to ensure that the services billed to Medicare meet the necessary standards of care and are medically necessary.

The primary goal of PROs is to promote quality healthcare, prevent fraud and abuse, and reduce unnecessary costs in the Medicare program. They achieve this by reviewing medical records, conducting site visits, and performing other activities to assess the appropriateness and quality of healthcare services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. Based on their findings, PROs may recommend corrective actions, impose sanctions, or take other measures to ensure that providers comply with Medicare regulations and policies.

PROs are typically composed of practicing physicians and other healthcare professionals who have expertise in the relevant medical specialties. They work collaboratively with CMS and other stakeholders to promote continuous quality improvement in the Medicare program and help ensure that beneficiaries receive high-quality, cost-effective healthcare services.

Research, in the context of medicine, is a systematic and rigorous process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information in order to increase our understanding, develop new knowledge, or evaluate current practices and interventions. It can involve various methodologies such as observational studies, experiments, surveys, or literature reviews. The goal of medical research is to advance health care by identifying new treatments, improving diagnostic techniques, and developing prevention strategies. Medical research is typically conducted by teams of researchers including clinicians, scientists, and other healthcare professionals. It is subject to ethical guidelines and regulations to ensure that it is conducted responsibly and with the best interests of patients in mind.

I believe there may be some confusion in your question. "Writing" is a common term used to describe the act or process of creating written content, whether it's for literary, professional, or personal purposes. However, if you're asking for a medical term related to writing, perhaps you meant "graphomotor," which refers to the fine motor skills required to produce handwriting or signing one's name. If this is not what you were looking for, please clarify your question so I can provide a more accurate answer.

Editorial policies refer to a set of guidelines and principles that govern the development, selection, peer-review, production, and publication of manuscripts in a medical journal. These policies aim to ensure the integrity, transparency, and quality of the published research while adhering to ethical standards and best practices in scientific publishing.

Some essential components of editorial policies include:

1. Authorship criteria: Defining who qualifies as an author, their roles, and responsibilities, and specifying the order of authorship based on contribution.
2. Conflict of interest disclosure: Requiring authors, reviewers, and editors to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their judgment or objectivity in the manuscript's evaluation.
3. Peer-review process: Outlining the steps involved in the peer-review process, including the selection of reviewers, the number of required reviews, and the criteria for accepting or rejecting a manuscript.
4. Plagiarism detection: Employing plagiarism detection software to ensure originality and prevent unethical practices such as self-plagiarism or duplicate publication.
5. Data sharing: Encouraging or requiring authors to share their data, code, or materials to promote transparency and reproducibility of the research findings.
6. Corrections and retractions: Establishing procedures for correcting errors, addressing scientific misconduct, and retracting published articles when necessary.
7. Post-publication discussions: Encouraging open dialogue and constructive criticism through post-publication discussions or letters to the editor.
8. Accessibility and copyright: Describing how the journal ensures accessibility of its content, such as through open-access models, and outlining the terms of copyright and licensing agreements.
9. Archiving and preservation: Ensuring long-term preservation and availability of published content by depositing it in appropriate digital archives or repositories.
10. Compliance with international standards: Adhering to guidelines and best practices established by organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Medical manuscripts are written documents that describe original research, analysis, or experiences in the field of medicine. These can take various forms such as:

1. Research papers: These report on original studies and include an abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and conclusion sections. They may also include tables, figures, and appendices.

2. Review articles: These provide a comprehensive overview of a specific topic in medicine, summarizing recent developments and findings from multiple sources.

3. Case reports: These describe unusual or interesting medical cases, often serving as educational tools for other healthcare professionals.

4. Clinical trials: These are detailed descriptions of clinical research studies involving human subjects, following a standardized format that includes information on the study's design, methods, results, and conclusions.

5. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: These involve a rigorous evaluation of all available evidence on a specific research question, using systematic methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant studies.

6. Letters to the editor: These are brief communications that may comment on previously published articles or raise new issues for discussion in the medical community.

Medical manuscripts must adhere to strict ethical guidelines and should be written in a clear, concise, and well-organized manner, following the standards set by reputable medical journals. They undergo rigorous peer review before publication to ensure their quality, accuracy, and relevance to the field of medicine.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "publishing" is not a term that has a medical definition. Publishing typically refers to the process of preparing and disseminating information, such as books, journals, or articles, to the public or a specific audience. It could involve both print and digital media. If you have any questions related to medicine or healthcare, I'd be happy to try to help answer those!

A medical definition of "Manuscripts as Topic" refers to the study and analysis of written documents that report original research or scholarly work in the field of medicine. This can include research articles, review articles, case reports, and other types of manuscripts that are submitted for publication in medical journals. The study of manuscripts as a topic may involve analyzing their content, structure, and quality, as well as evaluating the peer-review process and editorial policies of medical journals. Additionally, it can also cover the historical development of medical knowledge and practices through the examination of ancient and medieval medical manuscripts.

A "periodical" in the context of medicine typically refers to a type of publication that is issued regularly, such as on a monthly or quarterly basis. These publications include peer-reviewed journals, magazines, and newsletters that focus on medical research, education, and practice. They may contain original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorials, letters to the editor, and other types of content related to medical science and clinical practice.

As a "Topic," periodicals in medicine encompass various aspects such as their role in disseminating new knowledge, their impact on clinical decision-making, their quality control measures, and their ethical considerations. Medical periodicals serve as a crucial resource for healthcare professionals, researchers, students, and other stakeholders to stay updated on the latest developments in their field and to share their findings with others.

"Research Support as Topic" is not a specific medical term or diagnosis. However, in the context of medical literature and research, "research support" refers to the resources, funding, and infrastructure that enable and facilitate the conduct of scientific research. This can include financial support from various sources such as government agencies, private organizations, or institutions; access to laboratory facilities, equipment, and databases; and technical assistance in study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript preparation.

When "research support" is designated as a topic in medical literature, it typically refers to articles that discuss the various aspects of research funding, ethics, and management, including best practices for grant writing, financial conflict of interest disclosures, and responsible conduct of research. It may also include studies that examine the impact of research support on the quality, quantity, and outcomes of scientific research.

In the context of medical research, authorship refers to the recognition of individuals who have made significant contributions to the development and completion of a scientific paper or research project. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has established guidelines for determining authorship, which include the following four criteria:

1. Substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work.
2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content.
3. Final approval of the version to be published.
4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

All authors should meet these criteria, and their contributions should be clearly described in the manuscript. It is important to note that authorship should not be granted based on position or status alone, but rather on the basis of substantial intellectual contribution and commitment to the work.

A research design in medical or healthcare research is a systematic plan that guides the execution and reporting of research to address a specific research question or objective. It outlines the overall strategy for collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data to draw valid conclusions. The design includes details about the type of study (e.g., experimental, observational), sampling methods, data collection techniques, data analysis approaches, and any potential sources of bias or confounding that need to be controlled for. A well-defined research design helps ensure that the results are reliable, generalizable, and relevant to the research question, ultimately contributing to evidence-based practice in medicine and healthcare.

Pathology is a significant branch of medical science that deals with the study of the nature of diseases, their causes, processes, development, and consequences. It involves the examination of tissues, organs, bodily fluids, and autopsies to diagnose disease and determine the course of treatment. Pathology can be divided into various sub-specialties such as anatomical pathology, clinical pathology, molecular pathology, and forensic pathology. Ultimately, pathology aims to understand the mechanisms of diseases and improve patient care through accurate diagnosis and effective treatment plans.

Plagiarism is not a term that has a specific medical definition. It is a more general term that refers to the practice of using someone else's ideas, words, or creative expressions without giving credit to the original author. This can include copying and pasting text from another source without providing proper citation, failing to put quotation marks around borrowed language, or presenting another person's work as one's own.

Plagiarism is considered unethical in academic, professional, and creative settings because it involves stealing someone else's intellectual property and passing it off as one's own. It can have serious consequences, including damage to one's reputation, loss of credibility, and even legal action in some cases.

In the context of medical research and writing, plagiarism is taken very seriously and can result in sanctions such as retraction of published articles, loss of funding, or damage to professional standing. It is important for medical professionals and researchers to always give credit where credit is due and to properly cite any sources they use in their work.

The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is a measure of the frequency with which the "average article" in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years. For example, if a journal has an Impact Factor of 3 in 2020, that means articles published in 2018 and 2019 were cited 3 times on average in 2020. It is used to gauge the importance or rank of a journal by comparing the times it's articles are cited relative to other journals in the field. However, it has been criticized for various limitations such as being manipulated by editors and not reflecting the quality of individual articles.

"Quality control" is a term that is used in many industries, including healthcare and medicine, to describe the systematic process of ensuring that products or services meet certain standards and regulations. In the context of healthcare, quality control often refers to the measures taken to ensure that the care provided to patients is safe, effective, and consistent. This can include processes such as:

1. Implementing standardized protocols and guidelines for care
2. Training and educating staff to follow these protocols
3. Regularly monitoring and evaluating the outcomes of care
4. Making improvements to processes and systems based on data and feedback
5. Ensuring that equipment and supplies are maintained and functioning properly
6. Implementing systems for reporting and addressing safety concerns or errors.

The goal of quality control in healthcare is to provide high-quality, patient-centered care that meets the needs and expectations of patients, while also protecting their safety and well-being.

Quality Assurance in the context of healthcare refers to a systematic approach and set of activities designed to ensure that health care services and products consistently meet predetermined standards of quality and safety. It includes all the policies, procedures, and processes that are put in place to monitor, assess, and improve the quality of healthcare delivery.

The goal of quality assurance is to minimize variability in clinical practice, reduce medical errors, and ensure that patients receive evidence-based care that is safe, effective, timely, patient-centered, and equitable. Quality assurance activities may include:

1. Establishing standards of care based on best practices and clinical guidelines.
2. Developing and implementing policies and procedures to ensure compliance with these standards.
3. Providing education and training to healthcare professionals to improve their knowledge and skills.
4. Conducting audits, reviews, and evaluations of healthcare services and processes to identify areas for improvement.
5. Implementing corrective actions to address identified issues and prevent their recurrence.
6. Monitoring and measuring outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of quality improvement initiatives.

Quality assurance is an ongoing process that requires continuous evaluation and improvement to ensure that healthcare delivery remains safe, effective, and patient-centered.

In the context of medicine, "publications" typically refers to the dissemination of research findings or other medical information through various forms of media. This can include:

1. Peer-reviewed journals: These are scientific or medical publications that undergo a rigorous review process by experts in the field before they are accepted for publication. They represent some of the most reliable sources of medical information.

2. Conference proceedings: Medical conferences often publish abstracts, presentations, or posters from the event. These can provide early insights into ongoing research and new developments in the field.

3. Books and book chapters: Medical texts and reference books are a common form of publication, offering comprehensive overviews of specific topics or conditions.

4. Online platforms: Websites, blogs, and social media platforms have become increasingly popular ways to share medical information. While these can be valuable resources, it's important to critically evaluate the quality and reliability of the information presented.

5. News articles and press releases: Media outlets may report on new medical research or developments, although these should also be approached with caution as they may not always accurately represent the findings or context of the original research.

It's worth noting that all publications should be evaluated based on their source, methodology, and relevance to the specific question or issue at hand.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Jurisprudence" is not a term typically used in medical definitions. Jurisprudence refers to the theory and philosophy of law, or the study of legal systems, principles, and practices. It is a subject that falls under the purview of lawyers, judges, and scholars of law. If you have any questions about medical terminology, I'd be happy to help with those!

'Hospital Bed Capacity, 3

Diagnostic techniques, surgical refers to the use of surgical procedures or methods to diagnose and evaluate various medical conditions. These techniques are often used when non-invasive tests are inconclusive or when more detailed information is required. Here are some examples:

1. Biopsy: A small sample of tissue is removed from the body for examination under a microscope. This can help to confirm a diagnosis of cancer, infection, or other diseases.
2. Endoscopy: A flexible tube with a light and camera on the end is inserted into the body through a natural opening (such as the mouth or anus) or a small incision. This allows the doctor to visualize internal organs and tissues, and may also involve taking biopsy samples.
3. Imaging studies: Various imaging techniques such as X-rays, CT scans, MRI scans, and ultrasound can be used to produce detailed images of internal structures. These can help to diagnose a wide range of medical conditions, from broken bones to tumors.
4. Exploratory surgery: In some cases, a surgical incision may be made to directly visualize and examine an organ or tissue. This can help to diagnose conditions that are difficult to detect with non-invasive tests.
5. Functional testing: Some surgical techniques involve stimulating or measuring the function of an organ or system. For example, a cardiac stress test may be performed during surgery to assess heart function.

Overall, diagnostic techniques, surgical play an important role in the diagnosis and management of many medical conditions. They can provide valuable information that helps doctors to make informed decisions about treatment options and improve patient outcomes.

Accreditation is a process in which a healthcare organization, facility, or program is evaluated and certified as meeting certain standards and criteria established by a recognized accrediting body. The purpose of accreditation is to ensure that the organization, facility, or program provides safe, high-quality care and services to its patients or clients.

Accreditation typically involves a thorough review of an organization's policies, procedures, practices, and outcomes, as well as an on-site survey by a team of experts from the accrediting body. The evaluation focuses on various aspects of the organization's operations, such as leadership and management, patient safety, infection control, clinical services, quality improvement, and staff competence.

Accreditation is voluntary, but many healthcare organizations seek it as a way to demonstrate their commitment to excellence and continuous improvement. Accreditation can also be a requirement for licensure, reimbursement, or participation in certain programs or initiatives.

Examples of accrediting bodies in the healthcare field include The Joint Commission, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF), and the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA).

Research ethics refers to the principles and guidelines that govern the conduct of research involving human participants or animals. The overarching goal of research ethics is to ensure that research is conducted in a way that respects the autonomy, dignity, and well-being of all those involved. Research ethics are designed to prevent harm, promote fairness, and maintain trust between researchers and study participants.

Some key principles of research ethics include:

1. Respect for Persons: This means treating all individuals with respect and dignity, and recognizing their autonomy and right to make informed decisions about participating in research.
2. Beneficence: Researchers have a duty to maximize the benefits of research while minimizing potential harms.
3. Justice: Research should be conducted fairly, without discrimination or bias, and should benefit all those who are affected by it.
4. Confidentiality: Researchers must protect the privacy and confidentiality of study participants, including their personal information and data.
5. Informed Consent: Participants must give their voluntary and informed consent to participate in research, after being fully informed about the nature of the study, its risks and benefits, and their rights as a participant.

Research ethics are typically overseen by institutional review boards (IRBs) or research ethics committees (RECs), which review research proposals and monitor ongoing studies to ensure that they comply with ethical guidelines. Researchers who violate these guidelines may face sanctions, including loss of funding, suspension or revocation of their research privileges, or legal action.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Management Quality Circles" is not a recognized medical term or concept in healthcare management. It appears to be a term that combines the general business concept of "Quality Circles" with "Management," which may refer to a specific approach used in management and continuous improvement.

In the context of business and management, Quality Circles are small groups of employees who meet regularly to identify, analyze, and solve work-related problems and issues, with an aim to improve quality and productivity. The concept is often associated with Total Quality Management (TQM) and Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI).

However, if you're looking for a term related to healthcare management or medical definitions, please provide more context so I can give you a more accurate answer.

Health services research (HSR) is a multidisciplinary field of scientific investigation that studies how social factors, financing systems, organizational structures and processes, health technologies, and personal behaviors affect access to healthcare, the quality and cost of care, and ultimately, our health and well-being. The goal of HSR is to inform policy and practice, improve system performance, and enhance the health and well-being of individuals and communities. It involves the use of various research methods, including epidemiology, biostatistics, economics, sociology, management science, political science, and psychology, to answer questions about the healthcare system and how it can be improved.

Examples of HSR topics include:

* Evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different healthcare interventions and technologies
* Studying patient-centered care and patient experiences with the healthcare system
* Examining healthcare workforce issues, such as shortages of primary care providers or the impact of nurse-to-patient ratios on patient outcomes
* Investigating the impact of health insurance design and financing systems on access to care and health disparities
* Analyzing the organization and delivery of healthcare services in different settings, such as hospitals, clinics, and long-term care facilities
* Identifying best practices for improving healthcare quality and safety, reducing medical errors, and eliminating wasteful or unnecessary care.

Toxicology is a branch of medical science that deals with the study of the adverse effects of chemicals or toxins on living organisms and the environment, including their detection, evaluation, prevention, and treatment. It involves understanding how various substances can cause harm, the doses at which they become toxic, and the factors that influence their toxicity. This field is crucial in areas such as public health, medicine, pharmacology, environmental science, and forensic investigations.

Research personnel, in the context of medical and scientific research, refers to individuals who are involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of research studies. This can include, but is not limited to, principal investigators, co-investigators, research assistants, research coordinators, data managers, biostatisticians, and laboratory technicians. These individuals may have various levels of education, training, and expertise, and their roles and responsibilities will depend on the specific research study and their individual qualifications. It is important for research personnel to adhere to ethical guidelines and regulations in order to ensure the integrity and validity of research findings.

Physician services insurance refers to a type of health insurance coverage that helps pay for medically necessary services provided by licensed physicians. This can include office visits, hospital care, diagnostic tests, and treatments for injuries and illnesses. The specific services covered and the amount reimbursed will depend on the terms of the individual's insurance policy. Some policies may also have restrictions on which providers are considered in-network and covered under the plan. It is important to understand the details of one's coverage to know what is included and what out-of-pocket costs may be required.

Biomedical research is a branch of scientific research that involves the study of biological processes and diseases in order to develop new treatments and therapies. This type of research often involves the use of laboratory techniques, such as cell culture and genetic engineering, as well as clinical trials in humans. The goal of biomedical research is to advance our understanding of how living organisms function and to find ways to prevent and treat various medical conditions. It encompasses a wide range of disciplines, including molecular biology, genetics, immunology, pharmacology, and neuroscience, among others. Ultimately, the aim of biomedical research is to improve human health and well-being.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "United States" is a geopolitical entity, specifically the name of the country consisting of 50 states, and it is not a medical term or concept. Therefore, I can't provide a medical definition for it. If you have any questions related to health, medicine, or biology, I would be happy to try to help answer those!

Total Quality Management (TQM) is not a medical term per se, but rather a management approach that has been adopted in various industries, including healthcare. Here's a general definition:

Total Quality Management (TQM) is a customer-focused management framework that involves all employees in an organization in continuous improvement efforts to meet or exceed customer expectations. It is based on the principles of quality control, continuous process improvement, and customer satisfaction. TQM aims to create a culture where all members of the organization are responsible for quality, with the goal of providing defect-free products or services to customers consistently.

In healthcare, TQM can be used to improve patient care, reduce medical errors, increase efficiency, and enhance patient satisfaction. It involves the use of data-driven decision-making, process improvement techniques such as Lean and Six Sigma, and a focus on evidence-based practices. The ultimate goal of TQM in healthcare is to provide high-quality, safe, and cost-effective care to patients.

In a medical context, "faculty" most commonly refers to the inherent abilities or powers of a normal functioning part of the body or mind. For example, one might speak of the "faculties of perception" to describe the senses of sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. It can also refer to the teaching staff or body of instructors at a medical school or other educational institution. Additionally, it can be used more generally to mean a capability or skill, as in "the faculty of quick thinking."

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Science" is a broad field that refers to a systematic and logical process used to discover how things in the universe work. It's not typically used as a medical term. However, within the context of medicine, "science" often refers to evidence-based practices, which are treatments and preventions that have been scientifically researched and proven to be effective. This could include areas like pharmacology (the study of drugs), pathophysiology (the study of changes in the body due to disease), or clinical trials (studies used to test new treatments). If you're looking for a specific medical term, could you please provide more context?

A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organization has dual loyalties or is in a position to exploit their professional or personal relationships for personal or institutional gain. In the medical field, COIs can arise when healthcare providers, researchers, or institutions have financial or other interests that may influence their judgment or actions in providing care, conducting research, or making recommendations.

Examples of conflicts of interest in medicine include:

* A physician who has a financial relationship with a pharmaceutical company and receives compensation for promoting the company's products to patients or colleagues.
* A researcher who owns stock in a company that is funding their study and may stand to benefit financially from positive results.
* An institution that accepts funding from industry partners for research or educational programs, which could potentially influence the outcomes of the research or bias the education provided.

COIs can compromise the integrity of medical research, patient care, and professional judgment. Therefore, it is essential to disclose and manage COIs transparently to maintain trust in the healthcare system and ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of patients and society as a whole.

Professional competence, in the context of medicine, refers to the possession of the necessary skills, knowledge, and behaviors required for the provision of high-quality healthcare services. It involves the ability to apply medical knowledge and clinical skills effectively in practice, make informed and evidence-based decisions, communicate clearly and effectively with patients and colleagues, demonstrate professionalism and ethical behavior, and engage in continuous learning and improvement.

Professional competence is evaluated through various means, including assessments of clinical skills, knowledge tests, patient feedback, and peer reviews. It is an ongoing process that requires healthcare professionals to continually update their knowledge and skills, adapt to changes in medical practice, and strive for excellence in patient care. Maintaining professional competence is essential for ensuring the safety and quality of healthcare services and is a key component of medical regulation and licensure.

A medical audit is a systematic review and evaluation of the quality of medical care against established standards to see if it is being delivered efficiently, effectively, and equitably. It is a quality improvement process that aims to improve patient care and outcomes by identifying gaps between actual and desired practice, and implementing changes to close those gaps. Medical audits can focus on various aspects of healthcare delivery, including diagnosis, treatment, medication use, and follow-up care. The ultimate goal of medical audits is to ensure that patients receive the best possible care based on current evidence and best practices.

Nursing research is a scientific investigation that systematically studies nursing phenomena and related outcomes to establish best practices, improve patient care, and advance the profession of nursing. It utilizes various research methods and theories to address questions and problems relevant to nursing practice, education, administration, and policy-making. The ultimate goal of nursing research is to generate evidence-based knowledge that informs nursing interventions, enhances patient outcomes, and contributes to the development of nursing science.

I'm not aware of a specific medical definition for "Legislation, Hospital." However, I can provide some information related to legislation that affects hospitals and the healthcare industry.

Healthcare legislation refers to laws, regulations, and policies that govern the delivery, financing, and regulation of healthcare services. These laws have a significant impact on hospitals, as they set standards for patient care, establish guidelines for reimbursement, and shape the overall healthcare system. Some examples of major federal healthcare legislation in the United States include:

1. The Social Security Act (1935): Established the framework for federal involvement in healthcare, including funding for public health programs and income support for vulnerable populations.
2. The Hill-Burton Act (1946): Provided federal funding to construct and modernize hospitals, with a requirement that they provide a certain amount of free or reduced-cost care to uninsured patients.
3. The Medicare Act (1965): Created the federal health insurance program for people aged 65 and older, as well as some younger individuals with disabilities. This legislation significantly expanded access to healthcare services for millions of Americans.
4. The Medicaid Act (1965): Established a joint federal-state program that provides health insurance coverage for low-income individuals and families.
5. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA, 2010): Expanded healthcare coverage to millions of uninsured Americans through the creation of state-based health insurance marketplaces, Medicaid expansion, and various insurance reforms.

Hospitals must comply with these laws and regulations, which can impact their operations, finances, and patient care delivery. Additionally, hospitals may also be subject to state and local healthcare legislation that further shapes the regulatory environment in which they operate.

Organized financing in a medical context generally refers to the planning and coordination of financial resources and arrangements to support healthcare programs, services, or research. This can involve various funding sources, such as governmental agencies, private insurance, charitable organizations, and individual donors. The goal of organized financing is to ensure sustainable and equitable access to high-quality healthcare for all individuals, while also promoting cost-effective and efficient use of resources. Organized financing may also include efforts to address financial barriers to care, such as high out-of-pocket costs or lack of insurance coverage, and to promote transparency and accountability in the use of healthcare funds.

An "Employee Performance Appraisal" is a systematic and periodic process in which an organization evaluates the job performance of its employees. The purpose of this process is to provide feedback to employees about their strengths and areas for improvement, as well as to set goals and development plans for their future growth and performance enhancement.

The appraisal typically involves a review of the employee's job responsibilities, objectives, and achievements during a specific period, along with an assessment of their skills, behaviors, and competencies. The evaluation may be based on various factors such as job knowledge, productivity, quality of work, communication skills, teamwork, leadership, and attendance.

The performance appraisal is usually conducted by the employee's supervisor or manager, but it can also involve self-evaluation, peer review, or 360-degree feedback from multiple sources. The results of the appraisal are used to inform decisions about promotions, salary increases, training and development opportunities, and corrective actions when necessary.

Overall, the employee performance appraisal is a critical tool for organizations to manage their workforce effectively, improve productivity, and promote a culture of continuous learning and development.

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) is a non-profit organization in the United States that evaluates and accredits healthcare services and organizations. It was originally established in 1951 as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH), and changed its name to JCAHO in 1987 to reflect its expansion beyond hospital accreditation to include other types of healthcare organizations. In 2007, the organization became known simply as "The Joint Commission."

The Joint Commission's mission is to continuously improve the safety and quality of care provided by healthcare organizations through evaluation, accreditation, and education. It accomplishes this by setting standards for healthcare services and facilities, and then conducting unannounced surveys to assess whether these standards are being met. The survey process includes an on-site review of the organization's policies, procedures, and practices, as well as interviews with staff, patients, and their families.

Healthcare organizations that meet or exceed The Joint Commission's standards can earn accreditation, which is recognized as a mark of quality by consumers, insurers, and regulatory bodies. Accreditation is voluntary, but many healthcare organizations choose to participate because it demonstrates their commitment to excellence and helps them identify areas for improvement.

In addition to hospital accreditation, The Joint Commission also offers accreditation programs for ambulatory care facilities, behavioral health care organizations, home health agencies, laboratories, long-term care facilities, and office-based surgery practices.

The term "Congresses as Topic" refers to large, formal meetings that are held to discuss and exchange information on a specific topic or field, usually academic or professional in nature. In the context of medical science, a congress is an event where healthcare professionals, researchers, and experts gather to present and discuss the latest research, developments, and innovations in their field. Medical congresses can cover a wide range of topics, including specific diseases, treatments, medical specialties, public health issues, or healthcare policies. These events often include keynote speeches, panel discussions, workshops, poster sessions, and networking opportunities for attendees. Examples of well-known medical congresses are the annual meetings of the American Medical Association, the American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology.

'Guidelines' in the medical context are systematically developed statements or sets of recommendations designed to assist healthcare professionals and patients in making informed decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. They are based on a thorough evaluation of the available evidence, including scientific studies, expert opinions, and patient values. Guidelines may cover a wide range of topics, such as diagnosis, treatment, prevention, screening, and management of various diseases and conditions. They aim to standardize care, improve patient outcomes, reduce unnecessary variations in practice, and promote efficient use of healthcare resources.

Bibliometrics is the use of statistical methods to analyze books, articles, and other publications. In the field of information science, bibliometrics is often used to measure the impact of scholarly works or authors by counting the number of times that a work has been cited in other publications. This can help researchers identify trends and patterns in research output and collaboration, as well as assess the influence of individual researchers or institutions.

Bibliometric analyses may involve a variety of statistical measures, such as citation counts, author productivity, journal impact factors, and collaborative networks. These measures can be used to evaluate the performance of individual researchers, departments, or institutions, as well as to identify areas of research strength or weakness.

It is important to note that while bibliometrics can provide useful insights into research trends and impact, they should not be the sole basis for evaluating the quality or significance of scholarly work. Other factors, such as the rigor of the research design, the clarity of the writing, and the relevance of the findings to the field, are also important considerations.

Cooperative behavior, in a medical or healthcare context, refers to the actions and attitudes displayed by individuals or groups working together to achieve a common goal related to health and well-being. This may involve patients following their healthcare providers' advice, healthcare professionals collaborating to diagnose and treat medical conditions, or communities coming together to promote healthy behaviors and environments. Cooperative behavior is essential for positive health outcomes, as it fosters trust, communication, and shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers, and helps to ensure that everyone involved in the care process is working towards the same goal.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "universities" is a term that refers to institutions of higher education and research, and it is not a medical term. A university typically offers undergraduate and postgraduate programs leading to the award of degrees such as bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees.

If you have any questions related to medicine or healthcare, I would be happy to try to help answer them for you.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "teaching" is a general term that refers to the act of imparting knowledge or skills to others and is not a medical term. However, in the context of medical education, teaching refers to the instruction and training of medical students, residents, fellows, and other healthcare professionals to develop their knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for providing high-quality patient care. This can take place in various settings such as classrooms, clinical wards, simulation centers, or online platforms, and can involve a range of teaching methods including lectures, small group discussions, bedside teaching, case-based learning, and hands-on training.

Translational medical research, also known as "translational research," refers to the process of turning basic scientific discoveries into clinical interventions that improve human health and well-being. This type of research aims to "translate" findings from laboratory, animal, or cellular studies into practical applications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of human diseases.

Translational medical research typically involves a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together researchers from various fields such as biology, chemistry, engineering, genetics, and medicine to work collaboratively on solving complex health problems. The process often includes several stages, including:

1. Identifying basic scientific discoveries that have the potential to be translated into clinical applications.
2. Developing and optimizing new diagnostic tools, drugs, or therapies based on these discoveries.
3. Conducting preclinical studies in the laboratory or with animal models to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these interventions.
4. Designing and implementing clinical trials to test the effectiveness and safety of the new interventions in human patients.
5. Disseminating research findings to the scientific community, healthcare providers, and the public to facilitate the adoption of new practices or treatments.

Translational medical research is essential for bridging the gap between basic scientific discoveries and clinical applications, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.

Data collection in the medical context refers to the systematic gathering of information relevant to a specific research question or clinical situation. This process involves identifying and recording data elements, such as demographic characteristics, medical history, physical examination findings, laboratory results, and imaging studies, from various sources including patient interviews, medical records, and diagnostic tests. The data collected is used to support clinical decision-making, inform research hypotheses, and evaluate the effectiveness of treatments or interventions. It is essential that data collection is performed in a standardized and unbiased manner to ensure the validity and reliability of the results.

Utilization review (UR) is a comprehensive process used by healthcare insurance companies to evaluate the medical necessity, appropriateness, and efficiency of the healthcare services and treatments that have been rendered, are currently being provided, or are being recommended for members. The primary goal of utilization review is to ensure that patients receive clinically necessary and cost-effective care while avoiding unnecessary or excessive treatments.

The utilization review process may involve various steps, including:

1. Preauthorization (also known as precertification): A prospective review to approve or deny coverage for specific services, procedures, or treatments before they are provided. This step helps ensure that the planned care aligns with evidence-based guidelines and medical necessity criteria.
2. Concurrent review: An ongoing evaluation of a patient's treatment during their hospital stay or course of therapy to determine if the services remain medically necessary and consistent with established clinical pathways.
3. Retrospective review: A retrospective analysis of healthcare services already provided to assess their medical necessity, appropriateness, and quality. This step may lead to adjustments in reimbursement or require the provider to justify the rendered services.

Utilization review is typically conducted by a team of healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, and case managers, who apply their clinical expertise and adhere to established criteria and guidelines. The process aims to promote high-quality care, reduce wasteful spending, and safeguard patients from potential harm caused by inappropriate or unnecessary treatments.

Medical societies are professional organizations composed of physicians, surgeons, and other healthcare professionals who share a common purpose of promoting medical research, education, and patient care. These societies can focus on specific medical specialties, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) for cancer specialists or the American College of Surgeons (ACS) for surgeons. They may also address broader issues related to healthcare policy, advocacy, and ethics. Medical societies often provide resources for continuing medical education, publish scientific journals, establish clinical practice guidelines, and offer networking opportunities for members.

Interpersonal relations, in the context of medicine and healthcare, refer to the interactions and relationships between patients and healthcare professionals, as well as among healthcare professionals themselves. These relationships are crucial in the delivery of care and can significantly impact patient outcomes. Positive interpersonal relations can lead to improved communication, increased trust, greater patient satisfaction, and better adherence to treatment plans. On the other hand, negative or strained interpersonal relations can result in poor communication, mistrust, dissatisfaction, and non-adherence.

Healthcare professionals are trained to develop effective interpersonal skills, including active listening, empathy, respect, and cultural sensitivity, to build positive relationships with their patients. Effective interpersonal relations also involve clear and concise communication, setting appropriate boundaries, and managing conflicts in a constructive manner. In addition, positive interpersonal relations among healthcare professionals can promote collaboration, teamwork, and knowledge sharing, leading to improved patient care and safety.

A questionnaire in the medical context is a standardized, systematic, and structured tool used to gather information from individuals regarding their symptoms, medical history, lifestyle, or other health-related factors. It typically consists of a series of written questions that can be either self-administered or administered by an interviewer. Questionnaires are widely used in various areas of healthcare, including clinical research, epidemiological studies, patient care, and health services evaluation to collect data that can inform diagnosis, treatment planning, and population health management. They provide a consistent and organized method for obtaining information from large groups or individual patients, helping to ensure accurate and comprehensive data collection while minimizing bias and variability in the information gathered.

Genetic research is a branch of biomedical science that involves the study of genes, their functions, and heredity. It aims to understand how genetic variations contribute to human health and disease by using various scientific approaches such as genetics, genomics, molecular biology, biochemistry, and bioinformatics.

Genetic research can be conducted on humans, animals, or plants, and it can focus on a variety of areas including:

1. Identifying genes associated with specific diseases or traits
2. Understanding how genes are regulated and expressed
3. Investigating the role of genetic mutations in disease development
4. Developing new diagnostic tests and treatments based on genetic information
5. Exploring evolutionary relationships between species
6. Examining ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic research.

Genetic research has led to significant advances in our understanding of many diseases, including cancer, diabetes, heart disease, and neurological disorders. It also holds great promise for personalized medicine, which tailors treatments to individual patients based on their genetic makeup.

"Evaluation studies" is a broad term that refers to the systematic assessment or examination of a program, project, policy, intervention, or product. The goal of an evaluation study is to determine its merits, worth, and value by measuring its effects, efficiency, and impact. There are different types of evaluation studies, including formative evaluations (conducted during the development or implementation of a program to provide feedback for improvement), summative evaluations (conducted at the end of a program to determine its overall effectiveness), process evaluations (focusing on how a program is implemented and delivered), outcome evaluations (assessing the short-term and intermediate effects of a program), and impact evaluations (measuring the long-term and broad consequences of a program).

In medical contexts, evaluation studies are often used to assess the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of new treatments, interventions, or technologies. These studies can help healthcare providers make informed decisions about patient care, guide policymakers in developing evidence-based policies, and promote accountability and transparency in healthcare systems. Examples of evaluation studies in medicine include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the outcomes of a new treatment to those of a standard or placebo treatment, observational studies that examine the real-world effectiveness and safety of interventions, and economic evaluations that assess the costs and benefits of different healthcare options.

In a medical context, feedback refers to the information or data about the results of a process, procedure, or treatment that is used to evaluate and improve its effectiveness. This can include both quantitative data (such as vital signs or laboratory test results) and qualitative data (such as patient-reported symptoms or satisfaction). Feedback can come from various sources, including patients, healthcare providers, medical equipment, and electronic health records. It is an essential component of quality improvement efforts, allowing healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about changes to care processes and treatments to improve patient outcomes.

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is a medical approach that integrates the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values and preferences to make informed decisions about appropriate health care for individual patients. It is a process of lifelong learning and critical appraisal of new evidence to inform clinical practice. The goal of EBP is to provide high-quality, cost-effective healthcare that is based on the most current and valid scientific research, as well as the unique needs and preferences of each patient. This approach emphasizes the importance of using rigorous, systematic methods to evaluate medical research and to translate findings into clinical practice, while also taking into account individual patient circumstances and values.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Program Development" is not a medical term. It is a general term that refers to the process of creating, planning, and implementing a new program or project, typically in a business, education, or community setting. In a healthcare context, it might refer to the development of a new healthcare service, treatment program, or educational initiative.

If you have any questions related to medical terminology or concepts, I'd be happy to try and help!

Continuing medical education (CME) refers to the process of ongoing learning and professional development that healthcare professionals engage in throughout their careers. The goal of CME is to enhance knowledge, skills, and performance in order to provide better patient care and improve health outcomes.

CME activities may include a variety of formats such as conferences, seminars, workshops, online courses, journal clubs, and self-study programs. These activities are designed to address specific learning needs and objectives related to clinical practice, research, or healthcare management.

Healthcare professionals are required to complete a certain number of CME credits on a regular basis in order to maintain their licensure, certification, or membership in professional organizations. The content and quality of CME activities are typically overseen by accreditation bodies such as the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) in the United States.

Overall, continuing medical education is an essential component of maintaining competence and staying up-to-date with the latest developments in healthcare.

Reproducibility of results in a medical context refers to the ability to obtain consistent and comparable findings when a particular experiment or study is repeated, either by the same researcher or by different researchers, following the same experimental protocol. It is an essential principle in scientific research that helps to ensure the validity and reliability of research findings.

In medical research, reproducibility of results is crucial for establishing the effectiveness and safety of new treatments, interventions, or diagnostic tools. It involves conducting well-designed studies with adequate sample sizes, appropriate statistical analyses, and transparent reporting of methods and findings to allow other researchers to replicate the study and confirm or refute the results.

The lack of reproducibility in medical research has become a significant concern in recent years, as several high-profile studies have failed to produce consistent findings when replicated by other researchers. This has led to increased scrutiny of research practices and a call for greater transparency, rigor, and standardization in the conduct and reporting of medical research.

Sociometry is a method used in social science to measure the pattern of interpersonal relationships within a group. Sociometric techniques are thus the tools or methods employed to collect and analyze sociometric data, which typically involve individuals rating or choosing others in the group with whom they would prefer to work or interact. These techniques can be used to study various aspects of group dynamics, social structure, and individual social status within a group. Examples of sociometric techniques include surveys, questionnaires, interviews, and observation.

Clinical competence is the ability of a healthcare professional to provide safe and effective patient care, demonstrating the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required for the job. It involves the integration of theoretical knowledge with practical skills, judgment, and decision-making abilities in real-world clinical situations. Clinical competence is typically evaluated through various methods such as direct observation, case studies, simulations, and feedback from peers and supervisors.

A clinically competent healthcare professional should be able to:

1. Demonstrate a solid understanding of the relevant medical knowledge and its application in clinical practice.
2. Perform essential clinical skills proficiently and safely.
3. Communicate effectively with patients, families, and other healthcare professionals.
4. Make informed decisions based on critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.
5. Exhibit professionalism, ethical behavior, and cultural sensitivity in patient care.
6. Continuously evaluate and improve their performance through self-reflection and ongoing learning.

Maintaining clinical competence is essential for healthcare professionals to ensure the best possible outcomes for their patients and stay current with advances in medical science and technology.

I'm sorry for any confusion, but "Internet" is a term that pertains to the global network of interconnected computers and servers that enable the transmission and reception of data via the internet protocol (IP). It is not a medical term and does not have a specific medical definition. If you have any questions related to medicine or health, I'd be happy to try to help answer them for you!

Organizational models in the context of medicine refer to frameworks that are used to describe, analyze, and improve the structure, processes, and outcomes of healthcare organizations. These models provide a systematic way of understanding how different components of an organization interact with each other and how they contribute to the overall performance of the system.

Examples of organizational models in healthcare include:

1. The Donabedian model: This model focuses on the structure, process, and outcome of healthcare as interrelated components that influence the quality of care.
2. The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program: This model provides a framework for organizations to evaluate their performance and identify areas for improvement in seven categories: leadership, strategic planning, customer focus, measurement, analysis, and knowledge management; workforce focus; process management; and results.
3. The Institute of Medicine's (IOM) six aims for improvement: The IOM has identified six aims that should be the focus of healthcare quality improvement efforts: safety, timeliness, patient-centeredness, effectiveness, efficiency, and equity.
4. The Lean management system: This model is a process improvement approach that focuses on eliminating waste and maximizing value for customers through continuous improvement and respect for people.
5. The Six Sigma methodology: This model is a data-driven approach to quality improvement that seeks to reduce variation and defects in processes through the use of statistical tools and techniques.

These are just a few examples of organizational models used in healthcare. Each model has its own strengths and limitations, and organizations may choose to adopt one or more models depending on their specific needs and goals.

Metascience "Research Integrity and Peer Review". Research Integrity and Peer Review. Retrieved 3 June 2019. (Articles with ... Research Integrity and Peer Review is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal that was launched in 2016. It is ... Peer review, English-language journals, Open access journals, Academic journals established in 2016, BioMed Central academic ... published by BioMed Central and focuses on problems in peer review, replication, and the scientific process. ...
Open peer commentary Open research Open science Open science data Ross-Hellauer, Tony (2017-08-31). "What is open peer review? ... Open peer review is the various possible modifications of the traditional scholarly peer review process. The three most common ... "Overview: Nature's peer review trial". Nature. December 2006. doi:10.1038/nature05535. "Peer review and fraud". Nature. 444 ( ... In 2014, Life implanted an open peer review system, under which the peer-review reports and authors' responses are published as ...
Thus, more care must be taken over how peer review, and the results of peer-reviewed research, are communicated to non- ... "Does Peer Review Mean the Same to the Public as It Does to Scientists?". Nature peer review debate. peertopeer Peer review blog ... "open peer review". Open peer review is the various possible modifications of the traditional scholarly peer review process. The ... and journal peer review. It builds on historical research by Gould, Biagioli, Spier, and Rip. The first Peer Review Congress ...
However, peer review does not prevent publication of invalid research, and as experimentally controlled studies of this process ... In engineering, technical peer review is a type of engineering review. Technical peer reviews are a well defined review process ... Scholia has a topic profile for Peer review. Monument to peer review, Moscow What is Peer review? at Elsevier (CS1 errors: ... Instructors may also experiment with in-class peer review vs. peer review as homework, or peer review using technologies ...
Chemotherapy Research and Practice, ISRN Oncology). The peer review provided by PLOS ONE was reported to be the most rigorous ... Doing so would make it harder to maintain a predatory journal that does no peer review, because the record of peer review would ... Bonnie Swoger (26 November 2014). "Is this peer reviewed? Predatory journals and the transparency of peer review". Information ... "Who's Afraid of Peer Review?" is an article written by Science correspondent John Bohannon that describes his investigation of ...
"Peer Community in Archaeology, una peer review migliore per tutti". Stefano Costa - There's more than just potsherds out there ... "Peer Community In". "Pci-Open Access at Oxford". Alizon, Samuel (2018-05-01). "Inexpensive Research in the Golden Open-Access ... By (2020-08-19). "Revisiting: A Curious Blindness Among Peer Review Initiatives". The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved 2021-01-05. ... Staines, Heather (2019-09-18). "Making Peer Review More Open and Transparent". Commonplace. doi:10.21428/6ffd8432.d0730ab8. " ...
"The 1996 Ig Nobel Prize Winners". Improbable Research. August 2006. Retrieved 15 April 2016. "Peer Review". Social Text. 27 (3 ... The journal does not practice academic peer review, and it did not submit the article for outside expert review by a physicist ... The editors of the journal were awarded the 1996 Ig Nobel Prize for literature by "eagerly publishing research that they could ...
Bilingual Research Journal. Vol. 19, Nos. 3 & 4, pp. 513-523. Peer-reviewed. See profile at ERIC. See profile at Taylor & ... Chapter 5. The Institute for Policy Analysis and Research in collaboration with the National Center for Research on Cultural ... Barbara V. Kirk Sesenac wrote in the Bilingual Research Journal that the school's income and racial demographics were " ... Bilingual Research Journal. Spring 2002, Volume 26, Issue 1. Retrieved on December 17, 2016. Banas, Casey (1993-10-03). " ...
Peer Review, 13(1), 26. Accessed at https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/research-adult-learners-supporting- ... A Review of Past Research Perspectives. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 345-372. Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2011). Research on ... Peer Review. 29: 1. Retrieved 2 October 2013. Quinn, Laurie (2018). "Going Back To College After 50: The New Normal?". Forbes. ... "ERIC review: Exploring the meaning of "nontraditional" at the community college". Community College Review. 30 (1): 74-89. doi: ...
4 (Fall 2004) p. 473-5. Peer Reviewed. "Farmington Plan." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2009. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2 ... Association of Research Libraries The Association of Research Libraries Website. The Foreign Newspaper Microfilming Project ... Review of A History of the Farmington Plan by Ralph D. Wagner published in the American Archivist, Vol. 66, No. 1, Spring/ ... Wheeler, W. J., rev "A History of the Farmington Plan." College & Research Libraries v. 64 no. 4 (July 2003) p. 337-8. "The ...
Lipka, Sara; Engber, Daniel (October 15, 2004). "Peer Review". Chronicle of Higher Education. 51 (8): A7. Larry Yaeger's ... Yaeger's academic research focused on the evolution of true artificial intelligence through natural selection. He is the lead ...
Pigliucci, Massimo (May-June 2008). "Creationist peer review". Skeptical Inquirer. Archived from the original on 2012-02-18. ... Book excerpt) Creation Research Society Web page "Creation Research Society". Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation. ... 259-260 Numbers (2006) p. 262 "The Van Andel Creation Research Center". "The Creation Research Society is Moving". CRS Past ... at the Van Andel Creation Research Center in Chino Valley, AZ, although they will be moving their operation center and research ...
Economic and Social Research Council. "Peer Review College". Archived from the original on 10 June 2014. Retrieved 8 June 2014 ... Most of his research is available either through the Social Science Research Network (SSRN, Author ID: 14685) or at the CentAUR ... Economic and Social Research Council. "Research catalogue". Archived from the original on 15 July 2014. The Leverhulme Trust. " ... Brooks, C. (2021) First Class Research: A guide to your research project or dissertation in accounting and finance. Finance ...
"Publication and Collaboration Anomalies in Academic Papers Originating From a Russian-Based Paper Mill". Peer Review Congress. ... and some journals are revamping their review processes." It is a problem of research ethics and research integrity affecting ... In research, a paper mill is a "profit oriented, unofficial and potentially illegal organisation that produce and sell ... many legitimate research papers also sold authorship unknown to the journal editors, and were ultimately accepted in journals ...
Bivens-Tatum, Wayne (February 26, 2015). "Privilege in the Framework , Peer to Peer Review". Library Journal. Retrieved 2017-12 ... admin (2006-07-24). "Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report". Association of College & Research Libraries ... and peer-reviewed information. The barriers to access include a person's geographical location, access to technology, access to ... Hare, Sarah; Evanson, Cara (2018). "Information Privilege Outreach for Undergraduate Students". College & Research Libraries. ...
He also a member of the peer-review and editorial staff for the rOpenSci Software Review. Ram is the lead principal ... Ram is a founding editor of the Journal of Open Source Software, and an editorial board member of ReScience C and Research ... "rOpenSci Software Peer Review". ropensci.org. Retrieved April 11, 2021. "BIDS' Karthik Ram receives NSF award to design "US ... Karthik Ram is a research scientist at the Berkeley Institute for Data Science and member of the Initiative for Global Change ...
"Research report 27: Trans research review". equalityhumanrights.com. p. v. "2011 Census - Built-up areas". ONS. Retrieved 1 ... last checked 11 March 2023) McCook, Alison (2006). "Is peer review broken?". The Scientist. 20 (2): 26. Archived from the ... Law Quarterly Review. London: Sweet & Maxwell. ISSN 0023-933X. SSRN 4018581. Retrieved 4 March 2022 - via Durham Research ... research, and technological outputs. Scientific research and development remains important in British universities, with many ...
"What is Peer Review? It Depends Who is Asking!". Science & research news , Frontiers , Open-access publisher. 2016-03-23. ... These infographics have focused on a wide variety of topics in neuroscience, such as CRISPR and scientific peer review. Special ... Most content on Knowing Neurons is in the form of articles, infographics, book reviews, and interviews with prominent ... Kate Fehlhaber while she was a neuroscience PhD student at UCLA researching visual processing in the retina using ...
In 2011, Oransky and Adam Marcus coauthored an article in Nature pointing out that the peer review process for scholarly ... "Research integrity in the COVID-19 era: Insights from Retraction Watch co-founder Ivan Oransky". thepublicationplan.com. 17 ... "The peer-review scam". Nature. 515: 480-482.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link) Ivan Oransky at TED Marcus, Adam ... They also assess that, despite recent scandals involving research misconduct, the academic community is not interested in ...
Peer Review FROMMER, FREDERIC (September 13, 2011). "Should college athletes be paid? As much as $1M says new report". Sun ... Research concerning Title IX institutional compliance and gender equity issues has found that: Division I non-football schools ... Peer Review Renick, Jobyan (October 1994). "The Use and Misuse of College Athletics". The Journal of Higher Education. 45 (7): ... Peer Review Cooper, Coyte; Erianne Weight (April 2011). "Investigating NCAA administrator values in NCAA Division I athletic ...
It is often used in conjunction with self-reflection or peer-reviewing of teaching practices. Peer-Review of Teaching is a ... What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research Annual Conference on Building ... Peer Review of Teaching. University of Minnesota from http://www1.umn.edu/ohr/teachlearn/resources/peer/ Goe, L. & Croft, A. ( ... Through many research studies, it has shown that the estimates of teacher effectiveness were not through the same throughout ...
Peer Review Moves Slow. What's A Political Scientist To Do?". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved December 20, 2017. Hood, M. V.; ... 115 (3): 739-75.Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2014-56; Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. ... the research indicates that voter ID laws do disproportionately disenfranchise minority voters. Research also shows that racial ... In a 2014 review by the Government Accountability Office of the academic literature, five studies out of ten found that voter ...
Outcomes from the neuroscientific and behavioral studies have been published in > 100 peer-reviewed articles. The scientific ... For 22 years (1995-2017) sensory integration and processing was researched by an Interdisciplinary university-based research ... The STAR Institute Research Center provides the basis for the education and treatment programs, demonstrating the effectiveness ... Research drives advocacy initiatives that promote recognition of sensory processing challenges. STAR Institute offers a wealth ...
... awaiting peer review]." (2016). Chizzola, Maddalena, et al. "Landscape level effects of lion presence (Panthera leo) on two ... Veterinary Research Institute, Onderstepoorts, 1994. Walker, Clive H. "Boma Management, Construction and Techniques for a ... Van der Merwe, M. "Longevity in Schreibers' long-fingered bat." South African Journal of Wildlife Research-24-month delayed ... South African Journal of Wildlife Research 19.2 (1989): 86-87. Hulsman, Alma, et al. Non‐invasive monitoring of glucocorticoid ...
... peer review: 2 approved]". Gates Open Research. 3: 1503. doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.13029.2. PMC 6820452. PMID 31701090. Engl, E ... peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]". Gates Open Research. 3 (886): 886. doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.12923.2. ... Stanford Social Innovation Review: Demystifying Machine Learning for Global Development. Jul. 24, 2019. Harvard Business Review ... Stanford Social Innovation Review: Design Thinking Without Deep Data Will Fail Our Customers in Global Health. Feb. 14, 2019. ...
Science, Media and the Public Research Group (23 January 2014). "2014 peer reviewed articles". Science, Media and the Public. ... Brossard's research program concentrates on the intersection of science, media, and policy in the department's Science, Media ... This work includes research contributing toward understanding of Online Incivility or "The Nasty Effect". She has published ... Morgridge Institute for Research (2 March 2015). "Science engagement experts partner with Morgridge Institute". Morgridge ...
Peer to Peer Review". Library Journal. Beall, Jeffrey (1 June 2015). "Response to 'Beyond Beall's List'". College & Research ... More transparent peer review, such as open peer review and post-publication peer review, has been advocated to combat predatory ... Junk and fake Open Access journals have superficial or no peer review procedures, despite their claims of being peer-reviewed. ... Swoger, Bonnie (26 November 2014). "Is this peer reviewed? Predatory journals and the transparency of peer review". Scientific ...
Reprinted from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, an International Journal of Current Research and Theory with Open Peer ... "Open Peer Review" rather than a formalized review. Surprisingly in Encouraging Formative Peer Review Via Social Networking ... Interdisciplinary Peer Review (IPR) is a peer review process with an additional focus outside of the area of the author's ... Interdisciplinary Peer Review is a continual process of review. When publication is instant and prior to a review, the accuracy ...
Over 20,000 editors managed the peer review and selection of these papers, resulting in the publication of more than 470,000 ... These have included the likes of: The Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPPA) The Research Works Act PRISM. In the case of ... One of their Journals, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, was involved in the manipulation of the peer review report ... Over 22,000 editors managed the peer review and selection of these papers, resulting in the publication of about 500,000 ...
Scholarly articles are peer-reviewed. All content is published under the Creative Commons licenses. The journal is a platform ... This is reflected in the topics presented in the journal and the extended scope of research and methodologies that are becoming ... The journal's aim is to include research on art within the broader field of performance studies, strengthen the relationship ... between academic research on art and contemporary art practices, and combine theory and practice in a more direct way. ...
Metascience "Research Integrity and Peer Review". Research Integrity and Peer Review. Retrieved 3 June 2019. (Articles with ... Research Integrity and Peer Review is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal that was launched in 2016. It is ... Peer review, English-language journals, Open access journals, Academic journals established in 2016, BioMed Central academic ... published by BioMed Central and focuses on problems in peer review, replication, and the scientific process. ...
Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles https://engineering.purdue.edu/INSPIRE/Research/publications-presentations https://engineering. ... Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 6(1), Article 2. ... A systematic literature review. Paper presented at the 2016 American Educational Research Association (AERA) meeting, ... Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237-251.. Douglas, K. A., Rynearson A., Purzer, S., & Strobel, J. (2016 ...
Peer Review. For much of the last century, peer review has been the principal mechanism by which the quality of research is ... Despite its flaws, peer review does work to improve the quality of research. Considering the possible failings of peer review, ... Responsible peer review is a researchers responsibility. By definition, peer review depends on the willingness of peers to ... Effective peer review depends on academic integrity. Peer review must be conducted so that better scientific work is the result ...
Regard to Sham Peer Review. Posted 02/02/2006. Mark F. McDonnell, MD; Lawrence R. Huntoon, MD, PhD, FAAN; John Majerus; John ... Bad faith peer. review is a crime against patients, physicians, and medicine itself. Mark F. McDonnell, MD. Houston, Texas. _ ... I read with interest the recent article on sham peer review.[1] I was even more interested in the recent editorial by Mr. Bond ... I think that the term bad faith peer review (with all of its legal. implications) better describes the situation and should ...
Gulf War Illness, Lung Cancer, and Peer Reviewed Medical Research Programs. Sponsor. United States Department of Defense (DOD) ... Office of Research. Angela Vuk, Senior Grants and Contracts Specialist. Research Services Office. 519-824-4120 x55026. avuk@ ... Please note that research activities carried out in the context of COVID-19 need to adhere to the University of Guelph COVID-19 ... If you are interested in applying, please contact the Office of Research as soon as possible so we can work through the ...
Re: Peer -reviewed research on the efficacy of TEACCH. Home/TEACCH DISCUSSION FORUM/Peer -reviewed research on the efficacy of ... Home › Forums › TEACCH DISCUSSION FORUM › Peer -reviewed research on the efficacy of TEACCH › Re: Peer -reviewed research on ... Re: Peer -reviewed research on the efficacy of TEACCH2017-03-28T14:17:10+01:00 ...
Anti-Fracking Activists March on Science; EID Compiles Peer-Reviewed Research on Fracking and Health. BY Aileen Yeung Apr. 21 ... "Energy In Depth released a new compendium and a new health microsite highlighting peer-reviewed research and studies by ... EID developed a new compendium that includes data from 23 peer-reviewed studies, 17 government health and regulatory agencies, ... The research by regulatory agencies in top oil- and gas-producing states includes Colorado Department of Public Health and ...
Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review ... using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process. ... Background: The peer review process has been questioned as it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. This ... Implementing a two-step peer-review process could help improve the quality of reporting. ...
... peer-reviewed paper published by Chinese research team. Research laboratories and companies all over the world are doing their ... A Chinese research team published a peer-reviewed paper, stating, Antibody production was confirmed in a clinical trial of the ... Review. Coverage. Interview. Gastronomic Adventure. Mobile. Software. Web Service. Web Application. Hardware. Ride. Science. ... The research team divided the subjects into three groups and administered the vaccine to each group in three stages: high dose ...
Instruction Delphi Panel ResultsMethodPanel 4 convened RCR and research experts to address the following question:Within RCR ... 1. The significance of peer review. 100* (3.64). 73 (3.09). a. Peer review as a mechanism for quality assurance in publication ... research compliance, research ethics, research integrity and bioethics education including: "Teaching Research Ethics" at ... 2. Peer review?. The panel used a version of the Delphi method to achieve consensus. Panelists were asked to complete three ...
What changes do they want to see in peer review? And how can peer review quality be improved? Read on to know more. ... What do authors think about peer review? Do they think its working? ... Since this years theme for Peer Review Week is "Quality in Peer Review," we would like to share in some detail the author ... Sense about Science (2009). Peer Review Survey 2009: Full Report.. *Taylor & Francis (2015). Peer review in 2015: A global view ...
The result of the pending peer review is a so called Peer Challenger Report. The aim of the report is to discuss the strengths ... The Peer Review process will be supported substantially and organizationally by the FFU and its partners. The main task will be ... New project: Peer Challenger Report - Facilitating the Review of German Sustainability Policies. News from Feb 25, 2009 ... The aim of the Peer Challenger Report is to review the actual implementation of Germanys sustainability goals and to improve ...
Meta-Research: Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts. ... Meta-Research: Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts ... Meta-Research: Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts ... Your article has been reviewed by three peer reviewers, and the following individual involved in review of your submission has ...
The Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program (PRMRP) respiratory health research advocates Kenneth Benson and John Linnell ... More information about the Department of Defense Peer Review Medical Research Program is available on PRMRP website. ... U.S. COPD Coalition Board Members Lend Patient Perspective to Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program. ... They bring with them a sense of urgency and remind us all, of the human element involved in medical research." ...
The process allows peer reviewers to read about research before it is generally known and to gain insight into how other ... Box 1: Become a peer-review legend. * Formal courses in peer review are rare or absent, so seize the opportunity if lecturers ... The review itself involves several steps (see Become a peer-review legend). The first is to plan enough time and to stay in ... Peer review is the backbone of modern science, and academic researchers are expected to participate in the endeavour. Although ...
Research Assistance *Find materials by subject + course *Find materials by format + type *Research tutorials *Frequently asked ... For more about peer-reviewed articles, see What is a peer-reviewed journal? ... If you are searching for scholarly or peer-reviewed articles in a database, you may be able to limit your results to peer- ... reviewed or scholarly journal articles. Watch for check boxes with wording such as "scholarly journals" or "peer-reviewed." ...
... research articles, and information products and services supporting advancement across all fields of chemical sciences. ... ACS Publications provides high quality peer-reviewed journals, ... Chemical Research in ToxicologyChemical ReviewsChemistry of ... From agriculture to pharmaceuticals, discover how our peer-reviewed journals, e-books, and educational content can provide new ... AAccounts of Chemical ResearchAccounts of Materials ResearchACS Agricultural Science & TechnologyACS Applied Bio MaterialsACS ...
... review process and journal editors share their knowledge about the process and advice about how to create meaningful reviews. ... Why Peer Review?. Peer review has two main purposes: (a) to filter out research of poor quality or content that does not fit ... Peer Review: A Practice That Sustains Science. Peer Review: A Practice That Sustains Science. ... Peer review "is one of the most important things we do as scholars," Tone said. "Peer review sustains science," Goldstone added ...
I got involved with the Peer Reviewed Orthopaedic Research Program when Dr. Hooper was running the Center for the Intrepid at ... Defense Medical Research and Development. *Medical Simulation and Information Sciences Research Program (JPC-1) ... We need Service members that are recently wounded that can get through all the harder research without too much issue. ... Ive seen guys with terrible, life-altering, devastating injuries and, because of the prior research thats been done, because ...
The UK Research Councils peer review system is overwhelmed by the growing number of grant propo ... The UK Research Councils peer review system is overwhelmed by the growing number of grant proposals. They finally have decided ... Since the fix ignores that free peer reviews pose an externality and distort demand, the new policy is a joy only for research- ... Do you have negative results from your research youd like to share?. Submit Negative Results ...
Peer-reviewed Articles. *Environmental Research *Linking Exposure and Health in Environmental Public Health Tracking, October ... Environmental Research. 2014; 134:453.. *Dunlop TS, Porter D, Washam R, Li J, Ho J, Johnson R. Local perspectives on the ... Cancer Incidence Statistical Review - Five Year Update for Moab, Grand County, Utah Covering the Period from 1980 to 2014. ... Environmental Research. 2014. 134:435-452.. *Harris G, Thompson WD, Fitzgerald E, Wartenberg D. The association of PM 5 with ...
... the authors examine the relationship between exposure to Russian Internet Research Agency activities on Twitter and voting ... Peer review. Peer review information. Nature Communications thanks Dean Eckles and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their ... contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. ... which we combine with data from Pew Research and US census data. Pew Research estimates that in 2016, Twitter penetration in ...
Peer Review is such an important part of the research process and highlighting the role it plays is key to retaining and ... its Peer Review week again! Peer Review is such an important part of the research process and highlighting the role it plays ... Register peer reviews and contribute to the Research Nexus. At Crossref, we talk a lot about the research nexus, and its a ... As the Peer Review Week team states:. "Maintaining trust in the peer review decision-making process is paramount if we are to ...
In this study, we investigate how negative peer feedback shapes user behavior in an online review platform. Leveraging fine- ... Moreover, for users who are retained and write their next reviews, we find that negative feedback improves review frequency and ... These novel findings demonstrate that, contrary to the conventional wisdom, negative peer feedback can benefit the platforms ... we find interesting insights regarding the impact of negative peer feedback. First, negative feedback improves user retention ...
I show how the SP network can greatly improve review and dissemination of research articles in areas that are not well- ... I present a three phase plan for building a basic SP network, and making it an effective peer review platform that can be used ... Instead of reviewing a manuscript in secret for the Editor of a journal, each reviewer simply publishes his review (typically ... Once the SP network reviewers complete their review decisions, the authors can invite any journal editor they want to consider ...
Peer review is a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods ... Problems in research[edit]. Meta-research[edit]. Main article: Meta-research. Meta-research is the study of research through ... Main article: Documentary research. Steps in conducting research[edit]. Research design and evidence. Research cycle. Research ... Original research, also called primary research, is research that is not exclusively based on a summary, review, or synthesis ...
Foodie Body recommends that you talk to your physician first so you can modify the program plan based on known health issues as a more complete solution. ...
... peer review process. Its after this review of the article by the experts in the field (the authors peers) that the journal ... in which case you can easily limit your searches to the peer-reviewed articles only. To find out if a journal is peer-reviewed ... They could also accept pending minor revisions, or request more substantial revisions and then review it again. ...
Research Scientist. Organizational Affiliation(s). Department of Environmental Health. Indiana University. IU Innovation Center ... homeNCEH/ATSDR Scientific Information Quality - Peer Review Agenda. *Assessment of the Evidence for the Drinking Water ... Timing of Review (including deferrals): September 2014. Type of Review (panel, individual or alternative procedure): Individual ... Page last reviewed: August 18, 2015 Content source: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry ...
InterSystems was selected to earn a 2020 Gartner Peer Insights Customers Choice for a second year in a row. ... Gartner Research. Gartner Peer Insights Reviews are completed by InterSystems customers. Vendors placed in the upper-right ... If you are a current InterSystems customer, submit a Gartner Peer Insights review to claim a $25 gift card or donate to a ... The "Voice of the Customer" is a document that synthesizes Gartner Peer Insights reviews into insights for IT decision makers ...
  • Traditionally, with peer review, innovators would have to convince and satisfy mainstream reviewers who represent the very thinking the innovators aim to disrupt. (medscape.com)
  • Extramural Discovery Science (EDS) Scientific Directors determine which peer review committee will review the applications, and they recruit experts to the committees and assign reviewers to each application. (cancer.org)
  • Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following five core review criteria, and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). (nih.gov)
  • Reviewers will consider each of the five review criteria below in the determination of scientific and technical merit, and give a separate score for each. (nih.gov)
  • CSR receives over 80,000 applications a year and reviews the majority of them in 1,500 review meetings using 17,000 reviewers. (nih.gov)
  • CAMBRIDGE, MA - October 8, 2020 - The preprints selected for review in Rapid Reviews: COVID-19 (RR:C19) , an open-access overlay journal published by the MIT Press, cover a wide range of subjects, with peer reviewers finding a study that higher levels of cytokines IL-6 and IL-10 are associated with increased severity of COVID-19 is particularly noteworthy and could be useful in clinical care. (labmanager.com)
  • Peer reviewers similarly flag as misleading new research that non-COVID-19 vaccinations are linked to decreased SARS-CoV-2 rates. (labmanager.com)
  • This Open Access journal publishes papers for free, more or less immediately and after the paper has appeared online peer-reviewers are being invited. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
  • This journal uses AI to find and invite reviewers, and these reviews will the be are published alongside our article. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
  • Should we advised by reviewers to make changes, edits or improvements the next version of the paper will be published online alongside the original submission and the reviews. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
  • Additionally, we looked at whether the quality of peer reviewers' reports differed between journals operating on open and closed peer review models. (biomedcentral.com)
  • By comparing reviewer reports for manuscripts submitted to BMC Infectious Diseases (a medical journal operating on an open peer review model) and BMC Microbiology (the biology counterpart operating on a closed peer review model), we found that there was no difference in the quality of reports from reviewers suggested by the authors or those suggested by the Editor. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Intriguingly though, we found that reports on the open peer review model scored more highly on questions relating to feedback on the methods, constructiveness and the amount of evidence substantiating the reviewers' comments. (biomedcentral.com)
  • These journals operate on an open peer review model that includes making the reviewers' reports available alongside the published article. (biomedcentral.com)
  • This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. (springer.com)
  • What are our ethical obligations and responsibilities as peer reviewers? (ubc.ca)
  • How can we balance the risks of bias and the advantages of expertise as peer reviewers? (ubc.ca)
  • In this type of review, the identity of the reviewers is concealed from the authors. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • Both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous in double-blind peer review. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • Open review involves disclosing the identities of the reviewers to the authors and, in some cases, making the reviews publicly available. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • Open review promotes transparency and accountability but can also lead to potential challenges such as reviewers being reluctant to provide critical feedback. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • After the authors submit their revised manuscript, the editor reviews the changes and decides whether the revisions adequately address the reviewers' concerns. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • A double-blind peer review system is an anonymous review system whereby the identity of the author(s) of a manuscript is concealed from the selected reviewers. (academicjournals.org)
  • The International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research considers the double-blind peer system as a more effective review system because it limits possible bias from either the selected reviewers or from authors. (academicjournals.org)
  • On submission, a manuscript is reviewed to ensure that it meets the minimum requirements of the journal before it is sent to external reviewers. (academicjournals.org)
  • The reviewers are invited to review the manuscript by sending them the abstract of the manuscript. (academicjournals.org)
  • Upon acceptance to review the manuscript, the full text of the manuscript is sent to the reviewers after the author(s) have been concealed. (academicjournals.org)
  • As part of the outcome from the ISD lab studies subject - Intelligent Systems Construction, six research papers have been accepted by peer-reviewed conferences, including two at the 2023 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW23) - a top international conference with an average acceptance rate of 25.5% for research in the design and use of technologies that affect groups, organisations, communities, and networks. (edu.hk)
  • In aggressive pursuit of its vision of a world without Alzheimer's®, the Alzheimer's Association made its largest-ever research investment in 2021, granting more than $70 million to 253 scientific investigations. (alz.org)
  • The peer review of the Draft NTP Research Report on the CLARITY-BPA Core Study was convened April 26, 2018, in Rodbell Auditorium, Rall Building, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. (nih.gov)
  • Here is my research statement (for my tenure review) from 2018 that summarizes my work at UBC from 2013-2018. (ubc.ca)
  • These studies are reported in peer-reviewed NTP technical reports and journal manuscripts. (nih.gov)
  • Manuscripts reporting primary research or secondary analysis of primary research will have at least two referees per manuscript. (springer.com)
  • Journal editors and funding agencies depend on the peer review process to decide which manuscripts to publish and whose proposals to support. (ubc.ca)
  • Peer review helps maintain the quality and integrity of scientific research by subjecting manuscripts to rigorous evaluation by experts in the field. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • All submitted manuscripts undergo a peer review process before publication. (academicjournals.org)
  • Manuscripts that fails in this first stage of the review process are returned to the author(s) for modification and resubmission. (academicjournals.org)
  • Discussions around the future of peer review and problems with current models have led to experiments with open peer review , post publication peer review and double-blind peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
  • The journal employs a double-blind peer review system. (academicjournals.org)
  • I welcome you to today's webinar on submissions and peer review of NIH grants. (nih.gov)
  • The focus of this year's webinar series is on writing, submitting and managing global mental health research grants to the National Institutes of Health. (nih.gov)
  • These actions include the implementation of enhanced review criteria for evaluating the scientific and technical merit of applications submitted to the NIH for grants or cooperative agreements to support biomedical or behavioral research. (nih.gov)
  • The enhanced criteria will replace the review criteria adopted October 12, 2004 (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-05-002.html ) and modified May 11, 2006 (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-06-069.html ). (nih.gov)
  • A side-by-side comparison of the enhanced review criteria described below, and the criteria that will be replaced, is available on the OER website ( http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/guidelines_general/comparison_of_review_criteria.pdf ). (nih.gov)
  • The enhanced review criteria (below) will be effective for all applications for research grants and cooperative agreements that are submitted for funding consideration for fiscal year 2010 (FY2010) and thereafter. (nih.gov)
  • As part of this mission, applications submitted to the NIH for grants or cooperative agreements to support biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system. (nih.gov)
  • NIEHS offers a broad range of job opportunities, career enhancement programs, and research training grants and programs in environmental health sciences and administration. (nih.gov)
  • The CDTR program currently uses the "Center Core Grants (P30)" mechanism that supports shared resources and facilities for use by multiple investigators to enhance multidisciplinary approaches and collaborative research efforts focused on a common research problem or goal. (nih.gov)
  • Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee (HLBP) Roster - This committee, also known as the Program Project Parent Committee, performs the second level review of Program Project Grants sent to NHLBI under the P01 mechanism. (nih.gov)
  • NHLBI Institutional Training Mechanism Review Committee (NITM) Roster - This committee performs the review of training grants using the T32 mechanism. (nih.gov)
  • NHLBI Mentored Clinical and Basic Science Review Committee (MCBS) Roster - This committee performs the review of training grants using the K01 and K08 mechanisms. (nih.gov)
  • NHLBI Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Review Committee (MPOR) Roster - This committee performs the review of training grants using the K23, K24, and K25 mechanisms. (nih.gov)
  • NHLBI Mentored Transition to Independence Review Committee (MTI) Roster - This committee performs the review of training grants using the K99/R00 and K22 mechanisms. (nih.gov)
  • Grants & Contracts provides general information about the funding process, including the types of funding mechanisms, how to apply for funding, the peer-review process, and funding guidelines. (nih.gov)
  • The institute sponsors research relevant to neuroscience as described in announcements published regularly in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts . (nih.gov)
  • The locus of review for Career Development Awards (K01, K08, K23, K25, K99/R00), Small Grants (R03), Training Grants (T32, T35), Conference Grants (R13) and Program Project grants (P01) is the NICHD Scientific Review Branch (SRB) . (nih.gov)
  • Investigator-initiated Research Project Grants (R01), Academic Research Enhancement Awards (R15), Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Awards (R21), Small Research Grant Program awards (R03), Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Grants (R41, R42), and Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Awards (R43, R44) are reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review (CSR) . (nih.gov)
  • Our grants have funded some of the most instrumental research in Alzheimer's and dementia science . (alz.org)
  • The acting education minister has vetoed six humanities research grants which had been recommended by the independent Australian Research Council for funding. (innovationaus.com)
  • All American Cancer Society grant applications are evaluated for scientific merit and relevance to cancer using an independent, confidential, and highly competitive, two-stage peer review process. (cancer.org)
  • Peer review has long been an integral part of the research process to ensure high quality science is being published and shared with the world. (nih.gov)
  • It is published by BioMed Central and focuses on problems in peer review, replication, and the scientific process. (wikipedia.org)
  • First, we will focus on the preparation of grant applications for submission to the NIH, how those applications are processed and routed and then evaluated through the peer review process. (nih.gov)
  • NIMH is very focused on supporting global mental research, and individuals from other countries are faced with the added challenge of not being that familiar with the NIH process. (nih.gov)
  • Dr. Gagan Pandya of NIH's Center for Scientific Review will discuss the review process for small business innovation research and small business technology transfer grant applications, as well as answer questions from attendees. (nih.gov)
  • March 4, 2009 - See Notice (NOT-OD-09-054) Recovery Act of 2009: NIH Review Criteria, Scoring System, and Suspension of Appeals Process. (nih.gov)
  • The course focuses on the spectrum of clinical research and the research process by highlighting epidemiologic methods, study design, protocol preparation, patient monitoring, quality assurance, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issues. (nih.gov)
  • We have had some previous experience with the process of post-publication review, in 2017 BU's Dr. Sarah Collard and Prof. van Teijlingen wrote a referee report for F1000Research after it published a methods paper on online focus groups [2] . (bournemouth.ac.uk)
  • Peer review is a key process in the publication of scientific research, and often finds itself under scrutiny and the topic of debate . (biomedcentral.com)
  • This allowed the researchers a rare glimpse into the peer review process, which is so often conducted behind closed doors. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Peer review will always be debated , and researchers and editors should continue to look for more innovative ways to improve the process. (biomedcentral.com)
  • In this blog post, Dr. Martina Schmidt highlights modifications that are coming in the peer review process for NIH grant applications. (nih.gov)
  • The peer review process of any submission associated with a special issue, follows the procedure of the journal, but is handled by Guest Editors who are responsible for assigning at least two referees to each article and evaluating the reviews. (springer.com)
  • The peer-review process is both a quality control mechanism and is critical to the research process. (ubc.ca)
  • Failure to disclose conflicts of interest, maintain confidentiality and protect the integrity of the peer-review process constitutes a serious form of scholarly misconduct. (ubc.ca)
  • Consequences may range from removal from the peer review process, loss of research funding, or even legal action from the individual(s) whose privacy rights have been compromised. (ubc.ca)
  • During a peer-review process, the documents under review are confidential and should be treated as such. (ubc.ca)
  • We may misjudge our capacity to participate in the review and unintentionally delay the process. (ubc.ca)
  • It is unethical to conduct only a superficial review following a cursory reading, as the peer-review process is critical to improving the quality of research. (ubc.ca)
  • The peer-review process is inherently subjective and prone to biases. (ubc.ca)
  • Given that monetary policy was such an obvious success, the policy process was never subject to review: no royal commission, no board of inquiry, no external review committee asking how such a debacle could happen. (afr.com)
  • The peer review process plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific research. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • This page provides an overview of the peer review process and its significance in the academic community. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • Peer review is a rigorous evaluation process in which experts in a particular field assess the quality, validity, and originality of research papers before they are published. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • The review process is the most important aspect of the publication process of an article. (academicjournals.org)
  • The journal employs a three-stage review process - editorial office, external review and editors' decision. (academicjournals.org)
  • The first stage of the review process takes place in the editorial office. (academicjournals.org)
  • Once a manuscript successfully completes the editorial office review process, it proceeds to the second stage. (academicjournals.org)
  • The second stage of the review process employs the double-blind review system. (academicjournals.org)
  • After going through a peer review process, it is clear to the minister the application of the National Interest Test is not working in every case," the spokesperson told InnovationAus. (innovationaus.com)
  • Join NIH's Simplified Peer Review Framework Webinar! (nih.gov)
  • NIH is implementing a simplified framework for peer review of research project grant (RPG) applications due at the end of January 2025 onward. (nih.gov)
  • On Friday, November 3 from 1 to 2 pm ET , NIH is hosting a free webinar reviewing the changes made to the peer review framework and answer any questions. (nih.gov)
  • The subcommittee found that the long-term goals and science questions in the EDC Program are appropriate and represent an understandable and solid framework for setting research priorities, representing a combination of problem-driven and core research. (nih.gov)
  • The National Institutes of Health will be hosting a webinar to provide a high-level overview of the new simplified review framework for research project grant (RPG) applications. (nih.gov)
  • The webinar will go over changes to the review framework which will go into effect with submissions due on January 25, 2025. (nih.gov)
  • The National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives developed a community engagement framework that includes values, strategies to operationalize each value, and potential outcomes of their use, as well as a peer-review framework for evaluating research that engages communities. (nih.gov)
  • The formulation of the NIH budget provides an established framework within which priorities are identified, reviewed, and justified. (nih.gov)
  • At a conference on the forthcoming Research Excellence Framework (REF) this week, the Higher Education Funding Council for England sketched out how it intends to assess the quality of research outputs in the system, which will determine the allocation of £1.6 billion of annual research funding from 2014. (timeshighereducation.com)
  • Research Integrity and Peer Review is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal that was launched in 2016. (wikipedia.org)
  • This helps ensure the confidentiality of the work and preserves the integrity of our peer review. (ubc.ca)
  • The Office of Extramural Research (OER) manages the development and implementation of policies and procedures that pertain to peer review conducted in all components of the NIH. (nih.gov)
  • The NIH Office of Extramural Research is also an important resource for grant applicants and grantees. (nih.gov)
  • Recent research by Li and Agha found that NIH peer review scores correlated with better research outcomes. (nih.gov)
  • Store the privileged materials in a secure place, do not use the information to advance other research, avoid discussing the review or its outcomes with others who are not involved in the peer review, and, once our review is complete, destroy or return the documents in a secure manner. (ubc.ca)
  • In that case, it must be made clear to the researchers and the public that no peer review has taken place. (medscape.com)
  • NHERI conducts homeschooling research, is a clearinghouse of research for the public, researchers, homeschoolers, the media, and policy makers, and educates the public concerning the findings of all related research. (nheri.org)
  • Community engagement in research may enhance a community's ability to address its own health needs and health disparities issues while ensuring that researchers understand community priorities. (nih.gov)
  • Real, perceived, or potential conflicts of interest compromise the value of our review and undermine confidence and trust in our peers, as well as the public's trust in us as researchers. (ubc.ca)
  • The Alzheimer's Association funds independent researchers worldwide through our International Research Grant Program . (alz.org)
  • The researchers state that they based their quantitative research on a previous work that investigated remotely piloted aircraft. (gradetutors.com)
  • Join us for a three-part webinar series designed for faculty and sponsored programs/ research development personnel at institutions building research and research training capacity. (nih.gov)
  • The Introduction to the Principles and Practice of Clinical Research (IPPCR) is a course to train participants on how to effectively conduct clinical research. (nih.gov)
  • The purpose of this Centers program is to accelerate innovation of the spectrum of T2-T4 diabetes translational research (i.e., bedside to clinical practice and community settings, dissemination and implementation) to maximize positive impacts of research on population health through activities and core services that offer specialized expertise, tools, education, and support. (nih.gov)
  • This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Using the application ranking provided by the Peer Review Committees, the Extramural Discovery Science Council recommends funding based on the relative merit of the applications, the amount of available funds, and American Cancer Society (ACS) objectives. (cancer.org)
  • The peer review group evaluates the scientific and technical merit of the proposed research. (nih.gov)
  • Thank you for your interest in NIH's Request for Information (RFI): NIH System to Support Biomedical and Behavioral Research and Peer Review, as announced in the July 6, 2007 NIH Guide Notice . (nih.gov)
  • Committee members independently review grant applications and then meet in person or virtually as a group to discuss and rank applications by grant mechanism based on the evaluation criteria for the respective grant types. (cancer.org)
  • CSR is conducting a series of surveys and research studies of application evaluation and ranking fairness to determine the extent to which current peer review practices are optimal for achieving its' mission, and to identify areas of success and improvement in the quality and cost of peer review. (nih.gov)
  • The Pathology Evaluation and Peer Review (PEPR) Group provides support to NIEHS, including studies conducted by the Division of Translational Toxicology (DTT). (nih.gov)
  • Through research and evaluation, we examine new ways to support the Health Center Program in providing high quality and cost-effective care to historically medically underserved communities. (hrsa.gov)
  • View briefs, fast stats, and other resources that highlight ongoing health center research and evaluation activities. (hrsa.gov)
  • NCCIH blogs about research developments related to complementary health practices. (nih.gov)
  • Visit the Health Center Library to find current peer-reviewed articles that describe innovative promising practices, evidence-based interventions, quality improvement programs, and program evaluations relevant to health centers. (hrsa.gov)
  • Dr Ioannidis put it this way: "Biomedical innovation and discovery based on research and development by private and public companies and institutions are essential for advancing medical science and improving clinical care. (medscape.com)
  • These results were presented as a poster (which is available on F1000Posters ) by Maria Kowalczuk, Deputy Biology Editor, at the 7th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication 2013 . (biomedcentral.com)
  • Student loan debt is a common barrier for health professionals starting and sustaining a biomedical or biobehavioral research career. (nih.gov)
  • Furthermore, limited guidance is available for peer-review panels on evaluating proposals for research that engages communities. (nih.gov)
  • First level review at SRB is conducted by several subcommittees of the NICHD Integrated Review Group (IRG) or, when appropriate, by Special Emphasis Panels convened to provide specialized expertise in specific areas of science. (nih.gov)
  • This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines. (biomedcentral.com)
  • The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Read Our Guidelines Trusted peer advice and insights for technology professionals. (gartner.com)
  • Write your research manuscript following the guidelines provided by the target journal, ensuring proper formatting and adherence to specific requirements. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • The main objective of this Lab Studies subject is to bring students to the actual research context. (edu.hk)
  • Social Indicators Research also publishes special issues. (springer.com)
  • The International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research currently publishes full text of articles only in English language. (academicjournals.org)
  • The Institute publishes on average about 70 peer-reviewed papers per year, of which several are in top-ranking journals such as Nature and Science. (uu.nl)
  • For information about intramural program opportunities, visit the Research and Training Opportunities at the NIH website. (nih.gov)
  • However, they do not appear in peer-reviewed journals and have not been subjected to the rigor of traditional scientific screening, John Ioannidis, MD, DSc, from the Stanford Prevention Research Center in California, writes in a viewpoint article published in the February 17 issue of JAMA . (medscape.com)
  • At BioMed Central we offer a range of peer review models across our journals, including (to name just a few) open peer review on GigaScience and the medical titles in the BMC series , BMC Biology 's re-review opt out policy, and Biology Direct 's now well established model of author-driven open peer review . (biomedcentral.com)
  • BioMed Central's BMC series medical journals were also the subject of research conducted by Sally Hopewell and colleagues, presented at the congress. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Authors submit their research papers to scientific journals for consideration. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • Recent publications in peer-reviewed journals, by members of the ESS lab. (osu.edu)
  • AAIC Neuroscience Next is a global conference that showcases the work of students and early career investigators in cognitive, computational, behavioral and other areas of neuroscience research. (alz.org)
  • Your holiday gift today will provide much-needed care and support to the millions of families facing Alzheimer's, while advancing critical research to help end this disease. (alz.org)
  • As the world's largest nonprofit funder of Alzheimer's research, the Alzheimer's Association is committed to accelerating the global effort to eliminate Alzheimer's and all other dementia. (alz.org)
  • Our funding is peer-reviewed by a vast international network of active scientists and carefully vetted by our Medical and Scientific Advisory Group , which includes leaders from the Alzheimer's and dementia research community with expertise ranging from bench research to clinical care to community health and support services. (alz.org)
  • We have funded many of the most exciting advances in Alzheimer's and dementia research, including the development of Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB), the first radiotracer capable of showing beta-amyloid in the living brain during a positron emission tomography (PET) scan. (alz.org)
  • This award has been established to recognize notable research publications and reviews that contribute to the impact of FPT and the field of food protection. (foodprotection.org)
  • For most publications on the list below, we refer to the Research@WUR database. (wur.nl)
  • The quality of these decisions relies heavily on the quality of peer review. (ubc.ca)
  • This could include models in which reports of disruptive discoveries that are in dissonance with the mainstream can still be communicated as preprints without prior peer review. (medscape.com)
  • More recently we published a COVID-19 paper in a so-called pre-print journal SSRN [3] , but this was later in published in a traditional peer-reviewed journal called Scientific Reports [4] , part of the Nature publishing family. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
  • WASHINGTON, D.C. - New research by Public Citizen published today in a peer-reviewed medical journal reinforces the case that the diabetes drug Avandia can cause death from liver failure and should be banned immediately by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (citizen.org)
  • If you intend to involve a trainee in the review of a manuscript, you must seek and obtain permission from the journal first. (ubc.ca)
  • Before seeking advice from colleagues on a peer review, we should ensure that we have the explicit permission of the journal or funding agency to do so. (ubc.ca)
  • Identify the most appropriate journal for your manuscript based on scope, audience, impact factor, and relevance to your research field. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • The International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research employs a rigorous peer review system. (academicjournals.org)
  • Officials from many countries frequently visit the NIH Center for Scientific Review (CSR) because they want to copy the winning formula NIH uses to identify and fund the most promising grant applications. (nih.gov)
  • Watch one of our popular outreach presentations and get insights into how your NIH grant application is processed and reviewed so you enhance and advance your application in NIH peer review. (nih.gov)
  • The core grant is utilized by independently funded research projects. (nih.gov)
  • Clinical Trials Review Committee (CLTR) Roster - This committee performs the review of UG3 and U24 grant applications containing NIH-defined clinical trials. (nih.gov)
  • Institute advisory groups, such as the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development Council , provide secondary level review of grant applications and cooperative agreements. (nih.gov)
  • You will also learn considerations for determining research idea and grant writing readiness, selecting opportunities to apply for, effectively writing your grant application and seeking appropriate feedback. (nih.gov)
  • The announcement, made on Christmas eve, was the latest in 30 years for the Discovery program, drawing sharp criticism from universities, research groups and grant experts. (innovationaus.com)
  • In a liberal democracy, you make the grant rules, the independent research agency uses peer review to determine funding. (innovationaus.com)
  • Post-publication review occurs after the publication of the manuscript. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • The editor-in-chief or an associate editor evaluates the submitted manuscript to determine its general suitability for review. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • Authors may be asked to review and approve the final version of the manuscript before publication. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • The manuscript still undergoes the usual peer review and may be accepted or rejected if it is not suitable. (academicjournals.org)
  • This first stage of the review is very important as it enables the author(s) to improve the manuscript at an early stage. (academicjournals.org)
  • From what I can tell, if such a regime were actually adopted, well over half of the peer-reviewed papers cited by the IPCC would be immediately disqualified. (nofrakkingconsensus.com)
  • However, unless stealth research adopts more scientific transparency, investors, physicians, patients, and healthy people will not be able to judge whether some proposed innovation is worth $9 billion, $900 billion, or just $9 - let alone if the innovation will improve the health and well-being of individuals. (medscape.com)
  • Each Peer Review Committee is composed of 12 to 25 scientific advisors ("peers"), who are experts in their fields. (cancer.org)
  • Prior to joining NIMH Nick was at the NIH Center for Scientific Review for six years, initially as a scientific review officer and later as a Review Branch Chief. (nih.gov)
  • At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of the U.S. EPA. (nih.gov)
  • Nevertheless, I believe in giving credit where it's due, and Scientific American currently has an opinion piece in its health section enumerating the shortcomings of peer-reviewed scientific research. (nofrakkingconsensus.com)
  • The Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives (DPCPSI) identifies important areas of emerging scientific opportunity or rising public health challenges to assist in the acceleration of research investments in these areas. (nih.gov)
  • The CDTR program has limited funds and achieving portfolio balance will be considered in funding decisions that, in addition to a meritorious review outcome, will include objectives of obtaining as much national reach and breadth of relevant scientific topics as possible. (nih.gov)
  • Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Despite recognition of the importance of sex and gender in most areas of research, important knowledge gaps persist owing to the general orientation of scientific attention to one sex or gender category and because of a misconception that disaggregation of sex does not apply to other living organisms that can be classified by sex [ 3 - 6 ]. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Search for research funding opportunities in the NIH Guide . (nih.gov)
  • Search for funded research projects through RePORTer . (nih.gov)
  • The paper in question 'The paper ' Impact of Men's Labour Migration on Non-migrating Spouses' Health: A Systematic Review ' [1] is part of Shraddha Manandhar's Ph.D. study at the University of Huddersfield. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
  • Review of: "Impact of Men's Labour Migration on Non-migrating Spouses' Health: A Systematic Review", Qeios . (bournemouth.ac.uk)
  • Adult Civic Education and Support for Democratic Values: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (gla.ac.uk)
  • Systematic Reviews are literature reviews focused on a research question that synthesizes all high-quality research evidence relevant to that question. (karger.com)
  • The objective of a Systematic Review should be to arrive at an evidence-based conclusion. (karger.com)
  • NIEHS is committed to conducting the most rigorous research in environmental health sciences, and to communicating the results of this research to the public. (nih.gov)
  • NHLBI Single-Site and Pilot Clinical Trials Study Section (SSPT) Roster - This committee performs the review of single-site investigator-initiated clinical trials and clinical trial pilot studies using the R61/R33 and R34 mechanisms. (nih.gov)
  • Proactively schedule a time to conduct your review within reasonable deadlines or reach out to the editor or adjudication committee to explore alternatives as soon as you realize that you cannot complete your review on time. (ubc.ca)
  • Prior approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or an Ethics Review Committee is required for all investigations involving human subjects. (karger.com)
  • NICHD has several active notices of funding opportunities (NOFOs), including requests for application (RFAs), program announcements (PAs), PAs with special reviews (PARs), and notices (NOTs) related to the neurosciences. (nih.gov)
  • In 2012, after 10 years of running a well-funded and productive research program at Johns Hopkins, Nick sought a career change and moved to NIH. (nih.gov)
  • Dr. Nigel Walker briefed the peer-review panel on the overall CLARITY-BPA program. (nih.gov)
  • The subcommittee members (co-authors of this article) have expertise specific to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and related areas, with research that has considerable overlap with the U.S. EPA-sponsored EDC Research Program. (nih.gov)
  • Refer to the RFA for details and contact the program officer with questions about allowable T2-T4 translational research topics. (nih.gov)
  • NCCIH will administer three new high-impact research projects through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) High-Risk, High-Reward Research (HRHR) program. (nih.gov)
  • The Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies® (BRAIN) Initiative has a new program-the Brain Behavior Quantification and Synchronization (BBQS) program. (nih.gov)
  • The Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program (PRMRP), established in fiscal year 1999 (FY99), has supported research across the full range of science and medicine, with an underlying goal of enhancing the health, care, and well-being of military Service members, Veterans, retirees, and their family members. (kfgisit.us)
  • Clinical Data Science Institutional Review Board - This review board provides a central review of secondary research proposals. (nih.gov)
  • For this renewal, an emphasis is placed on novel methods and research to address health equity and reduce diabetes-related health disparities as these are high priority areas for NIDDK. (nih.gov)
  • This test should ensure taxpayer-funded Australian Government research funding is directed to areas of national importance and delivers public value. (innovationaus.com)
  • The research brief also identifies health centers located in these counties in order to identify opportunities for increased preventive care and targeted outreach. (hrsa.gov)
  • This type of review minimizes potential biases based on the authors' reputation or institutional affiliation. (gavinpublishers.com)
  • A review of cardiovascular treatment trials included in Cochrane Reviews reveals that only 27 % of the total trial participants in the 258 clinical trials were women [ 7 ]. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Recruiting Research Participants through Facebook Advertisements: A Handbook. (gla.ac.uk)
  • In May 2004 the BOSC formed a subcommittee to conduct the review, including individuals from academia, industry, private consulting, and other agencies. (nih.gov)
  • Elizabeth Moylan, Biology Editor at BioMed Central will be discussing our recent findings along with other aspects of peer review at a session at SpotOn on Friday 8th November (session hashtag: #solo13peer). (biomedcentral.com)
  • For the purposes of this NOFO, T2 - T4 translational research is defined as research focused on translating interventions and approaches that have demonstrated efficacy into real-world healthcare settings, communities, and diverse populations with an emphasis on reach, sustainability, and potential for widespread implementation. (nih.gov)
  • NIH Special Reports and Current Issues - selected reports, budget requests, testimony, and research portfolio. (nih.gov)
  • A database error is stopping the peer review reports from showing for this article. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Research Articles are reports of original work. (karger.com)
  • Investigator-initiated applications for NIH funding are evaluated by peer review groups composed of scientists from outside the NIH. (nih.gov)
  • RFAs and some PARs may include additional review criteria and considerations that are related to specific requirements of the RFA or PAR. (nih.gov)
  • I am the Director of the Center for Mental Health Research here at NIMH. (nih.gov)
  • Cancer Prevention Research Conference Boston, June 25-27, 2024. (cancer.org)
  • COVID-19 has disrupted access to health care services, and research suggests that an increased number of patients are foregoing critical preventive care such as cancer screenings. (hrsa.gov)