Expert Testimony: Presentation of pertinent data by one with special skill or knowledge representing mastery of a particular subject.ArchivesTorture: The intentional infliction of physical or mental suffering upon an individual or individuals, including the torture of animals.Narrative Therapy: A form of PSYCHOTHERAPY that centers on the individuals as the experts in their own lives and views problems as separate from people. It is assumed that people have many skills, competencies, beliefs, values, commitments, and abilities that will assist them to reduce the influence of problems in their lives.Tobacco Industry: The aggregate business enterprise of agriculture, manufacture, and distribution related to tobacco and tobacco-derived products.Ceremonial Behavior: A series of actions, sometimes symbolic actions which may be associated with a behavior pattern, and are often indispensable to its performance.Malpractice: Failure of a professional person, a physician or lawyer, to render proper services through reprehensible ignorance or negligence or through criminal intent, especially when injury or loss follows. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed)Literature, ModernConsumer Product SafetyDeception: The act of deceiving or the fact of being deceived.Suggestion: The uncritical acceptance of an idea or plan of action.
Propofol Expert Resumes Testimony in Michael Jackson Doctor Trial - NBC 6 South FloridaA medical expert looked jurors in the eyes Wednesday and told them that Michael Jackson's doctor committed 17 flagrant ... Propofol Expert Resumes Testimony in Michael Jackson Doctor Trial. 'I am asked every day in the operating room, 'Are you going ... Conrad Murray Trial: Who's Who, Coroner's Report, Testimony Timeline. Dr. Steven Shafer's testimony Wednesday in Dr. Conrad ... Other medical experts have echoed Shafer's concerns about Jackson's care.. A cardiologist testified last week that Murray's ...
No Expertise Required: How D.C. Has Erred in Expanding Its Expert Testimony Requirement by Colin Miller :: SSRN... s expert testimony requirement, which requires expert testimony to establish the pertinent standard of care unless the subject ... No Expertise Required: How D.C. Has Erred in Expanding Its Expert Testimony Requirement. Rutgers Law Record, Vol. 39, 2012 ... This essay argues that D.C. has improperly expanded its expert testimony requirement and should circumscribe it to malpractice ... Miller, Colin, No Expertise Required: How D.C. Has Erred in Expanding Its Expert Testimony Requirement (August 13, 2012). ...
Elizabeth Loftus gives expert testimony in Jerry Sandusky case | School of Social EcologyElizabeth Loftus, distinguished professor of social ecology, gave expert testimony at the latest Jerry Sandusky appeals hearing ...
MOTION Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Paul C for Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et...27, 2002) (expert testimony unreliable in part because expert "merely accepted the definition" of relevant data to be counted ... 5, 2006) (excluding expert testimony where expert's methods were contrary to method guidelines published by the leading ... This means that an expert's testimony may be found reliable where that expert applies a technique that has been maintained, but ... experts" if that "preliminary work" is relied upon by the expert or forms the basis of any part of the expert's opinion. D.I. ...
Michael Keeley Cornerstone Research Economic And Financial Consulting And Expert Testimony - Practice Details - TackkMichael Keeley Cornerstone Research Economic And Financial Consulting And Expert Testimony - Practice Details. ...
Orthopedic Disability & Expert Testimony 4eOrthopedic Disability & Expert Testimony 4e. 280 ???????. 1993 ???.. Orthopedic Disability & Expert Testimony 4e. ...
Expert Witness Testimony - Rx-ConsultantLLC is well respected for her expert knowledge of drug interactions. ... rx-Consultant, LLC Expert Witness Testimony. With the growing number of Americans taking prescription drugs, medical ... As an expert pharmaceutical witness, and medication expert, her company, rx-Consultant, communicates complex scientific ... During a distinguished career as a pharmacist, DeLinda McDaniel, of rx-consultant, LLC is well respected for her expert ...
What is Expert Testimony? - Definition from JustipediaExpert testimony is testimony from an expert who is presumed to be extremely knowledgeable about a relevant issue to the... ... Expert Testimony Definition - What does Expert Testimony mean? Expert testimony is testimony from an expert who is presumed to ... Justipedia explains Expert Testimony. Expert testimony is most often used to clarify scientific or technical details that are ... This testimony could provide critical insight into the case. Expert testimony is used by judes and juries to understand ...
High Speed Rail: EXPERT TESTIMONY ON STATE BANKSWRITTEN EXPERT TESTIMONY FOR. BANKING/FINANCE COMMITTEES. CONSIDERING STATE BANK LEGISLATION. By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall. ... and is referred to by many banking experts as a "cartel," (as OPEC is a cartel). The Federal Reserve System generates private ...
Jonathan Witt, Author at Evolution News | Page 9 of 15Dembski's Expert Testimony in Dover Trial. Design theorist William Dembski reports that "last spring The Thomas More Law Center ... Miller Testimony, Day II. Harrisburg, PA - In the second morning of testimony in the ACLU's lawsuit against a Dover, ... Harrisburg, PA - A question at the heart of the first day of testimony in Kitzmiller vs. Dover is whether it is illegal to ... On the first day I spotted biologists Kenneth Miller and Michael Behe, expert witnesses for the two sides of the lawsuit; [â ¦] ...
The Brattle Group: Economic Consulting and Expert TestimonyThe Brattle Group provides consulting services and expert testimony in economics, finance, and regulation to corporations, law firms, and governments around the world.
Medical Malpractice - Expert Testimony - 'Daubert' Hearing - Michigan Lawyers WeeklyIn this medical malpractice case involving sickle cell anemia, the trial court correctly denied a defense motion to exclude plaintiff's expert witnesses but should have granted an alternative motion to conduct a Daubert hearing to explore the reliability of the data upon which the experts based their opinions.Foundation Requirements"The current wording of MRE 702 was ...
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: How some physicians beg for lawsuits.Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Here's some perspective on the stock market . . .Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Lead Vytorin researcher on benefit of Schering-Plough...Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Love this gutter system.Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: They said WHAT about the Iraq war?Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: U.S. style democracy in Iraq. Finally.Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Top Ten Messages Left On Eliot Spitzer's Answering...Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Pfizer gets threads about alleged IT-firings pulled...Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: 100 Economists Against the Wall Street BailoutPeter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Current New Yorker CoverPeter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: Human babies are smarter than we think--they are the...Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
PETER ROST: PHARMA MARKETING EXPERT WITNESS. AWP, MEDICAL DEVICE EXPERT.: My secret vice: Calvin and Hobbes.Peter Rost, M.D., is a former Pfizer Marketing Vice President providing services as a drug expert witness, pharmaceutical marketing expert witness, pharma marketing expert witness, drug industry expert witness, speaker and writer.
CFACT provides expert testimony at EPA coal hearings from coast to coastStinson stated that it makes no sense for EPA to attack the miniscule amount of carbon dioxide emitted from coal-fired power plants, especially given that fossil fuels supply 80% of the energy for America's jobs, living standards, health and welfare.. Laycee Hyde added that the worst impacts of the EPA rules would be felt by the poor through higher energy prices - yet EPA refuses to conduct cost-benefit studies that place quantitative values on lost jobs, injuries to wildlife from wind turbines, lost industrial capacity, and the struggle by the poor to pay soaring utility bills. Laycee reported that she and Billy were the only two speakers in Seattle opposing the EPA rules - and that she was heckled and Billy's speech was met with total silence.. CFACT - which is challenging other EPA rules in court - was also represented on November 8 in Chicago by Senior Policy Advisor Paul Driessen, whose testimony must have burned the ears of EPA minions and President Obama's Hyde Park neighbors. ...
Recording Industry vs The People: Ms. Lindor Moves to Exclude RIAA Expert Testimony For Failure to Meet Reliability Standards...Rule 11(b)(3) requires that a representation in a pleading have evidentiary support and one wonders if the Plaintiffs are intentionally flouting that requirement in order to make their discovery efforts more convenient or to avoid paying the proper filing fees. In my view, the Court would be well within its power to direct the Plaintiffs to show cause why they have not violated Rule 11(b) with their allegations respecting joinder. [I]t is difficult to ignore the kind of gamesmanship that is going on here.....These plaintiffs have devised a clever scheme... to obtain court-authorized discovery prior to the service of complaints, but it troubles me that they do so with impunity and at the expense of the requirements of Rule 11(b)(3) because they have no good faith evidentiary basis to believe the cases should be joined." -Hon. Margaret J. Kravchuk, Magistrate Judge, District of Maine, January 25, 2008, Arista v. Does 1-27, 2008 WL 222283, modified Oct. 29, 2008 ...
NYSATA Athletic Trainers Provide Expert Testimony at NYC Youth Concussion and Sports Safety HearingNew York, NY (PRWEB) February 27, 2015 -- Is it reasonable - and appropriate - to require appropriate medical coverage at youth football practices and games,
Expert Testimony Leads to Heated Response by Defense in Infant Death Case | Davis Vanguardby Antoinnette Borbon, Jane Fitzsimmons, Marya Alloo and Andrew Reis As the prosecution's 'case-in-chief' comes near an end, it has been bringing forth a d
An Expert Testimony | TohuIn Eyal Weizman's new book, the reader joins the author as he hovers over contested territories in the Middle East, follows him as he traces the histories, ideologies, slippery borders, technologies, and narratives involved in the State-inflicted marginalization and displacement of the Bedouin inhabitants of the Negev desert, in Southern Israel. Rotem Rozental reviews
Laurence Molloy - Expert Witness TestimonyLaurence Molloy is a nationally recognized authority on lead, asbestos, mold, fungi, flood and indoor-air contamination. He has been widely quoted in The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal, and has provided commentary on Court-TV, WNBC-TV, WCBS-TV, and NY1-News. Mr. Molloy provides expert testimony to support litigation in such jurisdictions as state supreme courts, federal courts, federal arbitration panels, and local housing and health courts.. Areas of Expertise Mr. Molloy conducts original research on evolving scientific knowledge about health effects of contamination and publishes extensively in books, journals and newsletters. His degree in architecture, his extensive experience in construction and evaluation of building systems, plus his background in chemistry and bacteriology make him uniquely suited as an expert environmental witness with academic and practical knowledge of building contamination. Services Provided ...
Conrad Murray's fate soon to be in jury's hands as testimony ends | L.A. NOW | Los Angeles TimesProsecutors and defense attorneys rested their case Tuesday morning in the involuntary manslaughter trial of Michael Jackson's personal physician.. The final witness was government expert Dr. Steven Shafer, who was briefly recalled to the stand to reiterate his earlier testimony that Dr. Conrad Murray probably left an intravenous drip of the anesthetic propofol running into Jackson's veins after the singer's heart stopped.. Shafer refuted a defense expert's testimony that levels of the drug found in Jackson's urine proved he was wrong. In that analysis, Dr. Paul White relied on an outdated 1988 study, Shafer said. In fact, more recent research on the drug supports his hypothesis on what happened in the hours leading up to the pop star's death, Shafer testified.. INTERACTIVE: Conrad Murray witnesses: Who's who. The anesthesiologist, an expert on propofol, said the latest research also illustrated that Jackson could not have ...
CDC House hearing witness Frumkin submits CDC Director Gerberding's previously censored testimony | Climate Science WatchJohn Marburger, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, said in response to later Congressional questioning that OSTP had only recommended some text edits to the draft Gerberding testimony on health effects of climate change, not the deletion of the entire contents. From my experience and sources, I believe this is true. However, Marburger claimed that he didn't know who ordered the deletion of the testimony. Either that claim is false, or it reflects a failure of due diligence on Marburger's part to learn what is going on inside the administration vis-v-vis testimony on climate change. Which is worse?. Because the Office of Management and Budget runs the interagency review process for clearing draft Congressional communications by administration officials, some people seemed to assume that OMB was the culprit in redacting the Gerberding testimony. This may be the case, but I'm skeptical of that. From my ...
Expert elicitation: In science, engineering, and research, expert elicitation is the synthesis of opinions of authorities of a subject where there is uncertainty due to insufficient data or when such data is unattainable because of physical constraints or lack of resources. Expert elicitation is essentially a scientific consensus methodology.Frickley CollieryProgram for Torture VictimsList of tobacco-related topics: Nicotiana is the genus of herbs and shrubs which is cultivated to produce tobacco products.Ceremonial (Pink Cream 69 album)Non-economic damages capsJonathan AllynConsumer Product Safety Act: The Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) was enacted in 1972 by the United States Congress. The act established the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) as an independent agency of the United States federal government and defined its basic authority.The Other Side of Deception: The Other Side of Deception is a follow-up book to By Way of Deception by Victor Ostrovsky, a former Mossad agent with operational knowledge, plus a bibliography of newspaper articles in support of original book.Suggestibility
(1/270) Surgeons find themselves on trial in forum featuring CMPA lawyers.
During a recent forum, Ontario surgeons learned that the courtroom requires a much different form of behaviour than the operating room. These lessons hit home during a mock trial featuring CMPA lawyers. (+info)
(2/270) Relation of probability of causation to relative risk and doubling dose: a methodologic error that has become a social problem.
Epidemiologists, biostatisticians, and health physicists frequently serve as expert consultants to lawyers, courts, and administrators. One of the most common errors committed by experts is to equate, without qualification, the attributable fraction estimated from epidemiologic data to the probability of causation requested by courts and administrators. This error has become so pervasive that it has been incorporated into judicial precedents and legislation. This commentary provides a brief overview of the error and the context in which it arises. (+info)
(3/270) American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on breast cancer risk reduction strategies: tamoxifen and raloxifene.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct an evidence-based technology assessment to determine whether tamoxifen and raloxifene as breast cancer risk-reduction strategies are appropriate for broad-based conventional use in clinical practice. POTENTIAL INTERVENTION: Tamoxifen and raloxifene. OUTCOME: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefits. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for tamoxifen and raloxifene on the following topics: breast cancer risk reduction; tamoxifen side effects and toxicity, including endometrial cancer risk; tamoxifen influences on nonmalignant diseases, including coronary heart disease and osteoporosis; and decision making by women at risk for breast cancer. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. VALUES: More weight was given to publications that described randomized trials. BENEFITS/HARMS/COSTS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Working Group acknowledges that a woman's decision regarding breast cancer risk-reduction strategies will depend on the importance and weight attributed to the information provided regarding both cancer and non-cancer-related risks. CONCLUSIONS: For women with a defined 5-year projected risk of breast cancer of >/= 1.66%, tamoxifen (at 20 mg/d for up to 5 years) may be offered to reduce their risk. It is premature to recommend raloxifene use to lower the risk of developing breast cancer outside of a clinical trial setting. On the basis of available information, use of raloxifene should currently be reserved for its approved indication to prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women. Conclusions are based on single-agent use of the drugs. At the present time, the effect of using tamoxifen or raloxifene with other medications (such as hormone replacement therapy), or using tamoxifen and raloxifene in combination or sequentially, has not been studied adequately. The continuing use of placebo-controlled trials in other risk-reduction trials highlights the current unanswered issues concerning the use of such interventions, especially when the influence on net health benefit remains to be determined. Breast cancer risk reduction is a rapidly evolving area. This technology assessment represents an ongoing process with existing plans to monitor and review data and to update recommendations in a timely matter. (See VALIDATION: The conclusions of the Working Group were evaluated by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and by the ASCO Board of Directors. SPONSOR: American Society of Clinical Oncology. (+info)
(4/270) A medico-legal review of some current UK guidelines in orthodontics: a personal view.
This article is a critical analysis from a medico-legal perspective of some current authoritative UK clinical guidelines in orthodontics. Two clinical guidelines have been produced by the Royal College of Surgeons of England and four by the British Orthodontic Society. Each guideline is published with the analysis immediately following it. Following recent UK case law (Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority, 1997) which allows the courts to choose between two bodies of responsible expert medical opinion where they feel one opinion is not 'logical', it is likely that the UK courts will increasingly turn to authoritative clinical guidelines to assist them in judging whether or not an appropriate standard of care has been achieved in medical negligence cases. It is thus important for clinicians to be aware of the recommendations of such guidelines, and if these are not followed the reasons should be discussed with the patient and recorded in the clinical case notes. This article attempts to highlight aspects of the guidelines that have medico-legal implications. (+info)
(5/270) Inguinal hernia: medicolegal implications.
Repair of an inguinal hernia is one of the commonest operations undertaken by surgeons but the role of trauma in causing inguinal hernia is not well understood. This paper does not attempt to discuss the cause of inguinal hernia but seeks to analyse the cases which may be accepted by the Courts as being due to trauma. (+info)
(6/270) Doctors on tribunals. A confusion of roles.
BACKGROUND: Mental health review tribunals are required to apply legal criteria within a clinical context. This can create tensions within both law and psychiatry. AIMS: To examine the role of the medical member of the tribunal as a possible mediator between the two disciplines. METHOD: Observation of tribunal hearings and panel deliberations and interviews with tribunal members were used to describe the role of the medical member. RESULTS: The dual roles imposed on the medical member as witness and decision-maker and as doctor and legal actor create formal demands and ethical conflicts that are hard, in practice, either to meet or to resolve. CONCLUSIONS: The structure for providing tribunals with access to expert psychiatric input and advice requires reconsideration. (+info)
(7/270) Evaluation of new online automated embolic signal detection algorithm, including comparison with panel of international experts.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The clinical application of Doppler detection of circulating cerebral emboli will depend on a reliable automated system of embolic signal detection; such a system is not currently available. Previous studies have shown that frequency filtering increases the ratio of embolic signal to background signal intensity and that the incorporation of such an approach into an offline automated detection system markedly improved performance. In this study, we evaluated an online version of the system. In a single-center study, we compared its performance with that of a human expert on data from 2 clinical situations, carotid stenosis and the period immediately after carotid endarterectomy. Because the human expert is currently the "gold standard" for embolic signal detection, we also compared the performance of the system with an international panel of human experts in a multicenter study. METHODS: In the single-center evaluation, the performance of the software was tested against that of a human expert on 20 hours of data from 21 patients with carotid stenosis and 18 hours of data from 9 patients that was recorded after carotid endarterectomy. For the multicenter evaluation, a separate 2-hour data set, recorded from 5 patients after carotid endarterectomy, was analyzed by 6 different human experts using the same equipment and by the software. Agreement was assessed by determining the probability of agreement. RESULTS: In the 20 hours of carotid stenosis data, there were 140 embolic signals with an intensity of > or =7 dB. With the software set at a confidence threshold of 60%, a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 88.9% for detection of embolic signals were obtained. At higher confidence thresholds, a specificity >95% could be obtained, but this was at the expense of a lower sensitivity. In the 18 hours of post-carotid endarterectomy data, there were 411 embolic signals of > or =7-dB intensity. When the same confidence threshold was used, a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 97.5% were obtained. In the multicenter evaluation, a total of 127 events were recorded as embolic signals by at least 1 center. The total number of embolic signals detected by the 6 different centers was 84, 93, 108, 92, 63, and 78. The software set at a confidence threshold of 60% detected 90 events as embolic signals. The mean probability of agreement, including all human experts and the software, was 0.83, and this was higher than that for 2 human experts and lower than that for 4 human experts. The mean values for the 6 human observers were averaged to give P=0.84, which was similar to that of the software. CONCLUSIONS: By using the frequency specificity of the intensity increase occurring with embolic signals, we have developed an automated detection system with a much improved sensitivity. Its performance was equal to that of some human experts and only slightly below the mean performance of a panel of human experts (+info)
(8/270) Government laboratory worker with lung cancer: comparing risks from beryllium, asbestos, and tobacco smoke.
Occupational medicine physicians are frequently asked to establish cancer causation in patients with both workplace and non-workplace exposures. This is especially difficult in cases involving beryllium for which the data on human carcinogenicity are limited and controversial. In this report we present the case of a 73-year-old former technician at a government research facility who was recently diagnosed with lung cancer. The patient is a former smoker who has worked with both beryllium and asbestos. He was referred to the University of California, San Francisco, Occupational and Environmental Medicine Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital for an evaluation of whether past workplace exposures may have contributed to his current disease. The goal of this paper is to provide an example of the use of data-based risk estimates to determine causation in patients with multiple exposures. To do this, we review the current knowledge of lung cancer risks in former smokers and asbestos workers, and evaluate the controversies surrounding the epidemiologic data linking beryllium and cancer. Based on this information, we estimated that the patient's risk of lung cancer from asbestos was less than his risk from tobacco smoke, whereas his risk from beryllium was approximately equal to his risk from smoking. Based on these estimates, the patient's workplace was considered a probable contributing factor to his development of lung cancer. (+info)
- A medical expert looked jurors in the eyes Wednesday and told them that Michael Jackson's doctor committed 17 flagrant violations of the standard of care for his famous patient and was directly responsible for the death of the King of Pop. (nbcmiami.com)
- That peculiar aspect is D.C.'s expert testimony requirement, which requires expert testimony to establish the pertinent standard of care unless the subject in question is within the realm of common knowledge and everyday experience of the jurors. (ssrn.com)
- According to the court, though, the D.C. Court of Appeals has deviated from the norm by "[r]ecently…requir[ing] expert testimony in a wider variety of cases,…even those that might initially seem to fall within jurors' common knowledge. (ssrn.com)
- It has been argued that psychologists should provide expert evidence to help jurors discriminate between accurate and inaccurate eyewitness identifications. (springer.com)
- Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. (springer.com)
- As an expert pharmaceutical witness, and medication expert, her company, rx-Consultant, communicates complex scientific information in an easily understandable language and is committed to providing their clients the highest quality professional service in a timely and cost effective manner. (rx-consultant.com)
- Effects of witnessing conditions and expert witness testimony on credibility of an eyewitness. (springer.com)
- In each case, the result is the same: The D.C. Court of Appeals finds that the plaintiff cannot recover without expert testimony concerning the pertinent standard of care. (ssrn.com)
- For example, a surgeon may provide expert testimony on a medical case where the plaintiff is suing their health insurance company. (justipedia.com)
- To support the plaintiff's lost profits claim, its expert used Panduit to reconstruct the market and show causation and determined the plaintiff had a right to 100% of the defendant's sales of its infringing product. (bvresources.com)
- Expert witnesses are usually paid to give their testimonies. (justipedia.com)
- The defendant claimed the testimony was inadmissible because the expert did not accurately reconstruct the market and also failed to meet several of the Panduit factors necessary to establish causation. (bvresources.com)
- For example, a psychologist may be called to give an expert testimony in a case that involves a criminally insane person. (justipedia.com)
- The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. (springer.com)
- Elizabeth Loftus , distinguished professor of social ecology, gave expert testimony at the latest Jerry Sandusky appeals hearing, saying by phone that that there is no credible scientific support for a theory that someone can wall off a "horrific brutalization" and then recall it later because of counseling and therapy. (uci.edu)
- Expert testimony is testimony from an expert who is presumed to be extremely knowledgeable about a relevant issue to the case. (justipedia.com)
- Experts are often called to testify in court because they possess technical knowledge that is critical to the case but that few other people may possess. (justipedia.com)
- This testimony could provide critical insight into the case. (justipedia.com)
- Expert testimony is used by judes and juries to understand technical details related to the case. (justipedia.com)
- Other medical experts have echoed Shafer's concerns about Jackson's care. (nbcmiami.com)
- In assessing the expert testimony, the court first pointed out that the defendant "incorrectly separates the question of whether [the expert] reconstructed the hypothetical market from the question of whether the Panduit factors are satisfied. (bvresources.com)
- This essay argues that D.C. has improperly expanded its expert testimony requirement and should circumscribe it to malpractice cases and trials involving truly technical matters. (ssrn.com)
- Expert testimony is most often used to clarify scientific or technical details that are related to civil and criminal cases. (justipedia.com)
- and, has frequently been called upon for expert medication information and litigation support. (rx-consultant.com)
- The impact of general versus specific expert testimony and eyewitness confidence upon mock juror judgment. (springer.com)
- KEEPING FIT : Clearing Up Some Common Misconceptions About Laryngitis : All the throat-clearing and coughing in the world won't help, and may even exacerbate the problem, experts at Fullerton's Voice Institute say. (latimes.com)
- Review by a competent pharmacist and medication expert, saves vast amounts of time and money by dismissing non meritorious cases, while not having access to this information may cause the defense to seek early mediation and unnecessary resolution. (rx-consultant.com)
- One of the most rhetorically effective portions of evolutionist Kenneth Miller's testimony in the Dover trial was his PowerPoint discussion of pseudogenes. (evolutionnews.org)
- How effective are the cross-examination and expert testimony safeguards? (springer.com)