Lowering the age for routine influenza vaccination to 50 years: AAFP leads the nation in influenza vaccine policy. American Academy of Family Physicians.
(17/1843)
The American Academy of Family Physicians now recommends that all persons 50 years of age and older receive an annual influenza vaccination, because the rates of morbidity and mortality associated with influenza are high and vaccination is cost-effective. Reasons for lowering the recommended age for routine vaccination from 65 to 50 years of age include reductions in office visits, hospitalizations, time taken off work and associated costs. In working adults 18 to 64 years of age, the cost savings were estimated at $46.85 per person vaccinated. Furthermore, the fatality rate from influenza begins to rise at age 45 and is highest in persons with multiple chronic medical conditions. As in the past, recommendations target persons at high risk for complications, such as those with cardiac disease, lung disease and diabetes, as well as health care workers and residents of nursing homes. Severe allergy to eggs is a contraindication to influenza vaccination. (+info)
The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene initiative to stimulate educational programs to enhance medical expertise in tropical diseases.
(18/1843)
More than a decade ago, at a time when current and emerging tropical diseases posed growing threats to the United States, expert panels convened by the Institute of Medicine of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences concluded that medical expertise within the United States competent to address diseases of the tropics had declined. Recognizing a national need to encourage and enhance such, The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene developed a program to stimulate new postgraduate medical education in diseases of the tropics. The Society formally requested academic institutions within the United States and Canada to propose new postgraduate programs. To assure the quality of these new curricular offerings, the Society developed an outline of key areas of competency and agreed to offer an examination that would grant physicians a Certificate of Knowledge in Clinical Tropical Medicine and Travelers Health. The certifying examination was to be an integral component of a program to stimulate academic institutions to provide instructional programs in tropical diseases and to encourage physicians to become trained, evaluated, and recognized for their knowledge of clinical tropical diseases and travelers' health. The Society's initiative to stimulate educational programs in tropical medicine is reviewed. (+info)
Physician participation in capital punishment: a question of professional integrity.
(19/1843)
The death penalty is legal in 36 states, and physicians are expected to attend and participate in executions. Yet, every major medical and health-related organization opposes physician participation in capital punishment. This article argues that it is unethical for physicians within the role as medical professional to participate in capital punishment, and that such acts erode the foundation of trust at the heart of medical practice. We believe that it is important for professional groups and medical societies to impose sanctions on members who choose to participate in executions. (+info)
Early efforts of blacks in the fight against heart disease and stroke.
(20/1843)
This article highlighted the early efforts of some individuals whose vision and dedication helped to set the stage for later progress in the fight against heart disease, who forged links to those who eagerly took up the cause of creating an appropriate place for minority participation in the specialty of cardiovascular diseases, and to contribute to efforts to establish programs for the reduction of morbidity and mortality and for prevention in African Americans. This is only one view of what was an exciting period of fitful progress and controversy. Dr Wilson reviewed the still deplorable state of affairs in regard to minorities and the medical profession in 1986, stating: A meaningful role for minorities will not exist until there is access to academic postgraduate training programs that will lead to faculty positions and research opportunities for minorities to serve as role models for future students. The Association of Academic Minority Physicians was established to foster greater progress in this regard across disciplines. Again, while much has been accomplished, including Donald Wilson's becoming the first African-American dean of a nonminority medical school, much remains to be done as we approach the end of the 20th century. (+info)
The association between physician reimbursement in the US and use of hematopoietic colony stimulating factors as adjunct therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
(21/1843)
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Financial considerations play an important role in the delivery of medical care in the US. In 1996, revised guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) indicated that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were unlikely to be harmful for older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and suggested that physicians could consider their use in this setting. In 1997, the ASCO health services research committee evaluated whether physician reimbursement was a primary determinant in the decision to use G-CSF and GM-CSF in this clinical situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire describing clinical scenarios for a 67-year-old man with newly diagnosed de novo AML was mailed to 1500 ASCO members who practiced medical oncology and hematology. Physicians were queried about their preferences for adjunctive CSF use following induction and consolidation chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 1020 potentially eligible respondents, returned surveys were received from 672. Following induction chemotherapy, support for CSF use was 40%, similar in magnitude for that for non-use of these agents. The most important determinant of support for CSF use was being in a fee-for-service practice (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians in the US are mixed in their support for CSFs for older AML patients. Support was high in settings where CSF use was accompanied by financial profit to the physician practice, and support was low otherwise. (+info)
Liver transplantation. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
(22/1843)
Liver transplantation has revolutionized the care of patients with end-stage liver disease. Liver transplantation is indicated for acute or chronic liver failure from any cause. Because there are no randomized controlled trials of liver transplantation versus no therapy, the efficacy of this surgery is best assessed by carefully comparing postoperative survival with the known natural history of the disease in question. The best examples of this are in primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, for which well-validated disease-specific models of natural history are available. There are currently relatively few absolute contraindications to liver transplantation. These include severe cardiopulmonary disease, uncontrolled systemic infection, extrahepatic malignancy, severe psychiatric or neurological disorders, and absence of a viable splanchnic venous inflow system. One of the most frequently encountered contraindications to transplantation is ongoing destructive behavior caused by drug and alcohol addiction. The timing of the surgery can have a profound impact on the mortality and morbidity of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Because of the long waiting lists for donor organs, the need to project far in advance when transplantation might be required has proven to be one of the greatest challenges to those treating patients with end-stage liver disease. Three important questions must be addressed in a patient being considered for liver transplantation: (1) when should the patient be referred for possible transplantation? (2) when should the patient be listed for transplantation? and (3) when is the patient too sick to have a reasonable chance of surviving the perioperative period? (+info)
A survey of the current management of varicose veins by members of the Vascular Surgical Society.
(23/1843)
The assessment and treatment of varicose veins by members of the Vascular Surgical Society of Great Britain and Ireland has been assessed by postal questionnaire. The response rate was 65%, of which 77% were general surgeons with a vascular interest, 21% were vascular surgeons only and 2% were non-vascular. Approximately four new patients with varicose veins are seen per surgeon per week in clinics with a median waiting time to be seen of 12 weeks. A median of three varicose vein operations per surgeon per week are undertaken with 10-15% of surgery being performed for recurrent disease. The commonest indications for surgery are symptomatic (97%) and complicated (98%) varicose veins, although 55% of surgeons also perform surgery for cosmesis. 65% surgeons routinely use hand-held Doppler in the assessment of varicose veins; of the other methods available, Duplex scanning was used as the first line investigation by 83%. Although over 60% of surgeons use sclerotherapy surgery is the preferred option for primary treatment for varicose veins associated with long or short saphenous reflux. 62% surgeons use deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing varicose veins surgery selectively, and 27% use it routinely. (+info)
Ophthalmology's future in the next decade: a historical and comparative perspective.
(24/1843)
PURPOSE: To gain a historical and comparative perspective about the future of ophthalmology within the profession of medicine. METHODS: A literature search is made of disciplines other than medicine (history, sociology, philosophy, economics, and ethics) in order to assess factors responsible for survival and healthiness of a profession. The "learned" professions (medicine, law, and theology) are assessed. Other "professional" careers valued by society (sports and classical music) are reviewed. RESULTS: From the perspective of other disciplines, the future of ophthalmology is seen as vulnerable and fragile. Survival of professions, be they classically or economically defined, is linked to societal needs, a profession's unique commitment and ability to provide services to society, and the profession's maintenance of knowledge as well as skill-based services. Historical evidence has shown erosion of a profession's power consequent to capitalist influences, government influences, access of skills by less trained individuals, and elitist posturing by a profession. Comparative evidence has shown societal acceptance of an escalation of salaries for designated superstars, increasing roles and influence of managerial personnel, and trivialization of values other than economic ones. CONCLUSION: Attention to historical and comparative trends by individual ophthalmologists as well as associations representing ophthalmologists is mandatory if ophthalmology as we know it is to survive within the profession of medicine. (+info)