Gene expression data analysis with a dynamically extended self-organized map that exploits class information. (73/3779)

MOTIVATION: Currently the most popular approach to analyze genome-wide expression data is clustering. One of the major drawbacks of most of the existing clustering methods is that the number of clusters has to be specified a priori. Furthermore, by using pure unsupervised algorithms prior biological knowledge is totally ignored Moreover, most current tools lack an effective framework for tight integration of unsupervised and supervised learning for the analysis of high-dimensional expression data and only very few multi-class supervised approaches are designed with the provision for effectively utilizing multiple functional class labeling. RESULTS: The paper adapts a novel Self-Organizing map called supervised Network Self-Organized Map (sNet-SOM) to the peculiarities of multi-labeled gene expression data. The sNet-SOM determines adaptively the number of clusters with a dynamic extension process. This process is driven by an inhomogeneous measure that tries to balance unsupervised, supervised and model complexity criteria. Nodes within a rectangular grid are grown at the boundary nodes, weights rippled from the internal nodes towards the outer nodes of the grid, and whole columns inserted within the map The appropriate level of expansion is determined automatically. Multiple sNet-SOM models are constructed dynamically each for a different unsupervised/supervised balance and model selection criteria are used to select the one optimum one. The results indicate that sNet-SOM yields competitive performance to other recently proposed approaches for supervised classification at a significantly reduced computational cost and it provides extensive exploratory analysis potentiality within the analysis framework. Furthermore, it explores simple design decisions that are easier to comprehend and computationally efficient.  (+info)

Methods for assessing reproducibility of clustering patterns observed in analyses of microarray data. (74/3779)

MOTIVATION: Recent technological advances such as cDNA microarray technology have made it possible to simultaneously interrogate thousands of genes in a biological specimen. A cDNA microarray experiment produces a gene expression 'profile'. Often interest lies in discovering novel subgroupings, or 'clusters', of specimens based on their profiles, for example identification of new tumor taxonomies. Cluster analysis techniques such as hierarchical clustering and self-organizing maps have frequently been used for investigating structure in microarray data. However, clustering algorithms always detect clusters, even on random data, and it is easy to misinterpret the results without some objective measure of the reproducibility of the clusters. RESULTS: We present statistical methods for testing for overall clustering of gene expression profiles, and we define easily interpretable measures of cluster-specific reproducibility that facilitate understanding of the clustering structure. We apply these methods to elucidate structure in cDNA microarray gene expression profiles obtained on melanoma tumors and on prostate specimens.  (+info)

Finding relevant references to genes and proteins in Medline using a Bayesian approach. (75/3779)

MOTIVATION: Mining the biomedical literature for references to genes and proteins always involves a tradeoff between high precision with false negatives, and high recall with false positives. Having a reliable method for assessing the relevance of literature mining results is crucial to finding ways to balance precision and recall, and for subsequently building automated systems to analyze these results. We hypothesize that abstracts and titles that discuss the same gene or protein use similar words. To validate this hypothesis, we built a dictionary- and rule-based system to mine Medline for references to genes and proteins, and used a Bayesian metric for scoring the relevance of each reference assignment. RESULTS: We analyzed the entire set of Medline records from 1966 to late 2001, and scored each gene and protein reference using a Bayesian estimated probability (EP) based on word frequency in a training set of 137837 known assignments from 30594 articles to 36197 gene and protein symbols. Two test sets of 148 and 150 randomly chosen assignments, respectively, were hand-validated and categorized as either good or bad. The distributions of EP values, when plotted on a log-scale histogram, are shown to markedly differ between good and bad assignments. Using EP values, recall was 100% at 61% precision (EP=2 x 10(-5)), 63% at 88% precision (EP=0.008), and 10% at 100% precision (EP=0.1). These results show that Medline entries discussing the same gene or protein have similar word usage, and that our method of assessing this similarity using EP values is valid, and enables an EP cutoff value to be determined that accurately and reproducibly balances precision and recall, allowing automated analysis of literature mining results. .  (+info)

Euclidian space and grouping of biological objects. (76/3779)

MOTIVATION: Biological objects tend to cluster into discrete groups. Objects within a group typically possess similar properties. It is important to have fast and efficient tools for grouping objects that result in biologically meaningful clusters. Protein sequences reflect biological diversity and offer an extraordinary variety of objects for polishing clustering strategies. Grouping of sequences should reflect their evolutionary history and their functional properties. Visualization of relationships between sequences is of no less importance. Tree-building methods are typically used for such visualization. An alternative concept to visualization is a multidimensional sequence space. In this space, proteins are defined as points and distances between the points reflect the relationships between the proteins. Such a space can also be a basis for model-based clustering strategies that typically produce results correlating better with biological properties of proteins. RESULTS: We developed an approach to classification of biological objects that combines evolutionary measures of their similarity with a model-based clustering procedure. We apply the methodology to amino acid sequences. On the first step, given a multiple sequence alignment, we estimate evolutionary distances between proteins measured in expected numbers of amino acid substitutions per site. These distances are additive and are suitable for evolutionary tree reconstruction. On the second step, we find the best fit approximation of the evolutionary distances by Euclidian distances and thus represent each protein by a point in a multidimensional space. The Euclidian space may be projected in two or three dimensions and the projections can be used to visualize relationships between proteins. On the third step, we find a non-parametric estimate of the probability density of the points and cluster the points that belong to the same local maximum of this density in a group. The number of groups is controlled by a sigma-parameter that determines the shape of the density estimate and the number of maxima in it. The grouping procedure outperforms commonly used methods such as UPGMA and single linkage clustering.  (+info)

Automatic extraction of gene and protein synonyms from MEDLINE and journal articles. (77/3779)

Genes and proteins are often associated with multiple names, and more names are added as new functional or structural information is discovered. Because authors often alternate between these synonyms, information retrieval and extraction benefits from identifying these synonymous names. We have developed a method to extract automatically synonymous gene and protein names from MEDLINE and journal articles. We first identified patterns authors use to list synonymous gene and protein names. We developed SGPE (for synonym extraction of gene and protein names), a software program that recognizes the patterns and extracts from MEDLINE abstracts and full-text journal articles candidate synonymous terms. SGPE then applies a sequence of filters that automatically screen out those terms that are not gene and protein names. We evaluated our method to have an overall precision of 71% on both MEDLINE and journal articles, and 90% precision on the more suitable full-text articles alone  (+info)

Wavelets in bioinformatics and computational biology: state of art and perspectives. (78/3779)

MOTIVATION: At a recent meeting, the wavelet transform was depicted as a small child kicking back at its father, the Fourier transform. Wavelets are more efficient and faster than Fourier methods in capturing the essence of data. Nowadays there is a growing interest in using wavelets in the analysis of biological sequences and molecular biology-related signals. RESULTS: This review is intended to summarize the potential of state of the art wavelets, and in particular wavelet statistical methodology, in different areas of molecular biology: genome sequence, protein structure and microarray data analysis. I conclude by discussing the use of wavelets in modeling biological structures.  (+info)

Prediction of biologically significant components from microarray data: Independently Consistent Expression Discriminator (ICED). (79/3779)

MOTIVATION: Class distinction is a supervised learning approach that has been successfully employed in the analysis of high-throughput gene expression data. Identification of a set of genes that predicts differential biological states allows for the development of basic and clinical scientific approaches to the diagnosis of disease. The Independent Consistent Expression Discriminator (ICED) was designed to provide a more biologically relevant search criterion during predictor selection by embracing the inherent variability of gene expression in any biological state. The four components of ICED include (i) normalization of raw data; (ii) assignment of weights to genes from both classes; (iii) counting of votes to determine optimal number of predictor genes for class distinction; (iv) calculation of prediction strengths for classification results. The search criteria employed by ICED is designed to identify not only genes that are consistently expressed at one level in one class and at a consistently different level in another class but identify genes that are variable in one class and consistent in another. The result is a novel approach to accurately select biologically relevant predictors of differential disease states from a small number of microarray samples. RESULTS: The data described herein utilized ICED to analyze the large AML/ALL training and test data set (Golub et al., 1999, Science, 286, 531-537) in addition to a smaller data set consisting of an animal model of the childhood neurodegenerative disorder, Batten disease, generated for this study. Both of the analyses presented herein have correctly predicted biologically relevant perturbations that can be used for disease classification, irrespective of sample size. Furthermore, the results have provided candidate proteins for future study in understanding the disease process and the identification of potential targets for therapeutic intervention.  (+info)

Simple rules underlying gene expression profiles of more than six subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. (80/3779)

MOTIVATIONS AND RESULTS: For classifying gene expression profiles or other types of medical data, simple rules are preferable to non-linear distance or kernel functions. This is because rules may help us understand more about the application in addition to performing an accurate classification. In this paper, we discover novel rules that describe the gene expression profiles of more than six subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. We also introduce a new classifier, named PCL, to make effective use of the rules. PCL is accurate and can handle multiple parallel classifications. We evaluate this method by classifying 327 heterogeneous ALL samples. Our test error rate is competitive to that of support vector machines, and it is 71% better than C4.5, 50% better than Naive Bayes, and 43% better than k-nearest neighbour. Experimental results on another independent data sets are also presented to show the strength of our method. AVAILABILITY: Under http://sdmc.lit.org.sg/GEDatasets/, click on Supplementary Information.  (+info)