Treatment of superficial vein thrombosis to prevent deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.
(1/128)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCT) concerning the efficacy and safety of medical or surgical treatments of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane (CENTRAL) database to identify all randomized trials that evaluated the effect of surgical or medical treatment in the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with SVT of the legs. RESULTS: Five studies were included. Pooling of the data was not possible due to the heterogeneity among the studies. Moreover, three studies had major methodological drawbacks limiting the clinical applicability of the results. One of the remaining (pilot) studies showed a non-significant trend in favor of high- compared to low-dose unfractionated heparin for the prevention of VTE. The last remaining study showed a non-significant trend in favor of short-term treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) as compared to placebo shortly after treatment with respect to VTE, but the apparent benefit disappeared after three months of follow-up. Active treatment of SVT reduced the incidences of SVT extension or recurrence. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a therapeutic or prophylactic dose of LMWH or a NSAID reduces the incidence of SVT extension or recurrence, but not VTE. More RCT are needed before any evidence-based recommendations on the treatment of SVT for the prevention of VTE can be given. With the present lack of solid evidence we would suggest treating patients with at least intermediate doses of LMWH. (+info)
Implementing guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in a large Italian teaching hospital: lights and shadows.
(2/128)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a serious complication in hospitalized patients, in spite of several published guidelines (GL) on its prevention. The objective of this study (part of the TRiPSS-2 project) was to evaluate the impact of a locally adapted GL, supported by a multifaceted implementation strategy, in improving VTE prophylaxis in a large teaching hospital. DESIGN AND METHODS: A before and after controlled study was used to evaluate the impact of the recommendations on the appropriateness of prophylaxis. We evaluated the medical charts of two random samples, each of 250 patients, discharged in the first semester of the years 2000 and 2002. The hospital incidence of VTE (1996-2004) was also monitored, through the discharge summaries. RESULTS: Among high risk patients, appropriateness of prophylaxis increased both in medical (from 25% to 41.7%, p=0.0075) and in surgical patients (from 63.7% to 97.1%, p=0.0004). A parallel sharp increase (by 6-8 times) of consumption of elastic stockings was documented. In both medical and surgical patients the incidence of VTE decreased markedly and sustainedly in 2002-2004, with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.68 (95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.75). However, the use of lower than recommended doses of heparins and the increased use of prophylaxis in low risk patients represent unsolved problems. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Implementing locally adapted GL may be highly effective in improving appropriateness of prophylaxis and in reducing the incidence of VTE; however a careful evaluation of changes is recommended in order to identify unsolved problems or undesired effects. (+info)
Leg ulcers - causes and management.
(3/128)
BACKGROUND: A leg ulcer is not a disease but the manifestation of an underlying problem that requires a clear diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: This article outlines the assessment and management of patients with leg ulceration. DISCUSSION: The simple tag of 'leg ulcer' is not an adequate diagnosis. A comprehensive assessment of the patient, skin, vascular status, limb, and ulcer is required to determine the aetiology and to formulate an appropriate management plan. Most leg ulcers are caused by venous insufficiency and compression is required to successfully heal venous leg ulcers. Treatment must address oedema, infection and pressure. Managing peripheral oedema using compression bandages is often more important than the topical dressings. Success requires consistent adherence to a care plan designed to address the underlying pathology and contributing factors. (+info)
Knee versus thigh length graduated compression stockings for prevention of deep venous thrombosis: a systematic review.
(4/128)
OBJECTIVE: Graduated compression stockings are a valuable means of thrombo-prophylaxis but it is unclear whether knee-length (KL) or thigh length (TL) stockings are more effective. The aim of this review was to systematically analyse randomised controlled trials that have evaluated stocking length and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Clinical trials on hospitalised populations and passengers on long haul flights were selected according to specific criteria and analysed to generate summated data. RESULTS: 14 randomized control trials were analysed. Thirty six of 1568 (2.3%) participants randomised to KL stockings developed a deep venous thrombosis, compared with 79 of 1696 (5%) in the TL control/thigh length group. Substantial heterogeneity was observed amongst trials. KL stockings had a significant effect to reduce the incidence of DVT in long haul flight passengers, odds ration 0.08 (95%CI 0.03-0.22). In hospitalised patients KL stockings did not appear to be far worse than TL stockings, odds ratio 1.01 (95%CI 0.35-2.90). For combined passengers and patients, there was a benefit in favour of KL stockings, weighted odds ratio 0.45 (95% CI 0.30-0.68). CONCLUSION: KL graduated stockings can be as effective as TL stockings for the prevention of DVT, whilst offering advantages in terms of patient compliance and cost. (+info)
Brief report: graduated compression stocking thromboprophylaxis for elderly inpatients: a propensity analysis.
(5/128)
BACKGROUND: Graduated compression stockings (GCS) are often used for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in nonsurgical patients, although evidence on their effectiveness is lacking in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prophylaxis with GCS is associated with a decrease in the rate of deep vein thrombosis in nonsurgical elderly patients. METHODS: Using original data from 2 multicenter nonrandomized studies, we performed multivariable and propensity score analyses to determine whether prophylaxis with GCS reduced the rate of deep vein thrombosis among 1,310 postacute care patients 65 years or older. The primary outcome was proximal deep vein thrombosis detected by routine compression ultrasonography performed by registered vascular physicians. RESULTS: Proximal deep vein thrombosis was found in 5.7% (21/371) of the GCS users and in 5.2% (49/939) of the GCS nonusers (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.84). Although adjusting for propensity score eliminated all differences in baseline characteristics between users and nonusers, the OR for proximal deep vein thrombosis associated with GCS remained nonsignificant in propensity-stratified (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.59-2.10) and propensity-matched (conditional OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.42-2.02) analysis. Similar figures were observed for distal and any deep vein thrombosis. The rates of deep vein thrombosis did not differ according to the length of stockings. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with GCS is not associated with a lower rate of deep vein thrombosis in nonsurgical elderly patients in routine practice. Randomized studies are needed to assess the efficacy of GCS when properly used in this setting. (+info)
A factorial, randomized trial of pentoxifylline or placebo, four-layer or single-layer compression, and knitted viscose or hydrocolloid dressings for venous ulcers.
(6/128)
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effectiveness of pentoxifylline, knitted viscose or hydrocolloid dressings, and single-layer or four-layer bandaging for venous ulceration. METHOD: A factorial randomized controlled trial with 24-week follow-up was conducted in leg ulcer clinics in Scotland with blinded allocation to pentoxifylline (1200 mg) or placebo, knitted viscose or hydrocolloid dressings, and single-layer or four-layer bandages. The study enrolled 245 adults with venous ulcers. The main outcome measure was time to complete healing. Secondary outcomes included proportions healed, withdrawals, and adverse events. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: There was no evidence of interaction between the drug, bandages, and dressings. Pentoxifylline was associated with nonsignificant increased ulcer healing (62% vs 53%; P = .21). Four-layer bandages were associated with significantly higher healing rates (67% vs 49%; P = .009). There was no difference in healing between knitted viscose and hydrocolloid dressings (58% and 57%; P = .88). Cox regression models increased the significance of the pentoxifylline effect (relative risk of healing, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Pentoxifylline increased the proportion healing compared with placebo to the same extent as shown in recent systematic reviews, although this finding was only statistically significant when a secondary adjusted analysis was conducted. Four-layer bandaging produced higher healing rates than single-layer bandaging. There was no difference in time to healing between knitted viscose and hydrocolloid dressings. (+info)
Immediate hemodynamic effect of the additional use of the SCD EXPRESS Compression System in patients with venous ulcers treated with the four-layer compression bandaging system.
(7/128)
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that the SCD EXPRESS intermittent pneumatic compression applied in combination with a four-layer bandage in patients with venous ulcers increases popliteal vein volume flow and velocity. DESIGN: Twenty limbs of 18 patients with venous leg ulcers were studied, median age 76 years. The Total Volume Flow (TVF) and the Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) were recorded in the popliteal vein using duplex ultrasonography. Measurements were made (i) without bandage, (ii) with four layer bandage and (iii) following the application of the SCD Compression System on top of a four-layer bandage for at least 15 minutes. RESULTS: The median VCSS was 17 (range, 12-22) while the median VSDS for reflux was 4.5 (range, 1-7.5). The median TVF was 71 mL/min (inter-quartile range 57-101) without bandage, 112 (IQR 89-148) with four-layer bandage and 291 (IQR 241-392) with the addition of the SCD System (P<.001, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). The median PSV was 8.4 cm/sec (IQR 6.8-14) without bandage, 13 (9.0-19) with four-layer bandage and 27 (21-31) with the addition of the SCD System (P<.001, Wilcoxon signed ranks test). Both TVF and PSV increased slightly with the addition of the four-layer bandage. However, with the addition of the SCD System these parameters increased three fold. CONCLUSIONS: The SCD EXPRESS Compression System accelerates venous flow in the legs of patients with venous ulcers already treated with a four-layer bandage. The combination of four-layer compression with the SCD System on healing venous ulcers needs to be tested by a clinical effectiveness study. (+info)
Simultaneous changes of leg circumference and interface pressure under different compression bandages.
(8/128)
OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity of measuring changes of sub bandage pressure and leg circumference in different body positions for an in vivo characterization of the elastic properties of bandage systems. DESIGN: Experimental study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Different compression bandages were applied on the leg. The variations of interface pressure and leg circumference above the inner ankle (that depends on the elastic property of the bandage) were measured simultaneously by a pressure transducer and by strain-gauge plethysmography in 50 patients. Stiffness is defined as the increase of pressure per increase of circumference. RESULTS: The most consistent parameter to differentiate elastic from inelastic bandages was the pressure-difference between the standing and the lying position corrected for the actual increase of leg circumference (modified static stiffness index, mSSI; sensitivity and specificity 100%). Neglecting the individual changes of the circumference and considering the pressure difference alone allows a differentiation which is slightly less accurate (sensitivity 100%, specificity 88%) but much simpler to use. CONCLUSIONS: The static stiffness index is a useful tool to differentiate elastic from inelastic bandage material even without correction for the individual increase of leg circumference. (+info)