Minimization and management of wastes from biomedical research.
(41/1252)
Several committees were established by the National Association of Physicians for the Environment to investigate and report on various topics at the National Leadership Conference on Biomedical Research and the Environment held at the 1--2 November 1999 at the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland. This is the report of the Committee on Minimization and Management of Wastes from Biomedical Research. Biomedical research facilities contribute a small fraction of the total amount of wastes generated in the United States, and the rate of generation appears to be decreasing. Significant reductions in generation of hazardous, radioactive, and mixed wastes have recently been reported, even at facilities with rapidly expanding research programs. Changes in the focus of research, improvements in laboratory techniques, and greater emphasis on waste minimization (volume and toxicity reduction) explain the declining trend in generation. The potential for uncontrolled releases of wastes from biomedical research facilities and adverse impacts on the general environment from these wastes appears to be low. Wastes are subject to numerous regulatory requirements and are contained and managed in a manner protective of the environment. Most biohazardous agents, chemicals, and radionuclides that find significant use in research are not likely to be persistent, bioaccumulative, or toxic if they are released. Today, the primary motivations for the ongoing efforts by facilities to improve minimization and management of wastes are regulatory compliance and avoidance of the high disposal costs and liabilities associated with generation of regulated wastes. The committee concluded that there was no evidence suggesting that the anticipated increases in biomedical research will significantly increase generation of hazardous wastes or have adverse impacts on the general environment. This conclusion assumes the positive, countervailing trends of enhanced pollution prevention efforts by facilities and reductions in waste generation resulting from improvements in research methods will continue. (+info)
Applying environmental product design to biomedical products research.
(42/1252)
The principal themes for the Biomedical Research and the Environment Conference Committee on Environmental Economics in Biomedical Research include the following: healthcare delivery companies and biomedical research organizations, both nonprofit and for-profit, need to improve their environmental performance; suppliers of healthcare products will be called upon to support this need; and improving the environmental profile of healthcare products begins in research and development (R&D). The committee report begins with requirements from regulatory authorities (e.g., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], the U.S. Food and Drug Administration), and the healthcare delivery sector). The 1998 American Hospital Association and EPA Memorandum of Understanding to reduce solid waste and mercury from healthcare facilities is emblematic of these requirements. The dominant message from the requirements discussion is to ensure that R&D organizations do not ignore customer, environmental, and regulatory requirements in the early stages of product development. Several representatives from healthcare products manufacturers presented their companies' approaches to meeting these requirements. They reported on efforts to ensure that their R&D processes are sensitive to the environmental consequences from manufacturing, distributing, using, and disposing of healthcare products. These reports describe representatives' awareness of requirements and the unique approaches their R&D organizations have taken to meet these requirements. All representatives reported that their R&D organizations have embraced environmental product design because it avoids the potential of returning products to R&D to improve the environmental profile. Additionally, several reports detailed cost savings, sustainability benefits, and improvements in environmental manufacturing or redesign, and increased customer satisfaction. Many companies in healthcare delivery are working to improve environmental performance. Fundamental to these efforts is the necessity of motivating suppliers to improve the environmental profile of new products used in the healthcare delivery sector. (+info)
Arabian nights-1001 tales of how pharmaceutical companies cater to the material needs of doctors: case report.
(43/1252)
OBJECTIVE: To describe how pharmaceutical companies cater to the material needs of doctors. DESIGN: Case report of memoirs. SETTING: Facilities that have nothing to do with medicine, somewhere in the Arabian peninsula. PATIENT POPULATION: Random sample of doctors. INTERVENTIONS: Promotion by the pharmaceutical industry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short term outcomes were travel, pleasure, amusement, and gifts, and long term outcomes were the market share of specific companies. RESULTS: Short term outcomes were heterogeneous, underlying the diversity of the means employed by the pharmaceutical industry to subvert, divert, and influence medical practice. Overall, 200 doctors were dressed in white gowns, a doctor in preventive medicine quoted Hippocrates in favour of smoking, a senior doctor became a poet, a doctor trying to understand the Methods section of a poster paper wondered whether he should have been sunbathing at the beach instead, and two women doctors were kidnapped by Bedouin warriors. Long term outcomes on the sales of the company drugs are pending but are likely to be most favourable. CONCLUSIONS: Eat, drink, be merry, and boost prescriptions. (+info)
Reporting and dissemination of industry versus non-profit sponsored economic analyses of six novel drugs used in oncology.
(44/1252)
PURPOSE: Our prior study found that pharmaceutical-sponsored and non-profit sponsored analyses differed in their published assessments of the economic value of six new oncology drugs. In this study, we expand on our earlier findings and evaluate the association between funding source and 1) characteristics of the published study report and 2) journal type for dissemination of the previously evaluated economic studies. METHODS: We reviewed the published cost-effectiveness literature for hematopoietic colony stimulating factors, 5-HT3 antagonist antiemetics. and taxanes. Two blinded investigators rated specific aspects of study reporting based on the US Public Health Service Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine criteria. Dissemination strategies were evaluated using impact factor scores from the Science Citation Index. RESULTS: The operational aspects of pharmaceutical-sponsored study reporting were better overall than those associated with non-profit sponsored studies. Specifically, pharmaceutical-sponsored studies were more likely to be reported based on data obtained from randomized clinical trials or detailed cost-models (90% vs. 70%), to include descriptions of the source of cost differences (90% vs. 79%), to state whether the study was carried out from a societal, governmental, or insurer perspective (70% vs. 42%), and to clearly indicate the time-period over which costs were evaluated (65% vs. 50%). Nonprofit sponsored studies were more likely than pharmaceutical sponsored studies to report the generalizability of the findings, including being more likely to include information about how the data could be extrapolated to other clinical settings (58% vs. 35%), to include statements on the statistical significance of the findings (38% vs. 20%), and to clearly outline the cost per unit and data sources for the cost analyses (67% vs. 45%). A similar percent of pharmaceutical and non-profit sponsored studies reported background and conclusions with about 80% providing literature comparisons of the results (about 80%) and two thirds to three fourths discussing the limitations of the finding (75% for pharmaceutical-sponsored and 67% for non-profit sponsored studies). Most studies were published in low impact factor peer-reviewed journals, and journal impact factor scores were similar between pharmaceutical and nonprofit sponsored studies. CONCLUSIONS: Upon reviewing the entire pharmacoeconomic literature for six new oncology drugs, we identified differences in study reporting, but not in types of journals where studies were published, between pharmaceutical-sponsored and non-profit sponsored studies. These results, particularly the observed differences in data generalizability, may account in part for our previous finding of lower likelihood of reporting unfavorable conclusions in pharmaceutical-sponsored studies. (+info)
Oligophilic bacteria as tools to monitor aseptic pharmaceutical production units.
(45/1252)
The bacterial loads of air, surfaces, and personnel in clean rooms are routinely monitored using a set of standard media. Bacteria that can grow on these media are a tiny fraction of the total numbers in any environment. A substantial proportion of bacteria long thought to be unculturable were recently shown to be oligophilic. Oligophile counts in clean rooms in our studies exceeded the standard plate counts by up to 2 orders of magnitude. They responded to disinfection routines in ways similar to the responses of conventional bacteria. We suggest that oligophiles are better tools than conventional bacteria for environmental monitoring in aseptic pharmaceutical production units. (+info)
Methods of collecting and evaluating non-clinical cardiac electrophysiology data in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an international survey.
(46/1252)
OBJECTIVE: To assess current practice in the pharmaceutical industry for assessing the potential for QT interval prolongation by non-cardiovascular medicinal products. METHODS: The survey was based on responses from the Toxicology and (Safety) Pharmacology laboratories (a total of 74 laboratories) of 54 companies based in Europe, Japan/Asia and the USA, received between January and March 1999. RESULTS: All 54 companies conducted preclinical in vivo electrocardiography (EGG) evaluation of new active substances (NASs). Thirty of these companies also conducted in vitro cardiac electrophysiology studies on their compounds. The majority of in vivo work was done in conscious beagle dogs. There was no consistency within the industry in defining the magnitude of change in QT interval that is considered biologically important. Most companies considered a change greater than 10% to be important, although the design of the studies suggested that group sizes used may not give sufficient statistical power to detect this size of change. Bazett's formula was used by 41% of laboratories to correct QT for changes in heart rate, despite the fact that this formula is generally deemed to be unsuitable for use in dogs. For studies in anaesthetised dogs, the majority of laboratories used barbiturate anaesthesia, but researchers should be aware of the effects of this and some other anaesthetic agents on QT interval. As for in vitro cardiac electrophysiology, there was wide diversity in the testing methodologies, particularly with regard to the test species and tissue type. As with QT prolongation, there was no consensus on the degree of action potential prolongation to cause concern. For both in vitro and in vivo testing, the majority of companies tested a minimum of three dose (or concentration) levels in order to ascertain any dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: The survey provides a snapshot of the practice in the industry prior to any internationally-agreed consensus on the most effective and efficient approaches to minimising the risk of QT prolongation by new drugs in man. It must be stated that for any given methodology, the 'majority view' in the industry is not necessarily best practice. (+info)
The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery.
(47/1252)
In this review we describe and discuss several approaches to selecting higher plants as candidates for drug development with the greatest possibility of success. We emphasize the role of information derived from various systems of traditional medicine (ethnomedicine) and its utility for drug discovery purposes. We have identified 122 compounds of defined structure, obtained from only 94 species of plants, that are used globally as drugs and demonstrate that 80% of these have had an ethnomedical use identical or related to the current use of the active elements of the plant. We identify and discuss advantages and disadvantages of using plants as starting points for drug development, specifically those used in traditional medicine. (+info)
Preparing for the revolution--pharmacogenomics and the clinical lab.
(48/1252)
Pharmacogenomics seeks to apply the field of genomics to improve the efficacy and safety of therapeutics. Sinmply put, pharmacogenomics is genetic-based testing to determine patient therapy. Interestingly, the clinical lab has rarely been discussed within the context of pharmacogenomics. Since clinical labs fill a key role in drug development it is important that they are included in pharmacogenomic discussions. Currently, clinical labs assist pharmaceutical sponsors in preclinical pharmacogenetic testing. In the future, clinical labs will be looked to for genetic test development and validation, and high-throughput genotyping of patients in clinical trials and routine testing. Clinical labs are an essential link in the chain of pharmacogenomic drug development, a fact which must be recognised by both the labs themselves and the industry as a whole. (+info)