Incidence of serious side effects with intravenous bisphosphonate: a clinical audit.
(41/105)
BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates (BP) have been associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fractures (AFF). The prevalence of these side effects in intravenous (IV) BP-treated subjects is not well understood. AIM: This audit aimed to delineate the prevalence of ONJ, thigh pain and AFF in patients having regular IV BP and its effect on bone mineral density (BMD). Design and METHODS: Patients attending for IV BP over a 3-month period completed a questionnaire about thigh pain and dental health. Data concerning BMD, treatment indication and treatment history were obtained from medical records. RESULTS: There were 201 patients between 28 and 94 years (74.1% female) mostly on zoledronate (ZOL) (102) or pamidronate (PAM) (97). Osteoporosis (75.6%) and Paget's disease (16.5%) were the main indications for treatment; median length of IV BP was 4 years (range 0.25-25). One patient had ONJ (0.5%) while oral pain was reported by 6.5% and 12.7% noted tooth loosening. Twenty-seven subjects (13.4%) complained of current thigh pain. AFF occurred in four patients (2%), none of whom had idiopathic osteoporosis. At time of AFF, only one patient had a femoral neck T-score less than -2.5. All four had received pamidronate treatment; median 12.5 years (range 7-22). IV BP treatment significantly increased lumbar spine BMD but not femoral neck BMD. CONCLUSION: Classical ONJ was rare (0.5%), although tooth loss was more frequent. Thigh pain was frequent while AFF occurred in 2.0% of subjects and was associated with long treatment periods and non-osteoporotic bone. (+info)
Pharmacovigilance of artemether-lumefantrine in pregnant women followed until delivery in Rwanda.
(42/105)
Adjusted indirect comparison of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
(43/105)
BACKGROUND: Vit-K antagonists are the therapy of choice to prevent thromboembolic events due to atrial fibrillation since many years. New oral anticoagulants (NOA) showed encouraging results vs. warfarin but there are no data directly comparing different NOA. We performed an adjusted indirect meta-analysis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched. Efficacy end points were the cumulative rate of thomboembolic stroke (TES) and systemic embolism (SE). Main safety end point was the rate of hemorrhagic stroke (HS). RESULTS: Three RCTs (50578 patients) were included. Overall, NOA were comparable to warfarin according to the cumulative risk of TES and SE, as well as for TES alone. NOA were associated with a reduced rate of SE [OR 0.64 (0.44, 0.94], P=0.02]. Compared to warfarin, NOA were associated with a significantly reduced risk of HS [OR 0.43 (0.34, 0.55), P<0.001, NNT to avoid a HS 153] and all cause death [OR 0.90 [0.84, 0.96], P=0.03, NNT to save one fatality 43]. Head to head comparison showed that in terms of cumulative rate of TES/SE, as well as of TES, none of the NOA was significantly superior to the others (all Ps>0.05). Rivaroxaban showed superiority in the prevention of SE. Dabigatran 150 mg/twice daily was associated with the largest reduction in the risk of HS vs. warfarin and vs. other NOA. Overall mortality was quite comparable across NOA. CONCLUSION: Overall superiority of NOA over warfarin is largely influenced by the reduction of HS. Dabigatran 150 mg/twice daily seems to have the best risk/benefit profile. (+info)
What can we learn from parents about enhancing participation in pharmacovigilance?
(44/105)