Inverse relationship between systemic resistance of plants to microorganisms and to insect herbivory.
(25/7142)
Pre-inoculation of plants with a pathogen that induces necrosis leads to the development of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) to subsequent pathogen attack [1]. The phenylpropanoid-derived compound salicylic acid (SA) is necessary for the full expression of both local resistance and SAR [2] [3]. A separate signaling pathway involving jasmonic acid (JA) is involved in systemic responses to wounding and insect herbivory [4] [5]. There is evidence both supporting and opposing the idea of cross-protection against microbial pathogens and insect herbivores [6] [7]. This is a controversial area because pharmacological experiments point to negative cross-talk between responses to systemic pathogens and responses to wounding [8] [9] [10], although this has not been demonstrated functionally in vivo. Here, we report that reducing phenylpropanoid biosynthesis by silencing the expression of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) reduces SAR to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), whereas overexpression of PAL enhances SAR. Tobacco plants with reduced SAR exhibited more effective grazing-induced systemic resistance to larvae of Heliothis virescens, but larval resistance was reduced in plants with elevated phenylpropanoid levels. Furthermore, genetic modification of components involved in phenylpropanoid synthesis revealed an inverse relationship between SA and JA levels. These results demonstrate phenylpropanoid-mediated cross-talk in vivo between microbially induced and herbivore-induced pathways of systemic resistance. (+info)
Characterization of neuropeptide Y-induced feeding in mice: do Y1-Y6 receptor subtypes mediate feeding?
(26/7142)
The stimulation of food consumption after i.c.v. administration of various neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptor agonists was examined in CD-1 mice. These agonists, including endogenous peptides NPY, peptide YY (PYY), and pancreatic polypeptide, as well as several N-terminal truncated and synthetic peptides that are prototypic receptor agonists at Y1-Y6 NPY receptors ([Leu31Pro34]NPY, NPY2-36, NPY3-36, NPY13-36, PYY3-36, Pro34PYY, and D-Trp32NPY), showed varying abilities to elicit food consumption such that PYY > NPY2-36 = NPY = PYY3-36 > Pro34PYY > NPY3-36 >> [Leu31Pro34]NPY > NPY13-36 = D-Trp32NPY = pancreatic polypeptide. Published reports have suggested that NPY-induced feeding is mediated via the Y1 or the Y5 receptor subtypes. However, the relative ability of the various peptide analogs to elicit feeding differed from the relative ability of these peptides to bind to cloned Y1-Y6 receptors. The effects of prototypic Y1 receptor antagonists on NPY-induced feeding were also evaluated after i.c.v. administration. GR231118 (1229U91), a peptide Y1 antagonist, did not block NPY-induced feeding at the doses tested. BIBP3226, a nonpeptide Y1 receptor antagonist, as well as its opposite enantiomer, BIBP3435, which is inactive at Y1 receptors, blocked feeding elicited by NPY, [Leu31Pro34], or PYY at doses that did not cause overt behavioral dysfunction. The lack of effects with GR231118 and the nonstereoselective effects of BIBP3226 suggested that NPY-induced feeding in mice was not mediated via the Y1 receptor. Thus, by using currently available prototypic peptide NPY receptor agonists for Y1-Y6 receptors and peptide and nonpeptide Y1 receptor antagonists GR231118 and BIBP3226, the mediation of NPY-induced feeding cannot be unequivocally attributed to any one of the known NPY receptors. It is possible that NPY-induced feeding is mediated either by a combination of more than one NPY receptor subtype or by a unique NPY receptor subtype. Additional subtype-selective receptor antagonists, when available, will help to clarify this issue further. (+info)
The role of the response-reinforcer relation in delay-of-reinforcement effects.
(27/7142)
The role of the response-reinforcer relation in maintaining operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement was investigated by using a two-operandum (i.e., two-key) procedure with pigeons. Responding on one key was reinforced under a tandem variable-interval differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior (tandem VI DRO) schedule. The schedule defined a resetting unsignaled delay-of-reinforcement procedure in that a response was required when the interfood interval of the VI schedule lapsed, but further responding during the DRO component on either key reset the time interval. This ensured a fixed delay duration between any response and reinforcement. Responding on another key, physically identical to the first one except for spatial location, otherwise was without consequence. The location of the key correlated with the delay-of-reinforcement procedure varied between sessions according to a semirandom sequence. Differences in response rates between the two keys were greater, with proportionally higher rates on the key correlated with the delay-of-reinforcement procedure, the longer the delay-of-reinforcement procedure remained correlated with the same key. Differences in responding on the two keys also increased within individual sessions. These results suggest that the response-reinforcer relation is the primary determinant of responding when responding is acquired and maintained with delayed reinforcement. (+info)
Overt signs of toxicity to dogs and cats of dietary deoxynivalenol.
(28/7142)
Studies were conducted to determine the dietary amounts of deoxynivalenol (DON; vomitoxin) in dog and cat food that are required to produce overt signs of toxicity (e.g., vomiting or reduced food intake). Wheat naturally contaminated with 37 mg of DON/kg was used to manufacture pet foods containing 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg of DON/kg. Deoxynivalenol concentration in pet food following manufacture was unchanged, indicating that the toxin was stable during conventional extrusion processing. Dogs previously fed DON-contaminated food were able to preferentially select uncontaminated food. Dogs not previously exposed to DON-contaminated food consumed equal quantities of contaminated and uncontaminated food. There was no effect of 6 mg of DON/kg on dog food digestibility. Food intake of dogs was significantly reduced by DON concentrations greater than 4.5 +/- 1.7 mg/kg, and DON greater than 7.7 +/- 1.1 mg/kg reduced cat food intake. Vomiting by dogs and cats was commonly observed at the 8 and 10 mg DON levels. (+info)
Separation of deterrents to ingestive behavior of cattle from cattle feces.
(29/7142)
Feeding-deterrent chemicals were extracted from cattle feces and then separated with three chromatographic methods. Behavioral two-choice test bioassays with cattle were used to examine the deterrent properties of the fractions. Cattle feces were extracted with diethyl ether, and the extracts were separated into neutral, acidic, and basic fractions. Of the three fractions, only the neutral fraction was a deterrent. Separation of the ether-soluble neutral chemicals was conducted with an open column of silica gel using four carrier solutions consisting of pentane and ether. Fraction B (eluted with the carrier solution; pentane:ether = 90:10) was the most effective deterrent among the four fractions. This fraction was divided into 10 fractions by liquid chromatography. Fractions 6, 7, and 8 seemed to deter cattle from feeding. The combined Fractions 6, 7, and 8 were separated into 15 fractions with HPLC. Deterrent activities were detected in Fractions 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14, suggesting that deterrents were separated into two groups using HPLC. These results suggested that several specific chemicals in feces are involved in inhibiting cattle from ingesting grass near cattle feces. (+info)
Meal-synchronized CEA in rats: effects of meal size, intragastric feeding, and subdiaphragmatic vagotomy.
(30/7142)
Within a feeding schedule of intermittent food access, large meals have the ability to induce activity at the same time the next day [circadian ensuing activity (CEA)]. In these experiments, we evaluated the minimum meal size necessary to induce CEA and whether oral-pharyngeal factors and afferent vagal activity played necessary roles in the induction of the underlying process. In experiment 1, every 33 h rats were given two meals separated by a 2-h interval. The size of the first meal was varied, while total intake every feeding cycle was held constant. When the initial meal was <10 g (34 kcal) CEA occurred later, indicating that such a meal size was subthreshold for inducing CEA. In experiment 2, rats were given intragastric (IG) meals every 33 h, before and after complete subdiaphragmatic vagotomy. IG nutrient meals induced CEA, indicating that extensive oral-pharyngeal experience was not necessary for CEA induction. CEA occurred in vagotomized rats but, compared with intact rats, appeared to occur later relative to nutrient infusion, indicating that afferent vagal activity may be sufficient but not necessary to induce CEA. (+info)
Use of orchiectomy and testosterone replacement to explore meal number-to-meal size relationship in male rats.
(31/7142)
Because food intake is a function of meal number and meal size and because gender-related hormones are involved in feeding regulation, we explored effects of orchiectomy and testosterone replacement on the relationship between meal number and size and changes in resulting feeding patterns in adult male rats, randomized into orchiectomy and sham-operation groups. A rat eater meter measured feeding indexes for 1 wk before and 2 wk after castration and during 8 days of testosterone replacement. Orchiectomy leads to an immediate change in the meal number-to-size relationship, resulting in 1) change in pattern of feeding; 2) a significant decrease in dark-phase meal number; 3) a significant increase in dark-phase meal size, but insufficient to offset decrease in meal number, so total food intake significantly decreased during dark phase; 4) no significant change in light-phase meal number; and 5) an increase in meal size leading to an increased food intake during light phase, which offset decreased food intake in dark cycle and resulted in no net significant change in food intake after orchiectomy. Testosterone replacement acutely reversed effects of orchiectomy on meal number-to-meal size relationship, restoring feeding pattern. Data suggest that androgens immediately influence the meal number-to-meal size relationship. The speed of onset seen after orchiectomy suggests that the influence of testosterone on food intake may also occur partially via a nongenomic effect. (+info)
Central leptin modulates behavioral and neural responsivity to CCK.
(32/7142)
The mechanisms through which leptin, the protein product of the ob gene, affects food intake remain to be determined. To assess whether the actions of leptin depend on modulation of within-meal satiety signals, we measured the effect of third ventricular leptin administration on the satiety actions of CCK. Leptin (10 micrograms) administered 1 h before 30-min access to a liquid diet had no effect on intake when administered alone, but doses of 3.5 or 10 micrograms dose dependently increased the suppression of intake produced by 1 nmol/kg CCK. Examination of patterns of c-Fos activation induced by 3.5 micrograms leptin and 1 nmol/kg CCK revealed that the combination produced significant c-Fos activation within the area postrema and the caudal and medial nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) compared with either leptin or CCK treatments alone. The leptin-CCK combination also resulted in increased c-Fos activation within the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus above that produced by leptin alone. These data suggest that the actions of leptin in food intake are mediated through its ability to modulate responsivity to within-meal satiety signals. (+info)