Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards. (1/93)

 (+info)

Treatment and outcomes for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia compared to myelodysplastic syndromes in older adults. (2/93)

 (+info)

Passive cooling during transport of asphyxiated term newborns. (3/93)

 (+info)

What is the significance of perioperative release of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in cardiac surgery? (4/93)

 (+info)

Single- versus multilevel fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and multilevel lumbar stenosis: four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. (5/93)

 (+info)

Predictive validity of the Manchester Triage System: evaluation of outcomes of patients admitted to an emergency department. (6/93)

 (+info)

Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm. (7/93)

 (+info)

Predicting asthma outcomes in commercially insured and Medicaid populations? (8/93)

OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive ability of the ratio of controller-to-total asthma medication in commercially insured and Medicaid patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: Medical and pharmacy claims were used to identify asthma patients between 2004 and 2006. Ratios were computed during 3-, 6-, and 12-month assessment periods and asthma exacerbations were assessed during a subsequent 12-month follow-up period. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and logistic regression were used to select optimal ratio number, assessment time period, and incremental ratio analysis. RESULTS: The ratio significantly predicted future asthma exacerbations. An optimal value of >0.7 was identified in pediatric and adult Medicaid patients with a shorter assessment period in adults (3 months) than in children (6 months). In commercially insured patients, an optimal value of >0.5 during a 6-month assessment period was identified for children and adults. In commercially insured patients, a 0.1-unit increase in the ratio below the 0.5 value resulted in a 72% (odds ratio [OR] 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.57) and 80% (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.12-0.33) risk reduction among pediatric and adult patients, respectively. Similarly, a 0.1-unit increase in the ratio below the 0.7 optimal value in the Medicaid population resulted in significant risk reduction in the pediatric (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.97) but not the adult cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The ratio is a significant predictive risk marker in commercially insured and Medicaid asthma populations. Incremental risk reductions can be realized by unit increases in the ratio up to the identified optimal value.  (+info)