Moist bacterial strike-through of surgical materials: confirmatory tests.
(57/60)
New tests consisting of modifications of the inverted Mason jar test confirm our previously reported studies which showed that woven and nonwoven surgical materials vary greatly in their ability to serve as barriers against moist bacterial strike-through. Among the woven materials, only tightly woven Pima cloth or materials treated with Quarpel waterproofing process or with polythene layer lamination was invariably resistant. However, tight-woven Pima cloth, which had been treated with Quarpel became permeable after 100 washing-sterilizing cycles. Of the nonwoven materials, single-layer nonwoven materials tended to unevenly permeable to moist bacterial strike-through. Only the front and sleeves of nonwoven gowns reinforced with polyethelene layer were invariably resistant to moist contamination. (+info)
Environmental air and airborne infections.
(58/60)
The results of a study on the epidemiology of airborne (aerobic) surgical infections are presented. The first phase of the study was carried out in a surgical suite which contained no environmental or traffic control systems. The second phase of the study took place within a modern "up to date" operating room suite containing multiple air screens as well as an elaborate ventilation system utilizing HEPA type filters which provided the operating room with clinically sterile air. One hundred and fifty-six patients were also studied. All patients underwent major procedures. The ratio of clean, clean-contaminated, and dirty cases was the same in both groups. Preoperatively, a nasal swab, clean voided urine (or vaginal swab) and a rectal swab were obtained on each patient. Daily nasal cultures and cultures of suspected sites of infection were obtained postoperatively. Daily nasal cultures and "glove sweat" cultures were obtained on all personnel attending the patient. Environmental cultures of the operating room, the operating room hallway, recovery room and patients' rooms were also taken. All samples were checked for the presence of staphylococci, streptococci, Escherichia coli, proteus species, enterobacter, klebsiella, and pseudomonas. In all, 15,000 cultures were taken during the study. The rate of infection was essentially the same in both phases of the study. Environmental air only occasionaly served as the source of infecting organisms. The results of the study support the conclusion that the most common source of infecting organisms in surgical infections is thepatient or those around him. The most common time of contamination is during the surgical procedure itself. Surgical infections can best be minimized by meticulous observation of fundamental principles of antisepsis rather than by dependence on elaborate and costly ventilation and air control systems. (+info)
Current blood culture methods and systems: clinical concepts, technology, and interpretation of results.
(59/60)
Since the mid-1970s there has been a number of advances in blood culture practices and technology; these advances have been based largely on well-designed controlled clinical evaluations of blood culture systems and media. Thus, a sound scientific basis for the fundamental principles of blood culturing now exists. In this article. I will address issues of clinical and technical importance with regard to blood culturing; these issues include skin antisepsis, the number and timing of blood cultures, the appropriate volume of blood for culture, culture media and additives, length and atmosphere of incubation, and interpretation of positive blood culture results. Finally, I will discuss the currently available blood culture systems, with an emphasis on the newer continuous-monitoring blood culture systems. (+info)
The plastic surgical adhesive drape: an evaluation of its efficacy as a microbial barrier.
(60/60)
A microbial evaluation was made of adhesive plastic surgical drapes and cloth surgical drapes. These studies were done both during surgery and in the laboratory. The plastic drape does not allow bacterial penetration, lateral migration does not occur, skin bacteria do not multiply under the drape within the time periods studied and the patient drapes are held in place with their use. When wet, cloth drapes showed profuse bacterial penetration. Dry cloth showed less bacterial penetration as compared to wet cloth. Lateral migration under cloth drapes was not possible to assess due to a high level of penetration. The surface of cloth showed a higher level of bacterial contamination during the surgical procedures. Deep wound cultures collected just prior to closing showed 60% contamination when cloth was used compared to 6% when plastic was employed. The micro-organisms recovered from the various sites sampled were identified. Finally, in addition to the positive aseptic benefits afforded by plastic adhesive drapes, aesthetic features such as a more delineated operative field and elimination of towel clips make this product a useful adjunct to the surgeon's armamentarium. (+info)