Peer review research. Medical search. Frequent questions

Traditionally, with peer review, innovators would have to convince and satisfy mainstream reviewers who represent the very thinking the innovators aim to disrupt. (medscape.com)
Extramural Discovery Science (EDS) Scientific Directors determine which peer review committee will review the applications, and they recruit experts to the committees and assign reviewers to each application. (cancer.org)
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following five core review criteria, and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed). (nih.gov)
Reviewers will consider each of the five review criteria below in the determination of scientific and technical merit, and give a separate score for each. (nih.gov)
CSR receives over 80,000 applications a year and reviews the majority of them in 1,500 review meetings using 17,000 reviewers. (nih.gov)
CAMBRIDGE, MA - October 8, 2020 - The preprints selected for review in Rapid Reviews: COVID-19 (RR:C19) , an open-access overlay journal published by the MIT Press, cover a wide range of subjects, with peer reviewers finding a study that higher levels of cytokines IL-6 and IL-10 are associated with increased severity of COVID-19 is particularly noteworthy and could be useful in clinical care. (labmanager.com)
Peer reviewers similarly flag as misleading new research that non-COVID-19 vaccinations are linked to decreased SARS-CoV-2 rates. (labmanager.com)
This Open Access journal publishes papers for free, more or less immediately and after the paper has appeared online peer-reviewers are being invited. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
This journal uses AI to find and invite reviewers, and these reviews will the be are published alongside our article. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
Should we advised by reviewers to make changes, edits or improvements the next version of the paper will be published online alongside the original submission and the reviews. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
Additionally, we looked at whether the quality of peer reviewers' reports differed between journals operating on open and closed peer review models. (biomedcentral.com)
By comparing reviewer reports for manuscripts submitted to BMC Infectious Diseases (a medical journal operating on an open peer review model) and BMC Microbiology (the biology counterpart operating on a closed peer review model), we found that there was no difference in the quality of reports from reviewers suggested by the authors or those suggested by the Editor. (biomedcentral.com)
Intriguingly though, we found that reports on the open peer review model scored more highly on questions relating to feedback on the methods, constructiveness and the amount of evidence substantiating the reviewers' comments. (biomedcentral.com)
These journals operate on an open peer review model that includes making the reviewers' reports available alongside the published article. (biomedcentral.com)
This means that the author will remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout peer review. (springer.com)
What are our ethical obligations and responsibilities as peer reviewers? (ubc.ca)
How can we balance the risks of bias and the advantages of expertise as peer reviewers? (ubc.ca)
In this type of review, the identity of the reviewers is concealed from the authors. (gavinpublishers.com)
Both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous in double-blind peer review. (gavinpublishers.com)
Open review involves disclosing the identities of the reviewers to the authors and, in some cases, making the reviews publicly available. (gavinpublishers.com)
Open review promotes transparency and accountability but can also lead to potential challenges such as reviewers being reluctant to provide critical feedback. (gavinpublishers.com)
After the authors submit their revised manuscript, the editor reviews the changes and decides whether the revisions adequately address the reviewers' concerns. (gavinpublishers.com)
A double-blind peer review system is an anonymous review system whereby the identity of the author(s) of a manuscript is concealed from the selected reviewers. (academicjournals.org)
The International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research considers the double-blind peer system as a more effective review system because it limits possible bias from either the selected reviewers or from authors. (academicjournals.org)
On submission, a manuscript is reviewed to ensure that it meets the minimum requirements of the journal before it is sent to external reviewers. (academicjournals.org)
The reviewers are invited to review the manuscript by sending them the abstract of the manuscript. (academicjournals.org)
Upon acceptance to review the manuscript, the full text of the manuscript is sent to the reviewers after the author(s) have been concealed. (academicjournals.org)

As part of the outcome from the ISD lab studies subject - Intelligent Systems Construction, six research papers have been accepted by peer-reviewed conferences, including two at the 2023 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW23) - a top international conference with an average acceptance rate of 25.5% for research in the design and use of technologies that affect groups, organisations, communities, and networks. (edu.hk)

In aggressive pursuit of its vision of a world without Alzheimer's®, the Alzheimer's Association made its largest-ever research investment in 2021, granting more than $70 million to 253 scientific investigations. (alz.org)

The peer review of the Draft NTP Research Report on the CLARITY-BPA Core Study was convened April 26, 2018, in Rodbell Auditorium, Rall Building, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. (nih.gov)
Here is my research statement (for my tenure review) from 2018 that summarizes my work at UBC from 2013-2018. (ubc.ca)

These studies are reported in peer-reviewed NTP technical reports and journal manuscripts. (nih.gov)
Manuscripts reporting primary research or secondary analysis of primary research will have at least two referees per manuscript. (springer.com)
Journal editors and funding agencies depend on the peer review process to decide which manuscripts to publish and whose proposals to support. (ubc.ca)
Peer review helps maintain the quality and integrity of scientific research by subjecting manuscripts to rigorous evaluation by experts in the field. (gavinpublishers.com)
All submitted manuscripts undergo a peer review process before publication. (academicjournals.org)
Manuscripts that fails in this first stage of the review process are returned to the author(s) for modification and resubmission. (academicjournals.org)

Discussions around the future of peer review and problems with current models have led to experiments with open peer review , post publication peer review and double-blind peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
The journal employs a double-blind peer review system. (academicjournals.org)

I welcome you to today's webinar on submissions and peer review of NIH grants. (nih.gov)
The focus of this year's webinar series is on writing, submitting and managing global mental health research grants to the National Institutes of Health. (nih.gov)
These actions include the implementation of enhanced review criteria for evaluating the scientific and technical merit of applications submitted to the NIH for grants or cooperative agreements to support biomedical or behavioral research. (nih.gov)
The enhanced criteria will replace the review criteria adopted October 12, 2004 (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-05-002.html ) and modified May 11, 2006 (see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-06-069.html ). (nih.gov)
A side-by-side comparison of the enhanced review criteria described below, and the criteria that will be replaced, is available on the OER website ( http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/guidelines_general/comparison_of_review_criteria.pdf ). (nih.gov)
The enhanced review criteria (below) will be effective for all applications for research grants and cooperative agreements that are submitted for funding consideration for fiscal year 2010 (FY2010) and thereafter. (nih.gov)
As part of this mission, applications submitted to the NIH for grants or cooperative agreements to support biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system. (nih.gov)
NIEHS offers a broad range of job opportunities, career enhancement programs, and research training grants and programs in environmental health sciences and administration. (nih.gov)
The CDTR program currently uses the "Center Core Grants (P30)" mechanism that supports shared resources and facilities for use by multiple investigators to enhance multidisciplinary approaches and collaborative research efforts focused on a common research problem or goal. (nih.gov)
Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Review Committee (HLBP) Roster - This committee, also known as the Program Project Parent Committee, performs the second level review of Program Project Grants sent to NHLBI under the P01 mechanism. (nih.gov)
NHLBI Institutional Training Mechanism Review Committee (NITM) Roster - This committee performs the review of training grants using the T32 mechanism. (nih.gov)
NHLBI Mentored Clinical and Basic Science Review Committee (MCBS) Roster - This committee performs the review of training grants using the K01 and K08 mechanisms. (nih.gov)
NHLBI Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Review Committee (MPOR) Roster - This committee performs the review of training grants using the K23, K24, and K25 mechanisms. (nih.gov)
NHLBI Mentored Transition to Independence Review Committee (MTI) Roster - This committee performs the review of training grants using the K99/R00 and K22 mechanisms. (nih.gov)
Grants & Contracts provides general information about the funding process, including the types of funding mechanisms, how to apply for funding, the peer-review process, and funding guidelines. (nih.gov)
The institute sponsors research relevant to neuroscience as described in announcements published regularly in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts . (nih.gov)
The locus of review for Career Development Awards (K01, K08, K23, K25, K99/R00), Small Grants (R03), Training Grants (T32, T35), Conference Grants (R13) and Program Project grants (P01) is the NICHD Scientific Review Branch (SRB) . (nih.gov)
Investigator-initiated Research Project Grants (R01), Academic Research Enhancement Awards (R15), Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Awards (R21), Small Research Grant Program awards (R03), Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Grants (R41, R42), and Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Awards (R43, R44) are reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review (CSR) . (nih.gov)
Our grants have funded some of the most instrumental research in Alzheimer's and dementia science . (alz.org)
The acting education minister has vetoed six humanities research grants which had been recommended by the independent Australian Research Council for funding. (innovationaus.com)

All American Cancer Society grant applications are evaluated for scientific merit and relevance to cancer using an independent, confidential, and highly competitive, two-stage peer review process. (cancer.org)
Peer review has long been an integral part of the research process to ensure high quality science is being published and shared with the world. (nih.gov)
It is published by BioMed Central and focuses on problems in peer review, replication, and the scientific process. (wikipedia.org)
First, we will focus on the preparation of grant applications for submission to the NIH, how those applications are processed and routed and then evaluated through the peer review process. (nih.gov)
NIMH is very focused on supporting global mental research, and individuals from other countries are faced with the added challenge of not being that familiar with the NIH process. (nih.gov)
Dr. Gagan Pandya of NIH's Center for Scientific Review will discuss the review process for small business innovation research and small business technology transfer grant applications, as well as answer questions from attendees. (nih.gov)
March 4, 2009 - See Notice (NOT-OD-09-054) Recovery Act of 2009: NIH Review Criteria, Scoring System, and Suspension of Appeals Process. (nih.gov)
The course focuses on the spectrum of clinical research and the research process by highlighting epidemiologic methods, study design, protocol preparation, patient monitoring, quality assurance, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issues. (nih.gov)
We have had some previous experience with the process of post-publication review, in 2017 BU's Dr. Sarah Collard and Prof. van Teijlingen wrote a referee report for F1000Research after it published a methods paper on online focus groups [2] . (bournemouth.ac.uk)
Peer review is a key process in the publication of scientific research, and often finds itself under scrutiny and the topic of debate . (biomedcentral.com)
This allowed the researchers a rare glimpse into the peer review process, which is so often conducted behind closed doors. (biomedcentral.com)
Peer review will always be debated , and researchers and editors should continue to look for more innovative ways to improve the process. (biomedcentral.com)
In this blog post, Dr. Martina Schmidt highlights modifications that are coming in the peer review process for NIH grant applications. (nih.gov)
The peer review process of any submission associated with a special issue, follows the procedure of the journal, but is handled by Guest Editors who are responsible for assigning at least two referees to each article and evaluating the reviews. (springer.com)
The peer-review process is both a quality control mechanism and is critical to the research process. (ubc.ca)
Failure to disclose conflicts of interest, maintain confidentiality and protect the integrity of the peer-review process constitutes a serious form of scholarly misconduct. (ubc.ca)
Consequences may range from removal from the peer review process, loss of research funding, or even legal action from the individual(s) whose privacy rights have been compromised. (ubc.ca)
During a peer-review process, the documents under review are confidential and should be treated as such. (ubc.ca)
We may misjudge our capacity to participate in the review and unintentionally delay the process. (ubc.ca)
It is unethical to conduct only a superficial review following a cursory reading, as the peer-review process is critical to improving the quality of research. (ubc.ca)
The peer-review process is inherently subjective and prone to biases. (ubc.ca)
Given that monetary policy was such an obvious success, the policy process was never subject to review: no royal commission, no board of inquiry, no external review committee asking how such a debacle could happen. (afr.com)
The peer review process plays a crucial role in ensuring the quality, validity, and reliability of scientific research. (gavinpublishers.com)
This page provides an overview of the peer review process and its significance in the academic community. (gavinpublishers.com)
Peer review is a rigorous evaluation process in which experts in a particular field assess the quality, validity, and originality of research papers before they are published. (gavinpublishers.com)
The review process is the most important aspect of the publication process of an article. (academicjournals.org)
The journal employs a three-stage review process - editorial office, external review and editors' decision. (academicjournals.org)
The first stage of the review process takes place in the editorial office. (academicjournals.org)
Once a manuscript successfully completes the editorial office review process, it proceeds to the second stage. (academicjournals.org)
The second stage of the review process employs the double-blind review system. (academicjournals.org)
After going through a peer review process, it is clear to the minister the application of the National Interest Test is not working in every case," the spokesperson told InnovationAus. (innovationaus.com)

Join NIH's Simplified Peer Review Framework Webinar! (nih.gov)
NIH is implementing a simplified framework for peer review of research project grant (RPG) applications due at the end of January 2025 onward. (nih.gov)
On Friday, November 3 from 1 to 2 pm ET , NIH is hosting a free webinar reviewing the changes made to the peer review framework and answer any questions. (nih.gov)
The subcommittee found that the long-term goals and science questions in the EDC Program are appropriate and represent an understandable and solid framework for setting research priorities, representing a combination of problem-driven and core research. (nih.gov)
The National Institutes of Health will be hosting a webinar to provide a high-level overview of the new simplified review framework for research project grant (RPG) applications. (nih.gov)
The webinar will go over changes to the review framework which will go into effect with submissions due on January 25, 2025. (nih.gov)
The National Institutes of Health Director's Council of Public Representatives developed a community engagement framework that includes values, strategies to operationalize each value, and potential outcomes of their use, as well as a peer-review framework for evaluating research that engages communities. (nih.gov)
The formulation of the NIH budget provides an established framework within which priorities are identified, reviewed, and justified. (nih.gov)
At a conference on the forthcoming Research Excellence Framework (REF) this week, the Higher Education Funding Council for England sketched out how it intends to assess the quality of research outputs in the system, which will determine the allocation of £1.6 billion of annual research funding from 2014. (timeshighereducation.com)

Research Integrity and Peer Review is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal that was launched in 2016. (wikipedia.org)
This helps ensure the confidentiality of the work and preserves the integrity of our peer review. (ubc.ca)

The Office of Extramural Research (OER) manages the development and implementation of policies and procedures that pertain to peer review conducted in all components of the NIH. (nih.gov)
The NIH Office of Extramural Research is also an important resource for grant applicants and grantees. (nih.gov)

Recent research by Li and Agha found that NIH peer review scores correlated with better research outcomes. (nih.gov)
Store the privileged materials in a secure place, do not use the information to advance other research, avoid discussing the review or its outcomes with others who are not involved in the peer review, and, once our review is complete, destroy or return the documents in a secure manner. (ubc.ca)

In that case, it must be made clear to the researchers and the public that no peer review has taken place. (medscape.com)
NHERI conducts homeschooling research, is a clearinghouse of research for the public, researchers, homeschoolers, the media, and policy makers, and educates the public concerning the findings of all related research. (nheri.org)
Community engagement in research may enhance a community's ability to address its own health needs and health disparities issues while ensuring that researchers understand community priorities. (nih.gov)
Real, perceived, or potential conflicts of interest compromise the value of our review and undermine confidence and trust in our peers, as well as the public's trust in us as researchers. (ubc.ca)
The Alzheimer's Association funds independent researchers worldwide through our International Research Grant Program . (alz.org)
The researchers state that they based their quantitative research on a previous work that investigated remotely piloted aircraft. (gradetutors.com)

Join us for a three-part webinar series designed for faculty and sponsored programs/ research development personnel at institutions building research and research training capacity. (nih.gov)

The Introduction to the Principles and Practice of Clinical Research (IPPCR) is a course to train participants on how to effectively conduct clinical research. (nih.gov)
The purpose of this Centers program is to accelerate innovation of the spectrum of T2-T4 diabetes translational research (i.e., bedside to clinical practice and community settings, dissemination and implementation) to maximize positive impacts of research on population health through activities and core services that offer specialized expertise, tools, education, and support. (nih.gov)
This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. (biomedcentral.com)

Using the application ranking provided by the Peer Review Committees, the Extramural Discovery Science Council recommends funding based on the relative merit of the applications, the amount of available funds, and American Cancer Society (ACS) objectives. (cancer.org)
The peer review group evaluates the scientific and technical merit of the proposed research. (nih.gov)

Thank you for your interest in NIH's Request for Information (RFI): NIH System to Support Biomedical and Behavioral Research and Peer Review, as announced in the July 6, 2007 NIH Guide Notice . (nih.gov)

Committee members independently review grant applications and then meet in person or virtually as a group to discuss and rank applications by grant mechanism based on the evaluation criteria for the respective grant types. (cancer.org)
CSR is conducting a series of surveys and research studies of application evaluation and ranking fairness to determine the extent to which current peer review practices are optimal for achieving its' mission, and to identify areas of success and improvement in the quality and cost of peer review. (nih.gov)
The Pathology Evaluation and Peer Review (PEPR) Group provides support to NIEHS, including studies conducted by the Division of Translational Toxicology (DTT). (nih.gov)
Through research and evaluation, we examine new ways to support the Health Center Program in providing high quality and cost-effective care to historically medically underserved communities. (hrsa.gov)
View briefs, fast stats, and other resources that highlight ongoing health center research and evaluation activities. (hrsa.gov)

NCCIH blogs about research developments related to complementary health practices. (nih.gov)
Visit the Health Center Library to find current peer-reviewed articles that describe innovative promising practices, evidence-based interventions, quality improvement programs, and program evaluations relevant to health centers. (hrsa.gov)

Dr Ioannidis put it this way: "Biomedical innovation and discovery based on research and development by private and public companies and institutions are essential for advancing medical science and improving clinical care. (medscape.com)
These results were presented as a poster (which is available on F1000Posters ) by Maria Kowalczuk, Deputy Biology Editor, at the 7th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication 2013 . (biomedcentral.com)
Student loan debt is a common barrier for health professionals starting and sustaining a biomedical or biobehavioral research career. (nih.gov)

Furthermore, limited guidance is available for peer-review panels on evaluating proposals for research that engages communities. (nih.gov)
First level review at SRB is conducted by several subcommittees of the NICHD Integrated Review Group (IRG) or, when appropriate, by Special Emphasis Panels convened to provide specialized expertise in specific areas of science. (nih.gov)

This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines. (biomedcentral.com)
The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings. (biomedcentral.com)
Read Our Guidelines Trusted peer advice and insights for technology professionals. (gartner.com)
Write your research manuscript following the guidelines provided by the target journal, ensuring proper formatting and adherence to specific requirements. (gavinpublishers.com)

The main objective of this Lab Studies subject is to bring students to the actual research context. (edu.hk)

Social Indicators Research also publishes special issues. (springer.com)
The International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research currently publishes full text of articles only in English language. (academicjournals.org)
The Institute publishes on average about 70 peer-reviewed papers per year, of which several are in top-ranking journals such as Nature and Science. (uu.nl)

For information about intramural program opportunities, visit the Research and Training Opportunities at the NIH website. (nih.gov)

However, they do not appear in peer-reviewed journals and have not been subjected to the rigor of traditional scientific screening, John Ioannidis, MD, DSc, from the Stanford Prevention Research Center in California, writes in a viewpoint article published in the February 17 issue of JAMA . (medscape.com)
At BioMed Central we offer a range of peer review models across our journals, including (to name just a few) open peer review on GigaScience and the medical titles in the BMC series , BMC Biology 's re-review opt out policy, and Biology Direct 's now well established model of author-driven open peer review . (biomedcentral.com)
BioMed Central's BMC series medical journals were also the subject of research conducted by Sally Hopewell and colleagues, presented at the congress. (biomedcentral.com)
Authors submit their research papers to scientific journals for consideration. (gavinpublishers.com)
Recent publications in peer-reviewed journals, by members of the ESS lab. (osu.edu)

AAIC Neuroscience Next is a global conference that showcases the work of students and early career investigators in cognitive, computational, behavioral and other areas of neuroscience research. (alz.org)

Your holiday gift today will provide much-needed care and support to the millions of families facing Alzheimer's, while advancing critical research to help end this disease. (alz.org)
As the world's largest nonprofit funder of Alzheimer's research, the Alzheimer's Association is committed to accelerating the global effort to eliminate Alzheimer's and all other dementia. (alz.org)
Our funding is peer-reviewed by a vast international network of active scientists and carefully vetted by our Medical and Scientific Advisory Group , which includes leaders from the Alzheimer's and dementia research community with expertise ranging from bench research to clinical care to community health and support services. (alz.org)
We have funded many of the most exciting advances in Alzheimer's and dementia research, including the development of Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB), the first radiotracer capable of showing beta-amyloid in the living brain during a positron emission tomography (PET) scan. (alz.org)

This award has been established to recognize notable research publications and reviews that contribute to the impact of FPT and the field of food protection. (foodprotection.org)
For most publications on the list below, we refer to the Research@WUR database. (wur.nl)

The quality of these decisions relies heavily on the quality of peer review. (ubc.ca)

This could include models in which reports of disruptive discoveries that are in dissonance with the mainstream can still be communicated as preprints without prior peer review. (medscape.com)

More recently we published a COVID-19 paper in a so-called pre-print journal SSRN [3] , but this was later in published in a traditional peer-reviewed journal called Scientific Reports [4] , part of the Nature publishing family. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
WASHINGTON, D.C. - New research by Public Citizen published today in a peer-reviewed medical journal reinforces the case that the diabetes drug Avandia can cause death from liver failure and should be banned immediately by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (citizen.org)
If you intend to involve a trainee in the review of a manuscript, you must seek and obtain permission from the journal first. (ubc.ca)
Before seeking advice from colleagues on a peer review, we should ensure that we have the explicit permission of the journal or funding agency to do so. (ubc.ca)
Identify the most appropriate journal for your manuscript based on scope, audience, impact factor, and relevance to your research field. (gavinpublishers.com)
The International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research employs a rigorous peer review system. (academicjournals.org)

Officials from many countries frequently visit the NIH Center for Scientific Review (CSR) because they want to copy the winning formula NIH uses to identify and fund the most promising grant applications. (nih.gov)
Watch one of our popular outreach presentations and get insights into how your NIH grant application is processed and reviewed so you enhance and advance your application in NIH peer review. (nih.gov)
The core grant is utilized by independently funded research projects. (nih.gov)
Clinical Trials Review Committee (CLTR) Roster - This committee performs the review of UG3 and U24 grant applications containing NIH-defined clinical trials. (nih.gov)
Institute advisory groups, such as the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development Council , provide secondary level review of grant applications and cooperative agreements. (nih.gov)
You will also learn considerations for determining research idea and grant writing readiness, selecting opportunities to apply for, effectively writing your grant application and seeking appropriate feedback. (nih.gov)
The announcement, made on Christmas eve, was the latest in 30 years for the Discovery program, drawing sharp criticism from universities, research groups and grant experts. (innovationaus.com)
In a liberal democracy, you make the grant rules, the independent research agency uses peer review to determine funding. (innovationaus.com)

Post-publication review occurs after the publication of the manuscript. (gavinpublishers.com)
The editor-in-chief or an associate editor evaluates the submitted manuscript to determine its general suitability for review. (gavinpublishers.com)
Authors may be asked to review and approve the final version of the manuscript before publication. (gavinpublishers.com)
The manuscript still undergoes the usual peer review and may be accepted or rejected if it is not suitable. (academicjournals.org)
This first stage of the review is very important as it enables the author(s) to improve the manuscript at an early stage. (academicjournals.org)

From what I can tell, if such a regime were actually adopted, well over half of the peer-reviewed papers cited by the IPCC would be immediately disqualified. (nofrakkingconsensus.com)

However, unless stealth research adopts more scientific transparency, investors, physicians, patients, and healthy people will not be able to judge whether some proposed innovation is worth $9 billion, $900 billion, or just $9 - let alone if the innovation will improve the health and well-being of individuals. (medscape.com)
Each Peer Review Committee is composed of 12 to 25 scientific advisors ("peers"), who are experts in their fields. (cancer.org)
Prior to joining NIMH Nick was at the NIH Center for Scientific Review for six years, initially as a scientific review officer and later as a Review Branch Chief. (nih.gov)
At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of the U.S. EPA. (nih.gov)
Nevertheless, I believe in giving credit where it's due, and Scientific American currently has an opinion piece in its health section enumerating the shortcomings of peer-reviewed scientific research. (nofrakkingconsensus.com)
The Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives (DPCPSI) identifies important areas of emerging scientific opportunity or rising public health challenges to assist in the acceleration of research investments in these areas. (nih.gov)
The CDTR program has limited funds and achieving portfolio balance will be considered in funding decisions that, in addition to a meritorious review outcome, will include objectives of obtaining as much national reach and breadth of relevant scientific topics as possible. (nih.gov)
Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. (biomedcentral.com)
Despite recognition of the importance of sex and gender in most areas of research, important knowledge gaps persist owing to the general orientation of scientific attention to one sex or gender category and because of a misconception that disaggregation of sex does not apply to other living organisms that can be classified by sex [ 3 - 6 ]. (biomedcentral.com)

Search for research funding opportunities in the NIH Guide . (nih.gov)
Search for funded research projects through RePORTer . (nih.gov)

The paper in question 'The paper ' Impact of Men's Labour Migration on Non-migrating Spouses' Health: A Systematic Review ' [1] is part of Shraddha Manandhar's Ph.D. study at the University of Huddersfield. (bournemouth.ac.uk)
Review of: "Impact of Men's Labour Migration on Non-migrating Spouses' Health: A Systematic Review", Qeios . (bournemouth.ac.uk)
Adult Civic Education and Support for Democratic Values: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (gla.ac.uk)
Systematic Reviews are literature reviews focused on a research question that synthesizes all high-quality research evidence relevant to that question. (karger.com)
The objective of a Systematic Review should be to arrive at an evidence-based conclusion. (karger.com)

NIEHS is committed to conducting the most rigorous research in environmental health sciences, and to communicating the results of this research to the public. (nih.gov)

NHLBI Single-Site and Pilot Clinical Trials Study Section (SSPT) Roster - This committee performs the review of single-site investigator-initiated clinical trials and clinical trial pilot studies using the R61/R33 and R34 mechanisms. (nih.gov)
Proactively schedule a time to conduct your review within reasonable deadlines or reach out to the editor or adjudication committee to explore alternatives as soon as you realize that you cannot complete your review on time. (ubc.ca)
Prior approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or an Ethics Review Committee is required for all investigations involving human subjects. (karger.com)

NICHD has several active notices of funding opportunities (NOFOs), including requests for application (RFAs), program announcements (PAs), PAs with special reviews (PARs), and notices (NOTs) related to the neurosciences. (nih.gov)

In 2012, after 10 years of running a well-funded and productive research program at Johns Hopkins, Nick sought a career change and moved to NIH. (nih.gov)
Dr. Nigel Walker briefed the peer-review panel on the overall CLARITY-BPA program. (nih.gov)
The subcommittee members (co-authors of this article) have expertise specific to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and related areas, with research that has considerable overlap with the U.S. EPA-sponsored EDC Research Program. (nih.gov)
Refer to the RFA for details and contact the program officer with questions about allowable T2-T4 translational research topics. (nih.gov)
NCCIH will administer three new high-impact research projects through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) High-Risk, High-Reward Research (HRHR) program. (nih.gov)
The Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies® (BRAIN) Initiative has a new program-the Brain Behavior Quantification and Synchronization (BBQS) program. (nih.gov)
The Peer Reviewed Medical Research Program (PRMRP), established in fiscal year 1999 (FY99), has supported research across the full range of science and medicine, with an underlying goal of enhancing the health, care, and well-being of military Service members, Veterans, retirees, and their family members. (kfgisit.us)

Clinical Data Science Institutional Review Board - This review board provides a central review of secondary research proposals. (nih.gov)

What are the challenges of open peer review? (biomedcentral.com)

For this renewal, an emphasis is placed on novel methods and research to address health equity and reduce diabetes-related health disparities as these are high priority areas for NIDDK. (nih.gov)
This test should ensure taxpayer-funded Australian Government research funding is directed to areas of national importance and delivers public value. (innovationaus.com)

The research brief also identifies health centers located in these counties in order to identify opportunities for increased preventive care and targeted outreach. (hrsa.gov)

This type of review minimizes potential biases based on the authors' reputation or institutional affiliation. (gavinpublishers.com)

A review of cardiovascular treatment trials included in Cochrane Reviews reveals that only 27 % of the total trial participants in the 258 clinical trials were women [ 7 ]. (biomedcentral.com)
Recruiting Research Participants through Facebook Advertisements: A Handbook. (gla.ac.uk)

In May 2004 the BOSC formed a subcommittee to conduct the review, including individuals from academia, industry, private consulting, and other agencies. (nih.gov)

Elizabeth Moylan, Biology Editor at BioMed Central will be discussing our recent findings along with other aspects of peer review at a session at SpotOn on Friday 8th November (session hashtag: #solo13peer). (biomedcentral.com)

For the purposes of this NOFO, T2 - T4 translational research is defined as research focused on translating interventions and approaches that have demonstrated efficacy into real-world healthcare settings, communities, and diverse populations with an emphasis on reach, sustainability, and potential for widespread implementation. (nih.gov)

NIH Special Reports and Current Issues - selected reports, budget requests, testimony, and research portfolio. (nih.gov)
A database error is stopping the peer review reports from showing for this article. (biomedcentral.com)
Research Articles are reports of original work. (karger.com)

Investigator-initiated applications for NIH funding are evaluated by peer review groups composed of scientists from outside the NIH. (nih.gov)

RFAs and some PARs may include additional review criteria and considerations that are related to specific requirements of the RFA or PAR. (nih.gov)

I am the Director of the Center for Mental Health Research here at NIMH. (nih.gov)

Cancer Prevention Research Conference Boston, June 25-27, 2024. (cancer.org)
COVID-19 has disrupted access to health care services, and research suggests that an increased number of patients are foregoing critical preventive care such as cancer screenings. (hrsa.gov)

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment7

Psychiatry and Psychology6

Disciplines and Occupations12

Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena12

Technology, Industry, Agriculture1

Humanities2

Information Science16

Named Groups2

Health Care33

Geographicals1

Reviewers27

20231

20211

20182

Manuscripts6

Double-blind peer review2

Grants20

Process31

Framework9

Integrity2

Office of Extramural Research2

Outcomes2

Researchers6

Webinar Series1

Practice3

Merit2

Behavioral research1

Evaluation5

Practices2

Biomedical3

Panels2

Guidelines4

Main1

Publishes3

Intramural1

Journals5

Neuroscience Research1

Alzheimer's4

Publications2

Quality of peer1

Preprints1

Journal6

Grant8

Manuscript5

Papers1

Scientific9

Search2

Systematic5

Rigorous research1

Committee3

Funding Opportunities1

Program7

Proposals1

Open1

Areas2

Centers1

Biases1

Participants2

Conduct1

Findings1

Implementation1

Reports3

Applications1

PARs1

Mental Health Research1

Cancer2