• NLM encourages publishers to follow the retraction, errata, and similar guidelines established by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the Committee on Publication Ethics . (nih.gov)
  • Corrections, corrigenda, addenda, and partial retractions (such as for a single graph, statement, table or image) for previously published articles are all uniformly considered by NLM to be errata. (nih.gov)
  • Publishers submit to NLM the citation data for an erratum notice and can find guidance on data submission at XML help for data providers: Errata, retractions and comments . (nih.gov)
  • Data providers can find more guidance in XML help for data providers: Errata, retractions and comments and XML help for data providers: Ahead of print Withdrawn Policy . (nih.gov)
  • Readers accessing articles in both HTML and PDF formats will have the convenience of a Crossmark logo that provides real-time updates on the current status of the contents, which may include any revisions, errata, or retractions made to that specific article. (blueeyesintelligence.org)
  • in both cases, the VoR includes any post-publication corrections. (sagepub.com)
  • However, in some cases corrections may be required post-publication. (sagepub.com)
  • Retractions must not be confused with small corrections in published articles. (wikipedia.org)
  • Corrections, retractions, republications and version control. (cdc.gov)
  • Post-publication corrections will be published alongside the original article. (chemjournal.kz)
  • Editor's Notes, Editorial Expressions of Concern, Corrections, Retraction Statements, and Other Post-Publication Updates will all be published in the Chemical Journal of Kazakhstan. (chemjournal.kz)
  • For main research articles, which have undergone peer review, review-type articles, the following kinds of corrections and post-publication revisions apply. (chemjournal.kz)
  • Journal's policies on corrections and retractions . (doaj.org)
  • Copernicus Publications reserves the right to replace the posted files if purely technical corrections are necessary (e.g. corrupt file or incorrect bibliographical entry). (atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net)
  • Surface potential plagiarism and AI-generated content prior to publication with iThenticate's expansive content database. (turnitin.com)
  • As with all peer-reviewed journals, EMHJ has encountered cases of suspected breach of ethical research conduct and publication, including lack of ethical clearance and/or informed consent of participants when needed, and instances of plagiarism or duplicate publication. (who.int)
  • Our experience in addressing such incidents suggest that in some cases the authors were genuinely unaware of, or unfamiliar with, key ethical aspects of research conduct and publication, for example, what constitutes plagiarism or why duplicate publication is unacceptable. (who.int)
  • Authors may choose to request retraction of their own article by emailing [email protected] . (sagepub.com)
  • The authors request retraction of "Hyaluronan Activation of the Nlrp3 Inflammasome Contributes to the Development of Airway Hyperresponsiveness. (nih.gov)
  • In addition to this journal's retraction of Dr. Chua's Commentary, the findings of the investigation of the Singapore Medical Council resulted in the retractions of two other articles from the Singapore Medical Journal. (medscape.com)
  • Journal's options for post-publication discussions . (doaj.org)
  • ACP and its discussion forum adhere to high ethical standards which are summarized in the journal's publication ethics . (atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net)
  • NLM does not differentiate between errors that originate in the publication process and those that result from errors of scientific logic or methodology, because journal editors do not make this distinction consistently or clearly. (nih.gov)
  • A retraction may be initiated by the editors of a journal, or by the author(s) of the papers (or their institution). (wikipedia.org)
  • Retractions are typically accompanied by a retraction notice written by the editors or authors explaining the reason for the retraction. (wikipedia.org)
  • The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), DOAJ, the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association (OASPA), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) are scholarly organisations that have collaborated to identify principles of transparency and best practice for scholarly publications. (doaj.org)
  • These principles also acknowledge that publishers and editors are responsible for promoting accessibility, diversity, equity, and inclusivity in all aspects of the publication. (doaj.org)
  • NLM creates links in PubMed between citations for original articles and citations for retraction and erratum notices, expressions of concern, corrected and republished articles, comments, duplicate publications, updates, patient summaries, and republished articles. (nih.gov)
  • DISCLOSURE: Adam Marcus, a cofounder of Retraction Watch , is an editor at Medscape. (medscape.com)
  • Any errors of factual significance or major errors will be highlighted with the publication of a separate corrigendum (author error) or erratum (publisher error) highlighting the changes, provided the scholarly validity and integrity of the article remain intact. (sagepub.com)
  • NLM links the citation for the erratum notice to the citation for the referent article, and the citation for the erratum notice is automatically indexed with the Publication Type Published Erratum [PT]. (nih.gov)
  • In Vivo Static Retraction and Dynamic Elongation of Rotator Cuff Repai" by Rebekah L. Lawrence, Matthew C. Ruder et al. (henryford.com)
  • Previous research has shown that elongation (ie, retraction) of a repaired tendon is common even in patients with a repair construct that appears intact on magnetic resonance imaging. (henryford.com)
  • PURPOSE: To quantify static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation of repair tissue after rotator cuff repair. (henryford.com)
  • Static retraction was calculated as the change in the bead-to-insertion distance under static conditions between 1 week and 3 months after surgery, and maximum dynamic elongation was calculated as the maximal positive change in the bead-to-insertion distance during dynamic motion relative to the start of motion. (henryford.com)
  • The magnitudes of static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation were assessed with 1-sample t tests. (henryford.com)
  • RESULTS: At 3 months after surgery, static retraction occurred in all patients by a mean of 10.0 ± 9.1 mm ( P = .01 compared with no elongation). (henryford.com)
  • CONCLUSION: Repair tissue elongation (static retraction and maximum dynamic elongation) appeared to be a common and significant finding at 3 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. (henryford.com)
  • A 2011 paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics attempted to quantify retraction rates in PubMed over time to determine if the rate was increasing, even while taking into account the increased number of overall publications occurring each year. (wikipedia.org)
  • This statement has been adapted from the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics . (wikiversity.org)
  • The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) advises publishing an Editor's Note or EEoC as a way to inform the readers while a potentially time-consuming research integrity investigation is under place. (chemjournal.kz)
  • Retraction of a work may also be caused by transgressions of publication or the research ethics. (chemjournal.kz)
  • The AGU Publications Policies page is overseen by Ethics Manager Sarah Dedej, and supported by the AGU Director of Publications Operations, VP of Publications, the Publications Committee, and the AGU Ethics and Equity Center. (agu.org)
  • For ethics policies and procedures, visit the Publication Ethics and Integrity page . (agu.org)
  • According to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), they are "[not] to punish authors who misbehave. (thevarsity.ca)
  • A journal should have policies on publication ethics (for example, COPE's Core Practice guidance ). (doaj.org)
  • We follow the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)'s Core Practices and its advices . (ccsenet.org)
  • These guidelines present key issues related to research and publication ethics and EMHJ's expectations of papers submitted for publication. (who.int)
  • To do so, the journal follows established international standards and guidelines on the conduct and publication of health research, including the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki, the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). (who.int)
  • Based on key resources and documents by leading institutions and associations for research and publication ethics, the guidelines were drafted and revised in 2015 and shared with the Editorial Board for comments. (who.int)
  • As a result, a number of papers have been retracted made "Retraction Tsunami" due to quality and/or data issues, leading many experts to ponder not just the quality of peer review but also standards of retraction practices. (wikipedia.org)
  • This page outlines the policies related to peer review and publication of AGU Journals and Books. (agu.org)
  • AGU requires that the underlying data needed to understand, evaluate, and build upon the reported research be available at the time of peer review and publication. (agu.org)
  • Sage provides authors with an opportunity to review article proofs prior to publication with the express goal of ensuring accuracy of the content. (sagepub.com)
  • The expression of concern will be linked to the published article(s) it is related to and may be replaced by a corrigendum or a retraction or may exist in perpetuity if an investigation remains inconclusive. (sagepub.com)
  • that is, the retraction must appear on a numbered page in an issue of the journal that published the retracted article. (nih.gov)
  • The Publication Type Retraction of Publication [PT] is assigned to the citation for the retraction notice, and the citation is linked to the citation for the retracted article. (nih.gov)
  • In some cases it may be necessary to remove an article from publication, such as when the article is clearly defamatory, violates personal privacy, is the subject of a court order, or might pose a serious health risk to the general public. (wikipedia.org)
  • A supplement is appended to a research article when it's necessary to provide additional information that was not available at the time of publication but is essential for better comprehension of the content by the readers. (blueeyesintelligence.org)
  • A statement labelled 'Retraction: [article title]' will be issued to retract the article from the journal. (blueeyesintelligence.org)
  • Authors have the option to keep the article and/or their names confidential to the public and peer reviewers until article publication, by requesting such processing in the authorship declaration form. (wikiversity.org)
  • Retraction: An article may be retracted if flaws in the conduct, analysis, and/or reporting of the study seriously impair the integrity of the previously published work. (chemjournal.kz)
  • Although the original article has been designated as retracted, the readers may still get a PDF version of it, and the retraction statement is linked in both directions to the original published work.Retraction statements frequently include a comment from the writers, expressing their agreement or disagreement. (chemjournal.kz)
  • Every article submitted gets blind reviewed by multiple reviewers and the process for publication takes many hours. (naset.org)
  • Do they look at different article types, personal publication sites such as ORCID, or include social media metrics such as Altmetrics? (librarylearningspace.com)
  • Later (although it's not clear from the article whether it was after the submission of the manuscript or after its publication), Klessig directed more researchers on his team to work on duplicating Chandok's study. (scienceblogs.com)
  • Corrigenda have to be submitted to Copernicus Publications within 3 years from the publication date of the original journal article. (atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net)
  • The article stays online but the reader is notified about the retraction. (atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net)
  • in the unlikely case that Copernicus Publications is notified that a posted discussion paper or a published journal article turns out to be a fraud, the paper stays online but is formally withdrawn. (atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net)
  • After the publication of this article, it came to the authors attention that in order to support the conclusions of the study, the authors should have used primary T cells instead of T cell lines. (news-medical.net)
  • Thus, reviewers and authors need to know that their comments may be published on the web, though only in the case of papers that are ultimately accepted for publication. (agu.org)
  • In the Spring 2016 edition of JAASEP, we issued a retraction statement regarding one of the authors, Dr. Noel Chia, of various articles he published in our journal ( http://www.naset.org/4494.0.html ). (naset.org)
  • It is JAASEP's hope that this retraction of articles by one lead author in no way impacts the outstanding research and writing done by all authors over the past 10 years for JAASEP. (naset.org)
  • The authors apologize to the readers of Circulation for any inconvenience caused by this retraction. (cardiobrief.org)
  • All authors agree with this retraction. (news-medical.net)
  • As the consortium leaders, we sign this Retraction on behalf of all authors. (medscape.com)
  • The mission of the Center for Scientific Integrity, the parent organization of Retraction Watch, is to promote transparency and integrity in science and scientific publishing, and to disseminate best practices and increase efficiency in science. (umass.edu)
  • Supporting the scientific spirit of transparency, the Stowers Institute for Medical Research makes the data underlying its scientific publications freely accessible to the scientific community. (stowers.org)
  • Continuous publication Open Access journals do not publish any additional versions such as paginated issue/volume versions. (sagepub.com)
  • For online journals or online-only content, the retraction notice must be readily discernible in the table of contents of a subsequent issue and must be associated with identifiable pagination or elocation. (nih.gov)
  • Nine months after Retraction Watch notified a pair of journals about fraudulent letters they'd published by a researcher in Singapore, the publications are now being retracted. (medscape.com)
  • 2020 On January 8 2020, a paper written by Dalmeet Singh Chawla in Science about the Russian journals retracted more than 800 articles in the first results of a large-scale investigation conducted by the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) following claims of unethical publications. (wikipedia.org)
  • [1] [2] In addition, the journal follows the ICMJE's Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals . (wikiversity.org)
  • The database is a comprehensive list of retractions in scientific journals since 1923. (thevarsity.ca)
  • The retraction was then coordinated with the three journals. (cardiobrief.org)
  • To be accepted for publication, the manuscript must obtain an average score not less than 2.5 (some journals require a higher score). (ccsenet.org)
  • Papers submitted for consideration for publication to the EMHJ should comply with the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly work in Medical Journals of the ICMJE . (who.int)
  • Once the investigation is over, the Editor's Notes and EEoCs are often replaced by publishing another change, like a correction or retraction. (chemjournal.kz)
  • Science prides itself on being self-correcting, and retractions are a powerful mechanism for that self-correction. (thevarsity.ca)
  • When errors are relatively minor and restricted to a small portion of a publication, a complete withdrawal of the scientific finding is unnecessary and a correction may be issued. (thevarsity.ca)
  • Sage follows COPE Retraction Guidelines and a retraction will be issued to alert readers to major errors or breaches of scholarly integrity. (sagepub.com)
  • Cases like this demonstrate the wildly different implementation of retraction guidelines across institutions. (thevarsity.ca)
  • Therefore, the review and endorsement of draft guidelines on ethical conduct and publication of health research was included in the agenda of the Expanded EMHJ Editorial Meeting in June 2015. (who.int)
  • Dr Kawakami apologizes for any adverse consequences that may have resulted from the article's publication and any inconvenience and wasted effort that this may have caused the scientific community and readers of the journal. (cardiobrief.org)
  • Prof. Drexler and his team deeply regret the incident and are grateful to their international colleagues for flagging the potential problems following the article's publication. (medscape.com)
  • As articles can be read and cited as soon as they are published (including OnlineFirst publication), any changes thereafter could potentially impact those who read and cited the earlier version. (sagepub.com)
  • NLM creates links in PubMed between citations for original articles and citations for retraction notices based on information published by the journal. (nih.gov)
  • Furthermore, because retractions occur for a very small percentage of overall publications (fewer than 1 in 1,000 articles), a few scientists who are willing to commit large amounts of fraud can highly impact retraction rates. (wikipedia.org)
  • Based on the information presented, JAASEP has made the professional decision to retract all articles submitted by Dr. Noel Chia, not just the ones requested for retraction. (naset.org)
  • Unfortunately, because of the uncertainty surrounding the prior research done that warranted the aforementioned retractions, JAASEP has made the professional decision to retract all of Dr. Chia's articles published in JAASEP in order to protect the integrity of our journal. (naset.org)
  • Create an account below to get 6 C&EN articles per month, receive newsletters and more - all free. (acs.org)
  • Articles published fully or partly in other publications/websites are not reviewed or accepted. (ccsenet.org)
  • The types of manuscripts the journal will consider for publication (for example, that multiple or redundant publication is not allowed). (doaj.org)
  • UHN opened an investigation into Asa's publications as a result of these allegations, and implicated the pathobiologist in the fabrication and falsification of images. (thevarsity.ca)
  • These may be made at the discretion of the journal and Sage, with the understanding that not all requests for post-publication changes will be permitted. (sagepub.com)
  • In academic publishing, a retraction is a mechanism by which a published paper in an academic journal is flagged for being seriously flawed to the extent that their results and conclusions can no longer be relied upon. (wikipedia.org)
  • The retraction statement can be found in the journal. (blueeyesintelligence.org)
  • Questions on publications policies can be sent to the respective journal inboxes or to [email protected] . (agu.org)
  • The sin is not unique to this journal, but for that very reason greater prudence should have been the watchword before publication. (jwatch.org)
  • NEJM Journal Watch is a publication of NEJM Group , a division of the Massachusetts Medical Society. (jwatch.org)
  • notification of an important error made by the author(s) or by the journal that affects the publication record or the scientific integrity of the published, peer-reviewed work or the reputation of the author or the journal. (atmospheric-chemistry-and-physics.net)
  • Columbia Journalism Review Regret the Error columnist Craig Silverman calls Retraction Watch "a new blog that should be required reading for anyone interested in scientific journalism or the issue of accuracy. (umass.edu)
  • What motivated you to start Embargo Watch and later Retraction Watch? (umass.edu)
  • Retraction Watch provides updates on new retractions, and discusses general issues in relation to retractions. (wikipedia.org)
  • Last month, the Retraction Watch blog released a Retraction Watch Database. (thevarsity.ca)
  • Husband-wife duo Asa and Ezzat account for four of U of T's retractions listed on the Retraction Watch Database. (thevarsity.ca)
  • An example tissue retraction device includes a first engagement member having a first end and a second end, a second engagement member having a first end and a second end, a first elastic member attached to the second end of the first engagement member, and a first alignment member having a first end, a second end and a lumen extending therethrough. (justia.com)
  • Further, the tissue retraction device has a first length, the first alignment member has a second length, the first elastic member extends within the lumen of the first alignment member and the second length of the first alignment member is less than or equal to the first length of the tissue retraction device. (justia.com)
  • More particularly, the present disclosure pertains to a tissue retraction device and related delivery system. (justia.com)
  • The tissue retraction device has a first length, and the first alignment member has a second length. (justia.com)
  • The closure of Toronto-based researchers Dr. Sylvia Asa's and Dr. Shereen Ezzat's labs, and the termination of their positions within the University Health Network (UHN), is evidence of how retractions can pose dire consequences to academics' careers. (thevarsity.ca)
  • See Table 3 for bibliometric and international metrics used by rankers that may be affected by 2020 scholarly publication changes. (librarylearningspace.com)
  • C&EN wrote a story about the work at the time ( April 19, 2004, page 9 ), asking Gerald F. Joyce , of Scripps Research Institute California, to provide expert comment. (acs.org)
  • Retraction Note to: Antioxidants and ROS scavenging ability in ten Darjeeling tea clones may serve as markers for selection of potentially adapted clones against abiotic stress. (nih.gov)
  • Retraction Note: LncMAPK6 drives MAPK6 expressionand liver TIC self-renewal. (nih.gov)
  • Retraction note to: Aging decreases rate of docosahexaenoic acid synthesis-secretion from circulating unesterified α-linolenic acid by rat liver. (nih.gov)
  • Retraction Note: Knockdown of long non-coding RNA LUCAT1 reverses high glucose-induced cardiomyocyte injury via targeting CYP11B2. (bvsalud.org)
  • Before writing about this and other updates from Clarivate Analytics and Scopus, I realized I needed to know more about the make-up of the scholarly publications' landscape. (librarylearningspace.com)
  • The changing landscape of scholarly publications interests me more, including Early Access ( Appendix A ), Preprints ( Appendix B ) and Retractions¹ ( Appendix C ). I was also interested in what impact COVID-19 is having on document types². (librarylearningspace.com)
  • This may happen in cases where scholars are unaware of the retraction, in particular when the retraction occurs long after the original publication. (wikipedia.org)
  • Because it proves that when Sullivan and That Atlantic believe that he has made an error, The Atlantic 's policy includes not only explicit acknowledgment of the error, but also wholesale retraction of the item. (blogspot.com)
  • URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication. (cdc.gov)
  • ACS's Standard Package lets you stay up to date with C&EN, stay active in ACS, and save. (acs.org)
  • Retractions, or the pulling of a paper from publication, can tarnish a researcher's reputation, call into question the legitimacy of a lifetime of work, and dismantle careers. (thevarsity.ca)
  • You are asked to work through the UH Media Relations when addressing any issues of retraction before contacting the reporter or publication directly. (uh.edu)
  • Recent work from an independent group in developing animals indicated that embryonically/early postnatal generated GCs placed at a competitive disadvantage by selective expression of tetanus toxin (TeTX) to prevent synaptic release rapidly retracted their axons, and that this retraction was driven by competition from newborn GCs lacking TeTX. (ulaval.ca)
  • Retractions are issued to correct the scientific literature and alert readers of the unreliable conclusions of a paper. (thevarsity.ca)