Specific inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation by clopidogrel in vitro.
(1/1336)
1. The thienopyridine clopidogrel is a specific inhibitor of ADP-induced platelet aggregation ex vivo. No direct effects of clopidogrel (< or = 100 microM) on platelet aggregation in vitro have been described so far. 2. Possible in vitro antiaggregatory effects (turbidimetry) of clopidogrel were studied in human platelet-rich plasma and in washed platelets. 3. Incubation of platelet-rich plasma with clopidogrel (< or = 100 microM) for up to 8 h did not result in any inhibition of ADP (6 microM)-induced platelet aggregation. 4. Incubation of washed platelets with clopidogrel resulted in a time- (maximum effects after 30 min) and concentration-dependent (IC50 1.9+/-0.3 microM) inhibition of ADP (6 microM)-induced platelet aggregation. Clopidogrel (30 microM) did not inhibit collagen (2.5 microg ml(-1))-, U46619 (1 microM)- or thrombin (0.1 u ml(-1))-induced platelet aggregation. The inhibition of ADP-induced aggregation by clopidogrel (30 microM) was insurmountable indicating a non-equilibrium antagonism of ADP actions. The R enantiomer SR 25989 C (30 microM) was significantly less active than clopidogrel (30 microM) in inhibiting platelet aggregation (32+/-5% vs 70+/-1% inhibition, P < 0.05, n = 5). 5. In washed platelets, clopidogrel (< or = 30 microM) did not significantly reverse the inhibition of prostaglandin E1 (1 microM)-induced platelet cyclic AMP formation by ADP (6 microM). 6. The antiaggregatory effects of clopidogrel were unchanged when the compound was removed from the platelet suspension. However, platelet inhibition by clopidogrel was completely abolished when albumin (350 mg ml(-1)) was present in the test buffer. 7. It is concluded that clopidogrel specifically inhibits ADP-induced aggregation of washed platelets in vitro without hepatic bioactivation. Inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation by clopidogrel in vitro occurs in the absence of measurable effects on the reversal of PGE1-stimulated cyclic AMP by ADP. (+info)
Ticlopidine decreases the in vivo activity of CYP2C19 as measured by omeprazole metabolism.
(2/1336)
AIMS: To examine the effect of ticlopidine administration on the activities CYP2C19 and CYP3 A in vivo using omeprazole as a model substrate. METHODS: A single dose of 40 mg omeprazole was administered orally with or without ticlopidine (300 mg daily for 6 days) to six Japanese extensive metabolisers with respect to CYP2C19. Blood samples were taken for the measurement of plasma concentrations of omeprazole, 5-hydroxyomeprazole and omeprazole sulphone. RESULTS: Ticlopidine administration increased omeprazole Cmax (1978+/-859/ 3442+/-569 (control phase/ticlopidine phase, nm )) and decreased the oral clearance of omeprazole (CL/F; 25.70+/-16. 17/10.76+/-1.16 (control phase/ticlopidine phase, l h-1 )) significantly. The 5-hydroxyomeprazole to omeprazole AUC ratio (0. 817+/-0.448/0.236+/-0.053 (control phase/ticlopidine phase)) and the 5-hydroxyomeprazole to omeprazole sulphone AUC ratio (1.114+/-0. 782/0.256+/-0.051 (control phase/ticlopidine phase)) were decreased significantly after ticlopidine administration. The decrease in omeprazole CL/F and the 5-hydroxyomeprazole to omeprazole AUC ratio correlated significantly with their respective absolute values when the drug was given alone. The decrease in CL/F following ticlopidine administration correlated with that in the 5-hydroxyomeprazole to omeprazole AUC ratio. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that ticlopidine inhibited the in vivo activity of CYP2C19, but not, or to a lesser extent CYP3 A4, and that the magnitude of inhibition by ticlopidine is related to the in vivo activity of CYP2C19 before inhibition. (+info)
Effectiveness of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin in preventing stent thrombosis after coronary stent implantation.
(3/1336)
BACKGROUND: Ticlopidine has been shown to reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis compared with warfarin, but it may cause serious hematological side effects. Clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine derivative, may be a safe alternative to ticlopidine. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin with those of ticlopidine and aspirin in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The population of this study consisted of 2 groups: patients who underwent coronary stenting and were treated with ticlopidine and aspirin (TA group, n=1406), and patients who underwent coronary stenting followed by treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin (CA group, n=283). At 1-month follow-up, there was no difference in stent thrombosis (1.5% versus 1.4%, P=1.0) or major adverse cardiac events (3.1% versus 2.4%, P=0. 85) between the TA and CA groups, respectively. The probability of any side effect (neutropenia, diarrhea, rash) was significantly higher in the TA group (10.6% versus 5.3%, P=0.006; relative risk, 0. 53; CI, 0.32 to 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that clopidogrel may be an effective pharmacological regimen after coronary stent implantation. Furthermore, the simpler dosing regimen, the absence of neutropenia, and the lower frequency of other side effects make it a safe alternative to ticlopidine. (+info)
Stroke: part I. A clinical update on prevention.
(4/1336)
Clinical trials conducted during the past five years have yielded important results that have allowed us to refine our approach to stroke prevention. Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension prevents stroke and is generally well tolerated. New antiplatelet agents (clopidogrel and the combination of aspirin plus high-dose dipyridamole) have been shown to be effective in reducing vascular events in survivors of ischemic stroke, although aspirin remains the mainstay of antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention. Several clinical trials support the benefit of lipid-lowering agents ("statins") in reducing stroke. Warfarin reduces stroke for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. Carotid endarterectomy is highly beneficial in reducing stroke for symptomatic patients with severe carotid stenosis (greater than 70 percent), but the benefit is less for symptomatic patients with a moderate degree of stenosis (50 to 69 percent) and for patients with asymptomatic carotid disease of any severity. (+info)
The effects of antiplatelet agents in the prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during acute myocardial ischemia in rats.
(5/1336)
Experiments were performed in rat models to study the effectiveness of various antiplatelet agents in the prevention of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during acute myocardial ischemia. The time to the onset of ST-segment elevation and initiating ventricular arrhythmias, frequency and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality rates were observed during acute myocardial ischemia (20 minutes) induced by ligation of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in anesthetized rats. Four groups were studied: Control group (n = 10, not pretreated); Aspirin pretreated group (n = 10, 300 mg/kg p.o. for 1 wk); Ticlopidine pretreated group (n = 10, 200 mg/kg p.o. for 1 wk); and Abciximab (Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist) pretreated group (n = 10, 2 mg/kg i.v. 10-20 minutes before an experiment). No significant difference was observed in the time to the onset of ST-segment elevation and ventricular arrhythmias between the groups. The incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the abciximab group was significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.05) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the aspirin and ticlopidine group was significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.05). The mortality rate in the ticlopidine group was significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.01). This study suggests aspirin, ticlopidine, and abciximab can effectively prevent VT or VF during acute myocardial ischemia induced by nonthrombotic occlusion and its antiarrhythmic effect may lead to prolonged survival. (+info)
Complementary clinical benefits of coronary-artery stenting and blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Stenting Investigators.
(6/1336)
BACKGROUND: Inhibition of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with the monoclonal-antibody fragment abciximab reduces the acute ischemic complications associated with percutaneous coronary revascularization, whereas coronary-stent implantation reduces restenosis. We conducted a trial to determine the efficacy of abciximab and stent implantation in improving long-term outcome. METHODS: A total of 2399 patients were randomly assigned to stent implantation and placebo, stent implantation and abciximab, or balloon angioplasty and abciximab. The patients were followed for six months. RESULTS: At six months, the incidence of the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction was 11.4 percent in the group that received a stent and placebo, as compared with 5.6 percent in the group that received a stent and abciximab (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.68; P<0.001) and 7.8 percent in the group assigned to balloon angioplasty and abciximab (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.49 to 0.92; P=0.01). The hazard ratio for stenting plus abciximab as compared with angioplasty plus abciximab was 0.70 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.04; P=0.07). The rate of repeated revascularization of the target vessel was 10.6 percent in the stent-plus-placebo group, as compared with 8.7 percent in the stent-plus-abciximab group (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 1.13; P=0.22) and 15.4 percent in the angioplasty-plus-abciximab group (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.97; P=0.005). The hazard ratio for stenting plus abciximab as compared with angioplasty plus abciximab was 0.55 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.74; P<0.001). Among patients with diabetes, the combination of abciximab and stenting was associated with a lower rate of repeated target-vessel revascularization (8.1 percent) than was stenting and placebo (16.6 percent, P=0.02) or angioplasty and abciximab (18.4 percent, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: For coronary revascularization, abciximab and stent implantation confer complementary long-term clinical benefits. (+info)
Therapeutic benefit. Aspirin revisited in light of the introduction of clopidogrel.
(7/1336)
BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet agents are widely recognized for their efficacy in reducing the occurrence of vascular events in patients with atherothrombotic disease. Aspirin is currently considered to be the "reference standard" antiplatelet agent and is recommended by the American Heart Association for use in patients with a wide range of manifestations of cardiovascular disease on the basis of its high benefit-to-risk and benefit-to-cost ratios. Recently, clopidogrel (Plavix, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co), another antiplatelet agent, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for many of the same indications as aspirin. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Because physicians will be faced with deciding whether to switch from the well-established practice of recommending aspirin for use in patients with atherothrombotic disease, both aspirin and clopidogrel are compared with respect to the primary factors that influence such decisions (ie, their relative efficacy, safety, cost, and convenience of use). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, aspirin is preferred for the majority of stroke or myocardial infarction patients at risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events. Clopidogrel may, however, provide valuable therapeutic benefit over aspirin in patients with peripheral arterial disease and in stroke or myocardial infarction patients for whom aspirin treatment is contraindicated or for whom aspirin fails to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. (+info)
Specific impairment of human platelet P2Y(AC) ADP receptor-mediated signaling by the antiplatelet drug clopidogrel.
(8/1336)
Clopidogrel is an effective new antiplatelet agent useful for the treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular, cardiac, and peripheral arterial disease. However, the mechanism of clopidogrel action is not well understood, although it is known to inhibit ADP-evoked platelet aggregation. In the current study, the effect of clopidogrel on recently identified human platelet ADP receptors and their signaling pathways was investigated by using platelets from clopidogrel-treated subjects, 6 healthy volunteers (2 females and 4 males) who received 75 mg of clopidogrel daily for 7 days. Blood was taken and various platelet receptor signaling pathways were analyzed before treatment, after 7 days of medication, and 4 weeks after treatment had ceased. Platelet tests included the analysis of aggregation, rapid calcium influx, calcium mobilization from intracellular stores, adenylyl cyclase, and phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). The data indicate that clopidogrel does not affect those platelet ADP receptors coupled to cation influx (P2X1 ADP receptors) or calcium mobilization (P2Y1 ADP receptors). In contrast, clopidogrel treatment specifically impairs the ADP receptor coupled to G(i)/adenylyl cyclase (P2Y(AC) ADP receptors). Clopidogrel abolishes the inhibitory P2Y(AC) receptor-mediated ADP effects on prostaglandin E(1)-stimulated, cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of VASP without affecting epinephrine, thrombin, and thromboxane signaling. VASP phosphorylation is known to be closely correlated with the inhibition of platelet and fibrinogen receptor (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) activation. Therefore, inhibition of the platelet P2Y(AC) ADP receptor and its intracellular signaling, including decreased VASP phosphorylation, is suggested as a molecular mechanism of clopidogrel action. (+info)