From library to discharge: a managing care student project.
(49/340)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Patient Care Project (PCP) was a central component of the Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) grant project at the University of Nebraska. With the primary goal of improving students' critical thinking skills, the PCP was directed more toward an understanding of managing care than the business aspects of managed care and emphasized written communication skills, clinical hypothesis testing, and exploring ways to solve medical and ethical questions. METHODS: All 239 students graduating in 2000 and 2001 were required to analyze the medical care received by one of their hospitalized patients. Using a criterion-based evaluation tool, students' written critiques were assessed in five specific areas, all of which required critical thinking skills. Students also received an overall grade for the project. The UME-21 Graduation Survey was used to assess changes in attitudes and behavior. Students graduating in 1999, prior to the institution of the PCP graduation requirement, served as a control group. RESULTS: The most frequently discussed topic of the PCPs was cardiovascular disease. The mean overall rating by the faculty for the PCPs was 3.7 and 3.8 in academic years 2000 and 2001, respectively (maximum=5). In a qualitative analysis of the PCPs, students demonstrated insight into their patients' overall medical care, including the use of evidence-based medicine (EBM), quality improvement, and cost containment. There were no statistically significant differences, however, between the PCP and control groups on the UME-21 Graduation Survey. Nonetheless, more students who had completed the PCP reported that they had identified the total cost of a patient's stay, designed a quality improvement loop, and obtained clinical evidence from an EBM computer database. On this same survey, all students agreed with the use of clinical practice guidelines and cost containment. CONCLUSIONS: The PCP appeared to be relevant to the students' learning needs, and they provided cogent critiques of the medical care they had rendered as well as critical analyses of their patients' discharge summaries and the cost of care including ways to reduce cost. On the other hand, we were unable to demonstrate any substantial differences in the results of the UME-21 Graduation Survey given to both the PCP and control groups. In spite of this lack of effect on students' attitudes, the PCP was perceived by the faculty to be valuable and has been incorporated into the required third-year family medicine clerkship at the University of Nebraska. (+info)
A curriculum in systems-based care: experiential learning changes in student knowledge and attitudes.
(50/340)
BACKGROUND: To provide efficient, quality patient care, physicians must have a fundamental understanding of how the health care delivery system functions and how to appropriately use the various components of this system. As part of the Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) initiative, the University of Miami in partnership with AvMed Health Plans, a nonprofit managed care organization (MCO) developed a longitudinal educational program that prepares all students for medical practice in emerging systems of care. METHODS: The program, which spans the 4-year undergraduate curriculum, incorporates didactic sessions and practical experiences to teach about the clinical, managerial, financial, and ethical aspects of systems-based care. During the third year of medical school, students visit the administrative offices of AvMed Health Plans for a day-long series of presentation-discussions and experiential tours through the various administrative departments. There, they experience first-hand all facets of a systems-based approach to care using evidence-based practice guidelines, utilization review, quality measurement and improvement, and chronic disease management. RESULTS: An attitudinal survey, constructed to evaluate general attitudes toward managing care and MCOs, was administered to students at the beginning of their first, second, and third year and immediately before and after their visit to AvMed during their third year. Using factor analysis, there were no significant differences in students' attitudes at the beginning of the first, second, or third year nor immediately before the seminar day at the MCO. However, the day-long seminar at AvMed did have a favorable effect on attitudes toward systems of care and MCOs in general. In addition, students performed well on post-evaluation knowledge assessments addressing fundamental concepts of systems of care and the function of an MCO in managing the care of its members. The visit to the MCOs (AvMed) offices and the day-long curriculum was replicated at another medical school, with similar effects on students' attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students have neutral-to-negative opinions of systems of care and MCOs. Early educational experiences such as classroom lectures and panels that address managing care issues have minimal effect on these opinions. However, bringing medical students to an MCO's administrative offices, seeing first-hand how systems of care operate, and having an open dialogue with physician administrators does effect a positive change in medical student opinions of a system in which care is managed. In addition, medical students can gain new knowledge about effective systems-based practice. (+info)
Promoting the development of doctoring competencies in clinical settings.
(51/340)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This UME-21 project was developed to promote a variety of clinical competencies during a 12-week medicine clerkship for third-year students. METHODS: The clerkship is divided into three 4-week rotations--two inpatient rotations and one outpatient rotation. During each rotation, students select a competency, review the module about that competency on the clerkship Web site, and perform a literature search. Learning exercises prompt students to ask their preceptor to model and discuss the performance of the competency on at least one patient and to provide feedback on their performance at least twice. At the end of each rotation, students are required to write about what they learned from the articles they read, write a critical analysis of their performance of the competency on one patient, and complete an evaluation questionnaire. This report is based on the results from the students' evaluation questionnaire. RESULTS: At the end of the first six rotations, 120 students completed 330 evaluations of the course (93% response rate). The most frequently selected competency modules were behavior modification and patient education. In 81.5% of the evaluations, students felt that there was at least moderate improvement in their ability to perform the selected competency during the rotation. By the end of the rotation, in 85.3% of the evaluations, students indicated that they were confident performing the competency most or almost all of the time. Observing the preceptor was the component of the curriculum most often rated as helpful (59.1%), followed by literature review (57.9%), reviewing the Web site module (45.2%), and observation and feedback by the preceptor (32.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on student reports, the approach described in this paper appears to be a promising way to teach important doctoring competencies in a clinical setting. (+info)
Partnerships between health care organizations and medical schools in a rapidly changing environment: a view from the delivery system.
(52/340)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) project encouraged the formation or enhancement of partnerships between medical schools and health care organizations distinct from the traditional teaching hospitals. The purpose was to prepare medical students in nine content areas that were components of the UME-21 project. Despite their importance today to medical schools, such partnerships with health care organizations are a challenge to develop and maintain in the midst of a rapidly changing health care environment. This article categorizes the partnerships formed and discusses the benefits and the barriers encountered in such collaborations. METHODS: Information about the partnerships was abstracted from written reports from each of the UME-21 partner schools. Additional information was obtained from personal communications with external project representatives and from a post-project survey presented to all UME-21 partner schools. RESULTS: The eight partner schools established or enhanced 32 educational partnerships with external organizations. External partner organizations contributed to curriculum planning and implementation, course development and presentation, and provision of clinical sites and preceptors. Twenty-seven of 32 initial affiliations continued in some form beyond the contract period. CONCLUSIONS: Partnerships formed as part of the UME-21 project improved medical students' exposure to the health care system and their knowledge and skills for effective practice in the 21st century health system. Barriers encountered included financial pressures, changes in leadership, different organizational missions and priorities, and preexisting prejudices against new relationships. Factors associated with successful partnerships include the presence of a health care organization and an academic "champion" dedicated to the project, strong individual relationships, and a medical school commitment to involve external partners. (+info)
Collaborating to integrate curriculum in primary care medical education: successes and challenges from three US medical schools.
(53/340)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traditional medical school department-based clerkship structures can lead to redundancy and/or gaps in curriculum, inefficient administrative systems, and academic isolation for clerkship directors. This paper describes the approaches, successes, and challenges three institutions experienced when implementing an interdepartmental collaboration to create an integrated primary care clerkship experience. METHODS: Each school combined family medicine, ambulatory pediatrics, and ambulatory medicine into contiguous clerkship blocks. In all institutions, each clerkship maintained certain distinct features while the integrated aspects contained longitudinal curriculum of certain primary care topics. RESULTS: Evaluations by students demonstrated favorable responses to the new content and integrated methods of teaching, as did results of the Association of American Medical Colleges graduation survey. Faculty at each institution reported that their multidisciplinary approach has stimulated important educational collaborations, many of which require an economy of scale not often achievable within a single clerkship. These included innovative evaluation/documentation efforts; centralization of administrative tasks; enhanced recruitment, retention, and development of community-based faculty; an increase in the active core group of local and national primary care leaders; and an increase in scholarly activities. The collaborations have not occurred without challenges, primarily in the need for identifying sustainable resources for these and future collaborative educational endeavors. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits involved in developing an integrated primary care experience include expansion of curriculum content and methods, as well as enhancement of collegial support and resources to community-based and academic faculty. These integrations do, however, bring added challenges, time, and costs to traditional independent clerkships. (+info)
UME-21 local evaluation initiatives: contributions and challenges.
(54/340)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The 18 medical schools involved in the UME-21 initiative developed innovative curricula and evaluation strategies. While there was significant variation in how schools approached the evaluation process, there were common methodological issues and challenges affecting the reliability of scores and validity of interpretations regarding outcomes. This paper explores these issues and challenges, using experiences from selected UME-21 schools. METHODS: Four evaluation issues and strategies are discussed: instrument development, study design, process evaluation using formative evaluation methods, and qualitative strategies. Within each discussion, examples from a UME-21 school are presented. RESULTS: The four evaluation strategies offered the flexibility to match local evaluation needs with an effective approach to evaluations. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The school-level evaluation requirements by the UME-21 initiative provided schools the flexibility to design individualized evaluation strategies, yet also encouraged collaboration among evaluators. While this strategy resulted in many successes at the school level, it also served to identify common methodological challenges that can be used as a guide for other schools in implementing and evaluating curricula. (+info)
Evaluation of the UME-21 initiative at 18 medical schools between 1999 and 2001.
(55/340)
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the processes of curricular change and the initial outcomes of the Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) project at 18 schools. METHODS: Site visits were conducted at eight partner schools in 1999 and 2001. Written proposals, progress reports, and final reports of 18 schools were reviewed. Senior medical students' responses to questionnaires, including the annual Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire and a UME-21 supplemental graduation questionnaire, were analyzed. RESULTS: There was variation among the schools in the curriculum at baseline, in the structure of the UME-21 innovation that was introduced, and in the process of implementation. There was an increase in seniors' ratings of instruction in the newer areas of evidencebased medicine, quality assurance, and cost-effectiveness in relation to national norms between 1999 and 2001. There was less impact on the more traditional content areas of ethics, patient communications, prevention, and leadership skills. CONCLUSIONS: The circumstances of the national evaluation introduced many methodological complexities, some of which could have been avoided if planning for evaluation had started earlier. However, the evaluation revealed that even modest funding directed toward specific curricular goals can produce measurable change and can have effects that extend beyond the initial scope of the project. (+info)
Lessons learned-UME-21 project.
(56/340)
The Undergraduate Medical Education for the 21st Century (UME-21) project evolved from two prior projects that were aimed at studying the interface between managed care and undergraduate medical education. The project provided funding for 18 US medical schools to demonstrate how they would produce graduates who eventually could practice in a rapidly changing health care environment. Medical schools were required to provide educational opportunities in nine content areas or outline why such educational opportunities could not be provided in their individual projects. Participating schools were chosen via an involved process after careful evaluation by a panel of experienced medical educators. In a project of this type, many lessons are learned. In the UME-21 project, lessons learned were gleaned from progress reports, participant annual reports, proceedings from annual project meetings and a National Symposium, findings of a National Education Group, and published papers. A lesson must have been reported by a least two involved schools to be included. The lessons learned were divided into six categories as follows: content areas, implementation, collaboration, evaluation, governance, implications- summary. Many lessons emanated from each of these categories; however, only the 10 most important lessons in each category are presented. The implications of the lessons learned are outlined and provide direction for the future of medical education innovation and research. (+info)