Effect of training and experience on qualitative and quantitative CT perfusion data.
(65/304)
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate interobserver reliability of obtaining CT perfusion (CTP) data for qualitative identification of perfusion abnormality and quantitative assessment through regions-of-interest (ROIs) placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six observers participated in the study (neuroradiology attending physician, neurology attending physician, neuroradiology fellow, radiology resident physician, senior and junior CT technologists). After a brief training session, each observer evaluated 20 CTP datasets for qualitative identification of a right- or left-sided perfusion abnormality or symmetric perfusion. Observers also placed a single ROI of standard size to obtain quantitative data on the most severely hypoperfused region. An additional 10 ROIs were placed on the cortex to quantitatively evaluate global cortical perfusion. Mean quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) values were analyzed. RESULTS: The kappa values for qualitative assessment of a perfusion abnormality ranged from 0.55 to 1.0. Coefficients of variation for quantitative assessment of ischemia/infarct region were 27.10% for CBF, 13.33% for CBV, and 4.66% for MTT. Coefficients of variation for quantitative assessment of global cortical perfusion were 11.88% for CBF, 13.66% for CBV, and 3.55% for MTT. The junior CT technologist and neuroradiology fellow showed significant differences compared with other observers for the ischemia/infarct region and global cortical perfusion, respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall, quantitative differences seen in this study would not necessarily affect quality of interpretation of ischemia/infarct region or global cortical perfusion. Therefore, obtaining qualitative and quantitative CTP data can reliably be performed in the clinical setting among observers with various levels of skill and experience when using a uniform and standard technique. (+info)
Superpostdocs reach for the stars.
(66/304)
In the US and now also in Europe, a growing number of special fellowship programs, sometimes called "superpostdocs," offer newly minted PhDs instant independence and enable them to undertake pioneering research. Job prospects for fellows are rosy, but such early independence is not for everyone. (+info)
Orthopaedic surgery core curriculum: the spine.
(67/304)
OBJECTIVE: To develop a core curriculum for orthopaedic surgery and to conduct a national survey to assess the importance of 281 items in the curriculum. Attention was focused specifically on 24 items pertaining to the curriculum that are pertinent to the spine. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of a random sample of orthopaedic surgeons whose primary affiliation was non-academic, representing the provinces and territories of Canada METHODS: A questionnaire containing 281 items was developed. A random group of 131 (out of 156) orthopaedic surgeons whose primary affiliation is non-academic completed the questionnaire. The data were analysed quantitatively using average mean scores, histograms, the modified Hotelling's T2 test and the Benjimini-Hochberg procedure. RESULTS: 131 of 156 (84%) orthopaedic surgeons participated, in this study. 14 of 24 items were ranked at no less than 3 out of 4 thus suggesting that 58% of the items are important or probably important to know by the end of residency (SD< or =0.07). Residents need to learn the diagnosis and principles of managing patients with common conditions of the spine. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows, with reliable statistical evidence, that orthopaedic residents are no longer expected to be able to perform spinal fusions with proficiency on completion of residency. Is the exposure to surgical spine problems and the ability to be comfortable with operating expectations specific to the fellowship level? If so, the focus during residency or increasing accredited spine fellowships needs to be addressed to ensure that enough spine surgeons are educated to meet the future healthcare demands projected for Canada. (+info)
Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care.
(68/304)
BACKGROUND: General practitioners and other primary health care professionals are often the first point of contact for patients requiring health care. Identifying, understanding and linking current evidence to best practice can be challenging and requires at least a basic understanding of research principles and methodologies. However, not all primary health care professionals are trained in research or have research experience. With the aim of enhancing research skills and developing a research culture in primary health care, University Departments of General Practice and Rural Health have been supported since 2000 by the Australian Government funded 'Primary Health Care Research Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) Strategy'. A small grant funding scheme to support primary health care practitioners was implemented through the PHCRED program at Flinders University in South Australia between 2002 and 2005. The scheme incorporated academic mentors and three types of funding support: bursaries, writing grants and research fellowships. This article describes outcomes of the funding scheme and contributes to the debate surrounding the effectiveness of funding schemes as a means of building research capacity. METHODS: Funding recipients who had completed their research were invited to participate in a semi-structured 40-minute telephone interview. Feedback was sought on acquisition of research skills, publication outcomes, development of research capacity, confidence and interest in research, and perception of research. Data were also collected on demographics, research topics, and time needed to complete planned activities. RESULTS: The funding scheme supported 24 bursaries, 11 writing grants, and three research fellows. Nearly half (47%) of all grant recipients were allied health professionals, followed by general practitioners (21%). The majority (70%) were novice and early career researchers. Eighty-nine percent of the grant recipients were interviewed. Capacity, confidence, and level of research skills in ten core areas were generally considered to have improved as a result of the award. More than half (53%) had presented their research and 32% had published or submitted an article in a peer-reviewed journal. CONCLUSION: A small grant and mentoring scheme through a University Department can effectively enhance research skills, confidence, output, and interest in research of primary health care practitioners. (+info)
Role of embryo transfer in fellowship training.
(69/304)
Our objective was to survey training in ET techniques among fellows, its perceived importance, and potential barriers to ET training during fellowship. Although ET training remains an important issue for most fellows and recent graduates, 44% of respondents did not receive this training during their fellowship. (+info)
Long-term outcomes of performing a postdoctoral research fellowship during general surgery residency.
(70/304)
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether dedicated research time during surgical residency leads to funding following postgraduate training. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Unlike other medical specialties, a significant number of general surgery residents spend 1 to 3 years in dedicated laboratory research during their training. The impact this has on obtaining peer reviewed research funding after residency is unknown. METHODS: Survey of all graduates of an academic general surgery resident program from 1990 to 2005 (n = 105). RESULTS: Seventy-five (71%) of survey recipients responded, of which 66 performed protected research during residency. Fifty-one currently perform research (mean effort, 26%; range, 2%-75%). Twenty-three respondents who performed research during residency (35%) subsequently received independent faculty funding. Thirteen respondents (20%) obtained NIH grants following residency training. The number of papers authored during resident research was associated with obtaining subsequent faculty grant support (9.3 vs. 5.2, P = 0.02). Faculty funding was associated with obtaining independent research support during residency (42% vs. 17%, P = 0.04). NIH-funded respondents spent more combined years in research before and during residency (3.7 vs. 2.8, P = 0.02). Academic surgeons rated research fellowships more relevant to their current job than private practitioners (4.3 vs. 3.4 by Likert scale, P < 0.05). Both groups considered research a worthwhile use of their time during residency (4.5 vs. 4.1, P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: A large number of surgical trainees who perform a research fellowship in the middle of residency subsequently become funded investigators in this single-center survey. The likelihood of obtaining funding after residency is related to productivity and obtaining grant support during residency as well as cumulative years of research prior to obtaining a faculty position. (+info)
A study of military recruitment strategies for dentists: possible implications for academia.
(71/304)
Results of the annual American Dental Education Association surveys of dental school seniors show approximately 10 percent of graduates enter federal government services while less than 1 percent enter dental academia. To examine this difference, this study sought the perceptions of senior dental students and junior military dental officers regarding their choice of a military career in order to determine how military recruitment strategies influenced their career decisions. Official documents explaining military recruitment efforts were requested from the military services and summarized. In-depth telephone interviews were conducted to gather perception data from the students and dental officers on successful strategies. By employing several strategies, the military was able to inform potential recruits about the benefits of being a dentist in the military. The opportunity to have the military finance a student's dental education was a successful military recruitment tool. Other enticing factors included guaranteed employment upon graduation, prestige associated with serving in the military, access to postgraduate training, minimal practice management responsibilities, and opportunities to continue learning and improve clinical skills without significant financial implications. It was concluded that dental education can use the same strategies to highlight the benefits of an academic career and offer many similar incentives that may encourage students to consider a career path in dental education. (+info)
Recommended curriculum for teaching hematopathology to subspecialty hematopathology fellows.
(72/304)
The performance and interpretation of clinical hematology and hematopathology laboratory tests and diagnosis of benign or malignant hematolymphoid disorders present unique challenges to hematopathology fellow trainees. To assist hematopathology fellowship program directors in preparing trainees to meet these challenges, a task force of pathologists with expertise in hematopathology developed a suggested training curriculum that includes a comprehensive list of topics in the areas of analytic hematology, bone marrow pathology, lymph node pathology, splenic pathology, lymphoma diagnostics, cytogenetics, and molecular diagnostics. This report also includes recommendations for training experiences that will facilitate the transition of subspecialty residents to practicing consultants in hematopathology. (+info)