in-Training is the online peer-reviewed publication for medical students, and is the premier publication dedicated to the medical student community and run entirely by volunteer medical students. We identify ourselves as a peer-reviewed publication, combining the strengths of a scientific research journal, an online newspaper, a magazine, and a podcast website into a medical student-run publisher of the best articles written by medical students from around the world. ...
Elsevier Scopus | Check our abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature: Scientific journals, Books and Conference proceedings.
Elsevier Scopus | Check our abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature: Scientific journals, Books and Conference proceedings.
All research on Sacro Occipital Technique published in chiropractic peer-reviewed literature. SOT is used to diagnose & treat neuromusculoskeletal dysfunction.
The ISSPP PIPAC Database has been object of a publication in the societys peer-reviewed journal Pleura and Peritoneum. This publication, which first author is Prof. Michael Bau Mortensen from Odense University, Denmark, describes the design and the journey of establishing this international database and the first, preliminary results from the ISSPP PIPAC online database.. Several trials have documented the favorablesafety profile, and promising clinical results of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) directed treatment in different types of peritoneal malignancies.. However, until the results of randomized trials are available, the quality of documentation and acceptance by theusers may be improved through a worldwide registry. ISSPP facilitated this process by creating a dedicated focus group and providing the funding needed for the creation and implementation of this international database. ...
Research within Questias collection of full-text, peer-reviewed online articles from Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table (Fall)
Research within Questias collection of full-text, peer-reviewed online articles from Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, vol. 103, issue 5 (May)
With more than 35 peer-reviewed scientific publications, findings from the POG program are influencing precision oncology approaches around the world.
From the August 2015 issue of Research Now). In alphabetical order by title of paper, with a publication date range of June 20, 2015 through August 2015 (e-pub ahead of print) and author affiiliation of Nationwide Childrens Hospital:. 1: Yalvac ME, Arnold WD, Braganza C, Chen L, Mendell JR, Sahenk Z. AAV1.NT-3 gene therapy attenuates spontaneous autoimmune peripheral polyneuropathy. Gene Ther. 2015 Jun 30. doi: 10.1038/gt.2015.67. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26125608.. 2: Moradi Manesh D, El-Hoss J, Evans K, Richmond J, Toscan CE, Bracken LS, Hedrick A, Sutton R, Marshall GM, Wilson WR, Kurmasheva RT, Billups C, Houghton PJ, Smith MA, Carol H, Lock RB. AKR1C3 is a biomarker of sensitivity to PR-104 in preclinical models of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2015 Jun 26. pii: blood-2014-12-618900. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 26116659.. 3: Manelis A, Ladouceur CD, Graur S, Monk K, Bonar LK, Hickey MB, Dwojak AC, Axelson D, Goldstein BI, Goldstein TR, Bebko G, Bertocci MA, ...
Cheung MC, Hay AE, Crump M, Imrie KR, Song Y, Hassan S, Risebrough N, Sussman J, Couban S, MacDonald D, Kukreti V, Kouroukis CT, Baetz T, Szwajcer P, Shepherd L, Meyer RM, Le, A, Chen BE, Mittmann N, Committee on Economic Analysis and the Hematology Disease Site Committee, NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Gemcitabine/dexamethasone/cisplatin vs cytarabine/dexamethasone/cisplatin for relapsed or refractory aggressive-histology lymphoma: cost-utility analysis of NCIC CTG LY.12 Journal of National Cancer Institute. 2015 Apr 13; 107(7) pii (10.1093/JNCI/djv106 ...
Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR) is an international, open access journals, fair peer review System, Besides, quality control is riveted in each step of the publication process.
Loeb H, Kandadai V, Winston FK, DS C-M. Open Source Computer Vision Solution for Head and Gaze Tracking in a Driving Simulator Environment. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems. 2015;8:573-583. ...
Loeb H, Kandadai V, Winston FK, DS C-M. Open Source Computer Vision Solution for Head and Gaze Tracking in a Driving Simulator Environment. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems. 2015;8:573-583. ...
It was the typical patient. He was in his 50s and suffered from high blood pressure and high cholesterol. He came to the emergency department because he was having a headache and could not think clearly. After checking his vitals and labs, it was clear he was having a hypertensive emergency episode with systolic pressure running to 220 and evidence of papilledema on physical exam. He was admitted to the teaching service.. Once admitted, he was put through the ringer on intravenous medications to slowly bring the blood pressure down. Later that morning, I met him for the first time. Here was a burly man full of life, ready to get out of the hospital. He explained to me his past medical history, his compliance with medications and his awareness that his condition is pretty serious and could lead to a stroke or heart attack. As we were talking about beta blockers and statins, his lunch arrived. Immediately, his focus shifted and he began to look through the meal tray. His comments were peculiar: I ...
GenPool™ GenScript maintains the GenPool™ ORF clones database, the worlds largest commercial ORF clone database with over 2,428,863 ORF clones from 186 different species. Use our database to quickly find validated sequence information for full-length gene sequences and open reading frame (ORF) sequences for your gene of interest. For your convenience, we also offer instant pricing for ordering sequence-validated Full-Lenth or ORF clones. ...
Takaro TK, Scott JA, Allen RW, Anand SS, Becker AB, Befus AD, Brauer M, Duncan J, Lefebvre DL, Lou W, Mandhane PJ, McLean KE, Miller G, Sbihi H, Shu H, Subbarao P, Turvey SE, Wheeler AJ, Zeng L, Sears MR, Brook JR and the CHILD study investigators ...
The preclinical study found that orally administered VEN120 reduced inflammation in two separate mouse models of disease, accompanied by increased Treg cells in the intestinal lining (lamina propria).
Rising health care costs and increased cost sharing have resulted in significant medical expenses for many Americans. The goal of this study was to describe the prevalence of and risk factors for burdensome health care costs among non-elderly Americans. This was a cross sectional study of a nationally representative sample of non-elderly Americans. We used survey data previously collected by the Kaiser Family Foundation. We used logistic regression to identify key risk factors for burdensome health care costs and to assess whether risk factors differ according to age within our study population. For analyses comparing younger and middle-aged adults, we compared participants ages 18-39 (younger Americans) to those ages 40-64 (middle-aged Americans). Our study population included 5,493 participants. Twenty seven percent of participants reported difficulty paying medical bills, a prevalence that did not differ by age. Low income, lack of health insurance, and poor health were independently associated with
Statistical Process Monitoring (SPM) is not typically used in traditional quality assurance of inpatient care. While SPM allows a rapid detection of performance deficits, SPM results strongly depend on characteristics of the evaluated process. When using SPM to monitor inpatient care, in particular the hospital risk profile, hospital volume and properties of each monitored performance indicator (e.g. baseline failure probability) influence the results and must be taken into account to ensure a fair process evaluation. Here we study the use of CUSUM charts constructed for a predefined false alarm probability within a single process, i.e. a given hospital and performance indicator. We furthermore assess different monitoring schemes based on the resulting CUSUM chart and their dependence on the process characteristics. We conduct simulation studies in order to investigate alarm characteristics of the Bernoulli log-likelihood CUSUM chart for crude and risk-adjusted performance indicators, and illustrate
If youre a grad student or postdoc planning to attend the Fourth International Volvox Conference, dont forget that travel grant applications are due this Saturday.. The awards are made possible by a grant from the American Genetics Association. The application procedure is basically to fill out a form and email it in; it shouldnt take more than a few minutes.. ...
PNI has published over 500 peer-reviewed journal articles and our technology has been featured in over 100 peer-reviewed publications.
Find information about Drew University Pell Grant application. There are a variety of accredited college programs that may appeal to you. Advertising, business administration, or medical services are just a few career options.
Find info concerning Huston-Tillotson University Pell Grant application. There are a variety of accredited college programs that may appeal to you. Advertising, business administration, or medical services are just a few career options.
Location: Old Westbury, New York, United States. Dr. Donoghue has been involved in clinical research at the Adele Smithers Parkinson s Disease Treatment Center at the New York Institute of Technology for the past 10 years. She has been a principal investigator on 3 publications in peer-reviewed journals as well as co-investigator on 4 other peer-reviewed publications. Dr. Donoghue has developed and overseen the Wellness Program at the Adele Smithers Parkinson s Disease Treatment Center for the past 15 years. She has presented her work overseas at the International Conference on Alzheimer s and Parkinson s disease (PD). Her focus in research has been to understand and to enhance exercise and nutritional therapies to improve upon functional outcomes in PD and geriatrics. In addition to her research, Dr. Donoghue is a committed clinician treating and caring for individuals with PD as well as other geriatric and movement disorders.. ...
The Applied Medical Research is a peer-reviewed publication, aims to publish all the latest and outstanding research articles, reviews and letters in all areas of medical sciences from molecules to organ systems. The journal aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. Both experimental and clinical research and studies are welcome. By this way, one of the main aims of the journal is to supply original information from bench to bedside. Thus, submitted manuscripts should provide a significant advance to the field supported by evident data.. ...
Multiparametric MRI, USPSTFs updated PSA screening recommendation, and the landmark STAMPEDE and LATITUDE trials were among this years highlights in the peer-reviewed literature for prostate cancer, according to Leonard G. Gomella, MD; Stacy Loeb, MD, MS; and J. Brantley Thrasher, MD.
Philippe de Moerloose is Retired Professor of the Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland where he was Vice-Chair in the Department of Medical Specialities, Chair of the Laboratories Commission, Advisor for students in their last year of medicine, Head of the Haemostasis Unit and Adjunct Chef de Service for the Division of Angiology and Haemostasis. He holds specialist degrees in Internal Medicine, Angiology as well as Haematology. He is an expert in bleeding and thrombotic disorders. Philippe de Moerloose is a recurrent recipient of national and international grants. He has authored or co-authored over 400 peer-reviewed publications, review articles and book chapters. Philippe de Moerloose is past President of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders, reviewer of many international Journals (former associate Editor of the Journal of Thrombosis and Hemostasis) and is still active in research (especially fibrinogen disorders) and involved in projects for patients with ...
Additionally, we believe that one of the main objectives of peer review system is to improve the quality of a candidate manuscript. Normally we try to publish the average marks (out of 10) a manuscript received at initial peer review stage and at final publication stage to record its history of improvement during peer review. This process further increases the transparency. It is more important to record the strength and weakness of a manuscript honestly than claiming that our peer review system is perfect. Therefore, these transparent processes (i.e. publication of review history files and scores of a particular manuscript) additionally give a clear idea of the strength and weakness of a published paper to the readers. This process enhances the chances of proper use of the result of research (and or reduces the chances of misuse of the weakness of the findings of the paper). Thus this transparent process may prove to be highly beneficial for the society in the long run ...
Additionally, we believe that one of the main objectives of peer review system is to improve the quality of a candidate manuscript. Normally we try to publish the average marks (out of 10) a manuscript received at initial peer review stage and at final publication stage to record its history of improvement during peer review. This process further increases the transparency. It is more important to record the strength and weakness of a manuscript honestly than claiming that our peer review system is perfect. Therefore, these transparent processes (i.e. publication of review history files and scores of a particular manuscript) additionally give a clear idea of the strength and weakness of a published paper to the readers. This process enhances the chances of proper use of the result of research (and or reduces the chances of misuse of the weakness of the findings of the paper). Thus this transparent process may prove to be highly beneficial for the society in the long run ...
The peer review process is a cornerstone of biomedical research publication.1 The editorial peer review process is described as journal editors relying on the views of independent experts in making decisions on, for example, the publication of submitted manuscripts or presentation of reports at meetings.2 The peer review system is considered the best method for helping scientific editors decide on the acceptability of a manuscript for publication.3 Nevertheless, the effectiveness of the system has been questioned. In 2010, a report commissioned by the UK House of Commons showed that the cost to the UK Higher Education Institutions in terms of staff time was £110 to £165 million per year for peer review and up to £30 million per year for the work done by editors and editorial boards.4 Worldwide, peer review is estimated to cost £1.9 billion annually and accounts for about one-quarter of the overall costs of scholarly publishing and distribution.5 The human resources were estimated to be about ...
Propaganda is a word that usually brings to mind historic posters and speeches used to convey political messages, especially during wartime. According to the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, Propaganda is Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or point of view. As educators, we need to recognize that propaganda exists today and prepare our students to be able to analyze information to identify and contend with propaganda in its various forms.. Mind Over Media is a one-stop site designed to provide teachers and students (ages 11 and up) with the tools to recognize and respond to modern-day propaganda. The site not only provides lesson plans and general information about propaganda but also serves as a place to curate examples which provides you with an opportunity to examine propaganda, rate its potential impact, and comment on it allowing a chance to share interpretations with others.. Modern lesson plans abound about propaganda. Some are ...
In previous communications, we outlined NIH policy on confidentiality of the peer review process and the responsibility of all those involved to uphold integrity. We also outlined potential consequences of breaches of review integrity, such as terminating the review or Council members service in peer review, pursuing a referral for suspension or debarment, or other possibilities that could result in criminal penalties. Maintaining review integrity continues to be a matter of great concern, not only to the NIH but to the entire biomedical research community. Our attention to peer review integrity has been heightened with our growing awareness of the scope and impact of breaches, including those related to undue foreign influence in peer review. In response to these concerns, for example, Dr. Collins issued a Statement on Protecting the Integrity of U. S. Biomedical Research, which highlighted, among other issues, the sharing of confidential information by peer reviewers with others, including in ...
Evaluation of manuscripts is carried out by the journals Editors and the invited external peer reviewers according to the following procedures.. The editorial process and peer-review workflow for each journal are taken care of by a team of Senior Editors, Editorial Board Members (EABMs) who have expertise in their specific fields and the publication managers. Bentham follows a single blind peer review process. The services of Senior Editors and Editorial Board Members are sought through invitations to organize and conduct the peer-review of a submitted manuscript, keeping in view the scope of the manuscript and the expertise of Editors. Manuscripts are forwarded for evaluation to Editors initially and then subsequently to independent external reviewers to check if the research work presented in the manuscript:. ...
Beginning with an historical reminiscence, this paper examines the peer review process as experienced by authors currently seeking publication of their research in a highly controversial area. A case study of research into the events of 9/11 (11 September 2001) illustrates some of the problems in peer review arising from undue influences based on financial and political considerations. The paper suggests that ethical failures, rather than flaws in the process itself, are mainly responsible for perceived problems. The way forward lies in improved ethics and a more open process. In addition, editorial review boards and peer review strategies would help to improve the ethics of peer review in general.
Peer review is considered the gold standard of scientific publishing. Trust in the traditional system of editor - blind-reviewer - author is still high, but its authority is in decline and alternative methods are on the rise. The current study investigates opinions of alternative peer review methods, the arguments for and against, and the reasons why academics are searching for new approaches. The opinions were analysed by applying qualitative content analysis to online discussions. The findings were interpreted using two different sociological theories: the Mertonian sociology of science and social constructivism. The results of the study show that the most discussed method was also the most traditional one: closed pre-publication peer review comprised of single blind, double-blind and open peer review (non blinded). Discussions of open peer review (both open publishing of reports and open discussions) were also common. All other alternative methods were discussed much less. But the ...
This page lists individual Peer Reviewers alphabetically by the Surnames and gives further details about them on clicking their names.. Members of the Editorial and Peer Review Board peer review submitted articles in their areas of expertise, suggest names of other reviewers, suggest topics to be covered and provide ongoing advice to the editors. Final decision about the acceptance and refusal of the article for the publication will be taken by editors.. The editorial and peer review board will be reviewed annually.. No person, including editors, will be involved in the peer review of an article in which they have a direct or indirect interest or involvement.. ...
It seems as thought the wrong lesson is being drawn here. As you quote Menger: ...the system ultimately worked. I think that we ought to be focusing on the word ultimately. Although I am a terrific fan of peer review, approximately as it is now practiced, and although I appear to be in the minority here, I doubt that anyone in any part of this spectrum would disagree that it should be made more efficient, specifically, faster. Its not clear how that could happen, as peer review systems have long been operated by email and other digital means, so its not that the magical web is going to improve that too much. Unfortunately, the supply of expert reviewer time is limited by the number of experts, and their time. (Here expert means anyone who could have a sufficient understanding of the topic at hand to say something useful about it). Perhaps were going about peer review the wrong way. Its too hard to read and write a review of a whole paper in detail -- therein which lies the time ...
It seems as thought the wrong lesson is being drawn here. As you quote Menger: ...the system ultimately worked. I think that we ought to be focusing on the word ultimately. Although I am a terrific fan of peer review, approximately as it is now practiced, and although I appear to be in the minority here, I doubt that anyone in any part of this spectrum would disagree that it should be made more efficient, specifically, faster. Its not clear how that could happen, as peer review systems have long been operated by email and other digital means, so its not that the magical web is going to improve that too much. Unfortunately, the supply of expert reviewer time is limited by the number of experts, and their time. (Here expert means anyone who could have a sufficient understanding of the topic at hand to say something useful about it). Perhaps were going about peer review the wrong way. Its too hard to read and write a review of a whole paper in detail -- therein which lies the time ...
The peer review process both in journals and funding agencies could use more transparency, reporting and accountability. The authors identify incentives that could encourage journals to make their peer review data available to evaluate effectiveness toward achieving concrete measures of quality. This is a collective action problem requiring leadership and investment by publishers. It is time to apply the trust, but verify model to journal peer review. The authors suggest revising the Transparency and Openness (TOP) Guidelines, a set of reporting standards ...
Despite this, peer review doesnt need to be hard or nerve-wracking - or leave you with the feeling youre doomed to fail. Its actually a very structured process; it can be learned and improved the more you do it, and youll become faster and more confident as time goes on. Soon enough, youll even start benefitting from the process yourself.. Peer review not only helps to maintain the quality and integrity of literature in your field, its key to your own development as a researcher. Its a great way to keep abreast of current research, impress editors at elite journals, and hone your critical analysis skills. It teaches you how to review a manuscript, spot common flaws in research papers, and improve your own chances of being a successful published author.. To get the most out of the peer review process, youll need some best practice tips and techniques to keep in mind from the start. Heres where we come in. We asked an expert panel of researchers what steps they take to ensure a thorough ...
From one of the greatest French philosophers of the 20th century, comes a seminal study and critique of propaganda. Taking not only a psychological approach, but a sociological approach as well, Elluls book outlines the taxonomy for propaganda, and ultimately, its destructive nature towards democracy. Drawing from his own experiences fighting for the French resistance against the Vichy regime, Ellul offers a unique insight into the propaganda machine. A far more frightening work than any of the nightmare novels of George Orwell. With the logic which is the great instrument of French thought, Ellul] explores and attempts to prove the thesis that propaganda, whether its ends are demonstrably good or bad, is not only destructive to democracy, it is perhaps the most serious threat to humanity operating in the modern world.--Los Angeles The theme of Propaganda is quite simply . . . that when our new technology encompasses any culture or society, the result is propaganda . . . Ellul has made many
When writing your grant application you may want to consider utilising BioGrid services to facilitate your research. BioGrid can provide data collection tools, database linkage, data analysis and reporting to assist you with your research project.. To ensure that you can utilise the services of BioGrid, we encourage you to include funding for BioGrid in your research grant application. We can provide you with a quotation and description of BioGrid services and benefits to include in your application. Complete the Research Grant Quote Form and contact us at [email protected] and we will respond with a quotation and supporting information within two working days.. To view a complete range of existing BioGrid datasets (access subject to ethics and data custodian approval), current and prospective partner sites and data collection support services.. If you have a particular requirement not listed, contact us to see how BioGrid can help with your research project. ...
Update: Bill Hooker has pointed out that Im using a very strong sense of reliable in this section, holding peer review to the standard that it nearly always picks up errors, is a very accurate gauge of quality, and rarely suppresses innovation. If you adopt a more relaxed notion of reliability, as many but not all scientists and members of the general public do, then Id certainly back off describing this as a myth. As an approximate filter that eliminates or improves many papers, peer review may indeed function well. Every scientist has a story (or ten) about how they were poorly treated by peer review - the important paper that was unfairly rejected, or the silly editor who ignored their sage advice as a referee. Despite this, many strongly presume that the system works pretty well, overall.. Theres not much systematic evidence for that presumption. In 2002 Jefferson et al (ref) surveyed published studies of biomedical peer review. After an extensive search, they found just 19 studies ...
The Banerji Protocols are a new system of Medicine,developed by Dr. Prasanta Banerji and Dr. Pratip Banerji in which Specific Ultradilute Medicines are prescribed for Specific Diagnosis of Disease
Milk oligosaccharides (OS)-free complex carbohydrates-confer unique health benefits to the nursing neonate. Though human digestive enzymes cannot degrade these sugars, they provide nourishment to specific commensal microbes and act as decoys to prevent the adhesion of pathogenic micro-organisms to gastrointestinal cells. At present, the limited quantities of human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) impede research on these molecules and their potential applications in functional food formulations. Considerable progress has been made in the study of OS structures; however, the synthetic pathways leading to their synthesis in the mammary gland are poorly understood. Recent studies show that complex OS with fucose and N-acetyl neuraminic acid (key structural elements of HMO bioactivity) exist in goat milk. Polymorphisms in the CSN1S1 locus, which is responsible for synthesis of αs1-casein, affect lipid and casein micelle structure in goat milk. The present study sought to determine whether CSN1S1 ...
I understand that this piece isnt specific to VBACs, but wanted to share an important piece of information in case any women reading this might fall into the same category as me. I am part of a Facebook group called Special Scars, Special Women - we have all had cesareans that left us with not the typical scars on our uterus, meaning the low transverse. There are classicals, Ts, inverted Ts and Js and Im sure a few variations. What makes this matter is that typically we are COMPLETELY DENIED the option of a VBAC - and seen as a BIG uterine rupture risk. That said, Id say the MAJORITY of our ever-growing group has fought for or is fighting for VBACs. Its a *very* informed, educated decision - and the *truth* is that even in our numbers, the rupture rate is STILL LOW/VERY LOW! The struggle is very uphill for most of us - but we arm ourselves with the true numbers - and are working on getting accurate numbers/research done via our stories since were an organized group sharing these ...
I understand that this piece isnt specific to VBACs, but wanted to share an important piece of information in case any women reading this might fall into the same category as me. I am part of a Facebook group called Special Scars, Special Women - we have all had cesareans that left us with not the typical scars on our uterus, meaning the low transverse. There are classicals, Ts, inverted Ts and Js and Im sure a few variations. What makes this matter is that typically we are COMPLETELY DENIED the option of a VBAC - and seen as a BIG uterine rupture risk. That said, Id say the MAJORITY of our ever-growing group has fought for or is fighting for VBACs. Its a *very* informed, educated decision - and the *truth* is that even in our numbers, the rupture rate is STILL LOW/VERY LOW! The struggle is very uphill for most of us - but we arm ourselves with the true numbers - and are working on getting accurate numbers/research done via our stories since were an organized group sharing these ...
Graham C, Chooniedass R, Stefura WP, Becker AB, Sears MR, Turvey SE, et al. Innate immunity acquires an anti-inflammatory bias during healthy human pregnancy: opportunities to examine links between early life environment and childhood development of allergic disorders. In: Bochner BS, Creticos PS, eds. Towards precision diagnosis and targeted intervention in allergic disease: 31st Symposium of the Collegium Internationale Allergologicum Proceedings. Pisa: Pacini Giuridica; 2018. p. 21-26. ...
Abbott, M. B., Wolfe, B. B., Wolfe, A. P., Seltzer, G. O., Aravena, R., Mark, B. G., Polissar, P. J., Rodbell, D. T., Rowe, H. D., and Vuille, M., 2003, Holocene paleohydrology and glacial history of the central Andes using multiproxy lake sediment studies: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 194, p. 123-138.. Ambrose, W. A., Wawrzyniec, T. F., Fouad, Khaled, Talukdar, S. C., Jones, R. H., Jennette, D. C., Holtz, M. H., Sakurai, Shinichi, Dutton, S. P., Dunlap, D. B., Guevara, E. H., Meneses-Rocha, J., Lugo-Rivera, J. E., Aguilera, L., Berlanga, J., Miranda, L., Ruiz Morales, José, Rojas, R., and Solís, H., 2003, Geologic framework of upper Miocene and Pliocene gas plays of the Macuspana Basin, southeastern Mexico: AAPG Bulletin, v. 87, no. 9, p. 1411-1435.. Aslan, Andres, White, W. A., Warne, A. G., and Guevara, E. H., 2003, Holocene evolution of the western Orinoco Delta, Venezuela: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 115, no. 4, p. 479-498.. Banat, K. M., and ...
Journal of Environment and Bio-Sciences, is a peer-reviewed journal that accepts research works from scholars in their respective expertise of studies mainly in the field Environment and various disciplines of Bio-sciences, Chemistry, Biophysics, Geology and related sister sciences. This journal bears ISSN 0973-6913 (Print) and 0976-3384 9(On Line) and it has maintained a score of 4.43 by NAAS till date. The journal is published in the month of June and December every year. JEBS employ the peer review process in order to maintain academic standards and ensure the validity of individual works submitted for publication. It follows a single-blinded peer review process, to ensure impartial editorial decision-making. The journal is proudly the member of the following abstracting / indexing agencies and databases: Indian Science Index (INSDOC), Paryavaran Abstracts, Govt. of India, Indian Citation Index (ICI), India, Zoological Records (Clarivate Analytics), Google Scholar, Genamics JournalSeek, World
Austin publishing group is an online open access publishers that provides access to quality open access, peer-reviewed journals after peer review process.
Austin publishing group is an online open access publishers that provides access to quality open access, peer-reviewed journals after peer review process.
Peer review is carried out by a pool of independent external reviewers ​who are selected on the basis of their expertise to conduct the reviews. All proposals submitted to a call are treated equally. They are evaluated impartially on their merits, irrespective of their origin or identity of the applicants. All proposals and related documents communicated to the AO Foundation are treated in confidence. Based on the project abstract, each reviewer must confirm that he/she concurs with the AO Foundations Code of Ethics (PDF, 33 KB). After this confirmation, the reviewer will receive the full project proposal for review.. ...
While it is a serious mistake, as has been said, to overvalue propaganda, it is an equally serious mistake to assume, as some people do, that everything in the newspapers and on the radio, in the movies and magazines, is propaganda-propaganda that is self-seeking, deceitful, or otherwise improperly motivated. This is absurd.. The channels of communication can, of course, be used for propaganda. -They can be used for bad propaganda and they can also be used for good propaganda. And they can be utilized for material that is not propaganda at all.. Lets look at just one case-that of the newspaper. Under the Constitution, freedom of the press is guaranteed. Why? Because a democratic nation knows that free expression of opinion and the free flow of facts, unhampered by governmental restrictions, is fundamental to intelligent action on the part of its citizens-and is also a social safety valve.. The journalist of today has a responsibility to report facts as accurately, objectively, and ...
by Michael Mann and Gavin Schmidt. In a previous post, we discussed a number of examples where the Peer Review process has failed, and poor papers have been published in the ostensibly peer-reviewed literature. In this context, we revisit our previous discussions of the flawed work of McIntyre and McKitrick (henceforth MM). MM published a paper, in the controversial journal Energy and Environment, claiming to correct the proxy-based reconstruction of Northern Hemisphere temperatures published by Mann et al (1998-henceforth MBH98). Following the all-too-familiar pattern, this deeply flawed paper was heavily promoted by special interests as somehow challenging the scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate (an excellent account is provided by science journalist Dan Vergano of USA Today here). As detailed already on the pages of RealClimate, this so-called correction was nothing more than a botched application of the MBH98 procedure, where the authors (MM) removed 80% of ...
However, peer review is also something more, if not something even completely different in the first instance. Besides being a quality control device, peer review is a distributed effort for recognizing and increasing the value of manuscripts and so is inherently constructive. It is simultaneously a context in which experts develop, adapt and enforce standards of judgement, a form of (direct and indirect) connection and cooperation, a disciplined, mediated discourse between (often unrelated) experts in a safe (though often disorganised and ambiguous) environment. And so it is also inherently social. If this is true, peer review cannot be seen as a prediction game on the objective quality of manuscripts. Unlike an activity, such as people guessing the weight of an ox, which so fascinated the British scientist Francis Galton in the early 1900s, there is no pre-established, unambiguous weight or value that can be attributed to a research paper.. In a recent large-scale collaborative ...