Effects of progesterone receptor blockers on human granulosa-luteal cell culture secretion of progesterone, estradiol, and relaxin. (1/70)

We have developed culture methods for human luteinizing granulosa cells (GLC) that support the timely and dynamic secretion of estrogen (estradiol-17beta; E(2)), progesterone (P(4)), and relaxin (Rlx) in patterns that mimic serum hormone concentrations during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Additional hCG, to simulate rescue of the corpus luteum, prevented the normal decline in GLC hormone production. To test the importance of the P(4) receptor in P(4) production, GLC were treated in vitro with two P(4) receptor antagonists. Human GLC received one of two hCG support protocols: a Baseline group simulating the normal luteal phase or a Rescue group simulating early pregnancy. Baseline and Rescue groups were treated with either RU-486 or HRP2000 either early or late in the cell culture period. The effects of treatments or control on ovarian steroid and peptide hormone production were determined (significant difference was P < 0.05). In the Rescue group, late treatment resulted in an immediate and dramatic decline in E(2), P(4), and Rlx secretion to nearly nondetectable levels within 1 day after treatment, and hormones remained depressed for the remaining 10 days of culture. In contrast, early treatment resulted in a decline in steroid hormone secretion that returned to control levels within 5 days of cessation of treatment, and Rlx secretion was delayed for approximately 5 days more than in controls. The data support the hypothesis that P(4) may be a required autocrine factor, not only for its own production but also for the maintenance of full endocrine function of the corpus luteum.  (+info)

CDB-2914: anti-progestational/anti-glucocorticoid profile and post-coital anti-fertility activity in rats and rabbits. (2/70)

Our goal was to determine the endocrine and post-coital anti-fertility activity of CDB-2914. Concurrent administration of progesterone to rats on day 4 post-mating blocked the anti-fertility activity of a single oral 2 mg dose of CDB-2914. CDB-2914 did not exhibit progestational activity in the oestradiol-primed immature female rabbit at doses that exhibited anti-progestational activity. CDB-2914 antagonized exogenous and endogenous progesterone-stimulated uterine haptoglobin synthesis and secretion in immature and adult mated rabbits respectively. Neither CDB-2914 nor mifepristone exhibited glucocorticoid activity as determined by thymus involution in rats; mifepristone was twice as potent as CDB-2914 in antagonizing glucocorticoid action. Post-coital CDB-2914 treatment resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in implantation sites and pregnancy rates in rabbits. CDB-2914-induced inhibition of uterine weight increase, endometrial glandular arborization and uterine haptoglobin synthesis/secretion correlated with inhibition of pregnancy in mated rabbits. A single oral dose of 64 mg CDB-2914/rabbit was effective at blocking pregnancy when administered on day 4, 5, or 6 post-mating, whereas 32 mg/rabbit was only partially effective in this regard. These data demonstrate that CDB-2914 is a potent, orally active anti-progestin with weak anti-glucocorticoid activity. CDB-2914 inhibited implantation in adult rats and rabbits demonstrating its potential as a post-coital contraceptive drug.  (+info)

A single mid-follicular dose of CDB-2914, a new antiprogestin, inhibits folliculogenesis and endometrial differentiation in normally cycling women. (3/70)

Previous studies in women have shown that the antiprogestin mifepristone delays or inhibits folliculogenesis. The purpose of this study was to explore whether a new analogue, CDB-2914, has similar effects on folliculogenesis, ovulation, or on subsequent luteal phase endometrial maturation. Forty-four normally cycling, healthy women recorded urine LH and vaginal bleeding during pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment cycles. At a lead follicle diameter of 14-16 mm, a single oral dose (10, 50, 100 mg) of CDB-2914 or placebo was given, and daily ultrasound, oestradiol and progesterone were obtained until follicular collapse; an endometrial biopsy was obtained 5-7 days later. Single doses of CDB-2914 were well tolerated. Mid-follicular CDB-2914 suppressed lead follicle growth, causing a dose-dependent delay in folliculogenesis and suppression of plasma oestradiol. At higher doses, a new lead follicle was often recruited. Although luteinized unruptured follicles were observed at the 100 mg dose, all women had follicular collapse. There was a significant delay in endometrial maturation after CDB-2914 at all doses. The treatment cycle was lengthened by 1-2 weeks in 30% at 100, 27% at 50 and 9% at 10 mg. CDB-2914 altered ovarian and endometrial physiology without major effects on menstrual cyclicity and may have therapeutic utility.  (+info)

Circulating concentrations of the antiprogestins CDB-2914 and mifepristone in the female rhesus monkey following various routes of administration. (4/70)

The overall aim of these studies was to investigate the oral and i.m. bioavailability of CDB-2914 in intact female rhesus monkeys, and to compare the serum concentrations of CDB-2914 with that of mifepristone following oral administration. In the first study, a 50 mg bolus of CDB-2914 per monkey was administered intravenously, orally or intramuscularly. The area under the serum concentration-time curve for 72 h (AUC(0-72)) following i.v. injection was 18 320 +/- 2718 ng/ml*h, and that for oral administration was 10 464 +/- 3248 ng/ml*h. Thus, the oral bioavailability of CDB-2914 equivalents was 56%. The AUC(0-168 h) following i.m. injection was 11 226 +/- 1130 ng/ml*h. Therefore, the i.m. bioavailability of CDB-2914 equivalents was 62%. In the second study, the serum concentrations of CDB-2914 and mifepristone equivalents were compared following an oral bolus dose in two different formulations. When administered at 5 mg/kg in aqueous suspending vehicle (ASV), the mean peak serum concentration (C(max)) of CDB-2914 equivalents (192 +/- 64 ng/ml) occurred at 5 +/- 1 h, whereas the C(max) of mifepristone equivalents (82 +/- 25 ng/ml) occurred at 3 +/- 1 h. Following administration in gelatin capsules (35 mg/monkey), the C(max) of CDB-2914 equivalents (129 +/- 24 ng/ml) occurred at 5 +/- 1 h, while the C(max) of mifepristone equivalents (31 +/- 8 ng/ml) occurred at 3 +/- 1 h. The serum concentration (AUC(0-120 h)) of CDB-2914 equivalents was 4.7- or 5. 3-fold greater than that of mifepristone equivalents when administered orally in ASV or gelatin capsules respectively. The serum protein binding characteristics of CDB-2914 were also studied. CDB-2914 bound to human alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (AAG), but not with as high an affinity as mifepristone. In contrast, neither CDB-2914 nor mifepristone bound with high affinity to AAG, corticosteroid binding globulin or sex hormone binding globulin in monkey serum. Collectively, these results indicated that CDB-2914 was more efficiently absorbed than mifepristone following oral administration to female rhesus monkeys.  (+info)

Reversal effects of nomegestrol acetate on multidrug resistance in adriamycin-resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line. (5/70)

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is important in the systematic treatment of breast cancer. To enhance the response of tumours to chemotherapy, attention has been focused on agents to reverse multidrug resistance (MDR) and on the sensitivity of tumour cells to chemical drugs. Hundreds of reversal drugs have been found in vitro, but their clinical application has been limited because of their toxicity. The reversal activity of progestogen compounds has been demonstrated. However, classical agents such as progesterone and megestrol (MG) also have high toxicity. Nomegestrol (NOM) belongs to a new derivation of progestogens and shows very low toxicity. We studied the reversal activity of NOM and compared it with that of verapamil (VRP), droloxifene (DRO), tamoxifen (TAM) and MG, and investigated the reversal mechanism, i.e. effects on the expression of the MDR1, glutathione S-transferase Pi (GSTpi), MDR-related protein (MRP) and topoisomerase IIalpha (TopoIIalpha) genes, as well as the intracellular drug concentration and the cell cycle. The aim of the study was to examine the reversal effects of NOM on MDR in MCF7/ADR, an MCF7 breast cancer cell line resistant to adriamycin (ADR), and its mechanism of action. METHODS: MCF7/ADR cells and MCF7/WT, an MCF7 breast cancer cell line sensitive to ADR, were treated with NOM as the acetate ester. With an assay based on a tetrazolium dye [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide; MTT], the effects of various concentrations of NOM on MDR in MCF7/ADR cells were studied. Before and after the treatment with 5 microM NOM, the expression of the MDR-related genes MDR1, GSTpi, TopoIIalpha and MRP were assayed with a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) immunocytochemistry assay. By using flow cytometry (FCM), we observed the intracellular ADR concentration and the effects of combined treatment with NOM and ADR on the cell cycle. Results collected were analysed with Student's t test. RESULTS: NOM significantly reversed MDR in MCF7/ADR cells. After treatment NOM at 20, 10 and 5 microM, chemosensitivity to ADR increased 21-fold, 12-fold and 8-fold, respectively. The reversal activity of NOM was stronger than that of the precursor compound MG, and comparable to that of VRP. After treatment with 5 microM NOM, the expression of both the MDR1 and the GSTpi mRNA genes began to decline on the second day (P <0.05 and P <0.01, respectively), and reached the lowest level on the third day (both P <0.01); however, on the fifth day the expression levels began to increase again (both P <0.05). The expression of MRP and TopoIIalpha had no significant changes. Changes in the expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and GSTpi were similar to those of their mRNA expressions, showing early declines and late increases. Two hours after treatment with 20, 10 and 5 microM NOM, the intracellular ADR concentration increased 2.7-fold, 2.3-fold and 1.5-fold respectively. However, NOM did not increase ADR accumulation in MCF7/WT cells. FCM data showed that after 48 h of combined administration of NOM (20 microM) and ADR (from low to high concentration), MCF7/ADR cells showed a gradual arrest at the G2M phase with increasing ADR dose. The arrest effect with combined drug treatment was stronger than that with the single ADR treatment. CONCLUSION: MDR is the major mechanism of drug resistance in malignant tumour cells. To overcome MDR and to increase chemosensitivity, many reversal agents have been found. Most progestogen compounds have been demonstrated to have reversal effects, but we found no data on NOM, a new progestogen compound. Our results show that NOM has strong reversal activity. The reversal effects were stronger than those of the precursor compound, MG, and were comparable to that of VRP. Because NOM has low toxicity, it might have good prospects in clinical application. Using RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry assays, we studied the effects of NOM on MDR-related genes. The results were that NOM could markedly downregulate the mRNA and protein expression levels of MDR1 and GSTpi. TopoIIalpha and MRP gene expression showed no significant changes. It is known that P-gp induces MDR in tumour cells mainly by decreasing the intracellular drug concentration. After treatment with NOM, the intracellular drug concentration in MCF7/ADR cells increased significantly. Combined treatment with NOM and ADR induced arrest at the G2M phase. It is worth noting that NOM caused an early decrease and a late increase in the expression of some MDR-related genes in a time-dependent manner. The phenomena raise a question for the continued administration of reversal agents in clinics that merits further study. We demonstrate that NOM has strong reversal effects on MDR in MCF7/ADR cells. The reversal is via different routes, namely downregulating the mRNA and protein expression levels of MDR1 and GSTpi, increasing intracellular drug concentration and arresting cells at the G2M phase (NOM in combination with ADR). The reversal mechanism needs further study.  (+info)

Inhibitory effect of nomegestrol acetate on steroidogenesis of cultured granulosa cells from rat ovary in vitro. (6/70)

AIM: To study the effect of nomegestrol acetate, a new synthetic progesterone on granulosa cells' viability and steroidogenesis function. METHODS: Granulosa cells were cultured in McCoy's 5A medium. Trypan blue stain was used to measure viable cells. FSH and testosterone were added to stimulate the steroid secretion. Specific RIA assay was used to evaluate the estrogen and progesterone secretion respectively. RESULTS: IC50 of nomegestrol acetate to damage cells is 6.85 mg/L (95 % confidence limits 5.36-8.75 mg/L). Nomegestrol acetate 0.45, 0.9, and 1.8 mg/L greatly inhibited the estrogen secretion from granulosa cells by 7.6 %, 12.5 %, 28.3 % in the presence of testosterone 0.5 micromol/L and FSH 10 U/L without affecting the number of viable cells. The secretion of progesteron were markedly decreased by 44.5 %, 53.3 %, and 62.0 % concurrently. CONCLUSION: Nomegestrol acetate directly inhibited the steroidogenesis of granulosa cells.  (+info)

Luteal phase dose-response relationships of the antiprogestin CDB-2914 in normally cycling women. (7/70)

BACKGROUND: Progesterone receptor modulators have potential therapeutic use in progesterone-dependent conditions such as endometriosis, fibroids and induction of labour. The synthetic steroid CDB-2914 binds to the progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors. In animals it has antiprogestational activity at doses 50-fold less than those required for antiglucocorticoid effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated the biological activity, blood levels and safety of CDB-2914 at escalating single doses, in 36 normally cycling women at mid-luteal phase. CDB-2914 at doses of 1-100 mg did not change luteal phase length, but after 200 mg, all women had early endometrial bleeding. Four women with early menses had concurrent functional luteolysis (one at 10, 50, 100 and 200 mg). There were no biochemical or clinical signs of toxicity, and no effect on urinary cortisol or circulating thyroxine, prolactin, adrenocorticotrophic hormone or renin levels. Higher serum equivalents of CDB-2914 were observed by radioimmunoassay than by high performance liquid chromatography detection, indicating a considerable contribution of metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-luteal administration of CDB-2914 antagonizes progesterone action on the endometrium, in a dose-dependent fashion, without apparent antiglucocorticoid effects. Further study of CDB-2914 is needed to determine its clinical role.  (+info)

Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications. (8/70)

Since the discovery of the antiprogestin mifepristone, hundreds of similar compounds have been synthesized, which can be grouped in a large family of progesterone receptor ligands. This family includes pure agonists such as progesterone itself or progestins and, at the other end of the biological spectrum, pure progesterone receptor antagonists (PA). Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) have mixed agonist-antagonist properties, and occupy an intermediate position of the spectrum. These compounds have numerous applications in female health care. Mifepristone is used to terminate pregnancy, and as such is commercially available in many countries. The negative abortion-related image of mifepristone has clearly limited the involvement of the major pharmaceutical companies in the development of PA and SPRM. Many PA and SPRM display direct antiproliferative effects in the endometrium, although with variable actions which seem product- and dose-dependent. This property justifies their use in the treatment of myomas and endometriosis. PA also suppress late follicular development, block the LH surge and retard endometrial maturation, which renders them potential estrogen-free contraceptive drugs. SPRM such as asoprisnil are not as effective in blocking the LH surge and appear to target the endometrium directly and produce amenorrhoea. Interestingly, clinical data show that treatment with these compounds is not associated with hypo-estrogenism and bone loss. The potential clinical applications of these compounds cover a broad field and are very promising in major public health areas. These include emergency contraception, long-term estrogen-free contraception (administered alone, or in association with a progestin-only pill to improve bleeding patterns), myomas (where they induce a marked reduction in tumour volume and produce amenorrhoea) and endometriosis. Further developments might also include hormone replacement therapy in post-menopausal women, as well as the treatment of hormone-dependent tumours.  (+info)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9