Editorial Policies
Publishing
Editorial
Peer Review, Research
Health Policy
Authorship
Policy Making
Journalism, Medical
Journal Impact Factor
Peer Review
Organizational Policy
Conflict of Interest
Protection of patients' rights to privacy. (1/243)
The following statement was agreed [upon] by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (the Vancouver Group) at its meeting last week in San Francisco. It is a complete revision of the initial guidelines on this subject issued in 1991. (+info)BMJ response to Dr. Gupta. (2/243)
We sent a questionnaire survey to a random sample of 125 correspondents to the BMJ who had previously sent a letter which had been rejected. The objective was to evaluate the policy of sending on some unpublished letters to the authors of the articles to which they referred. There were 94 replies, a response rate of 75%. The key finding was that although most respondents agreed with the policy, a third thought it unconstructive. A quarter of the respondents said that the BMJ policy would discourage them from sending a letter to the journal for publication. This survey has led to a change of policy at the BMJ. Letters which are not published are not now sent on to the authors of the original articles. (+info)Prominent medical journals often provide insufficient information to assess the validity of studies with negative results. (3/243)
BACKGROUND: Physicians reading the medical literature attempt to determine whether research studies are valid. However, articles with negative results may not provide sufficient information to allow physicians to properly assess validity. METHODS: We analyzed all original research articles with negative results published in 1997 in the weekly journals BMJ, JAMA, Lancet, and New England Journal of Medicine as well as those published in the 1997 and 1998 issues of the bimonthly Annals of Internal Medicine (N = 234). Our primary objective was to quantify the proportion of studies with negative results that comment on power and present confidence intervals. Secondary outcomes were to quantify the proportion of these studies with a specified effect size and a defined primary outcome. Stratified analyses by study design were also performed. RESULTS: Only 30% of the articles with negative results comment on power. The reporting of power (range: 15%-52%) and confidence intervals (range: 55-81%) varied significantly among journals. Observational studies of etiology/risk factors addressed power less frequently (15%, 95% CI, 8-21%) than did clinical trials (56%, 95% CI, 46-67%, p < 0.001). While 87% of articles with power calculations specified an effect size the authors sought to detect, a minority gave a rationale for the effect size. Only half of the studies with negative results clearly defined a primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Prominent medical journals often provide insufficient information to assess the validity of studies with negative results. (+info)Abstract! (4/243)
With the availability of electronic databases, it has become crucial to provide informative abstracts to published papers. Articles published without an abstract run a great risk of being neglected by readers and authors. The Netherlands Journal of Medicine will provide informative abstracts of all future papers, including editorials and letters. (+info)Founding editorial--bone biology. (5/243)
The skeleton is a complicated vertebrate structure, comprised of bone cells that form, modulate, and resorb the extracellular structure of bone. It is the extracellular structure, made up of the bone mineral (largely calcium phosphate) and the bone matrix, which constitutes the visible skeleton and the mechanical support for the vertebrate body. The matrix is the protein structure on which the bone mineral is laid down, many components of which have been identified in recent years. (+info)Emerging ethical issues in instructions to authors of high-impact biomedical journals. (6/243)
Public interest in issues concerning the maintenance of high ethical standards in the conduct of scientific research and its publication has been increasing. Some of the developments in these issues as reflected in the publication of the medical literature are traced here. This paper attempts to determine whether public interest is reflected in the specific requirements for authors for manuscript preparation as stated in the "Instructions to Authors" for articles being prepared for submission to 124 "high-impact" journals. The instructions to authors of these journals were read on the Web for references to ethical standards or requirements. The ethical issues that the instructions most often covered were specifically related to the individual journal's publication requirements. The results suggest that while the editors and publishers of the biomedical literature are concerned with promoting and protecting the rights of the subjects of the experiments in the articles they publish, and while these concerns are not yet paramount, they are evolving and growing. (+info)Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals. (7/243)
BACKGROUND: Researchers from the developing world contribute only a limited proportion to the total research output published in leading medical education journals. Some of them believe that there is a substantial editorial bias against their work. To obtain an objective basis for further discussion the present study was designed to assess the composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals. METHODS: The editorial boards of the three leading medical education journals according to their impact factor were retrieved from the respective January issue of the year 2003. We evaluated in which countries the editorial board members were based and classified these countries using the World Bank income criteria. RESULTS: Individuals from a number of countries can be found on the editorial boards of the investigated journals, but most of them are based in high-income countries. CONCLUSION: The percentage of editorial board members which are based in developing world countries is higher for the leading medical education journals than in most of their psychiatry and general medicine counterparts. But it is still too low. (+info)Conflicts between commercial and scientific interests in pharmaceutical advertising for medical journals. (8/243)
In 1992, researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles, published a study on the scientific merit and validity of pharmaceutical advertisements in medical journals. Their results led them to conclude, provocatively, that many pharmaceutical advertisements contained deficiencies in areas in which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had established explicit standards of quality. This article provides a detailed account of third-party reactions to the study following its publication in the Annals of Internal Medicine, as well as the implications for those involved, including the authors, editors, and publisher. The increasingly diverging interests between medical journal editors and publishers are also discussed and highlighted by two recent cases of editors' departures from prominent general-interest medical journals. (+info)Editorial policies refer to a set of guidelines and principles that govern the development, selection, peer-review, production, and publication of manuscripts in a medical journal. These policies aim to ensure the integrity, transparency, and quality of the published research while adhering to ethical standards and best practices in scientific publishing.
Some essential components of editorial policies include:
1. Authorship criteria: Defining who qualifies as an author, their roles, and responsibilities, and specifying the order of authorship based on contribution.
2. Conflict of interest disclosure: Requiring authors, reviewers, and editors to declare any potential conflicts of interest that may influence their judgment or objectivity in the manuscript's evaluation.
3. Peer-review process: Outlining the steps involved in the peer-review process, including the selection of reviewers, the number of required reviews, and the criteria for accepting or rejecting a manuscript.
4. Plagiarism detection: Employing plagiarism detection software to ensure originality and prevent unethical practices such as self-plagiarism or duplicate publication.
5. Data sharing: Encouraging or requiring authors to share their data, code, or materials to promote transparency and reproducibility of the research findings.
6. Corrections and retractions: Establishing procedures for correcting errors, addressing scientific misconduct, and retracting published articles when necessary.
7. Post-publication discussions: Encouraging open dialogue and constructive criticism through post-publication discussions or letters to the editor.
8. Accessibility and copyright: Describing how the journal ensures accessibility of its content, such as through open-access models, and outlining the terms of copyright and licensing agreements.
9. Archiving and preservation: Ensuring long-term preservation and availability of published content by depositing it in appropriate digital archives or repositories.
10. Compliance with international standards: Adhering to guidelines and best practices established by organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), and the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
I'm sorry for any confusion, but "publishing" is not a term that has a medical definition. Publishing typically refers to the process of preparing and disseminating information, such as books, journals, or articles, to the public or a specific audience. It could involve both print and digital media. If you have any questions related to medicine or healthcare, I'd be happy to try to help answer those!
A "periodical" in the context of medicine typically refers to a type of publication that is issued regularly, such as on a monthly or quarterly basis. These publications include peer-reviewed journals, magazines, and newsletters that focus on medical research, education, and practice. They may contain original research articles, review articles, case reports, editorials, letters to the editor, and other types of content related to medical science and clinical practice.
As a "Topic," periodicals in medicine encompass various aspects such as their role in disseminating new knowledge, their impact on clinical decision-making, their quality control measures, and their ethical considerations. Medical periodicals serve as a crucial resource for healthcare professionals, researchers, students, and other stakeholders to stay updated on the latest developments in their field and to share their findings with others.
In the context of medical publishing, an editorial is not a medical definition itself but rather a piece of writing that outlines the opinion or viewpoint of the editor or authors. It may express their stance on a specific medical issue, research finding, or policy and can help to shape public opinion and influence decision-making in the medical community.
An editorial may also provide context for an article or research study being published, summarize key points, and highlight any implications for clinical practice or future research. However, it is important to note that an editorial does not necessarily reflect the views of the entire publication or organization.
Peer review in the context of research refers to the evaluation of scientific, academic, or professional work by others working in the same field. The purpose of peer review is to ensure that the research is rigorous, valid, and relevant to the field. In a peer-review process, experts in the relevant field assess the research article, report, or other type of scholarly work for its accuracy, quality, and significance before it is published or presented at a conference.
The peer-review process typically involves several stages:
1. Submission: The author(s) submit their manuscript to a journal, conference, or other publication venue.
2. Assignment: The editor of the publication assigns the manuscript to one or more reviewers who are experts in the field.
3. Review: The reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as originality, methodology, data analysis, interpretation of results, and contribution to the field. They provide feedback and recommendations to the editor.
4. Decision: Based on the feedback from the reviewers, the editor makes a decision about whether to accept, reject, or request revisions to the manuscript.
5. Revision: If the manuscript is rejected or requires revisions, the author(s) may have an opportunity to revise and resubmit the manuscript for further consideration.
Peer review is a critical component of the scientific process, as it helps ensure that research is held to high standards of quality and integrity. It also provides a mechanism for identifying and correcting errors or weaknesses in research before it is published or disseminated widely.
Health policy refers to a set of decisions, plans, and actions that are undertaken to achieve specific healthcare goals within a population. It is formulated by governmental and non-governmental organizations with the objective of providing guidance and direction for the management and delivery of healthcare services. Health policies address various aspects of healthcare, including access, financing, quality, and equity. They can be designed to promote health, prevent disease, and provide treatment and rehabilitation services to individuals who are sick or injured. Effective health policies require careful consideration of scientific evidence, ethical principles, and societal values to ensure that they meet the needs of the population while being fiscally responsible.
In the context of medical research, authorship refers to the recognition of individuals who have made significant contributions to the development and completion of a scientific paper or research project. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) has established guidelines for determining authorship, which include the following four criteria:
1. Substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work.
2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content.
3. Final approval of the version to be published.
4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
All authors should meet these criteria, and their contributions should be clearly described in the manuscript. It is important to note that authorship should not be granted based on position or status alone, but rather on the basis of substantial intellectual contribution and commitment to the work.
I'm sorry for any confusion, but "policy making" is not a medical term per se. It refers to the process of formulating or establishing official guidelines or rules, such as public policies or organizational policies, that govern decisions and actions. In the context of healthcare, policy making can refer to the development of guidelines, laws, regulations, and procedures that govern the delivery, financing, and accessibility of medical care and health promotion activities.
Examples of policy making in healthcare include:
* Developing clinical practice guidelines for the management of specific medical conditions
* Establishing reimbursement policies for medical procedures or treatments
* Implementing regulations to ensure patient safety and quality of care
* Creating public health policies to address population health issues, such as tobacco control or obesity prevention.
Medical journalism is a branch of journalism that focuses on reporting and disseminating news and information related to the medical field, including healthcare policy, public health, medical research, clinical trials, pharmaceuticals, medical technology, and medical education. It involves writing for both professional and lay audiences in various formats, such as newspapers, magazines, websites, and broadcast media. Medical journalists are expected to have a strong understanding of medical concepts and terminology, as well as the ethical considerations involved in reporting on medical issues. They must also be able to critically evaluate scientific studies and communicate their findings accurately and clearly to the public.
The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is a measure of the frequency with which the "average article" in a journal has been cited in a particular year. It is calculated by dividing the number of current year citations to the source items published in that journal during the previous two years. For example, if a journal has an Impact Factor of 3 in 2020, that means articles published in 2018 and 2019 were cited 3 times on average in 2020. It is used to gauge the importance or rank of a journal by comparing the times it's articles are cited relative to other journals in the field. However, it has been criticized for various limitations such as being manipulated by editors and not reflecting the quality of individual articles.
Peer review is a process in which experts in a field assess the quality and validity of scientific research, scholarly articles, or other professional works prior to publication. In the context of medical research, peer review typically involves one or more researchers with similar expertise evaluating a manuscript or study proposal to ensure that it meets established standards for design, methodology, analysis, and interpretation of results. The goal of peer review is to maintain the integrity and credibility of the scientific record by identifying and correcting errors, biases, or other shortcomings in the research before it is published. Peer review is a standard practice in medical publishing and is considered an essential component of the scientific process.
I'm sorry for any confusion, but "organizational policy" is not a medical term. It falls under the broader category of management or administrative terminology.
An organizational policy generally refers to a formal statement or set of guidelines that outline an organization's approved course of action or conduct regarding various matters. These policies guide decision-making and help ensure consistent action across the organization. They can cover a wide range of topics, including (but not limited to) employee behavior, data security, patient care standards, and operational procedures.
In a healthcare setting, organizational policies play a crucial role in maintaining quality of care, ensuring patient safety, and complying with relevant laws and regulations.
A conflict of interest (COI) is a situation in which a person or organization has dual loyalties or is in a position to exploit their professional or personal relationships for personal or institutional gain. In the medical field, COIs can arise when healthcare providers, researchers, or institutions have financial or other interests that may influence their judgment or actions in providing care, conducting research, or making recommendations.
Examples of conflicts of interest in medicine include:
* A physician who has a financial relationship with a pharmaceutical company and receives compensation for promoting the company's products to patients or colleagues.
* A researcher who owns stock in a company that is funding their study and may stand to benefit financially from positive results.
* An institution that accepts funding from industry partners for research or educational programs, which could potentially influence the outcomes of the research or bias the education provided.
COIs can compromise the integrity of medical research, patient care, and professional judgment. Therefore, it is essential to disclose and manage COIs transparently to maintain trust in the healthcare system and ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of patients and society as a whole.
In the context of healthcare, "policy" refers to a course or principle of action adopted or proposed by an organization or government to guide and determine its decisions, actions, and responses to issues related to the provision, financing, and regulation of health and healthcare services. Health policies are formulated to address various aspects such as access to care, quality of care, cost containment, medical research, public health, and patient safety. They can be established through legislation, regulations, guidelines, protocols, or organizational rules and may be aimed at various stakeholders, including healthcare providers, payers, patients, and the general public.
Domestic policy of the Justin Trudeau government
Combinatorial Theory (journal)
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
List of academic publishers by preprint policy
Global Policy
International Journal of Drug Policy
Visa policy of Saudi Arabia
Marine Policy
Home Office hostile environment policy
Cryptocurrency
Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
UQ Law School
Ibn Sina Medical College
Apparatus (journal)
Bitcoin
Josephat Obi Oguejiofor
Transformative Works and Cultures
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Current Oncology
Ethnicity & Disease
Conservation Science in Cultural Heritage
Open Access Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
Museum of Science Fiction
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Chattogram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College
Animal welfare and rights in Brazil
Information Technologies and International Development
Rangifer (journal)
Archives Italiennes de Biologie
History of U.S. foreign policy, 1829-1861
Editorial Policies
Editorial and publishing policies | Scientific Reports
Interactive Patient Education Editorial Policy | Elsevier
CDC - Preventing Chronic Disease: Editorial Policy
APNIC document editorial policy - APNIC
KidsHealth Editorial Policy (for Kids) - Norton Children's
Editorial Policy | TopNews
Editorial Policy for eSecurity Planet
Editorial Policy and Call for Articles
African Journal of Biotechnology - Editorial Policies
Editorial Standards & Policies | Lab Manager
Editorial Policies
Editorial policy
Editorial Policy
CTV News | Editorial Standards and Policies
Polls show voters open to more sustainable spending policy | EDITORIAL | Editorials | Opinion
Editorial Policies | Pediatrics | American Academy of Pediatrics
NY Times Editorial: Obama 'Misspoke' When He Said You Can Keep Insurance Policy
Streetsblog San Francisco Editorial Independence Policy - Streetsblog San Francisco
International Journal of Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research - Editorial Policies
Editor and Editorial Policy
What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy
Editorial Policies
עיתון ההסתדרות הרפואית וחיל הרפואה | Editorial Policies
CTV News | Editorial Standards and Policies
Editorial Policies - International Institute of Anticancer Research
Suntory | Sustainability | Reporting Standards & Editorial Policy | Editorial Policy on Sustainability Information
Editorial policy
Editorials Archives - Page 4 of 15 - Alabama Policy Institute
Manuscripts4
- All manuscripts submitted to a Collection are assessed according to the standard Scientific Reports editorial criteria and are subject to the standard journal and Nature Portfolio editorial policies. (nature.com)
- The cover letter will not be transmitted to peer reviewers and is intended to aid in the editorial pre-screening of manuscripts. (aip.org)
- Peer reviewers are required to provide recommendations to help authors to improve the quality of published manuscripts and editor in determining the editorial policy, in accordance with their respective expertise. (ugm.ac.id)
- Peer review of accepted manuscripts is undertaken by the editorial committee. (wikipedia.org)
20222
- Note: Modifications to Editorial Policy were made on 22, December, 2022. (topnews.in)
- The editorial advisory board was established in 2022. (labmanager.com)
Submissions1
- The authors can contact the editorial team via [email protected] if they would like to express disagreement with the decisions about their submissions, or to report a failure in process (such as a long delay), or to fire a complaint on anything within the responsibility of the editorial team. (hep.com.cn)
Journal's2
- For more information on the journal's disclosure policies, please contact the editorial office . (aap.org)
- Overall editorial responsibility rests with the journal's Editor-in-Chief, who is supported by an expert, international Advisory Board . (umassmed.edu)
Content24
- WebMD LLC ("WebMD" or "we"), which operates www.medscape.com ("Medscape"), is committed to providing Medscape users with editorial content that meets the highest journalistic and editorial standards, focusing on fairness, accuracy, independence, transparency, and objectivity. (medscape.com)
- Medscape's editorial content, including news, features, and reference, is developed independently of the advertising and promotional content available on Medscape, all of which is clearly labeled as such in accordance with the WebMD Advertising Policy . (medscape.com)
- Third-party editorial content licensed for use on Medscape is held to the same editorial standards as Medscape's original content. (medscape.com)
- Medscape editors review all content prior to publication to ensure adherence to our editorial standards, including disclosure of any relevant financial relationships of expert contributors. (medscape.com)
- Chief editors and authors from this network work directly with Medscape's editorial team to ensure the currency, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of the content. (medscape.com)
- We reserve the right to reject a paper even after it has been accepted if it becomes apparent that there are serious problems with its scientific content, or our publishing policies have been violated. (nature.com)
- The goal of Elsevier's editorial review process is to produce the highest quality content as efficiently as possible to best meet our customers' needs. (elsevier.com)
- This page describes the editorial policy that the KidsHealth team follows when creating content. (kidshealth.org)
- We aim to make it clear to our audience whether a piece of content is sponsored promotional content or purely editorial. (labmanager.com)
- We do not currently accept opinion pieces as editorial content. (labmanager.com)
- Editorial content is independent of any and all sponsored content. (labmanager.com)
- Sponsored content and advertisers do not have any influence over editorial content. (labmanager.com)
- Editorial content is created by Lab Manager 's editorial team or external contributors. (labmanager.com)
- The Spectator is written and edited by students of UW-Eau Claire, and they are solely responsible for its editorial policy and content. (spectatornews.com)
- This editorial policy explains how we select and review the content and tools you see on our site, how we distinguish advertising and sponsored content from news content, how financial or other influences from outside our company affect our website, and how you may contact us to ask questions or comment on our websites. (fractovia.org)
- fractovia employs editorial professionals who are responsible for content selection, development and maintenance process. (fractovia.org)
- We recognise the importance of maintaining a clear separation between our independent editorial content and any materials that are advertising or any content that may be influenced by our sponsors. (fractovia.org)
- All material on our website that we present as our own is either created by us or is obtained from content providers whose editorial processes we have evaluated and found to be acceptable. (fractovia.org)
- Sources for third-party editorial content include government agencies, not-for-profit organisations, universities, and key stakeholders that provide news and information about all the verticals we cover. (fractovia.org)
- Our editorial staff reviews most content from outside sources for accuracy, balance, completeness and timeliness before we make it available on our sites. (fractovia.org)
- We design these areas to make it clear to the user that the content has not gone through our editorial process. (fractovia.org)
- The editor-in-chief, aided by the deputy editors and associate editors, is responsible for the content and editorial matters related to APL. (aip.org)
- Our Editorial Policy is a pillar of trust and reliability, guiding the creation and dissemination of content that is accurate, compassionate, and informative, tailored to support those seeking assistance for addiction. (help4addiction.co.uk)
- For example, editorial marketing communications must clearly indicate whether the content is paid for. (who.int)
Reviewers6
- Ø When data is stored in the repository, links and publicly shared permanent access addresses should be provided for the editorial department and reviewers to review. (hep.com.cn)
- The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. (undip.ac.id)
- The peer-reviewers will be completely external to the editorial board and the publisher, the Universitat de València. (uv.es)
- Peer reviewers are entitled to provide the authors with some feedbacks to foster the quality of the published manuscript and editors for the decision making of editorial policy in accordance to their respective expertise. (ugm.ac.id)
- Every paper published will be reviewed by the board of peer reviewers consisting of experts in related fields, so that the quality of the published paper is in accordance with the determined editorial standards. (ugm.ac.id)
- Strives to prevent any possible conflict of interests between authors and reviewers or the editorial board. (ru.lv)
Guidelines5
- Staff and external writers must adhere to our editorial guidelines , which include articles that are non-promotional, original, and exclusive to Lab Manager . (labmanager.com)
- This policy describes guidelines in the publication process of the African Journal of Biotechnology. (academicjournals.org)
- While responding to that comment , we felt that now would be a good time to let PuneTech readers know what are the editorial guidelines PuneTech uses in determining what goes up on the front page, and the tone we use. (punetech.com)
- That much cheating is allowed, as is explicitly mentioned in the editorial guidelines . (punetech.com)
- Broadly speaking, public policies consist of diversified and specific actions, regulated by documentary guidelines, the purpose of which is to respond to the requirements of society and to guarantee social rights in various areas such as health, work, and education. (bvsalud.org)
20201
- As part of the efforts promoted by LILACS (Latin American Literature in Health Sciences) to raise the quality of the editorial processes of scientific journals in Latin America and the Caribbean, within the framework of the webinar "Best practices in LILACS editorial processes 2020" I gave a lecture (6) of which the present chapter is an expanded version. (bvsalud.org)
Practice2
- Accurate and transparent global health estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury are key to policy and practice in occupational and workers' health and safety, at the workplace, enterprise, national, regional and global levels. (cdc.gov)
- and draw out lessons for future estimation of burden of disease and other scenarios where scientific research is reviewed and synthesised to inform policy and practice. (cdc.gov)
Editors5
- Collection Guest Editors are members of the Scientific Reports Editorial Board . (nature.com)
- Collection Guest Editors are involved in soliciting papers, and in writing an introductory Editorial. (nature.com)
- The editors also recommended that young people, necessary participants for the law's exchanges to function, buy policies rather than pay the penalty. (mediaite.com)
- We extended this survey to grant-awarding bodies and editors of medical journals to discover their policies regarding the function and reporting of pilot studies. (nih.gov)
- The editor is assisted by the editorial committee, which includes associate editors, regular members, and occasionally guest editors. (wikipedia.org)
Board19
- Scientific Reports is editorially independent, and Editorial Board Members make decisions independently from other Nature Portfolio journals. (nature.com)
- What is the role of Lab Manager 's editorial advisory board members? (labmanager.com)
- The editorial team invited these members to join the board based on a specific set of criteria. (labmanager.com)
- The editorial board generally comprises the editor-in-chief, managing editor, Currents editor, chief copy editor, News editor, Op/Ed Editor and Sports editor but may include other members of the editorial staff. (spectatornews.com)
- All the articles to be published to LA Frontiers have gone through scrutiny from the editorial board and careful editing by the editorial team. (hep.com.cn)
- Seventy-four percent of school board members who responded to a survey conducted by the Alabama Policy Institute oppose school choice. (alabamapolicy.org)
- In a meeting last week with the Honolulu Star-Advertiser editorial board, Caldwell said pilot studies are underway in Waikiki to explore ways of adapting streets, and the underlying pipes and infrastructure, to flooding. (staradvertiser.com)
- Yesterday's Hartford Courant editorial voiced disappointment that the legislature and administration could not agree to add consumer and small business voices to the CT Health Insurance Exchange Board this session. (cthealthpolicy.org)
- The members of Editorial Board have enriched, also with their contributions, the dossiers of "Segni e Comprensione", allowing for that virtuous exchange of skills, which has made the editorial line credible, intended to compare, without limits, different orientations. (unisalento.it)
- The Toronto Youth Food Policy Council (TYFPC) is looking for volunteers to be on the editorial board for the bi-annual youth food policy journal Gathering . (tyfpc.ca)
- If you have an interest in reviewing an article in any of these fields, and would like to be a member of the editorial board for the first youth food policy journal in Canada, please contact Joel Fridman, Education Lead on the TYFPC ( [email protected] ). (tyfpc.ca)
- This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer----- and the publisher (Diponegoro University). (undip.ac.id)
- In addition, the Department of Civil Engineering and Design of Diponegoro University and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary. (undip.ac.id)
- Articles will be subject to a preliminary review by the editorial board that will check whether the article meets the thematic and formal criteria laid down in the rules of publication. (uv.es)
- If suitable experts external to the journal cannot be found then members of the Editorial Board may be asked to complete a review task. (umassmed.edu)
- Members of the editorial team/board are permitted to submit their own papers to the journal. (umassmed.edu)
- All other members of the editorial committee are appointed by the Annual Reviews board of directors and serve five-year terms. (wikipedia.org)
- All texts are rigorously edited and verified by our Editorial and Scientific Board. (bvs.br)
- The Editorial Board will therefore give priority to articles that make significant contribution to the development and promotion of health in Africa. (who.int)
Manuscript2
- In such cases, the authors will be notified by the editorial office and their manuscript can be considered as a regular Scientific Reports submission. (nature.com)
- This policy does not preclude the journal considering a manuscript that has been rejected by another journal, or a complete report that follows publication of a preliminary report, such as an abstract or poster displayed at a professional meeting. (cdc.gov)
Journal4
- One author should be designated as the corresponding author who will be responsible for communication between the authors and the journal editorial office(s) and publisher. (ima.org.il)
- The items of information labelled as topical discussions and the news items have been reviewed by the journal editorial staff and found to conform to the legal and professional standards of the Engineering Integrity Society. (e-i-s.org.uk)
- In cases where an author is associated with the journal, they will be removed from all editorial tasks for that paper and another member of the team will be assigned responsibility for overseeing peer review. (umassmed.edu)
- The African Journal of Health Sciences provides a forum for communication of research results and policy issues in the health sciences and related disciplines. (who.int)
Publication2
- If accepted for publication, an article processing charge applies (with standard waiver policy ). (nature.com)
- If redundant or duplicate publication is attempted or occurs without such notification, authors should expect editorial action to be taken. (cdc.gov)
Describes2
- This document describes the editorial process used by the APNIC Secretariat to document and implement consensus decisions arising from the APNIC Policy Development Process and to maintain clear, effective, and up-to-date documentation. (apnic.net)
- This document describes the policies and procedures that apply to the production and maintenance of APNIC official documents. (apnic.net)
Staff8
- For a list of the Medscape editorial staff, click here . (medscape.com)
- The KidsHealth editorial staff also reviews all reader comments about the articles on this site, including suggestions for possible improvements and corrections. (kidshealth.org)
- The KidsHealth editorial staff makes every effort to be as neutral as possible with regard to sex, race, color, religion, and age. (kidshealth.org)
- In addition to Lab Manager 's editorial and creative services staff, a group of freelance contributors regularly write articles for the print magazine and website. (labmanager.com)
- Editorials, opinion pieces, columns, cartoons and letters in The Spectator reflect the opinion of the writer and does not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Spectator or the rest of its staff. (spectatornews.com)
- Students, faculty and staff members are invited to write letters to the editor to express their views on public issues and other matters of concern or to respond to editorials or other opinions in the newspaper. (spectatornews.com)
- Our editorial staff determines what those topics are and retains full editorial control of the resulting coverage. (streetsblog.org)
- It would be imprudent to say that the editorial staff can be or is neutral, particularly regarding some of the more controversial issues. (autismdailynewscast.com)
Specialty1
- Each member brings a unique perspective and specialty area of expertise to the Lab Manager editorial team. (labmanager.com)
Authorship2
- Scientific Reports follows the Nature Portfolio authorship policies. (nature.com)
- Changes in authorship after submission or acceptance of a paper are strongly discouraged, but the editorial leadership recognizes that in certain circumstances, it may be required. (ima.org.il)
Process3
- The KidsHealth articles and features on this site go through a rigorous editorial process that includes review by medical professionals. (kidshealth.org)
- During the editorial and medical review process, our team fact checks information and ensures that only reputable, credible, and current sources get used. (detox.net)
- These amendments are primarily editorial in nature and are designed to reflect the current budget proposal and approval process and related terminology. (who.int)
Standards1
- This written policy iteration is based on standards developed by. (streetsblog.org)
19871
- In 1992, 85% of employers had workplace smoking policies, compared with 54% in 1987 (6). (cdc.gov)
Characterize1
- Its objective is to characterize the main stages that constitute the scientific and editorial management of journals, their participants, and functions, trying to show best practices in the organization and management of editorial processes. (bvsalud.org)
Authors2
- This policy is not intended to prevent authors with financial or other interests from publishing their work. (aap.org)
- The editorial committee determines which topics should be included in each volume and solicits reviews from qualified authors. (wikipedia.org)
Practices1
- We welcome constructive input and adjust our editorial practices accordingly to enhance the relevance, accuracy, and helpfulness of the information we provide. (help4addiction.co.uk)
Voices2
- Our policy is to seek out diverse voices, not only in the types of stories we cover but also in our sources, on-screen, on-the-air, behind the scenes and within our workforce. (ctvnews.ca)
- The editorial notes that a bill adding a significant number of both voices passed the House but stalled in the Senate. (cthealthpolicy.org)
Journalism2
- Our partners and sponsors fund our high-quality journalism and product evaluations, but they do not influence our coverage or editorial decisions. (esecurityplanet.com)
- This separation ensures that financial support does not present a conflict of interest for our journalism or compromise our editorial independence. (streetsblog.org)
Timely1
- We will post policy changes on our websites in a timely manner. (fractovia.org)
Legislation1
- The wave of legislation adoption in the Region has not reduced tobacco use in the majority of the countries for many reasons, most importantly because the legislation and policies for the key demand reduction measures have not been adopted at the highest level of achievement. (who.int)
Minor1
- Minor changes to the policy may occur that will not affect the overall goals this policy is designed to achieve. (fractovia.org)
Submission1
- Each submission will be reviewed first in the editorial office for the primary check, and then the eligible ones will be sent for peer review. (hep.com.cn)
News4
- When sharing news releases from external sources, the editorial team takes the same approach of fact-checking and evaluating a release for authenticity, accuracy, and relevance. (labmanager.com)
- In the cases where a complete review is not possible, we rely on spot-checking and our previous evaluation of possible sources of information and of the editorial procedures used by the information provider (for example, in the case of the use of government agency news releases). (fractovia.org)
- This is a summary of CTV News policies and is not meant to be comprehensive. (ctvnews.ca)
- Soon, the News Editorial Policy for VHL MTCI will be available. (bvsalud.org)
Implementation1
- First, most of the countries have only made moderate progress because implementation of tobacco control policies has been at a middle level of achievement, neither the highest nor the lowest, in other words a "comfort zone" level. (who.int)
Improvements1
- If there is going to be an aggressive policy shift that will complicate everything from clean-energy improvements to building plans on shoreline properties, people have to be clear on the reasons. (staradvertiser.com)
Senate1
- And while Biden comes from a long history in the Senate where the Federal Reserve policy was almost never questioned, we're now in different times. (albertleatribune.com)
Version1
- This is the abbreviated version of the assessment policy. (uv.es)
Proposals1
- This fall, students will return to a University that botched new policy proposals for students living off-campus by creating new regulations that treat 21-year-olds like children and unfairly target Greek life organizations. (gwhatchet.com)
Psychology2
- This is a literature review on the study of Educational Policies and its relation to School and Educational Psychology. (bvsalud.org)
- Research on the intersection between Educational Policies and School and Educational Psychology is still incipient. (bvsalud.org)
Privacy policy2
- You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link. (cdc.gov)
- We design our website with the goal of making it clear to you when you are leaving our websites for another website so that you will know that another site's advertising, editorial policy, privacy policy, and terms of use are in effect. (fractovia.org)
User1
- User comments are governed by a separate comments policy . (punetech.com)
Decisions1
- We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. (undip.ac.id)
Responsible1
- We are not responsible for how other websites handle editorial once you leave our website. (fractovia.org)
Health Policy1
- He also serves on several scientific, public health, and health policy national and international committees. (cdc.gov)
Education1
- We also have organised the operations of our website to provide for appropriate separation of our education and promotion programs from an editorial perspective. (fractovia.org)