Tolterodine does not affect the human in vivo metabolism of the probe drugs caffeine, debrisoquine and omeprazole. (1/138)

AIM: To investigate the in vivo effect of treatment with tolterodine on debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation (an index of CYP2D6 activity), omeprazole 5-hydroxylation (CYP2C19), omeprazole sulphoxidation (CYP3A4) and caffeine N3-demethylation (CYP1A2). METHODS: Twelve healthy male volunteers (eight extensive metabolisers [EMs] and four poor metabolisers [PMs] with respect to CYP2D6) received 4 mg tolterodine L-tartrate orally twice daily for 6 days. All subjects were EMs with respect to CYP2C19. The subjects received single oral doses of debrisoquine (10 mg), omeprazole (20 mg) and caffeine (100 mg) for determination of the appropriate metabolic ratios (MR). The drugs were given on separate consecutive days, before, during and after the co-administration of tolterodine. RESULTS: Mean serum tolterodine concentrations were 5-10 times higher in PMs than in EMs. Serum concentrations of the active 5-hydroxymethyl metabolite of tolterodine, 5-HM, were not quantifiable in PMs. The mean MR of debrisoquine (95% confidence interval) during tolterodine treatment was 0.50 (0.25-0.99) and did not differ statistically from the values before [0.49 (0.20-1.2)] and after tolterodine administration [0.46 (0.14-1.6)] in EMs. The mean MR of omeprazole hydroxylation and sulphoxidation or caffeine metabolism were not changed in the presence of tolterodine in either EMs or PMs. Debrisoquine and caffeine had no significant effect on the AUC(1,3 h) of either tolterodine or 5-HM, but during omeprazole administration small decreases (13-19%) in these parameters were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Tolterodine, administered at twice the expected therapeutic dosage, did not change the disposition of the probe drugs debrisoquine, omeprazole and caffeine and thus had no detectable effect on the activities of CYPs 2D6, 2C19, 3A4 and 1A2. Alteration of the metabolism of substrates of these enzymes by tolterodine is unlikely to occur.  (+info)

Impact of ethnic origin and quinidine coadministration on codeine's disposition and pharmacodynamic effects. (2/138)

CYP2D6 is polymorphically distributed so that in poor metabolizers enzyme activity is missing. The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of codeine with and without quinidine between Caucasian and Chinese extensive metabolizers of debrisoquin. Nine Caucasians and eight Chinese subjects received in random, double blind fashion, on two occasions, codeine 120 mg. with placebo or with quinidine 100 mg. Pharmacodynamic effects were determined over 6 h. Codeine-apparent clearance and partial metabolic clearance by O-demethylation were significantly greater in the Caucasian than in the Chinese subjects (1939 +/- 175 ml/min versus 1301 +/- 193 ml/min, p <.03 and 162.7 +/- 36.6 ml/min versus 52.7 +/- 12.7 ml/min, p <.02, respectively). Codeine's respiratory effects (except on resting ventilation) were significantly greater in the Caucasian than in the Chinese subjects (p <.05), but no interethnic differences were noted in codeine's effect on the digit symbol substitution test and pupillary ratio. No morphine or morphine metabolites were detected in plasma when codeine was coadministered with quinidine. Codeine O-demethylation was significantly reduced after quinidine in both ethnic groups; however, the absolute decrease was greater in Caucasians (115.8 +/- 25.9 ml/min versus 46.8 +/- 10.6 ml/min, respectively, p <.03). The diminished production of morphine after quinidine was associated in the Caucasians, but not in the Chinese, with a marked reduction in codeine's effects (p <.01). In conclusion, Chinese produce less morphine from codeine, exhibit reduced sensitivity to that morphine, and therefore might experience reduced analgesic effect in response to codeine. In addition, quinidine induced inhibition of codeine O-demethylation is ethnically dependent with the reduction being greater in Caucasians.  (+info)

Evidence that serine 304 is not a key ligand-binding residue in the active site of cytochrome P450 2D6. (3/138)

Homology models of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) have identified serine 304 as an active-site residue and implicated a putative role for this residue in substrate enantioselectivity and the differential inhibition of enzyme activity by the diastereoisomers quinine and quinidine. The role of serine 304 in selectivity is thought to be achieved through a preferential hydrogen-bond interaction between the hydroxyl group of the residue and one of the stereoisomers of each ligand. We have tested this hypothesis by substituting serine 304 with alanine, a non-hydrogen-bonding residue, and compared the properties of the wild-type and mutant enzymes in microsomes prepared from yeast cells expressing the appropriate cDNA-derived enzyme. The Ser(304)Ala substitution did not alter the enantioselective oxidation of metoprolol; the O-demethylation reaction remained R-(+)-enantioselective (wild-type, R/S, 1.7; mutant, R/S, 1.6), whereas alpha-hydroxylation remained S-(-)-enantioselective (wild-type and mutant, R/S, 0.7). Similarly, the selective oxidation of the R-(+) and S-(-) enantiomers of propranolol to the major 4-hydroxy metabolite was identical with both wild-type and mutant forms of the enzyme (R/S 0.9), although the formation of minor metabolites (5-hydroxy and deisopropylpropranolol) did show some slight alteration in enantioselectivity. The differential inhibition of enzyme activity by quinine and quinidine was also identical with both forms of CYP2D6, the IC(50) values for each enzyme being approx. 10 microM and 0.1 microM for quinine and quinidine, respectively. The kinetics of formation of alpha-hydroxymetoprolol and 4-hydroxydebrisoquine by wild-type and the Ser(304)Ala mutant was also very similar. However, modest changes in the regioselective oxidation of metoprolol and debrisoquine were observed with the Ser(304)Ala mutant. The regio- and enantioselective oxidation of an analogue of metoprolol, in which the hydroxyl group attached to the chiral carbon was replaced by a methyl moiety, was again identical with both wild-type and Ser(304)Ala mutant. However, the observed selectivity was the reverse of that observed with metoprolol. Collectively, these data indicate that Ser(304) is unlikely to be a key ligand-binding residue, although the residue may indeed be located in the active-site cavity. The reversal of selectivity with the methyl analogue of metoprolol indicates that the hydroxyl group attached to the chiral centre of ligands, such as metoprolol, is important in defining the enzyme's selective properties, and that a hydrogen-bonding residue, other than Ser(304), may be involved in this interaction. Current homology models of the active site of CYP2D6 that predict a hydrogen-bond interaction between Ser(304) and specific ligands will need to be re-evaluated, and other candidate residues capable of such an interaction nominated and tested by site-directed mutagenesis studies.  (+info)

Inhibition of debrisoquine hydroxylation with quinidine in subjects with three or more functional CYP2D6 genes. (4/138)

AIMS: To study whether the CYP2D6 capacity in ultrarapid metabolizers of debrisoquine due to duplication/multiduplication of a functional CYP2D6 gene, can be 'normalised' by low doses of the CYP2D6 inhibitor quinidine and whether this is dose-dependent. METHODS: Five ultrarapid metabolizers of debrisoquine with 3, 4 or 13 functional CYP2D6 genes were given single oral doses of 5, 10, 20, 40, 80 and 160 mg quinidine. Four hours after quinidine intake, 10 mg debrisoquine was given. Urine was collected for 6 h after debrisoquine administration. Debrisoquine and its 4-hydroxymetabolite were analysed by h.p.l.c. and the debrisoquine metabolic ratio (MR) was calculated. RESULTS: Without quinidine the MR in the ultrarapid metabolizers ranged between 0.01 and 0.07. A dose-effect relationship could be established for quinidine with regard to the inhibitory effect on CYP2D6 activity. To reach an MR of 1-2, subjects with 3 or 4 functional genes required a quinidine dose of about 40 mg, while the sister and brother with 13 functional genes required about 80 mg quinidine. After 160 mg quinidine, the MRs, in the subjects with 3, 3, 4, 13 and 13 functional genes, were 12.6, 10.1, 9.2, 2.4 and 2.2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A dose-effect relationship could be established for quinidine inhibition of CYP2D6 in ultrarapid metabolizers. The clinical use of low doses of quinidine as an inhibitor of CYP2D6 might be considered in ultrarapid metabolizers taking CYP2D6 metabolized drugs rather than giving increased doses of the drug. Normalizing the metabolic capacity of CYP2D6, by giving a low dose of quinidine, may solve the problem of 'treatment resistance' caused by ultrarapid metabolism.  (+info)

A micromethod for quantitation of debrisoquine and 4-hydroxydebrisoquine in urine by liquid chromatography. (5/138)

We describe a new simple, selective and sensitive micromethod based on HPLC and fluorescence detection to measure debrisoquine (D) and 4-hydroxydebrisoquine (4-OHD) in urine for the investigation of xenobiotic metabolism by debrisoquine hydroxylase (CYP2D6). Four hundred microl of urine was required for the analysis of D and 4-OHD. Peaks were eluted at 8.3 min (4-OHD), 14.0 min (D) and 16.6 min for the internal standard, metoprolol (20 microg/ml). The 5-microm CN-reverse-phase column (Shimpack, 250 x 4.6 mm) was eluted with a mobile phase consisting of 0.25 M acetate buffer, pH 5.0, and acetonitrile (9:1, v/v) at 0.7 ml/min with detection at lambdaexcitation = 210 nm and lambdaemission = 290 nm. The method, validated on the basis of measurements of spiked urine, presented 3 ng/ml (D) and 6 ng/ml (4-OHD) sensitivity, 390-6240 ng/ml (D) and 750-12000 ng/ml (4-OHD) linearity, and 5.7/8.2% (D) and 5.3/8.2% (4-OHD) intra/interassay precision. The method was validated using urine of a healthy Caucasian volunteer who received one 10-mg tablet of Declinax(R), po, in the morning after an overnight fast. Urine samples (diuresis of 4 or 6 h) were collected from zero to 24 h. The urinary excretion of D and 4-OHD, Fel (0-24 h), i.e., fraction of dose administered and excreted into urine, was 6.4% and 31.9%, respectively. The hydroxylation capacity index reported as metabolic ratio was 0.18 (D/4-OHD) for the person investigated and can be compared to reference limits of >12.5 for poor metabolizers (PM) and <12.5 for extensive metabolizers (EM). In parallel, the recovery ratio (RR), another hydroxylation capacity index, was 0.85 (4-OHD: SigmaD + 4-OHD) versus reference limits of RR <0.12 for PM and RR >0. 12 for EM. The healthy volunteer was considered to be an extensive metabolizer on the basis of the debrisoquine test.  (+info)

CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes of patients with terodiline cardiotoxicity identified through the yellow card system. (6/138)

AIMS: Terodiline has concentration dependent QT prolonging effects and thus the potential for cardiotoxicity. Pharmacogenetic variation in terodiline metabolism could be responsible for cardiotoxicity. We sought to determine whether CYP2D6 (debrisoquine hydroxylase) or CYP2C19 (S-mephenytoin hydroxylase) status is a risk factor for terodiline cardiotoxicity. METHODS: Using the UK Yellow Card scheme to identify patients, blood samples were obtained from eight patients who survived ventricular tachycardia or torsades de pointes suspected to be due to terodiline, for determination of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes. Genotype prevalence was compared with that in published general population groups. RESULTS: One patient was a CYP2D6 poor metaboliser (CYP2D6*4 homozygous) and a second was heterozygous for CYP2D6*4, a slightly lower frequency for these genotypes compared with the general population (P = 0.31). In the case of CYP2C19, one patient was a poor metaboliser and four were heterozygous for the variant CYP2C19*2 allele, compared with general population frequencies of 2% and 23%, respectively (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that debrisoquine poor metaboliser status is not primarily responsible for terodiline cardiotoxicity. However, possession of the CYP2C19*2 allele appears to contribute to adverse cardiac reactions to terodiline. The present study demonstrates the feasibility of using spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting schemes to determine the contribution of genotype for metabolizing enzymes to uncommon adverse drug reactions.  (+info)

Halofantrine and chloroquine inhibit CYP2D6 activity in healthy Zambians. (7/138)

AIMS: To determine the effect of therapeutic loading doses of halofantrine and chloroquine on CYP2D6 activity in healthy black Zambians. METHODS: Twenty healthy black male Zambians were phenotyped for CYP2D6 activity by measuring the debrisoquine/4-hydroxydebrisoquine ratio in a 0-8 h urine sample after a 10 mg oral dose of debrisoquine hemi-sulphate. The subjects (all 'extensive metabolizer' phenotype with respect to CYP2D6) were randomized into two groups of 10, and 24 h later one group received 1500 mg halofantrine hydrochloride and the other group 1500 mg chloroquine phosphate both orally in divided doses. All subjects were given further 10 mg doses of debrisoquine at 2 h, 1 week and 2 weeks after the last dose of the antimalarial drug, and phenotyped as described above. RESULTS: The median debrisoquine/4-hydroxydebrisoquine 0-8 h urinary ratio was increased by halofantrine (1.39 to 6.05; P<0.01; 95% confidence intervals 4.00-11.7) and chloroquine (1.96 to 3.91; P<0.01; 95% confidence intervals 1.34-2.66) when debrisoquine was given 2 h after treatment. The decrease in CYP2D6 activity remained statistically significant for 1 week after both drugs. Halofantrine was a significantly more potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 than chloroquine (P=0.037). Phenocopying occurred in two subjects taking halofantrine and one taking chloroquine (i.e. the debrisoquine/4-hydroxydebrisoquine ratios became consistent with the poor metabolizer phenotype). CONCLUSIONS: Given in therapeutic loading doses, both halofantrine and chloroquine caused significant inhibition of CYP2D6 activity in healthy black Zambians. With respect to halofantrine, this finding reinforces the recommendation that its combination with other drugs known to prolong the QT interval should be avoided, especially those that are metabolized significantly by CYP2D6.  (+info)

Comparison of debrisoquine and guanethidine in treatment of hypertension. (8/138)

A cross-over trail of debrisoquine and guanethidine in 32 patients showed that both drugs were equally effective in lowering both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The degree to which they were tolerated by the patients, however, differed greatly. After three months on each drug 18 patients preferred debrisoquine, nine preferred guanethidine, and five showed no particular preference. At current prices the cost of daily treatment to the patient was cheaper with debrisoquine than with guanethidine.  (+info)

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• 10