Comparison of cyclacillin and amoxicillin for therapy for acute maxillary sinusitis. (1/8)

Cyclacillin, a new aminosalicylic semisynthetic penicillin, was compared with amoxicillin for the therapy of acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis in 80 patients (ages, 12 to 70 years) in a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Direct sinus aspirations for quantitative culture were done for all patients before and after 10 days of therapy. Both drugs were administered at a dosage of 500 mg orally three times daily. Among culture-positive patients, clinical cure was achieved in 23 of 26 patients and 25 of 27 patients treated with cyclacillin and amoxicillin, respectively, for an overall cure rate of 91%. Bacteriologic failure occurred in 9% (4 of 44 patients); 3 of the 4 failures were in the cyclacillin group. There was no correlation between clinical or bacteriologic cure and the results of sinus transillumination (clear, dark) at follow-up. Initial direct sinus aspirates were positive in 57 of 80 cases (70%): 25 (44%) of these were the result of Streptococcus pneumoniae and 23 (40%) were the result of Haemophilus influenzae. All of these isolates were susceptible (MIC, less than or equal to 0.5 microgram/ml) to both study drugs; no ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae was recovered. On day 10 of therapy, mean concentrations of both drugs in serum were 2.5 to 2.7 micrograms/ml, but no antibiotic was detectable in 20 of 21 simultaneous sinus aspirates. Adverse effects (rash, diarrhea) were infrequent and similar in both groups. Cyclacillin appears equivalent to amoxicillin in the therapy of acute maxillary sinusitis.  (+info)

Double-blind clinical trials of oral cyclacillin and ampicillin. (2/8)

A double-blind study was performed to compare the clinical response and the incidence of side effects in 2,581 patients administered ampicillin or cyclacillin for infections of the genitourinary or respiratory tract, infections of the skin and soft tissues, or for otitis media. There was no significant difference in clinical response and bacterial eradication. All side effects, including diarrhea and skin rash, were approximately twice as frequent in patients treated with ampicillin.  (+info)

Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to beta-lactam antibiotics and beta-lactamase production. (3/8)

We examined the susceptibility of various anaerobes to four beta-lactamase susceptible (ampicillin, amoxycillin, cyclacillin, and penicillin G) and two beta-lactamase resistant (moxalactam, and N-F-thienamycin) beta-lactam antibiotics and measured beta-lactamase production. Members of the Bacteroides groups were most resistant to the six antibiotics. N-F-thienamycin was the most effective antimicrobial agent against all the test strains, moxalactam the next most effective, and penicillin G the least. Beta-lactamase production was mainly confined to Bacteroides species. Cephalosporinase was the most common beta-lactamase produced; penicillinase was detected less often. About two thirds of the penicillin-resistant isolates produced cephalosporinase. N-F-thienamycin and moxalactam were the most active agents against those anaerobes that were resistant to many beta-lactam antibiotics.  (+info)

Pharmacological and in vitro evaluation of cyclacillin: assessment as potential single-dose therapy for treatment of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection. (4/8)

The pharmacokinetic properties of cyclacillin administered as a 3.0-g oral dose, with and without progenecid, have been studied and correlated with in vitro activity of the drug against 109 isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. By 8 h after dosage, levels of cyclacillin in serum declined below the minimal inhibitory concentration and the inferior antibacterial activity of cyclacillin (compared with that of amipicillin) suggest that cyclacillin is not a promising alternative to ampicillin for single-dose treatment of gonorrhea.  (+info)

Comparative pharmacokinetics of cyclacillin and amoxicillin in infants and children. (5/8)

Concentrations of cyclacillin in serum over a 6-h period were similar in fasted and milk-fed infants who received 25-mg/kg doses of cyclacillin suspension. Measured by the concentration in serum after oral administration of 15-mg/kg doses, cyclacillin was absorbed more rapidly, reached larger concentrations, and was cleared more promptly than was amoxicillin.  (+info)

Differential recognition of beta -lactam antibiotics by intestinal and renal peptide transporters, PEPT 1 and PEPT 2. (6/8)

This study was initiated to determine if there are differences in the recognition of beta -lactam antibiotics as substrates between intestinal and renal peptide transporters, PEPT 1 and PEPT 2. Reverse transcription-coupled polymerase chain reaction and/or Northern blot analysis have established that the human intestinal cell line Caco-2 expresses PEPT 1 but not PEPT 2, whereas the rat proximal tubule cell line SKPT expresses PEPT 2 but not PEPT 1. Detailed kinetic analysis has provided unequivocal evidence for participation of PEPT 2 in SKPT cells in the transport of the dipeptide glycylsarcosine and the aminocephalosporin cephalexin. The substrate recognition pattern of PEPT 1 and PEPT 2 was studied with cefadroxil (a cephalosporin) and cyclacillin (a penicillin) as model substrates for the peptide transporters constitutively expressed in Caco-2 cells (PEPT 1) and SKPT cells (PEPT 2). Cyclacillin was 9-fold more potent than cefadroxil in competing with glycylsacosine for uptake via PEPT 1. In contrast, cefadroxil was 13-fold more potent than cyclacillin in competing with the dipeptide for uptake via PEPT 2. The substrate recognition pattern of PEPT 1 and PEPT 2 was also investigated using cloned human peptide transporters functionally expressed in HeLa cells. Expression of PEPT 1 or PEPT 2 in HeLa cells was found to induce H(+)-coupled cephalexin uptake in these cells. As was the case with Caco-2 cells and SKPT cells, the uptake of glycylsarcosine induced in HeLa cells by PEPT 1 cDNA and PEPT 2 cDNA was inhibitable by cyclacillin and cefadroxil. Again, the PEPT 1 cDNA-induced dipeptide uptake was inhibited more potently by cyclacillin than by cefadroxil, and the PEPT 2 cDNA-induced dipeptide uptake was inhibited more potently by cefadroxil than by cyclacillin. It is concluded that there are marked differences between the intestinal and renal peptide transporters in the recognition of beta -lactam antibiotics as substrates.  (+info)

Absorption of amino penicillins from everted rat intestine. (7/8)

1. Using an in vitro everted gut sac method based on that of Wilson & Wiseman (1954), a number of amino penicillins were tested in order to identify the involvement of any specialized transport mechanisms in their absorption across rat intestine. 2. Only one of the amino penicillins, cyclacillin (1-amino-cyclohexyl penicillin) was shown to be actively transported. The other penicillins appeared to diffuse passively across the intestine. 3. Cyclacillin was found to concentrate against a gradient at 37 degrees C but not at 19 degrees C. 4. Transport of cyclacillin across the mucosal membrane was saturated at mucosal concentrations greater than 1000 microgram/ml. 5. The rate of the forward flux of cyclacillin was many times that of its back flux. 6. No relationship between the active transport of cyclacillin and that of amino acids could be demonstrated.  (+info)

Recognition of beta-lactam antibiotics by rat peptide transporters, PEPT1 and PEPT2, in LLC-PK1 cells. (8/8)

PEPT1 and PEPT2 are H(+)-coupled peptide transporters expressed preferentially in the intestine and kidney, respectively, which mediate uphill transport of oligopeptides and peptide-like drugs such as beta-lactam antibiotics. In the present study, we have compared the recognition of beta-lactam antibiotics by LLC-PK1 cells stably transfected with PEPT1 or PEPT2 cDNA. Cyclacillin (aminopenicillin) and ceftibuten (anionic cephalosporin without an alpha-amino group) showed potent inhibitory effects on the glycylsarcosine uptake in the PEPT1-expressing cells. Other beta-lactams, such as cephalexin, cefadroxil, and cephradine (aminocephalosporins), inhibited modestly the PEPT1-mediated glycylsarcosine uptake. Except for ceftibuten, these beta-lactams showed much more potent inhibitions on the glycylsarcosine uptake via PEPT2 than via PEPT1. Comparison of the inhibition constant (Ki) values between cefadroxil and cephalexin suggested that the hydroxyl group at the NH2-terminal phenyl ring increased affinity for both PEPT1 and PEPT2. It is concluded that PEPT2 has a much higher affinity for beta-lactam antibiotics having an alpha-amino group than PEPT1 and that substituents at the NH2-terminal side chain of these drugs are involved in the recognition by both peptide transporters.  (+info)