PreprintsManuscriptsReviewers are notScholarlyClimate scientistResearchersELifeScientist'sArticlesTwitterSystematic ReviewProcessManuscriptUnlikeResearch papersBlogospherePublishesPerspectivesJournalLiteratureContentWork2020FindingsJournalsWidelyCitizenPapersPaper2016PublicationAlternativesNOAADataRealizeCommentaryNewsExperimentalEmailsCommentsResultsScienceTimeProblemsPublicationsArticleSaving the wStudiesInternationalWriteYearsFieldImpactPostAcademicStudyCommunity
Preprints4
- Instead of sending out a manuscript to anonymous referees to read and review, preprints should be sent to other labs to actually replicate the findings. (everydayscientist.com)
- Preprints - rapidly published non peer reviewed research articles - are becoming an increasingly common fixture in scholarly communication. (lse.ac.uk)
- Do preprints need peer review? (lse.ac.uk)
- Do preprints improve with peer review? (cdc.gov)
Manuscripts5
- Incentive to review: Many reviewers make an effort to judge manuscripts honestly and on merit. (biomedcentral.com)
- The current view is that arXiv could implement a Community Peer Review model, in which registered readers are allowed to comment and rate manuscripts, which are then collated to form a ranking. (lse.ac.uk)
- A registrant can submit several papers per year, but a maximum of six manuscripts will be peer reviewed. (lse.ac.uk)
- The goal of this book is to make it easier for scientists, especially those new to scientific writing, to write about their results and to get their manuscripts accepted in peer-reviewed journals. (wiley-vch.de)
- When reviewing manuscripts prior to publication, many scientists become frustrated by identifying the same minor issues repeatedly. (uwaterloo.ca)
Reviewers are not2
- A way around that would be either double-blinded peer review (where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous) or, even better, open peer review where reviewers are not anonymous and their comments are openly available. (biomedcentral.com)
- The second element leading to a high variance in the peer review process is that reviewers are not investing the same amount of time to analyze the projects (or equivalently are not with the same abilities). (wikipedia.org)
Scholarly7
- Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. (wikipedia.org)
- Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals. (wikipedia.org)
- Scholarly peer review has been subject to several criticisms, and various proposals for reforming the system have been suggested over the years. (wikipedia.org)
- Likewise, the recognition and recruitment of peer reviewers continues to be a significant issue in the field of scholarly publishing. (wikipedia.org)
- In this post Wang LingFeng discusses how the development of preprint servers as self-organising peer review platforms could be the future of scholarly publication. (lse.ac.uk)
- However, unlike traditional scholarly publications, they have not been peer reviewed. (lse.ac.uk)
- Energy and Environment Research (EER) is a double-blind peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to promoting scholarly exchange among scientists and researchers in the field of energy and environment. (lu.se)
Climate scientist4
- Seitz was not a climate scientist, had not been involved with the IPCC's Second Assessment Report, and had not attended the key IPCC Plenary Meeting in Madrid at which the "discernible human influence" finding was finalized. (scientificamerican.com)
- Despite not being a credentialed climate scientist, Mr. Lewis immediately identified a significant error in the paper, substantially altering the conclusions, which the authors now acknowledge . (drroyspencer.com)
- The federal climate scientist hailed by conservatives as a whistleblower for allegedly revealing manipulated global warming data said yesterday he was actually calling out a former colleague for not properly following agency standards for research. (eenews.net)
- Bates laid out his claims, which are largely technical and related to the sharing of data, on the blog run by Judith Curry, a climate scientist who has broken with many colleagues and called into question the actual extent of humanity's influence on the planet. (eenews.net)
Researchers7
- Early-career researchers and peer review: Meanwhile, early career researchers who may make great reviewers don't get invited to review because they are not known by editors as experts in their field. (biomedcentral.com)
- Before I came to #SpotOn2016, I hadn't realized how many people were already working on new initiatives such as Authorea , Overleaf and Paperhive , to improve peer review and publishing, and to facilitate collaboration between researchers. (biomedcentral.com)
- Also, maybe publishers could find ways of allowing researchers to apply to be reviewers, so that junior scientists not yet known to the editors would be given the opportunity to become reviewers. (biomedcentral.com)
- For papers published after peer replication, the names of researchers who undertook the replication work will be included in the published paper (on a separate line). (everydayscientist.com)
- ECR Chat - Blog and international twitter community for early career researchers. (imperial.ac.uk)
- The Research Whisperer - Blog for early career researchers with international contributors. (imperial.ac.uk)
- The aide said the committee would again seek the emails of federal researchers, and if a formal request were ignored, another round of subpoenas could be issued or scientists might be forced to testify in front of the committee. (eenews.net)
ELife1
- In the case of eLife, peer review is used not for deciding whether to publish an article, but for assessing its importance and reliability. (wikipedia.org)
Scientist's2
- For example, a junior scientist might not feel comfortable reviewing a more senior scientist's work if they know that their name is going to be published alongside their review. (biomedcentral.com)
- It's not incompetently drafted, but it's clearly vexatious and intended to silence dissent about an alleged scientist's peer-reviewed article. (wattsupwiththat.com)
Articles8
- I've had the opportunity to receive several scientific CDC awards and have published peer reviewed journal articles during my tenure here at CDC. (cdc.gov)
- We are all accustomed to publishing our results to our peers through peer-review articles. (agu.org)
- I found this a strange if interesting claim - some Nature articles are not peer reviewed? (blogs.com)
- To the best of my knowledge, Nature never publishes research articles that have not been properly reviewed, and I doubt that any serious scientist thinks otherwise. (blogs.com)
- Since 2017, ARS scientists have published 205 peer-reviewed articles about AMR and alternatives to antibiotics. (usda.gov)
- View the latest news, press coverage, Velocity of Content blog articles and podcast episodes. (copyright.com)
- When the citation engines in the blogosphere find references in blog entries to scientific articles on the web, they could resolve those to their most canonical forms: DOIs, PubMed records. (jonudell.net)
- Last week, we posted to the site a group of four articles about a peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Neurosurgery showing that football helmet design affected concussion risk among a large group (or what scientists call a 'cohort') of college football players. (momsteam.com)
Twitter1
Systematic Review1
- Systematic Review and Future Direction of Neuro-Tourism Research (https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13040682) 2. (researchgate.net)
Process23
- Once you have agreed on the details of authorship and submitted your paper, you start the lengthy and complicated process of peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
- However, peer review does not prevent publication of invalid research, and as experimentally controlled studies of this process are difficult to arrange, direct evidence that peer review improves the quality of published papers is scarce. (wikipedia.org)
- Many studies have emphasized the problems inherent to the process of peer review. (wikipedia.org)
- Brezis and Birukou also show that the peer review process is not working properly. (wikipedia.org)
- Two main elements affect the bias in the peer process: The first element is that referees display homophily in their taste and perception of innovative ideas. (wikipedia.org)
- Brezis and Biruku show that this heterogeneity among referees will lead to seriously affect the whole peer review process, and will lead to main arbitrariness in the results of the process. (wikipedia.org)
- The peer process is also in use for projects acceptance. (wikipedia.org)
- Peer review is more problematic when choosing the projects to be funded since innovative projects are not highly ranked in the existing peer-review process. (wikipedia.org)
- The peer-review process leads to conformity, i.e., the selection of less controversial projects and papers. (wikipedia.org)
- Other attempts to reform the peer review process originate among others from the fields of metascience and journalology. (wikipedia.org)
- Reformers seek to increase the reliability and efficiency of the peer review process and to provide it with a scientific foundation. (wikipedia.org)
- The present-day peer-review system evolved from this 18th-century process, began to involve external reviewers in the mid-19th-century, and did not become commonplace until the mid-20th-century. (wikipedia.org)
- The current peer review process is a dreadful combination of being both very fallible and also a huge hurdle to communicating important science. (everydayscientist.com)
- Secondly, the process should actually be more rewarding than traditional peer review, which puts a huge burden on the authors to perform additional experiments and defend their work against armchair reviewers. (everydayscientist.com)
- Peer replication turns the process on its head: the referees would do the work of defending the manuscript's findings. (everydayscientist.com)
- Peer replication transforms the adversarial process of peer review into a cooperation among colleagues to seek the truth. (everydayscientist.com)
- The peer review process subjects scientific beliefs and claims of fact to critical analysis by qualified experts. (blogs.com)
- In his op-ed, Seitz wrote that in more than 60 years as a leading light in American science, he had "never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report. (scientificamerican.com)
- His incorrect claims regarding the IPCC's peer-review process were eventually rebutted by the IPCC leadership and by scientists involved with the IPCC report. (scientificamerican.com)
- The book covers each step throughout the submission process, from organizing and outlining the manuscript, presenting statistical data and results, to what happens during the in-house manuscript review process and what to do if an article is initially rejected. (wiley-vch.de)
- This book takes the guesswork out of the planning, writing, and publishing process and is certain to boost the publication success rate of any practicing scientist. (wiley-vch.de)
- The bad news is that the peer review process, presumably involving credentialed climate scientists, should have caught the error before publication. (drroyspencer.com)
- It also refers to the involvement of non-scientists, i.e. citizen science, in the research process. (lu.se)
Manuscript2
- Each manuscript is reviewed by 3 registrants. (lse.ac.uk)
- I highly recommend the very practical and results oriented book Getting Published in the Life Sciences by Richard J. Gladon, William R. Graves, and J. Michael Kelly to anyone in any life, natural, or biological science who seeks to write a clear and concise manuscript for publication in any peer reviewed journal. (wiley-vch.de)
Unlike2
- Unlike peer review, the referees will actually receive compensation for their work in the form of citations and another paper to include on their CV. (everydayscientist.com)
- For unlike the scientists they are criticising, they don't care about scientific truth. (newscientist.com)
Research papers1
- The journal publishes high-quality research papers, short reports, reviews, and mini-reviews that connect medical genetics research with clinical practice. (feedspot.com)
Blogosphere1
- Well, the marginalrevolution blog is influential, widely cited in the blogosphere. (jonudell.net)
Publishes2
- also publishes reviews, news, and commentary on significant developments in the photonics field. (lifeboat.com)
- Oncogene also publishes 8 Review issues a year, on a broad range of topics. (feedspot.com)
Perspectives1
- This blog contains a section on peer review perspectives from 'frustrated scientist' Elodie Chabrol. (biomedcentral.com)
Journal7
- Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference. (wikipedia.org)
- is a prestigious, peer-reviewed scientific journal that is published by the Nature Publishing Group. (lifeboat.com)
- Publons - Your publications, citation metrics, peer reviews and journal editing work, in one place. (imperial.ac.uk)
- CODEN: GENEG9) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of genetics and genomics published monthly online by MDPI. (feedspot.com)
- Insects (ISSN 2075-4450) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of entomology published by MDPI online quarterly. (bvs.br)
- As an interdisciplinary peer-reviewed open-access journal, the IJC is dedicated to furthering the understanding of institutions for use and management of resources that are (or could be) enjoyed collectively. (lu.se)
- Journal of Management and Sustainability (JMS) is an international, double-blind peer-reviewed, open-access journal for academics and practitioners of sustainable management. (lu.se)
Literature1
- To start my assessment, I conducted a literature review of studies that observed and recorded the various types of habitats where sea otters currently exist. (oregonstate.edu)
Content2
- He blogs at Managing Greatness: Strategy in the Age of Search & Social , where his favorite topics include User Generated Content, Search Engine Optimization, monetization, and leadership. (bruceclay.com)
- The great thing about blogs is that they make it very easy to make sure such content isn't wasted. (greenmonk.net)
Work11
- These issues suggest that a system change may be in order - not just changes to peer review itself but also to how peer reviewers, authors and their work are evaluated. (biomedcentral.com)
- As a first step towards that change, I would like to see double-blinded review introduced as standard so I wouldn't feel I was being judged based on my boss's, my colleague's or my name but rather on the work I present in the paper I submit. (biomedcentral.com)
- Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. (wikipedia.org)
- Elaborating, he shared a confidence with the audience, telling the audience of scientists that meditating was hard work for him (even though he meditates for 4 hours every morning), and that if neuroscientists were able to find a way to put electrodes in his brain and provide him with the same outcome as he gets from meditating, he would be an enthusiastic volunteer. (scientificamerican.com)
- The NCEH/ATSDR "Meet the Scientist" series provides insight into the work of NCEH/ATSDR scientists. (cdc.gov)
- What notable contributions has your work as a Senior Health Scientist contributed to the public health arena? (cdc.gov)
- The APHRC seeks to recruit a Post-doctoral Research Scientist to work in the West Africa Regional Office (WARO) in Senegal. (aphrc.org)
- I'm sorry but to characterize the hard work of the majority of climate scientists, including many Christians as 'voodoo meteorology' is inappropriate, never mind incorrect. (blogspot.com)
- As we pointed out in an earlier post, even as recently as Darwin, scientists were either independently wealthy or forced to cobble together funding and resources for their work. (ametsoc.org)
- Scientists-version-3.0 were able to work in big, sometimes, multi-disciplinary teams for years at a stretch. (ametsoc.org)
- I think the brushback that the committee received, and the chairman received consistently, about how science is capable of policing itself and doesn't need anyone outside asking questions, even when the science being discussed is paid for and performed by scientists paid for with the taxpayer's money and used to implement far-reaching federal policies or justify implementation of far-reaching federal policies, doesn't really work,' the aide said. (eenews.net)
20202
Findings2
- First and foremost, because most scientists value finding truth, and would love to show that their findings hold up even after rigorous testing. (everydayscientist.com)
- Still, the available figures suggest that research findings, even if peer-reviewed and published in reputable journals, should not be necessarily assumed to be reproducible. (bvsalud.org)
Journals3
- Warming continued unabated, as established by multiple independent data sets from around the world, and numerous studies in peer-reviewed journals. (newscientist.com)
- For decades now those of us trying to publish papers which depart from the climate doom-and-gloom narrative have noticed a trend toward both biased and sloppy peer review of research submitted for publication in scientific journals. (drroyspencer.com)
- Sherzod's research has been published in numerous peer-reviewed journals and edited volumes. (lu.se)
Widely1
- The blog entry itself was widely noticed, it has 31 del.icio.us bookmarks . (jonudell.net)
Citizen4
- Scientists gain new insights about the critically endangered hawksbill sea turtle by engaging citizen scientists. (esri.com)
- The app simplifies sea turtle sighting input from citizen scientists. (esri.com)
- It was a decision that would lead to new technology applications that support not only sea turtles but citizen scientists. (esri.com)
- Baumbach's idea, which he and another grad student launched in 2014, was to forgo the transmitter and enlist citizen scientists as collaborators. (esri.com)
Papers8
- The lack of peer review, is also perceived as making preprint servers harder to use, as finding high quality papers amidst a sea of other papers is a time-consuming, if not impossible task. (lse.ac.uk)
- Second, some papers may be quickly reviewed by a number of readers, while others may be unduly neglected. (lse.ac.uk)
- Third, as reviewing is voluntary, there is little control over whether reviewing takes place at all and the time taken for papers to be reviewed. (lse.ac.uk)
- Papers are reviewed in the order in which they are submitted. (lse.ac.uk)
- Whereby, their own papers will not be reviewed and their right to use the preprint database will be suspended for a period of time. (lse.ac.uk)
- Papers and reviewers are matched based on their relative rankings: A paper with an estimated rating of N should be reviewed by reviewers whose review qualification level is N-1, N or N+1. (lse.ac.uk)
- Scientists have used data from previous alignments of the two spacecraft to produce multiple peer-reviewed papers on solar phenomena observed by both missions. (nasa.gov)
- He published 223 peer-reviewed papers (Thomson Reuters) (Google Scholar: h-index: 101). (researchgate.net)
Paper10
- A potential issue could be that some reviewers may see the authors as competition and thus review a paper more harshly than may be warranted. (biomedcentral.com)
- As Andy York has pointed out, the best test of a new method is not a peer reviewing your paper, but a peer actually using your technique . (everydayscientist.com)
- Check out their peer-reviewed paper associated with this post. (agu.org)
- They investigated their models based on his purported conclusion and published a peer-reviewed paper regarding the issue. (universalhub.com)
- But that hasn't stopped British newspaper The Mail on Sunday trying to resurrect a dead duck: this time claiming that scientists at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) played fast and loose with data on a well-regarded 2015 paper in Science that definitively showed there was no pause in global warming. (newscientist.com)
- Ken McRitchie states that my paper was not peer reviewed. (blogs.com)
- Ertel's paper is rather laughingly referred to as "peer-reviewed. (blogs.com)
- If the conclusions of the paper support a more alarmist narrative on the seriousness of anthropogenic global warming, the less thorough will be the peer review. (drroyspencer.com)
- Note to reader: I wrote this blog on February 25, 2014 and updated it to include new information and updates one year later February 25, 2015 about a new 'helmet add-on paper. (momsteam.com)
- What he found humorous was that taped to the sign was a paper that said, "If you have evidence to disprove evolution… then write it down, get it peer reviewed & collect your Nobel prize. (consider.org)
20161
- Nature, October 2016 - This edition of Nature is a special issue on young scientists that focuses on the problems that postdocs and early career academics are currently facing and how to solve them. (imperial.ac.uk)
Publication4
- The first record of an editorial pre-publication peer-review is from 1665 by Henry Oldenburg, the founding editor of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society at the Royal Society of London. (wikipedia.org)
- The first peer-reviewed publication might have been the Medical Essays and Observations published by the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1731. (wikipedia.org)
- One serious problem with peer replication is the additional time it may take between submission and ultimate publication. (everydayscientist.com)
- It survived a rigorous peer review that included a famous psychologist whom I will reveal in a later publication. (blogs.com)
Alternatives2
- Alternatives to common peer review practices have been put to the test, in particular open peer review, where the comments are visible to readers, generally with the identities of the peer reviewers disclosed as well, e.g. (wikipedia.org)
- Indeed, the "power of the paradigm" often shapes the thinking of scientists so strongly that they become unable to accurately summarize, let alone evaluate, radical alternatives. (scienceblogs.com)
NOAA1
- Yesterday, a NOAA spokesman did not directly address the specific allegations, other than to say that they are currently under review. (eenews.net)
Data3
- But once you discover peer review and the struggle to publish, you realize that having gathered your data was actually only the beginning. (biomedcentral.com)
- In an interview with E&E News yesterday, former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration principal scientist John Bates had a significantly more nuanced take on the controversy that has swirled since a top House Republican hailed his blog post as proof that the agency 'played fast and loose' with temperature data to disprove the theory of a global warming 'pause. (eenews.net)
- But science should be about open shared peer review of the data, and associated theories. (greenmonk.net)
Realize1
- First Watts (wrongly) suggests that global warming 'proponents' expect the warming to happen in a steady, linear fashion, but then a few moments later admits that the climate is much more complex than that (which, believe it or not, climate scientists realize). (skepticalscience.com)
Commentary1
- So it was peer reviewed, and the commentary section is not reserved for non-definitive reporting. (blogs.com)
News3
- No one would read the news with months of delay, but that's what we scientists do. (biomedcentral.com)
- We regularly report on new research outputs in our blog and news, while our publications page lists recent DCC outputs and presentations. (dcc.ac.uk)
- And the story that Pope Francis is a scientist, a chemist with a Masters Degree, gets repeated in countless blogs and other news outlets. (shroudstory.com)
Experimental1
- Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical re- sults in as much detail as possible. (bvs.br)
Emails3
- A UK Parliament report concluded that the emails have no bearing on our understanding of climate science and that claims against UEA scientists are misleading. (ucsusa.org)
- An Associated Press review of the emails found that they "don't undercut the vast body of evidence showing the world is warming because of man-made greenhouse gas emissions. (ucsusa.org)
- Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) has issued subpoenas and has for nearly two years attempted to obtain scientists' emails involved in the global warming pause research. (eenews.net)
Comments1
- In my case, correcting common errors and inconsistencies became so repetitive that I gradually compiled recurring concerns into a single document, allowing rapid copy/paste/editing of these comments into reviews whenever needed. (uwaterloo.ca)
Results2
- They underline that the ratings are not robust, e.g., changing reviewers can have a dramatic impact on the review results. (wikipedia.org)
- This is evident from the six separate posts on Watts' blog (to date) desperately trying ( and failing ) to find a fundamental flaw in the results of Marcott et al. (skepticalscience.com)
Science10
- The Plainspoken Scientist is the science communication blog of AGU's Sharing Science program. (agu.org)
- With this blog, we wish to showcase creative and effective science communication via multiple mediums and modes. (agu.org)
- Dan blogs about peer-reviewed Earth science for Junior High level audiences and up. (agu.org)
- His assertions, published simultaneously in Judith Curry's contrarian climate blog and the Mail , have now been thoroughly debunked in the science press . (newscientist.com)
- What is peer review but quality control (making sure the scientific methodology is sound) coupled with testing new science against the current consensus to see where it fits in or where it exposes weaknesses? (scienceblogs.com)
- If Casey had two neurons to rub together, he could answer the question in two sentences and echo how scientists would answer the question: When you have an actual scientifically valid reason, based on science, evidence, experimentation, and observational evidence, to think that the current scientific consensus about something is in error, then it is appropriate to challenge the scientific consensus. (scienceblogs.com)
- Anyone who has studied the history of science knows that scientists are not immune to the non-rational dynamics of the herd. (scienceblogs.com)
- Part of the problem is the increased specialization of climate science (and other sciences in general), so that there are relatively few peers who know enough about what they are reviewing to pass expert judgement on it. (drroyspencer.com)
- I just want to make it clear - science needs to be open to peer review, whether privately or publicly funded. (greenmonk.net)
- Any history of science will tell you that for every teenager who from getting hit by a falling apple intuits the structure of the universe there are hundreds of excellent scientists who look at the state of the art and decide they can do a trifle better. (acm.org)
Time2
- Traditional peer review requires a lot of time and effort to do well, but with zero reward except a warm fuzzy feeling (if that). (everydayscientist.com)
- A penalty mechanism for if an author or reviewer does not accept a review assignment, or does not complete review on time. (lse.ac.uk)
Problems2
- But open peer review comes with problems of its own. (biomedcentral.com)
- And those have equipped scientists-version-3.0 to tackle a raft of scientific problems that had previously defied analytical, closed-form mathematical solutions: modeling the economy and financial markets, or the weather and climate, or a nuclear explosion, or the chemical structure of complex organic molecules, and so on. (ametsoc.org)
Publications1
- Usefule tool if you wish to embed your publications in your website, blog or Linkedin page. (lu.se)
Article6
- Only after the review is finished will the identity of the author/s be revealed on the article. (lse.ac.uk)
- But lets look at the conversation surrounding the PloS Medicine article cited in the blog entry to which Gordon points. (jonudell.net)
- What about the PloS Medicine article cited in this popular blog entry? (jonudell.net)
- But the PLoS Medicine reaction to the article is not part of the blog conversation. (jonudell.net)
- The conversation-tracking tools used by bloggers should discover scientific discourse related to a scientific article as easily as they discover blog discourse. (jonudell.net)
- This article is a slightly updated version of a note I posted almost two years ago on my personal blog, bertrandmeyer.com . (acm.org)
Saving the w1
- Read on to learn more about NCEH/ATSDR's Chinaro Kennedy, DrPH, MPH, and CDC Senior Health Scientist, who's in hot pursuit of saving the world. (cdc.gov)
Studies2
- Wie hier im Blog bereits erwähnt , bin ich in der vergangenen Woche von der Graduate Studies Group des Georg-Simmel-Zentrums für Metropolenforschung an der Humboldt-Universität Berlin zu einem Vortrag eingeladen worden. (fu-berlin.de)
- The lack of representation of successful female scientists during my studies as a mechanics engineer affected myself and some fellow students. (lu.se)
International1
- This annual, peer-reviewed report on the Arctic was compiled by a total of 61 international scientists. (accuweather.com)
Write3
- He then write a blog about it. (universalhub.com)
- Guest writers write blogs on a diverse range of timely academic issues, such as the REF, public engagement and open access. (imperial.ac.uk)
- We must be careful in what we say and what we write about Pope Francis as to him being a scientist or chemist. (shroudstory.com)
Years5
- In her current position, she has served as a senior health scientist for the past three years as a senior clearance officer. (cdc.gov)
- Scientist version 3.0 This pretty much covers every scientist alive today who's been out of graduate school for at least 5-10 years. (ametsoc.org)
- Each registrant's review qualification level will be adjusted every three years. (lse.ac.uk)
- Scientists from USDA developed the tools to mass produce penicillin, which was used for treating wounded soldiers over 70 years ago during World War II. (usda.gov)
- In point of fact I do think that in 1957 there was a degree of 'licenciado en ciencias químicas', which is comparable to a master's (at least 4 years), though the reference above implies Bergoglio didn't study for it. (shroudstory.com)
Field1
- Academic peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) academic field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. (wikipedia.org)
Impact4
- have shown that there is a low correlation between peer review outcomes and the future impact measured by citations. (wikipedia.org)
- While I was very happy with my position with the state, I was even more intrigued with the far-reaching impact that CDC scientists have in the public health arena. (cdc.gov)
- LSE Impact Blog - Blog about maximising the impact of academic research. (imperial.ac.uk)
- To add to this problem, that the assessment of methodological rigor ends up blending conflated with that of impact and originality during peer review and editorial appraisal, even though these aspects clearly represent different dimensions of scientific quality. (bvsalud.org)
Post3
- Interested candidates are encouraged to send their application letter and CV in English to [email protected] with the subject "Post-doctoral Research Scientist -WARO" by December 05 , 2019 . (aphrc.org)
- Hopefully this blog post, based on my experience with different presenters, will help offer some "pointers" for those looking to pick up a new model. (uwaterloo.ca)
- Manipulating the Human Microbiome for Precision Public Health: Prospects and Challenges (blog post) Haile M, et al. (cdc.gov)
Academic1
- The New Academic - Blog by Liverpool-based humanities lecturer with advice on many aspects of academia, aimed at those starting or aiming for their first permanent academic job. (imperial.ac.uk)
Study4
- Ketchum's study has been submitted for peer review, rather than reviewed by other scientists - so at this stage, it's not considered a scientific discovery. (yahoo.com)
- Yet, even though the Carlson study makes claims of scientific fact, it had not been peer reviewed. (blogs.com)
- Prof. Dr. Mahmoodi was ranked in Stanford University study of the world's top 2% of scientists in 2022 (Rank = 42 in Chemical Engineering). (researchgate.net)
- Last week, we reported on a peer-reviewed study showing that football helmet design affected concussion risk. (momsteam.com)
Community4
- There are three obvious weak points to Community Peer Review. (lse.ac.uk)
- Researchers14 blog - Researchers14 is a group of Universities, which represent 65% of the research staff community in the UK. (imperial.ac.uk)
- As a community, scientists have beliefs and agendas that get in the way of pure objectivity. (consider.org)
- The global community has worked on highlighting the inspiring and engaging women scientists of our century. (lu.se)