• 2023. Establishing research priorities for investigating male suicide risk and recovery: A modified Delphi study with lived-experience experts. . (cardiff.ac.uk)
  • In today's post Alice Meadows, Jasmine Wallace, and Karin Wulf kick off a week of posts to celebrate Peer Review Week 2023 with their thoughts on peer review and the future of publishing. (sspnet.org)
  • INSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES & RESEARCH LEADERSHIP, LU (examples)2018 - 2023 Member of the Research and Infrastructure Board, Faculty of Medicine. (lu.se)
  • Peer Review Plan For 2020 Hepatitis C Screening Recs. (cdc.gov)
  • Since the beginning of June 2020, every one of the 11,000-plus submissions Frontiers received has been run through AIRA, which is integrated into its collaborative peer-review platform. (ieee.org)
  • In the proposed pilot , research projects funded through the Horizon 2020 programme would be subject to general scrutiny, with people posting opinions on the progress of a given project and project participants, or indeed anyone, able to openly respond to comments. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • Today, Horizon 2020 reviews are carried out by Commission staff with the assistance, typically, of three experts per project. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • Openness is not making [Horizon 2020] more attractive because it is against the interests of companies, [which] aim to make profit with the results," commented Richard Smits, managing director at CSI chemical, a research consultancy based in Sofia, Bulgaria. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • Peer Review Week 2020 Resources For Everyone! (sspnet.org)
  • Since March 2020, all 42 additional review panel meetings have been virtual, either online (VM or Zoom) or telephone. (cdc.gov)
  • Health sciences librarians contribute to systematic review production but little is known about their involvement in peer reviewing SR manuscripts. (biomedcentral.com)
  • This survey aimed to assess how frequently librarians are asked to peer review systematic review manuscripts and to determine characteristics associated with those invited to review. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Results indicated that 22% ( n = 63) of respondents had been asked by journal editors to peer review systematic review or meta-analysis manuscripts. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Respondents had peer reviewed manuscripts for 38 unique journals and believed they were asked because of their professional expertise. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Reviewers not only help to select the content to be published but also are expected to provide meaningful comments that can improve the quality of the manuscripts they review. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • By incorporating reviewers' comments and suggestions, authors can improve their manuscripts and even develop new research ideas. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • writes short editorials, news and research highlights, and carries out heavy developmental/technical editing of manuscripts. (springer.com)
  • All manuscripts must include an ethical research statement that addresses the Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement . (mja.com.au)
  • Manuscripts will be subject to an internal editorial review undertaken by Lowitja Institute's Guest Editorial team prior to peer review. (mja.com.au)
  • Manuscripts will undergo peer review and assessment through the MJA 's processes. (mja.com.au)
  • This peer review process helps ensure that manuscripts are of high quality, and that the results of the research are useful and relevant to practitioners and others engaged with child nutrition programs. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • A sincere "thank you" is extended the professionals listed below who reviewed manuscripts for The Journal of Child Nutrition & Management in the past year. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • Before being accepted, external reviewers (peer-review) evaluate manuscripts. (elsevier.es)
  • Cell Biochemistry & Function also discourages submission of research based exclusively on analysis of publically available transcriptomic and proteomic datasets, although the acceptability of specific manuscripts in this particular area can be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. (wiley.com)
  • In accordance with Nature Research policy , a Data Availability Statement must be included with all original research manuscripts. (nature.com)
  • You will be asked to identify your areas of interest/expertise which the editors of Family Medicine will use to match reviewers with appropriate manuscripts. (stfm.org)
  • The information you provide will help the editors of PRiMER match reviewers with appropriate manuscripts. (stfm.org)
  • We appreciate the efforts of all the authors who took time to prepare their manuscripts and the many reviewers for their time and talent during the peer review process. (cdc.gov)
  • One hundred and nineteen ECRs who had never reviewed an RCT manuscript were recruited from December 2017 to January 2018. (nih.gov)
  • LONDON , Sept. 7, 2018 /CNW/ -- Publons - the leading scholarly peer review platform, today launched the Global State of Peer Review report , the largest ever study of peer review. (newswire.ca)
  • Reviewers who provided feedback on articles submitted to the Journal as part of the 2018 issues are listed in alphabetical order. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • We support our staff to develop their skills by undertaking performance development reviews and ensuing professional development, and in 2018 implemented a new staff induction session for research staff that focuses on research approaches and quality. (iied.org)
  • I received the Global Peer Review Awards from Web of Science in 2019, and the Outstanding Contribution Awards from Elsevier in 2017. (google.com)
  • Trained ECRs using the COBPeer tool were more likely to detect inadequate reporting in RCTs than the usual peer review processes used by journals. (nih.gov)
  • That is, reviewers should evaluate whether an article is appropriate for a certain journal, based on factors such as its submission guidelines and, for some journals, reviewer guidelines or additional information in the invitations sent to potential reviewers. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Minimally, this is an inefficient use of scarce resources, including space in journals and the time of authors, editors, and reviewers. (uaf.edu)
  • Geographical peer review disparity is harming the development of non-Western researchers - fewer review invitations mean fewer opportunities to see the latest research trends, learn what journals are looking for in a great manuscript, make professional connections with journal editors, and develop critical analysis skills. (newswire.ca)
  • Reviewers also return their peer reviews faster for more prestigious journals, as median days to complete a review reduces as JIF increases. (newswire.ca)
  • Cell Biochemistry and Function currently does not publish research in specific areas that are better served by specialist journals. (wiley.com)
  • Considerable research shows poor quality in peer review for scientific journals. (bmj.com)
  • 3 Using reviewers suggested by authors over those selected by editors failed to improved the quality of peer review for journals. (bmj.com)
  • Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals. (dovepress.com)
  • Our 23 peer reviewed journals are driven by editors who are recognized experts and leaders in their respective research areas. (agu.org)
  • We boast the fastest publication times across all Earth and space science journals, allowing your research to be accessed, read, and cited sooner. (agu.org)
  • I also serve as a regular reviewer for about 30 mainstream journals and 8 flagship conferences across the domains of Robotics, artificial intelligence, and Control. (google.com)
  • Journals would not be able to publish the research that they do without the dedication of peer reviewers. (springernature.com)
  • I love to review new journals and research articles. (springernature.com)
  • When authors are appointed by academic journals to become peer reviewers, the benefits to them are multi-fold, in terms of career development and networks, participants at a recent webinar titled Excellence in Peer Review: How to be an effective peer reviewer were told. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Journals also have annual acknowledgements of their reviewers and could link their contributions to their ORCID profiles. (universityworldnews.com)
  • In some cases, journals have editors-in-chief, and others may have section or associate editors who oversee peer review of articles within own specialist area. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Guest Post - Integrity and Trust in Peer Reviewed Literature: Will Journals Be Alone in Doing the Heavy Lifting? (sspnet.org)
  • As a biostatistician and epidemiologist, Dr Bahnassy made significant contributions to science publishing globally / regionally, having published over 100 papers in different peer-reviewed journals. (who.int)
  • and a senior peer reviewer for several journals and research centres. (who.int)
  • or it could refer to research findings that are locked behind paywalls of academic journals. (lu.se)
  • He is critical of the current way in which research is typically classified as credible: publications in the right journals and peer review. (lu.se)
  • The demand for peer review is also increasing owing to an increase in scientific production and proliferation of new scientific journals. (medscape.com)
  • It performs three broad functions, explains Daniel Petrariu , director of project management: assessing the quality of the manuscript, assessing quality of peer review, and recommending editors and reviewers. (ieee.org)
  • Publons allows reviewers to track their peer review contributions. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Publons Academy and Nature Masterclass provide free peer-review training courses. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Clarivate recently launched the next generation of Web of Science Researcher Profiles to incorporate the best features of Publons and ResearcherID, creating a one-stop destination for researchers to manage their academic profile and demonstrate their expertise, including in peer review. (librarytechnology.org)
  • The Office of Research Development announces the winners of spring 2022 Faculty Development Awards and University Small Research Grants. (k-state.edu)
  • We round out Peer Review Week with a guest post by Erin Landis, Meghan McDevitt, and Jason Roberts of Origin Editorial reporting on the 2022 Peer Review Congress. (sspnet.org)
  • Kicking off Peer Review Week 2022: Does trust in research begin with trust in peer review across the whole ecosystem, and what does that look like for different communities and stakeholders? (sspnet.org)
  • This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy in identifying inadequate reporting in RCT reports by early career researchers (ECRs) using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process. (nih.gov)
  • Web of Science Researcher Profiles help build a deeper understanding of the citation impact of research activity with a visualization (Web of Science Author Impact Beamplot) that aligns with best practices for research evaluation, as well as a geographic citation map (showing the location of citations to a researchers' work). (librarytechnology.org)
  • One of the major findings is that researchers from emerging regions are under-represented in the peer review process. (newswire.ca)
  • It found that researchers from the USA , UK and Japan review significantly more than reviewers from emerging regions , especially when compared with how much relative peer review demand (by way of manuscript submissions) these regions generate (1.95 reviews/submission among established regions compared to 0.66 reviews/submission in emerging regions). (newswire.ca)
  • We asked researchers about their experience as peer reviewers. (springernature.com)
  • Opposing him, Georgina Mace, professor of biodiversity and ecosystems at University College London, conceded that peer review was "under pressure" due to constraints on reviewers' time and the use of publications to assess researchers and funding proposals. (timeshighereducation.com)
  • Besides striving for conceptual insights and fundamental discussion that further our scientific understanding in all areas of knowledge, Nature Communications acknowledges the value of applied science and is also dedicated to publishing high-quality research that represents important technical and technological advances of significance to communities of researchers and professionals working in all fields of applied sciences and engineering. (nature.com)
  • Applied research submitted to Nature Communications should be sound and either transformative or consolidative, containing sufficient context, methodological details, data, and critical discussion to enable independent researchers to test and build upon the study. (nature.com)
  • The peer review process has been questioned as it may fail to allow the publication of high-quality articles. (nih.gov)
  • US Federal Information Quality Regulations require peer review of the draft recommendations before publication by specialists in the field who were not involved in their development to ensure the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information disseminated by federal agencies. (cdc.gov)
  • Peer review is the process by which outside experts in a particular subject area assess the scientific rigor, validity, and other measures of quality to determine whether a scientific article meets the standards for publication," according to Amy Drew, the APS director of publications. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) provides ethical guidelines for peer reviewers. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • At APS, after an author submits a manuscript, the Editor in Chief determines whether or not it should be considered for possible publication and, if so, assigns the article to a Senior Editor, who assigns and coordinates with an appropriate Action Editor to determine whether the manuscript should be sent out for review. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Indeed, publication is central to many disputes about responsible conduct of research. (uaf.edu)
  • For these latter reasons, publication has a prominent role in advancement, promotion, and continued research funding. (uaf.edu)
  • Ultimately, the centrality of publication in academic life means that it is implicated to some degree in nearly all aspects of the responsible conduct of research. (uaf.edu)
  • Without such reference, the second publication constitutes a falsification of the research record. (uaf.edu)
  • We aim to provide authors with a constructive, collaborative process during peer review and publication. (mja.com.au)
  • This partnership and publication will celebrate Indigenous leadership and excellence in health and medical research. (mja.com.au)
  • Serving as the checkpoint to academic credibility, reviewers provide crucial feedback for authors and editors that influences the future of a paper's publication status. (springernature.com)
  • Editors expect reviewers to provide a report on whether the article is suitable for publication in the journal. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Richard Smith, who edited the BMJ between 1991 and 2004, told the Royal Society's Future of Scholarly Scientific Communication conference on 20 April that there was no evidence that pre-publication peer review improved papers or detected errors or fraud. (timeshighereducation.com)
  • That is the real peer review: not all these silly processes that go on before and immediately after publication," he said. (timeshighereducation.com)
  • Peer review is an essential component of the publication process. (medscape.com)
  • In academic publishing, the goal of peer review is to assess the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. (lu.se)
  • Because a peer-reviewed journal will not publish articles that fail to meet the standards established for a given discipline, peer-reviewed articles that are accepted for publication exemplify the best research practices in a field. (lu.se)
  • Another is for the NCEH/ATSDR Office of Science, rather than a study's lead scientist(s), to select the reviewers. (cdc.gov)
  • Likewise, journal editors and authors often seek to improve the quality of published SRs and other evidence syntheses through peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Peer review has two main purposes: (a) to filter out research of poor quality or content that does not fit within the scope of a particular journal, and (b) to improve the quality of journal articles. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • A written review usually follows a certain structure that helps the editor to ultimately answer the question: Should this particular article be published in this particular journal? (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Potential candidates might be recruited from authors or peer reviewers that have worked for your journal or from recommendations by other board members. (springer.com)
  • Track publications, citation metrics, peer reviews and journal editing work in one place to demonstrate expertise throughout their career. (librarytechnology.org)
  • That's 260 million researcher days spent waiting for reviews to be returned to a journal p.a. or 720,000 researcher-years waiting for reviews annually. (newswire.ca)
  • The hallmark of a research journal is that submissions undergo a peer-review process. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • These 44 reviewers are to be commended for their contributions to the Journal of Child Nutrition and Management. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • Those interested in joining the Review Team are invited to contact the Journal Editor. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • For this reason, space is provided in the journal for research in the biological, clinical and psychosocial fields. (elsevier.es)
  • Once the submission materials have been prepared in accordance with the Author Guidelines, new submissions should be made via the Research Exchange submission portal https://submission.wiley.com/journal/cbf . (wiley.com)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Machine Learning and Computation is now open for submissions! (agu.org)
  • From my discussion with other peer reviewers and editors, I have noticed that there is an imbalance of distribution of peer review requests of journal articles. (springernature.com)
  • Most of the time, we have to review the journal and read the abstract of referenced articles, and assume that the reference quoted is accurate. (springernature.com)
  • In order to track down potential peer reviewers, editors search within their own networks, as well as journal databases or they use artificial intelligence. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Key insights on how peer review functions for a new journal, handling data on individual lives of people enslaved in the historical slave trade, that serves both academic and public audiences. (sspnet.org)
  • He said peer review persists due to "huge vested interests", and admitted that scrapping peer review was "just too bold a step" for a journal editor currently to take. (timeshighereducation.com)
  • In my own specialist field, I've had some very good suggestions from reviewers, especially from top end specialist journal (like J Gen Physiol and J Physiol in my area). (timeshighereducation.com)
  • The journal will consider articles reporting research that narrows the gap between academic knowledge and real-life applications, from proof-of-concept studies for innovative solutions and designs to large-scale technical demonstrations of capability. (nature.com)
  • The American Journal of Kidney Diseases (AJKD) , the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation , is recognized worldwide as a leading source of information devoted to clinical nephrology practice and clinical research . (medscape.com)
  • Consistent with the established standards of the journal, all submissions have been peer reviewed by at least two outside, expert reviewers. (cdc.gov)
  • Save time with a profile that syncs with ORCID and exports publications and verified peer review history with a few clicks, so that a researcher can focus on their research. (librarytechnology.org)
  • On average it takes 19.1 days for a researcher to peer review a paper. (newswire.ca)
  • I am an Early Careers Researcher representative for the Northern Advanced Research Training Initiative. (ncl.ac.uk)
  • I started my academic career as an exclusively qualitative researcher, doing an ethnographic PhD, and then later moved to doing more quantitative, evaluative research after training in Epidemiology. (cardiff.ac.uk)
  • Ask an Editor-in-Chief/Surgeon/Researcher/Author/Reviewer: Is Research Integrity Possible without Peer Review? (sspnet.org)
  • Researcher Burak Tunca at Lund University School of Economics and Management sees several possible measures that could make research better - and more open. (lu.se)
  • We do not single out any individual researcher, we simply say that more research is needed. (lu.se)
  • Submissions received after this date will not be reviewed for consideration in this Special Issue. (mja.com.au)
  • We seek original and high quality submissions that apply Multi Agent research to Web Service frameworks and vice versa in innovative and interesting ways. (daml.org)
  • The STFM Program Committee welcomes assistance from members who wish to review the Annual Spring Conference submissions. (stfm.org)
  • To assess accuracy in identifying inadequate reporting, we used two tests: (1) ECRs assessing a manuscript using the COBPeer tool (after completing an online training module) and (2) the usual peer-review process. (nih.gov)
  • Implementing a two-step peer-review process could help improve the quality of reporting. (nih.gov)
  • He truly appreciates being included in the review process and helping bring those ideas to life. (health.mil)
  • In his words, "I believe that input from the consumer advocate plays an invaluable role in the process of researching and developing new treatments and technologies that ultimately benefit us. (health.mil)
  • public comments will be solicited at the same times as the peer review process is conducted. (cdc.gov)
  • In the APS webinar The Basics of Peer Review , Drew was joined by Becca White, the APS peer review manager, alongside Robert L. Goldstone , editor in chief of Current Directions in Psychological Science , and Erin B. Tone , associate editor for Clinical Psychological Science , to share their experiences involving the process of peer review and tips for engaging in meaningful peer review. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Drew and White explained the peer-review process and what happens "behind the scenes. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Peer review is the process by which scientific or other research protocols (i.e., study designs) and final reports are validated. (cdc.gov)
  • This review process helps ensure the highest quality of science for ATSDR studies. (cdc.gov)
  • 2. How does ATSDR in particular conduct the peer review process? (cdc.gov)
  • Similarly, the final report must complete the peer review process before the written results can be published formally. (cdc.gov)
  • Through a rigorous annual granting process, Jesse's Journey seeks to fund the most promising research from around the world. (wikipedia.org)
  • How efficient is the peer review process? (newswire.ca)
  • The report is set up and designed to answer the burning questions of the peer review process. (newswire.ca)
  • This critical review process is very time consuming. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • Peer review is an important part of the publishing process. (springernature.com)
  • The review process doesn't have to feel like a chore. (springernature.com)
  • Google and grammar tools are helpful when facilitating the review process. (springernature.com)
  • Though part of the review process has been moved to the Web, the review i. (researchgate.net)
  • Although the process has its detractors , evaluation of academic research by a cohort of contemporaries has endured for over 350 years, with " relatively minor changes . (ieee.org)
  • Altogether, this helps "maximize the efficiency of the publishing process and make peer-review more objective," says Kamila Markram , founder and CEO of Frontiers. (ieee.org)
  • The discussion would be tracked, considered by evaluators and fed into the review process. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • More consultation will make the evaluation process longer, may not result in constructive feedback, and might draw unfair comments, which he fears could sway a reviewer. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • I think the burden of having to prepare reports that can be made public will be bigger than the benefit of getting feedback for the project participants, so [companies] will not volunteer to open up the review process," Smits said. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • Furthermore, the peer review process could assist authors in how they prepare their own papers, thereby strengthening their standing in their field, Solera said. (universityworldnews.com)
  • New meeting formats and procedures have increased the efficiency of the review process. (cdc.gov)
  • Some estimates place the time for every peer review completed at between a few hours and a day, which means that recognition for peer reviewers is crucial to provide credit for reviewers' contribution to the scholarly record. (librarytechnology.org)
  • The vision is for peer reviews to become a standard and discoverable part of the scholarly record across all disciplines. (librarytechnology.org)
  • So parts of scholarly communication are speeding up, but other parts are clogging the system and it is getting harder to find suitable reviewers. (newswire.ca)
  • Faculty Development Awards support travel expenses to present research, scholarly or creative work or a performance at an international meeting or to visit an external funder or sponsor. (k-state.edu)
  • University Small Research Grants are seed grants to support small research projects, scholarly activity, and other creative efforts. (k-state.edu)
  • In the world of academics, peer review is considered the only credible validation of scholarly work. (ieee.org)
  • What is the single most pressing issue for the future of peer review in scholarly publishing? (sspnet.org)
  • Clarivate Plc ( NYSE: CLVT), a global leader in providing trusted information and insights to accelerate the pace of innovation, today celebrates Peer Review Week with the announcement of new services for authors to better track their peer review activity. (librarytechnology.org)
  • Clarivate celebrates Peer Review Week with the announcement of new services for authors to better track their peer review activity. (librarytechnology.org)
  • These individuals send their reviews to the Action Editor, who then makes the decision to accept the manuscript, reject it, or ask the authors to revise it, taking into account the reviewers' and editor's comments before resubmitting it. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Also ensure that your recommendations and reviews are aligned-if your review only mentions positive aspects and then recommends a rejection, it is not helpful for the authors. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Specifically, we consider how information about the geographical location and institutional affiliation of authors influence how scientific abstracts are evaluated by their peers. (elifesciences.org)
  • In some research groups, jointly written text is assumed to be shared property available for use by any of the original authors. (uaf.edu)
  • The authors of a Cochrane review found little empirical evidence to support the use of editorial peer review as a mechanism to ensure quality of biomedical research. (bmj.com)
  • 2 Blinding reviewers to the authors and the origin of the manuscript or requiring them to sign the peer review report had no effect on the detection rate for errors. (bmj.com)
  • The authors of a study of 248 grant proposals compared two similar peer review processes for ranking proposals. (bmj.com)
  • This page provides policies, resources and practical advice on ethical concerns that arise in scientific publishing for authors, reviewers, editors, and others. (agu.org)
  • She works closely on sharing insight and guidance on the benefits and services available to our editors, reviewers, and authors. (springernature.com)
  • Authors highly value reviews, yet complain about the time it takes to get feedback to the point of putting research timeliness at stake. (researchgate.net)
  • The reviewers know who the authors are, and once peer review is complete, the authors know who the reviewers are. (universityworldnews.com)
  • There is evidence that reviewers provide more detailed comments, which are beneficial to the authors. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Continuing our series of posts for Peer Review Week 2021, guest authors Matt Giampoala, Randy Townsend, and Paige Wooden of AGU share their efforts to improve reviewer and editorial board diversity. (sspnet.org)
  • Peer reviewers in established regions also tend to accept fewer review invitations and take longer to review than their counterparts in emerging regions. (newswire.ca)
  • Editors send more review invitations now than five years ago. (newswire.ca)
  • Reviewers who get a lot of requests do not have enough time to spend on them, which can lead to a drop in quality, and the reviewers who are interested and available do not seem to get enough invitations. (springernature.com)
  • 3. How does ATSDR make sure that peer expert reviewers are objective? (cdc.gov)
  • Objective To quantify randomness and cost when choosing health and medical research projects for funding. (bmj.com)
  • Knowing the identity of the author could prevent the reviewer from being objective. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Proposals are peer-reviewed by external reviewers. (wikipedia.org)
  • File PhotoThe peer-review system of the German Research Foundation (DFG) is unique, as proposals are reviewed by experts nominated and elected by the scientific community. (the-scientist.com)
  • He points out that since the DFG formation 50 years ago, the number of funding proposals has increased dramatically and research fields have become. (the-scientist.com)
  • Ten University Small Research Grant proposals were submitted and will be funded. (k-state.edu)
  • All proposals are peer-reviewed and discussed in a panel. (k-state.edu)
  • 7 Thirty two proposals for funding from the McGill University Health Center Research Institute were assessed by two competing processes: a traditional review committee of 11 members and independent reviews from a committee member and content expert. (bmj.com)
  • An analysis of reviewers' scores for grant proposals to the National Institutes of Health showed that adjusting for uncertainties and biases among reviewers would lead to a 25% change in the pool of funded proposals. (bmj.com)
  • 11 Similarly, a study of proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation re-reviewed 75 funded and 75 not funded grant proposals, and for 25% of proposals the funding decision changed. (bmj.com)
  • The United Kingdom's National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is keen to improve review processes so we studied relationships between reviewer scores, funding board scores, and funding recommendations across 4 programs managed by a single NIHR coordinating center. (peerreviewcongress.org)
  • Cell Biochemistry & Function publishes original research articles and reviews on the mechanisms whereby molecular and biochemical processes control cellular activity with a particular emphasis on the integration of molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and physiology in the regulation of tissue function in health and disease . (wiley.com)
  • There are many useful research questions to be addressed that could improve current processes. (bmj.com)
  • His experiences are not lost on the scientists and clinicians of those peer review panels, and he finds himself regularly humbled by their regard for his contributions. (health.mil)
  • Avoid exaggerated or primacy claims as these should be deducible from context and often distract readers from the research technical contributions. (nature.com)
  • However, peer review may be set to undergo its biggest revolution ever-the integration of artificial intelligence . (ieee.org)
  • There was a trend towards increasing AUROC for individual reviewers receiving more NIHR grants. (peerreviewcongress.org)
  • Faculty Development Awards and University Small Research Grants are awarded each fall and spring by the Office of the Vice President for Research through the Office of Research Development. (k-state.edu)
  • For projects predominantly focused on innovation and outside-the-box research, investigators may wish to consider mechanisms other than R01s for example (e.g., exploratory/developmental research (R21) grants, NIH Director's Pioneer Award Program (DP1), and NIH Director's New Innovator Award Program (DP2). (nih.gov)
  • One study 10 estimated that 38 416 reviews per grant would be required to get a high precision for the peer review and selection of grants from the National Institutes of Health. (bmj.com)
  • I was selected as regular Fundings/Grants reviewer for EPSRC, NIHR and NSFC. (google.com)
  • RESEARCH GRANTS, TOTALExternal funding approx. (lu.se)
  • See the NIH guidance for elaboration on the 4 major areas of rigor and transparency emphasized in grant review. (nih.gov)
  • Setting Grant review panels of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. (bmj.com)
  • Grant funding agencies strive to support the best scientific research. (bmj.com)
  • Surprisingly, given the impact that decisions on research funding have on academic careers, relatively little research has been done into the peer review of grant applications. (bmj.com)
  • 2021Reviewer of grant applications, Swedish Research Council. (lu.se)
  • It adapts a system that has long been in practice, albeit without [legitimacy]," says Jahn, who currently chairs the review committee in biology. (the-scientist.com)
  • I am a committee member of the Chartered Association of Business School, Chartered Business and Management Educator review board. (ncl.ac.uk)
  • As we say farewell to another Peer Review Week, here are some handy resources created by members of the Organizing Committee that you can use all year round! (sspnet.org)
  • We have also expanded the breadth and depth of representation in our team of associate editors and in our Editorial Board and Statistics Review Committee. (cdc.gov)
  • preparation, review, or approval of the abstract. (peerreviewcongress.org)
  • According to Solera, once an author has been invited to review an article, the email will include the name and title, type of review, deadline and abstract. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Methodological rigor, such as the quality of the search strategies, directly affects the quality of systematic reviews. (biomedcentral.com)
  • These recommendations describe comprehensive systematic reviews of the literature that were conducted, analyzed, and assessed to examine the availability and quality of the evidence regarding HCV infection prevalence and health benefits and harms associated with one-time hepatitis C screening for persons unaware of their infection status. (cdc.gov)
  • Data" in a systematic review are the set of studies resulting from the comprehensive literature search, which is analogous to the findings and data from a primary research study or specific results or data from an experiment [ 9 ]. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Dividing research findings into the smallest publishable units might increase an investigator's total number of publications, but works against the interests of science. (uaf.edu)
  • While taking credit for someone else's research findings is clearly a greater wrong than copying their methods section, both are examples of plagiarism-- taking personal credit for someone else's words or ideas. (uaf.edu)
  • The farther removed your reviewers are from your field, the more information you'll need to provide on basic biology, importance of the area, research opportunities, and new findings. (nih.gov)
  • Each issue of AJKD includes a mix of research findings and educational content. (medscape.com)
  • Original Investigations-fully reviewed not only by peer reviewers but also by statistics experts to ensure validity-describe the latest findings related to pathogenesis and treatment of kidney disease, hypertension, acid-base and electrolyte disorders, dialysis therapies , and kidney transplantation . (medscape.com)
  • Peer input is essential to put the article's findings into context for the reader. (medscape.com)
  • I bring my extensive knowledge and experience into the curriculum to facilitate a better student understanding of management research, theory and practice. (ncl.ac.uk)
  • We publish high quality research and commentary to inform health policy and influence medical practice in Australia. (mja.com.au)
  • How Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research ethics was upheld in the research practice. (mja.com.au)
  • We believe that achieving research excellence is supported by engaging with partners, local communities and governments and drawing on their experience as a community of knowledge and practice. (iied.org)
  • Having a positive impact on policy and practice to promote change that benefits people on low or no income and benefits the environment is a central component of research excellence at IIED. (iied.org)
  • In addition, AJKD's rich array of educational and special interest features includes narrative reviews, editorials, teaching cases, quizzes, and articles focusing on translational research, clinical practice, and socioeconomic aspects of kidney disease and treatment . (medscape.com)
  • Therefore, we comprehensively examined CSBD across 42 countries, genders, and sexual orientations, and validated the original (CSBD-19) and short (CSBD-7) versions of the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder Scale to provide standardized, state-of-the-art screening tools for research and clinical practice. (bvsalud.org)
  • The focus of my academic research is emotion, stress and coping. (ncl.ac.uk)
  • We engage with diverse communities using a range of context-sensitive research methods and communications strategies for targeted impact across audiences ranging from academic communities to practitioners and policymakers. (iied.org)
  • Research suggests that scientists based at prestigious institutions receive more credit for their work than scientists based at less prestigious institutions, as do scientists working in certain countries. (elifesciences.org)
  • The Earth and Space Science Open Archive is a community server where scientists can share early research outputs including preprints and posters presented at major scientific meetings. (agu.org)
  • For this reason, scientists sometimes ask reviewers to sign non-disclosure agreements. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • The title "Senior Scientist" is awarded annually by the German Aerospace Center to scientists who distinguish themselves in the field of fundamental research as well as to scientists whose work is application-oriented and focusses in particular on project work. (dlr.de)
  • In addition, new insights from the Institute for Scientific Information investigates articles in the Web of Science displaying Transparent Peer Reviews. (librarytechnology.org)
  • I set aside personal time as learning/growth time during the week, and use this time to review articles. (springernature.com)
  • I sometimes find it challenging to cross-reference the review article if I do not have access to papers listed as referenced articles. (springernature.com)
  • But while peer reviewers contribute to the quality of articles, the experience also helps support their own career development, she argued. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Editors seek articles that value originality, thorough research, knowledgeable sources, fact checking and Associated Press style - all in ways that speak to journalism advisers. (jea.org)
  • Developing a comprehensive, reproducible literature search is the basis for a high-quality systematic review (SR). Librarians and information professionals, as expert searchers, can improve the quality of systematic review searches, methodology, and reporting. (biomedcentral.com)
  • A literature review does not typically include formal quality assessment or risk of bias assessment and is not considered evidence-based. (biomedcentral.com)
  • If so, the Action Editor seeks the advice of reviewers who are experts in the field or can otherwise contribute to improving the manuscript quality. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • Gatekeeper: Make sure a manuscript is of sufficient quality and won't mislead future research. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • the elected representatives will be responsible for quality control and for writing funding recommendations based on the initial reviews. (the-scientist.com)
  • It is important to have people who you trust to carry out whatever is required to get the papers peer reviewed, edited and published with consistent levels of quality and timekeeping. (springer.com)
  • What do we know about the quality of peer review? (newswire.ca)
  • While a longer review does not imply a higher quality review, this word count difference might explain some of the difference in invitation rates between regions. (newswire.ca)
  • This retrospective review of the literature indicates that numerous drugs have been used for targeted therapy and that the studies of radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy are diverse and complicated by their variable quality. (dovepress.com)
  • This page sets out how we work towards research excellence, including our commitments to integrity and ethics and quality standards. (iied.org)
  • High-quality research allows us to provide decision makers with evidence and recommendations to support confident decision making. (iied.org)
  • The meeting successfully provided a high-quality review of the 35 applications. (cdc.gov)
  • To address the challenge of managing these large meetings virtually, OEP initiated the use of multiple panels to complete high quality reviews in a timely manner and reduce peer reviewer burden. (cdc.gov)
  • Peer reviewers not only rate an article's quality, but also make suggestions for improvement. (medscape.com)
  • These impartial reviewers are charged with carefully evaluating the quality of the submitted manuscript. (lu.se)
  • UAA is a hub for cutting-edge theoretical and applied research in health, engineering, and the physical and social sciences. (alaska.edu)
  • Many people, perhaps journalists in particular, take peer review as a guarantee of good research, but peer reviewers mainly convey theoretical arguments and rarely demand to examine the data behind the study. (lu.se)
  • Editors tend to invite reviewers from their own geographical regions much more than chance would predict. (newswire.ca)
  • Demand for reviews is outstripping supply where reviewers tend to be busy people who contribute voluntarily. (researchgate.net)
  • While a reviewer's textual comments provide most value, their review score should be a good proxy for opinion regarding funding outcome. (peerreviewcongress.org)
  • Join our team and help us advance research, improve cancer education and provide lifesaving resources. (aicr.org)
  • However, further fundamental research and accumulation of clinical data will provide a more comprehensive understanding of these therapies. (dovepress.com)
  • Where culture, innovation and adventure converge, the unique locations provide unparalleled access to industry connections, Arctic research, outdoor recreation and more, facilitating once-in-a-lifetime experiences, groundbreaking education and impactful careers. (alaska.edu)
  • The Peer-Reviewed Reports in Medical Education Research (PRiMER) editor selects PRiMER Editorial Board members. (stfm.org)
  • The reviewers' unedited comments are sent to the "study lead" for a response. (cdc.gov)
  • The study lead must respond to the peer reviewers' comments in writing and prepare a revision if necessary. (cdc.gov)
  • Muki Haklay, professor of geographical information science at University College London, likes the idea, as it would mean "expertise and comments are not confined only to the people in a consortium, or in the three reviewers who are selected to assess the project. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • For Solera, if an article makes the cut, at least two independent reviewers who are experts will be approached for comments. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Reviewers make comments and this informs the author where it should be revised or rejected. (universityworldnews.com)
  • I have even been in the "top 10%" of reviewers-an achievement probably more dependent on timely submission of my comments rather than any extraordinary insights. (medscape.com)
  • In nearly every discipline, undergraduate and graduate students have the opportunity to join research teams and collaborate with experienced faculty mentors. (alaska.edu)
  • To round off Peer Review Week 2021, Phill Jones and Alice Meadows share work under way to map out a PID-optimized workflow for peer review - and invite your feedback! (sspnet.org)
  • The peer reviewers check the manuscript for accuracy and assess the validity of the research methodology and procedures. (lu.se)
  • It seemed to her that the "limiting factor" on effective peer review was the availability of good reviewers, and more attention needed to be paid to increasing the supply. (timeshighereducation.com)
  • Peer review sustains science," Goldstone added, noting that reviewers should make their reviews as helpful as they can. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • The type of reviewer does not make much difference, but using the mean score from different types of reviewer instead of individual scores does. (peerreviewcongress.org)
  • When you include the American Institute for Cancer Research in your estate plans, you make a major difference in the fight against cancer. (aicr.org)
  • We champion the latest and most authoritative scientific research from around the world on cancer prevention and survival through diet, weight and physical activity, so that we can help people make informed lifestyle choices to reduce their cancer risk. (aicr.org)
  • Your job is to make the reviewers feel confident that the risk is worth taking. (nih.gov)
  • This step is crucial for ensuring the relevance and focus of the study, particularly in Design Science Research (DSR), where problems and solutions develop gradually. (researchgate.net)
  • Of respondents who had declined to peer review (32%, n = 20), the most common explanation was "not enough time" (60%, n = 12) followed by "lack of expertise" (50%, n = 10). (biomedcentral.com)
  • Multiple opportunities for public comment will be available during the same time as peer review. (cdc.gov)
  • With the world facing an unprecedented time of crisis, the work of reviewers is more essential than ever. (springernature.com)
  • It's Peer Review Week Video Time! (sspnet.org)
  • He added that an experiment carried out during his time at the BMJ had seen eight errors introduced into a 600-word paper that was sent out to 300 reviewers. (timeshighereducation.com)
  • He added that peer review was too slow, expensive and burdensome on reviewers' time. (timeshighereducation.com)
  • Benefits associated with this change include reduced time burden on reviewers and significantly lower meeting costs due to the absence of travel, meeting space, and conference services. (cdc.gov)
  • With reviewers from different time zones, ensuring that a minimum number of reviewers are present to achieve quorum can be challenging. (cdc.gov)
  • If reviewers turn off their video when taking breaks, the Scientific Review Officer assigned to the meeting will know the number of reviewers present at the meeting at any given time. (cdc.gov)
  • Although I do receive intellectual gratification from my peer review efforts, it is increasingly difficult to reconcile these intangible benefits with the time required. (medscape.com)
  • Our policy (PDF) aims to ensure that IIED's research meets a set of agreed ethical standards, and provides guidance on how to integrate ethical considerations into the design and conduct of IIED research, partnerships and policy engagement activities. (iied.org)
  • NIOSH was able to conduct the WTCHP meeting using the Virtual Meeting (VM) module within the NIH Internet Assisted Review (IAR) system, which was already in use for data collection in face-to-face meetings. (cdc.gov)
  • In light of the protracted nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, countries may wish to conduct periodic reviews during the event so they can continue to reflect on the ongoing response and revise national and subnational response strategies and plans as needed. (who.int)
  • The event held online by the publisher Francis and Taylor on 24 September was attended by academics from all over the world and was addressed by Dr Dafne Solera, desk review manager, and Dr Diana Marshall, head of reviewer programmes at the Taylor and Francis Group, both based in London, United Kingdom. (universityworldnews.com)
  • Reviewing is a privilege and I always feel proud when I receive a request to review an article, especially in the materials science and consumer technology intersections. (springernature.com)
  • Conversely, narrative literature reviews do not require the same level of rigor in the literature search, nor the double screening of results to determine if the information found meets pre-established inclusion criteria. (biomedcentral.com)
  • Academics worldwide seek to ensure the integrity of the scientific and wider research literature by providing peer review and assessment of work in their fields of expertise. (librarytechnology.org)
  • Literature reviews are a traditional method for comprehending the proble. (researchgate.net)
  • In Quora and other PhD forums, students moan about their frustrating reading and literature review experiences. (researchgate.net)
  • It takes me at least 2-3 hours to do a thoughtful peer review, more if I need to consult the literature. (medscape.com)
  • Similarly, techniques developed in the Multi Agent research community promise to have a strong impact on this fast growing technology. (daml.org)
  • While writing a review, "context is key," Drew explained. (psychologicalscience.org)
  • We recognise that research must be context sensitive, representative and innovative, driven by the voice of local communities, organisations and governments. (iied.org)
  • Our analysis covering 4 NIHR programs shows large variation in the number of peer reviews informing recommendations. (peerreviewcongress.org)
  • Agencies are required to have a web accessible plan for peer review of Highly Influential Scientific Assessments as well as any influential scientific information/assessment to be released that will have "a clear and substantial impact on important public policies or private sector decisions. (cpsc.gov)
  • he got taken first prize for the excellent research paper awarded by Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province in 2004 and 7 China invention patents.he took part in compiling 4 books related to my research and have more than 50 scientific publications. (omicsonline.org)
  • The CUP is an ongoing review of research and captures the data from new scientific studies from around the world as they are published. (aicr.org)
  • Demonstrate the proposed research is new and unique, e.g., explores new scientific avenues, has a novel hypothesis, will create new knowledge. (nih.gov)
  • Conclusions Allocating funding for scientific research in health and medicine is costly and somewhat random. (bmj.com)
  • They cover promising developments, not only discoveries made in the laboratory, but also product development, collaborative research, manufacturing, and (in some cases) commercialization of nanotech products. (cdc.gov)
  • You may wish to review the privacy policy of the external site as its information collection practices may differ from ours. (cpsc.gov)
  • This might not always work to get rid of bias as reviewers might be familiar with the writing style of some academics and could guess who they are. (universityworldnews.com)
  • In FY2022, all 15 review panels were held using Zoom. (cdc.gov)
  • The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) provides expert reviews of the biological mechanisms to support the epidemiological evidence. (aicr.org)
  • Teaching and research interests include extensive clinical and forensic expert testimony experience with identifying, assessing and treating traumatic stress, chronic pain, insomnia, personal injury, custody, and criminal assessments. (alaska.edu)
  • This would not be a fully open review as the expert reviewers would have the last say, but it would be a stepping stone towards it, to gauge the interest and identify potential benefits and problems," the Commission says. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • Expert Review of Vaccines. (lu.se)
  • The NCEH/ATSDR Office of Science typically asks three to seven independent experts to review the document. (cdc.gov)
  • Peer review is used to decide who gets funded by including the opinions of experts, but problems with peer review mean decisions might not be reliable. (bmj.com)
  • In both his advocacy work and participation in the PRORP peer review, Tyler is constantly reminded that he is not alone as either an injured Veteran or a passionate advocate. (health.mil)
  • Peer review is a vital part of this work and we want to ensure it receives the recognition it deserves. (librarytechnology.org)
  • Open-access publisher Frontiers has debuted an AI tool called the Artificial Intelligence Review Assistant (AIRA), which purports to eliminate much of the grunt work associated with peer review. (ieee.org)
  • Fabio Casati, professor of computer science at the University of Trento in Italy said, "I think project reviews as they are done today work reasonably well. (sciencebusiness.net)
  • Peer Review: Work or Hobby? (medscape.com)
  • Cite this: Peer Review: Work or Hobby? (medscape.com)