Reviewers of papers. Medical search. Frequent questions

Emerging Infectious Diseases thanks the following reviewers for their support through thoughtful, thorough, and timely reviews in 2023. (cdc.gov)

If you have followed the guidelines, your paper will then go to the editor, who will also read your cover letter. (leeds.ac.uk)
If this is your first review for us, please check out the Guidelines for Reviewers, which you can find on the website and below. (maa.org)
We ask that you double-check that your papers have followed the submission guidelines with respect to length (i.e. they are at most 10 pages, where the ninth and tenth page must contain only references), format, and anonymity, and that they are not joke papers! (icml.cc)

We ask that all reviewers complete their evaluations at ScholarOne Manuscripts . (cdc.gov)
Manuscripts will be sent by journal editorial staff in confidence to reviewers. (cdc.gov)
We may ask reviewers to reevaluate manuscripts that were revised and resubmitted according to their revisions, or we may submit the revised manuscripts to new reviewers. (cdc.gov)
For each article reviewed, reviewers are requested to complete a score sheet on ScholarOne Manuscripts , which contains the same information as the Reviewer's Confidential Manuscript Assessment for the Editor . (cdc.gov)
She reports reviewers telling the journal, "'I'm sorry but I'm already reviewing four other manuscripts, I simply can't do this in the timeframe you're requesting. (the-scientist.com)
Many manuscripts that make it past the editor's desk still have issues that peer reviewers must spot and flag. (the-scientist.com)
Reviewers for all AGU journals must evaluate the following criteria when reviewing submitted manuscripts. (agu.org)
Peer reviewers for Emerging Infectious Diseases evaluate manuscripts on EID Manuscript Central , which is a manuscript tracking system that allows authors to submit manuscripts and reviewers to evaluate manuscripts electronically. (cdc.gov)

To show our thanks, we present here the profiles those awarded our 'top reviewer' accolade in 2022. (nature.com)
Copenhagen, August 31st-September 2nd, 2022 *Important dates * Draft paper submission: August 7th, 2022 Draft paper notification: August 9th, 2022 Early registration deadline: August 12th, 2022 Late registration deadline: September 2nd, 2022 Symposium: August 31st-September 2nd, 2022 (3 days) *Scope * The goal of the IFL symposia is to bring together researchers actively engaged in the implementation and application of functional and function-based programming languages. (mail-archive.com)

The IEEE Computer Society requires that papers be selected for publication on the basis of merit and appropriateness. (computer.org)

Each Outstanding Reviewer will receive a certificate to give recognition for their significant contribution. (rsc.org)

The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) is pleased to announce a special call for papers from Guest Co-Editors at the Lowitja Institute for the 2024 Special Issue on Indigenous Health. (mja.com.au)
Less focus has been placed on the behaviour of reviewers and editors. (leeds.ac.uk)
One of the main motivations, if not the main one, for how researchers structure and write their papers is that the approach they follow is what they deem most likely to be deemed a publishable paper by editors/reviewers. (leeds.ac.uk)
You'll want to ideally use your academic institutional email here, as the Editors will validate potential reviewers before we use them, and checking email addresses is one of the most common starting points for this process. (warwick.ac.uk)
Thirdly, and most informally, you can contact myself or any of my Editors and ask to become a reviewer. (warwick.ac.uk)
We ask reviewers to give detailed comments (with references, whenever possible) that will help authors to improve their papers and PCD editors to decide whether to publish. (cdc.gov)
Reviewers serve as advisors to PCD editors, who make final decisions. (cdc.gov)
it's much better with editors and reviewers than it is being hidden from potential audiences. (leeds.ac.uk)
When a limited number of established coronavirus experts are inundated with peer review requests often under tight deadlines, many first-choice reviewers are turning her editors down. (the-scientist.com)
Typical reviewers are members of the community not editors. (stackexchange.com)
Editors must declare any potential conflict of interest (COI) to the EIC or AEIC within one week of the paper being assigned. (computer.org)
Common Sense Media reviewers include writers, editors, and child development experts. (commonsensemedia.org)
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers. (mdpi.com)
EID copy editors will ensure that accepted papers are grammatically correct and follow EID style conventions, so reviewers need not to address those areas in detail. (cdc.gov)

Examples include an association with the research reported on, or with one of the authors of the paper. (bledconference.org)
This, in turn, can lead authors to overstate their findings for fear of being punished by reviewers if they were more circumspect. (leeds.ac.uk)
The authors are Julia Kramer, Danielle Poreh and Alice M. Agogino and the paper title is: Using TheDesignExchange as a knowledge platform for human-centered design-driven global development. (berkeley.edu)
In common with standard academic journal practice, all prior authors with the title are considered as potential future reviewers. (warwick.ac.uk)
We would also like to thank the Journal of Materials Chemistry C board and the materials chemistry community for their continued support of the journal, as authors, reviewers and readers. (rsc.org)
while authors are identified to reviewers, reviewers remain anonymous to authors. (cdc.gov)
This information is kept confidential and is not revealed to authors or other reviewers. (cdc.gov)
We ask authors to direct all queries about peer reviewers to the editorial staff. (cdc.gov)
We welcome suggestions from authors for appropriate peer reviewers. (cdc.gov)
Don't worry, this back and forth between authors and reviewers is common. (leeds.ac.uk)
Blinding is not intended to be a great burden for reviewers or authors. (usenix.org)
Double-blind means that authors don't know who is reviewing their papers and reviewers don't know the authors of a paper. (usenix.org)
Similarly, reviewers' identities are blinded from authors to encourage honest and high-quality feedback to authors. (usenix.org)
It is important to note that the program committee chairs know the identity of both reviewers and authors. (usenix.org)
Deployed papers must follow the double-blind policy above in that the authors need to be anonymized. (usenix.org)
On the other hand, a paper on optimizing storage for a Palm Pilot may be difficult to understand if the authors were deliberately vague on the details of the device and its capabilities. (usenix.org)
This is a very delicate subject, but this goes back again to having both authors and reviewers make a best effort to avoid discovering author identity. (usenix.org)
Although reviewers may eventually find your technical report or arXiv paper, they will already have taken notes and created an opinion of the work before knowing the authors' identities. (usenix.org)
Work that extends a previous workshop paper by the authors should discuss the extensions upon the previous workshop paper in the submission using an anonymous citation. (usenix.org)
Further, the authors should upload an anonymized copy of the workshop paper along with their submission. (usenix.org)
People with whom you have collaborated in the past five years, including co-authors of accepted/rejected/pending papers and grant proposals. (computer.org)
If the authors provided a previously published version of their submission, please take the time-before assigning reviewers-to determine whether there has been sufficient new material added to warrant publication. (computer.org)
Identifies papers and authors for possible inclusion in the special issue, with a brief description of each paper. (elsevier.com)
The guest editor should follow the journal's policy relating to the disclosure of conflicts of interest by authors and reviewers. (elsevier.com)
From Once Teased For Her Love Of Bugs, 8-Year-Old Co-Authors Scientific Paper . (scienceblogs.com)
However, keeping in mind the space constraints of an ICML paper, you may want to consider looking at the supplementary material before complaining that the authors did not provide a fully rigorous proof of their theorems, or only demonstrated qualitative results on a small number of examples. (icml.cc)
Before the symposium authors submit draft papers. (mail-archive.com)
Each draft paper is presented by one of the authors at the symposium. (mail-archive.com)

First, we advise reviewers to complete a preliminary review of submissions prior to any search for related work. (usenix.org)
Where possible, reviewers should identify submissions that are very similar (or identical) to versions that have been previously published, or that have been submitted in parallel to other conferences. (icml.cc)
AMERICAN@ is accepting paper submissions for its Spring issue 2004. (upenn.edu)
Consistent with the established standards of the journal, all submissions have been peer reviewed by at least two outside, expert reviewers. (cdc.gov)

For Theme Based Special Issues, time bound Special Call for Papers will be announced and the same will be applicable for that specific issue only. (veterinaria.org)
The International Conference on Romanticism announces its call for papers for its 2004 Conference in Laredo, TX. (upenn.edu)

So reviewers are requested to ensure that their reviews reflect the guidance provided in this document. (bledconference.org)
We will request each reviewer's permission before forwarding a manuscript, limit review requests to two or three per year per reviewer, and allow at least two weeks to complete reviews. (cdc.gov)
A 'revise and resubmit' means that the editor is already interested in your paper and if you address the reviewers' comments in each round of reviews, your paper is likely to be published. (leeds.ac.uk)
Reviewers may visit this site multiple times and revise their reviews as often as necessary before the reviewing deadline. (icml.cc)
There will be at least 3 reviews per paper. (mail-archive.com)
The reviewers have 6 weeks to write their reviews. (mail-archive.com)
Section four helps you navigate the reviews (and reviewers! (cdc.gov)

There is actually a fourth way you can become a reviewer, and that is to publish with Exchanges . (warwick.ac.uk)
Publish your paper with us. (karger.com)

The purpose of reviewing a paper is to assure quality, in both the negative sense of filtering out low-quality papers, and the positive sense of encouraging the Author(s) to deliver a better version of the paper in question, and better papers in the future. (bledconference.org)
All members of the Bled Community stand to gain from a professional approach to reviewing, because it enhances the quality of the papers that get accepted into the Program. (bledconference.org)
When addressing reviewers' comments, remember they have spent their free time reviewing your paper and are helping you refine it. (leeds.ac.uk)
Despite their increased workload, coronavirus experts emphasize the importance of swift peer review to combat misinformation and better address the pandemic, and intend to keep reviewing as many papers as they can. (the-scientist.com)
Of course, double blind reviewing is not perfect: by searching the Internet, a reviewer may discover (or think he/she may have discovered) the identity of an author. (icml.cc)

Unless the journal is operating an open peer review system or reviewers have agreed to disclose their names, the guest editor must not disclose reviewers' identities. (elsevier.com)

We ask reviewers to disclose any conflicts of interest or personal or professional biases that may render them unable to provide a fair and objective assessment of the manuscript under review. (cdc.gov)

We would like to highlight the Outstanding Reviewers for Journal of Materials Chemistry C in 2019, as selected by the editorial team, for their significant contribution to the journal. (rsc.org)
We would like to say a big thank you to those individuals listed here as well as to all of the reviewers that have supported the journal. (rsc.org)
If you would like to become a reviewer for our journal, just email us with details of your research interests and an up-to-date CV or résumé. (rsc.org)
Papers for the regular issues of the journal can be submitted, round the year, electronically at [email protected] After the final acceptance of the paper, based upon the detailed review process, the paper will immediately be published online. (veterinaria.org)
If you would like to apply for the position of an Editorial Board Member/Reviewer on the journal, please contact the Editor including your CV and a brief covering letter detailing why you are a suitable candidate, to [email protected] . (veterinaria.org)
If the editor thinks it's suitable for the journal, your paper will be sent to 2 or 3 reviewers. (leeds.ac.uk)
I have rejected probably twenty new coronavirus papers without review because they simply didn't meet scientific Journal of Virology study criteria," Sandri-Goldin estimates. (the-scientist.com)
No, the paper is not strong and/or not appropriate for this journal. (agu.org)
Is this paper appropriate for the journal? (agu.org)
I'm submitting to a journal and they require me to suggest several reviewers. (stackexchange.com)
The guest editor should protect the confidentiality of all material submitted to the journal and all communications with reviewers. (elsevier.com)
References to journal papers are seldom needed, but if you must include them, then cite them in a parenthetical note. (maa.org)
Our Toolkit for Preparing and Writing Scientific Journal Articles takes you through each step in researching, writing, responding to reviewers, and submitting your article to the chosen journal. (cdc.gov)
The Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal extends sincere thanks to the following experts for their generous and invaluable assistance in the review of papers considered for publication during 2020. (who.int)

The paper is well written and concise. (cdc.gov)

If we determine that the manuscript has sufficient priority and warrants further review, we then assign it to at least two peer reviewers who possess expertise in the subject covered by the manuscript. (cdc.gov)
Even if we do not accept a manuscript for publication, we send the reviewers' comments to the author. (cdc.gov)
After the review process is completed, we ask reviewers to destroy manuscript copies. (cdc.gov)
Reviewers log in, read their assigned manuscript, and recommend whether EID should accept, reject, or revise the manuscript. (cdc.gov)
Assessments should include comments on the originality and relevance of the manuscript, clarity of the presentation, logic, and conclusions, and adequacy of methods in the body of the paper, figures, tables, and all supplemental appendices and materials. (cdc.gov)

Please read these instructions before submitting your paper. (mja.com.au)
Read on for your fuss-free paper mache tutorial : 1. (lillepunkin.com)
If you have good reason to suspect that a paper has been published in the past, you can go and search on the Internet, but we ask that you first completely read the paper. (icml.cc)
Your responsibility as a reviewer is to read and judge the main paper. (icml.cc)
You can often improve your paper by asking colleagues to read it and give you their feedback. (cdc.gov)

For more formal details about how we conduct and manage quality assurance, see Exchanges' guidance for peer reviewers . (warwick.ac.uk)
Does the Paper Meet AGU'S Data and Software Guidance? (agu.org)

We built the first version of a system to suggest reviewer assignments for the NIPS 2010 conference, followed, in 2012, by a release that better integrated our system with Microsoft's popular Conference Management Toolkit (CMT). (mila.quebec)
During the review period, you will probably get many emails sent from CMT (e.g., those telling you about paper assignments). (icml.cc)

These should ideally be both disciplinary broadly and specific, because when my Editorial Board are looking for reviewers, the first place we turn is to search on these terms. (warwick.ac.uk)

EMHJ publishes papers in all areas of public health, in English, Arabic, and French and in support of the WHO strategic objective of making health knowledge accessible to all. (who.int)

The reverse is also true, as we do seek our reviewers in the wider academic world, via our professional networks, where we don't have sufficient good matches within our own reviewers' database for articles on various disparate topics. (warwick.ac.uk)
However, the reviewers may be anyone with sufficient knowledge to understand and assess your paper. (stackexchange.com)

However this is not a simple task: large conferences typically have to assign hundreds of papers to hundreds of reviewers, and time constraints make the task impossible for one person to accomplish. (mila.quebec)

Reviewers make recommendations to accept, accept after minor revision, reconsider after major revision, or reject. (cdc.gov)
The key to remember is that the goal isn't to make your identity completely undiscoverable across the entire internet, but rather ensure the paper is written in a way that plausibly could have been written by someone else. (usenix.org)
The paper will be assigned to a nonconflicted editorial board member who will oversee the paper through peer review and make all recommendations for the paper. (computer.org)
These draft papers will be screened by the program chair to make sure that they are within the scope of IFL. (mail-archive.com)
Emerging Infectious Diseases has partnered with Publons to make it easier for peer reviewers to track their contributions. (cdc.gov)

We regret that we are unable to provide review copies to our reviewers. (upenn.edu)

The following resources are available for reviewers of MLA '20 contributed content. (mlanet.org)
Does the title adequately represent the content of the paper? (agu.org)
I feel like the technical content and style of this paper is more suited to a statistics or information theory venue, like IEEE Transactions on information theory, in line with many of the references presented, but is still within the purview of NIPS. (nips.cc)
Your help is vital to our community: the technical content of the program is largely determined by the efforts and comments of the reviewers. (icml.cc)

Furthermore other constraints, such as reviewer load have to be taken into account, preventing the process from being completely distributed. (mila.quebec)

This paper provides an overview of the system, a summary of learning models and methods of evaluation that we have been using, as well as some of the recent progress and open issues. (mila.quebec)
The submission and peer review of special issue papers must be managed using this system. (elsevier.com)
When you were invited to become a reviewer, you should have been sent an email with instructions on how to login to the system. (icml.cc)

It is OK if reviewers find your deanonymized work through their actions once they have done a preliminary review, but they should not receive this information passively, such as via email or their social media feed. (usenix.org)

Or are there steps that the author could take to improve their chances next time they submit a paper? (bledconference.org)
Please submit requests for review to our Lead Reviewer, jim greenwald, using the book review form. (militarywriters.com)

No, the editorial board serves a different purpose from the reviewers. (stackexchange.com)
Typically, your paper will be assigned to one member of the editorial board, who will be responsible for managing the review process, and making a decision based on the reviewers' recommendations. (stackexchange.com)

We hear many stories of how challenging the submission and peer review process can be, but it's actually a great opportunity to refine your paper with expert help. (leeds.ac.uk)
The paper review process will be double-blind. (usenix.org)
Because it is highly unlikely that all articles submitted for potential inclusion in a special issue will successfully pass the peer review process, it is wise to consider more papers than you anticipate as the upper limit. (elsevier.com)
By viewing the papers, you agree that the ICML review process is confidential. (icml.cc)

Our reviewers are essential in supporting the publication process of BMT. (nature.com)
Yes, the paper is a significant contribution and worthy of prompt publication. (agu.org)

Your paper is about to go through a long process. (leeds.ac.uk)

The background purpose is to inform the Author(s) what needs to be done to improve the paper. (bledconference.org)
Briefly summarise the paper, or convey by other means that you've grasped what the author was trying to do. (bledconference.org)
and the Author needs suggestions about what they can do about the features the reviewer doesn't like. (bledconference.org)
Julia Kramer was the lead author and presented the paper and received the award. (berkeley.edu)
For example, chairs may intervene to ensure that a reviewer doesn't recommend rejecting a paper due to preview work (e.g., on arXiv) that the reviewer didn't realize was by the author of the submitted paper. (usenix.org)

Does this paper put the progress it reports in the context of existing published work? (agu.org)
These papers do not need to have been written at this time, although it might be the case that work is already in progress. (elsevier.com)
Specifically, you agree not to use ideas and results from submitted papers in your work, research or grant proposals, unless and until that material appears in other publicly available formats, such as a technical report or as a published work. (icml.cc)
Some reviewer feedback will show you clear ways to improve your work. (cdc.gov)
The work flow in LUP Student Papers differ from LUP in that it involves an additional role, teacher , making possible the distribution of student papers amongst students on a course prior to seminars. (lu.se)
While many of the noise sources described in this paper have been previously documented by other studies, most prior work has been limited to individual sources, such as data for a single worksite or for a single type of sound (e.g. the recent reports on exposures as a function of music player use). (cdc.gov)

The draft papers will be made available to all participants at the symposium. (mail-archive.com)

Reviewers are encouraged to consult the editor in chief if they have any questions about such matters, and they are asked to disqualify themselves if they consider themselves unable to give an impartial assessment. (cdc.gov)

Contributions submitted for the draft paper deadline must be between two and twelve pages long. (mail-archive.com)

We also ask reviewers to include a full formal review, which is explained more below. (agu.org)
Some papers include supplementary material. (icml.cc)

In this article, we'll explore 10 environmentally-friendly products that reviewers have passionately recommended, demonstrating that going green doesn't have to break the bank. (savedelete.com)
A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications. (mdpi.com)
The toolkit reminds you to think carefully about which reviewers to choose and which reviewer suggestions will really strengthen your article. (cdc.gov)

Anyone with a research background from a PhD student through to established professor from any academic or research institution from around the globe is warmly welcomed to consider joining our growing peer reviewer community. (warwick.ac.uk)

Reviewers may wish to consider these questions when writing a formal review, however it is not required. (agu.org)

Reviewers should not discuss articles under review with anyone. (cdc.gov)

Carefully, he folded the paper. (shilohwalker.com)

Some papers may require additional assessment by expert statistical reviewers. (cdc.gov)
He says the journal's expert virologists "have been willing to review papers under very short turnarounds, sometimes less than 24 hours. (the-scientist.com)

The Bled Conference benefits from the efforts of c. 200 people who review papers each year. (bledconference.org)
Before the pandemic happened, I was asked to review maybe one to two coronavirus papers per year," says Andrew Ward , a computational biologist at the Scripps Research Institute who has researched coronaviruses for a number of years. (the-scientist.com)
Sophia was a bug loving 8 year old (reminds me of my neighbor) who's mother put her in touch with the Entomological Society of Canada, and this eventually led to Sophia's collaboration on a paper that was recently published. (scienceblogs.com)

If your opinion is that the paper isn't appropriate for Bled, is there some other venue where it might find a home? (bledconference.org)
Challenge older kids to find the historic or artistic origins of effects like Contours, Gotham Noir, or Granny's Paper. (commonsensemedia.org)

Researchers respond to incentives, and I suggest that if reviewers follow these simple steps we can change the 'rules of the game', and therefore, ultimately change submission practices and behaviour. (leeds.ac.uk)
Now to the new paper in JAMA-Cardiology looking at longer-term all cause and CV death with intensive BP lowering over longer follow-up of SPRINT. (medscape.com)

Diseases20

Chemicals and Drugs5

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment81

Psychiatry and Psychology14

Phenomena and Processes12

Disciplines and Occupations19

Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena19

Technology, Industry, Agriculture5

Humanities4

Information Science59

Named Groups5

Health Care117

Geographicals7

20231

Guidelines3

Manuscripts8

20222

IEEE Compute1

Outstanding Reviewer1

Editors14

Authors28

Submissions4

Call for pa2

Reviews7

Publish2

Reviewing5

Identities1

Disclose1

Journal14

Concise1

Manuscript5

Read5

Guidance2

Assignments2

Search1

Publishes1

Sufficient2

Conferences1

Make5

Copies1

Content4

Constraints1

System3

Preliminary1

Submit2

Editorial2

Review process4

Publication2

Process1

Author5

Work6

PARTICIPANTS1

Consult1

Contributions1

Include2

Article3

Community1

Formal1

Articles1

Carefully1

Expert2

Year3

Find2

Follow2