• We gratefully acknowledge experts' contributions on the Expert Reviewers page. (medlineplus.gov)
  • Between 2004 and 2007, authors solicited input on the draft report Public Health Implications of Great Lakes Areas of Concern from both peer reviewers and expert reviewers. (cdc.gov)
  • If this is your first review for us, please check out the Guidelines for Reviewers, which you can find on the website and below. (maa.org)
  • Expert honoraria are paid for timely and substantiated reviews, written according to ESF's reviewer guidelines prepared for each campaign (including selection criteria, scoring approach, guidance for dealing with biases and Conflicts of Interest, etc. (esf.org)
  • The following guidelines outline key considerations, specific to library faculty cases, for the selection of external and internal reviewers. (illinois.edu)
  • We always ask for a reviewer's permission before forwarding a manuscript, limit review requests to two or three per year per reviewer, and allow at least two weeks to complete reviews. (cdc.gov)
  • Once a new reviewer candidate has applied, and it is determined that the reviewer's background is appropriate for a competition, an Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE) representative will contact that person to confirm availability to participate in a particular review. (ed.gov)
  • Please be assured that all reviewer comments are confidential, and authors cannot see the reviewer's identity. (who.int)
  • NVIDIA samples usually ship with a PDF titled 'reviewer's guide,' which only politely suggests to reviewers something along the lines of 'here's our cool new graphics card that's capable of playing this game at that resolution with these settings, just don't test it on something like Linux with Nouveau drivers, because that either won't work or won't show what our card is truly capable of. (techpowerup.com)
  • In an effort to find the best academic work, journal editors invite and consider critiques from several reviewers - typically a minimum of two or three - who are experts in their field. (chronicle.com)
  • The report - which surveyed more than 11,000 researchers worldwide - also finds a growing "reviewer fatigue", with editors having to invite more reviewers to get each review done. (nature.com)
  • Let us reassure you that we recognize that authors, editors, and reviewers may need some additional time to address journal assignments. (biophysics.org)
  • The Editorial Office has reduced the number of reminders being sent to editors and reviewers from every two days to once a week. (biophysics.org)
  • Finally, when considering asking for additional experimental data, we ask reviewers and editors to recognize that many authors no longer have access to their labs. (biophysics.org)
  • Editors, please do not hesitate to communicate with your Associate Editor, and reviewers, likewise please communicate any delays or concerns with your editor. (biophysics.org)
  • The editors would like to publicly acknowledge the people listed below who served as reviewers on the journal during 2022. (bmj.com)
  • Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers? (bvsalud.org)
  • Click here for the 2018 reviewer list. (computer.org)
  • Reviewers who provided feedback on articles submitted to the Journal as part of the 2018 issues are listed in alphabetical order. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • We are continually looking for suitable reviewers for manuscripts submitted to Preventing Chronic Disease (PCD). (cdc.gov)
  • Reviewers are responsible for complete and timely assessment of the scientific merit of manuscripts sent to them for review. (cdc.gov)
  • Manuscripts are edited in our office for grammatical correctness and journal style, so reviewers need not address those areas. (cdc.gov)
  • It provides easy and user-friendly access for authors to submit and track their manuscripts and for reviewers to deliver their review comments. (who.int)
  • This allows reviewers to critically review and make candid comments on manuscripts with the aim of improving the quality of manuscripts published in the journal. (who.int)
  • Reviewers are held to high standards of writing and the paramount responsibility of preserving the integrity of the review (by omitting or reporting potential bias, or conflicts of interest). (ed.gov)
  • It is consequently the responsibility of the reviewers to voluntarily report conflicts of interest in connection with the evaluation of applications. (rj.se)
  • Once you have delivered your review, you might want to make use of Elsevier's Reviewer Hub to ensure that you receive credit for your work. (elsevier.com)
  • Peer review - and reviewers - are at the heart of the academic publishing process. (elsevier.com)
  • Find out why reviewers perform this vital role, how they are recognized and how you can volunteer to review yourself. (elsevier.com)
  • This article is part of the security training for Firefox OS app reviewers who want to learn how to conduct meaningful security review. (mozilla.org)
  • In an effort to make their life harder and the life of our users more care-free, this series of security review tutorials will walk you through the review process from the perspective of an experienced reviewer. (mozilla.org)
  • If you have access to the Marketplace reviewer backend and want to click along in this tutorial, you will find the app in the review queue . (mozilla.org)
  • Selected reviewers score and evaluate applications using the U.S. Department of Education scoring rubric and selection criteria worksheets, technical review form, and training documents prepared for the panel discussion. (ed.gov)
  • Reviewers may be selected to serve as alternates for a competition review. (ed.gov)
  • On occasion, an emergency may hinder a reviewer from completing the review process. (ed.gov)
  • Alternate reviewers are expected to participate in all scheduled orientation meetings, and to remain available throughout the review to step in if the need arises. (ed.gov)
  • Alternate reviewers are compensated for their time spent on the competition review. (ed.gov)
  • The double-blinded peer-review mechanism means that authors don't know the reviewers of their papers and reviewers don't know the authors of the papers they review. (who.int)
  • Logging in will bring you to the " Reviewer Main Menu ", which allows you to see how many review requests you have received as well as your pending and completed reviews. (who.int)
  • In the " Reviewer Main Menu ", click on " Pending Assignments " to see the paper(s) you have agreed to review. (who.int)
  • The SfN Reviewer Mentor Program is designed to help advanced graduate students, early postdocs, or other SfN members who feel they need more training, to get involved in peer review and to write strong, constructive manuscript reviews. (jneurosci.org)
  • While several rounds of peer and expert review of the draft report were conducted, many important reviewer comments were not adequately addressed. (cdc.gov)
  • The reviewer should know how to write a tenure reference letter and how it will be used in the review process. (illinois.edu)
  • Full professor review cases require reviewers who, at minimum, hold full professor status. (illinois.edu)
  • Tenure-track candidates must identify three internal reviewers from the University of Illinois to critique and comment on the impact of the candidate's librarianship as part of the final tenure review process. (illinois.edu)
  • 1. What are the responsibilities of peer reviewers? (ed.gov)
  • The primary responsibilities of reviewers are to participate in mandatory program orientations and trainings, and to read and evaluate applications assigned to them. (ed.gov)
  • Join us in celebrating our outstanding peer reviewers for 2021. (rsc.org)
  • Non-selected peer reviewer applications remain in the reviewer database for future consideration. (ed.gov)
  • TBD is grateful for the contributions of our excellent reviewers. (computer.org)
  • These 44 reviewers are to be commended for their contributions to the Journal of Child Nutrition and Management. (schoolnutrition.org)
  • Reviewer reputation is a rough measurement of your standing within the Trailspace community, based on the quality and quantity of your contributions. (trailspace.com)
  • Emerging Infectious Diseases thanks the following reviewers for their support through thoughtful, thorough, and timely reviews in 2022. (cdc.gov)
  • 3. What are the qualifications and our expectations of peer reviewers? (ed.gov)
  • Outside Reviewers 2006," Journal of Coastal Research 2007(233), 809-812, (1 May 2007). (bioone.org)
  • Hoping for your willingness to become a reviewer in our journal. (google.com)
  • or cases in which a reviewer is involved in an application in a manner that easily arouses the suspicion of partisan assessment. (rj.se)
  • Thank you for your interest in applying to serve as an NAEYC Proposal Reviewer. (naeyc.org)
  • Proposal reviewers read through and assess proposals for the NAEYC Annual Conference (held in November) and NAEYC Professional Learning Institute (held in June). (naeyc.org)
  • Before you can assign reviews, you need to get the reviewers into the system and make sure they are assigned the reviewer function. (conference-service.com)
  • Each reviewer must commit to the panel schedule and provide detailed, objective, constructive, and timely written reviews for each assigned application. (ed.gov)
  • The language of this NDA, released verbatim to the web by Heise, provides a glimpse of what terms reviewers agree to, in order to write launch-day reviews of new products. (techpowerup.com)
  • Over the past several launch cycles, NVIDIA and AMD have slated product launch and market availability on separate dates, resulting in reviewers being unable to buy graphics cards from friendly stores a few days in advance, to post launch-day reviews. (techpowerup.com)
  • Retailers that sell cards on market-availability day usually begin stocking up only a couple of days earlier, leaving reviewers with not enough time to write reviews with retailer-sourced cards, if they intend to post their reviews on launch-day (there are very few exceptions to this). (techpowerup.com)
  • A new study from Harvard Business School shows that, when considered as a whole rather than individually, the hundreds of reviews they analyzed tended to reflect fairly accurately the judgments made by professional reviewers. (nbcnews.com)
  • Over time, it becomes second nature for reviewers to not publish before a date prescribed by the manufacturer, NDA or not. (techpowerup.com)
  • To celebrate those going above and beyond, each year our RCE editorial team evaluates peer reviewers based on the number, timeliness and quality of the reports completed over the last year. (rsc.org)
  • Reviewers are usually invited and registered by the EMHJ editorial staff. (who.int)
  • Once registered as a reviewer, you will receive an email notification from the editorial office containing your registration details and a link to access the Editorial Manager . (who.int)
  • Are Amazon reviewers usurping the role of 'professional' critics? (nbcnews.com)
  • Reviewers Landing page is a responsive multi purpose one page / Landing page WordPress business theme. (wordpress.org)
  • Reviewers Landing page is simple to set up but has a lot of features for affiliate marketing, i.e. lots of advertisement space for affiliate programs such as Google AdSense. (wordpress.org)
  • The report notes that finding peer reviewers is becoming harder, even as the overall volume of publications rises globally (see 'Is reviewer fatigue setting in? (nature.com)
  • This entails being ready to receive occasional invitations from ESF to act as an external expert reviewer for research project proposals or fellowship applications. (esf.org)
  • Bridging the Transatlantic Publishing Gap: How American Reviewers Evaluate European Idiographic Research. (lu.se)
  • Bruise (ブルーズ, Burūzu) Voiced by: Kenji Hamada A dogman reviewer with a preference for plump succu-girls. (wikipedia.org)
  • Many of you in our author, editor, reviewer, and reader community are hibernating labs, transitioning to remote teaching, prioritizing family, and changing the way you work and interact with people. (biophysics.org)
  • A conflict of interest may exist if circumstances can be identified that call into question the impartiality of an external reviewer, thus implying the risk that he or she may demonstrate inappropriate partiality. (rj.se)
  • An application in which the external reviewer is included or whether he or she may benefit or be damaged as a result of a recommendation. (rj.se)
  • In accordance with Provost Communication #9, Library candidates for promotion and tenure and their Division's advisory committee are required to supply two separate lists of external and internal reviewers for final consideration by the Library Executive Committee. (illinois.edu)
  • The Division will finalize its nomination list of five external reviewers and three internal reviewers after having received the candidate's lists. (illinois.edu)
  • The candidate must select five external reviewers. (illinois.edu)
  • Many reviewers tell us, after looking over the materials, that it took less time than they anticipated. (medlineplus.gov)
  • Is It Time to Pay Peer Reviewers? (chronicle.com)
  • Reviewers should be comfortable reading a large volume of material in a defined period of time and be capable of providing in-depth individual analysis, and/or participating in small group discussions about the applications. (ed.gov)
  • Reviewers don't mind signing onto NDAs which tell them 'you must not leak before NDA expiry time, or else no more samples. (techpowerup.com)
  • There are NDAs for even little things like new thermal pastes, and reviewers end up signing dozens of them each year. (techpowerup.com)
  • Throughout the study, each reader re-read a 5% randomly selected sample of the tapes s/he read previously and another 5% were re-read by another reviewer. (cdc.gov)
  • Any eGC1 owner (Principal Investigator, eGC1 Preparer, Administrative Contact, Pre-Award Budget Contact, Budget Preparer) or any reviewer can add an additional reviewer (called an ad hoc reviewer ) for an individual or a role (for example, Dean's Reviewer) to the approval flow once the eGC1 is routing. (washington.edu)
  • Once they have done this, you can assign them the role of reviewer at Participants / Accounts/ Functions at the conference . (conference-service.com)
  • You can assign the role of reviewer to the new user at Participants / Accounts / Functions at the conference . (conference-service.com)
  • Most reviewers find it easiest to use the Track Changes feature in Microsoft Word (or software compatible with Microsoft Word documents) to insert their suggested changes and make comments, and then return the revised documents via e-mail. (medlineplus.gov)
  • Reviewers are then selected for competitions based on education and experience specific to each grant competition. (ed.gov)
  • New reviewers of all experience levels are always welcomed. (trailspace.com)
  • Welcome to Reviewer Hub - your source of information, guidance and support for reviewing with Elsevier. (elsevier.com)
  • We value our reviewer community and know that they too are dealing with many uncertainties. (biophysics.org)
  • Your reviewer reputation score is a rough measure of your standing within the Trailspace community. (trailspace.com)
  • This activity has been peer reviewed and the reviewer has no relevant financial relationships. (medscape.com)
  • Reviewer selection is determined for each grant competition through a needs analysis that assesses the overall pool of applications and one that ensures reviewers are broadly representative of the applicant pool. (ed.gov)
  • The candidate must justify his/her selection in the reviewer biography by citing evidence that the reviewer has an excellent scholarship record in the candidate's area of study. (illinois.edu)
  • The solution, the study recommends, is for scientists to cast a wider net when looking for potential peer reviewers. (nature.com)
  • These reviewers comment on the quality and significance of the candidate's scholarship as evidenced in his/her publications and service. (illinois.edu)
  • Peer reviewers will assess applications at their home or office and enter comments and scores for each application electronically into the Department's online eReader system. (ed.gov)
  • Applications from close relatives or related parties of reviewers or in which the application may benefit or damage a close relative or related party of the reviewer. (rj.se)
  • Applications in which particular circumstances are present that may call into question the impartiality of a reviewer in one specific matter. (rj.se)