• Manuscripts should describe original work unpublished elsewhere and not being considered for publication elsewhere. (aes.org)
  • Manuscripts submitted to the Journal of the AES for publication are reviewed anonymously by members of the review board. (aes.org)
  • Review articles must not include unpublished material (unpublished/original data, submitted manuscripts, or personal communications) and may be rejected in review or reclassified, at a significant delay, if found to include such content. (frontiersin.org)
  • The senior editors assign those manuscripts deemed to be appropriate for peer review to an associate editor. (unitec.ac.nz)
  • All manuscripts are normally reviewed by two experts, but where there is disparity regarding the merits of the work, an additional review may also be requested, or one of the journal's editors may give an evaluation. (unitec.ac.nz)
  • Full details of these submission types are given on the AES Journal Manuscript Types page. (aes.org)
  • After papers have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, authors should submit the final source files including manuscript as LaTeX file, illustration files (as described below) and supplementary material such as author photographs and biographies. (aes.org)
  • As part of your JAES submission, it is required to provide at least one suggestion for an expert who could review your manuscript (name and email address). (aes.org)
  • With our peer review service, you can get our experts to review your paper and provide constructive feedback so that you can improve your manuscript much before you make the submission. (editage.com)
  • You may suggest or oppose reviewers when you formally submit your work to your journal. (aes.org)
  • This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. (wjgnet.com)
  • Accepted for publication after peer review and revision. (elifesciences.org)
  • In short the peer review means that a group of peers read and evaluate the paper to determine if it merits publication in that journal. (lu.se)
  • A film from Jönköping University about the scholarly publication process, different types of materials and peer-review. (lu.se)
  • Social work services and psychosocial interventions for children, adolescents and families. (sickkids.ca)
  • Systematic Reviews should: clearly define the research question in terms of population, interventions, comparators, outcomes and study designs (PICOS), and state which reporting guidelines were used in the study. (frontiersin.org)
  • During my EPP Fellowship at the ESS/Sandec department of Eawag, I worked on a research project entitled as, 'Psychosocial determinants of drinking chlorinated water to design behavior change interventions in Rohingya camps in Bangladesh' under the supervision of Professor Dr. Hans-Joachim Mosler. (eawag.ch)
  • To conduct a narrative literature review on the factors associated with work interruption and on existing interventions aimed at reducing the absence prevalence during pregnancy. (bvsalud.org)
  • The review, which includes 42 papers, presents a broad and comprehensive picture of factors and interventions associated with absence from work among pregnant workers. (bvsalud.org)
  • Systematic Review articles present a synthesis of previous research, and use clearly defined methods to identify, categorize, analyze and report aggregated evidence on a specific topic. (frontiersin.org)
  • Authors are required to pay a fee (A-type article) to publish an Original Research article. (frontiersin.org)
  • Specifically, the journal is intended to enable students, graduates and researchers to publish their natural-history discoveries in a peer-reviewed format. (unitec.ac.nz)
  • The study was published as a preprint and has not yet been peer reviewed. (medscape.com)
  • Twice a year, in the spring and fall, ERIC reviews journals and producers of conference papers, reports, and books as potential candidates for inclusion in ERIC, using a revised selection policy as a guide when evaluating recommended content. (ed.gov)
  • For a limited time, the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society is offering complimentary Open Access on all Review Papers. (aes.org)
  • For Review Papers, there will be no charge up to 20 pages, but $100 will be charged per extra page starting from page 21. (aes.org)
  • They are sometimes called working papers . (lu.se)
  • it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. (researchsquare.com)
  • Please refer to your preferred journal and section to clarify which article types are available. (frontiersin.org)
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. (sagepub.com)
  • Pre-prints - a draft to an article/paper that has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal. (lu.se)
  • Journal articles - a common way for researchers to reach out with their findings and scientific work is to write an article for a journal in within their field. (lu.se)
  • By using tools like the ones presented below you can see whether a journal is peer- reviewed or not, if it has a high ranking within its subject area, etc. (lu.se)
  • A database congaing bibliographic information and information about whether a journal is for example peer reviewed or Open Access. (lu.se)
  • Still, the available figures suggest that research findings, even if peer-reviewed and published in reputable journals, should not be necessarily assumed to be reproducible. (bvsalud.org)
  • You can expect to have a response from the editorial team within 2-4 working weeks. (unitec.ac.nz)
  • To add to this problem, that the assessment of methodological rigor ends up blending conflated with that of impact and originality during peer review and editorial appraisal, even though these aspects clearly represent different dimensions of scientific quality. (bvsalud.org)
  • The revised policy was released in January 2016 to clarify the types of materials ERIC is seeking for the collection. (ed.gov)
  • Maternal Type 1 Diabetes Drives Congenital Heart Defects Review of more than 600,000 Finnish live births from 2006 to 2016 showed that mothers with type 1 diabetes had a nearly fourfold higher rate of children born with a congenital heart defect. (medscape.com)
  • Associate Editor) who will oversee the review process. (unitec.ac.nz)
  • Historically, the process for conducting code review has been pretty "anti-Agile. (smartbear.com)
  • As originally conceived by Michael Fagan in 1976, code inspections1 were a heavyweight code review process that led to an entire generation of software developers who believed that meetings were required to review code. (smartbear.com)
  • Jason Cohen, founder of SmartBear Software®, conducted a study at Cisco Systems® which demonstrated that a lightweight peer code review approach was not only as effective as a heavyweight code inspection process, but also more time-efficient by a factor of 7. (smartbear.com)
  • Watch this video if you want to learn about the types of resources ERIC will and will not index, the source selection process, and how to recommend a new resource. (ed.gov)
  • All submissions will go through a peer review process to check their suitability for JAES. (aes.org)
  • Only article types that appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process are available for submission to the selected section. (frontiersin.org)
  • The review is double-blind, and this process can take up to three months. (unitec.ac.nz)
  • Frontiers offers multiple article types to maximize your options for disseminating your work. (frontiersin.org)
  • The literature on absence from work during pregnancy and its determinants remains inconsistent and rather scarce. (bvsalud.org)
  • The determinants of absence from work during pregnancy are complex and multifactorial and involve multiple stakeholders. (bvsalud.org)
  • All Frontiers articles are peer-reviewed, receive a DOI, are citable, published in PDF and HTML format, and submitted for indexing in relevant digital archives. (frontiersin.org)
  • Original Research articles are peer-reviewed, have a maximum word count of 12,000 and may contain no more than 15 Figures/Tables. (frontiersin.org)
  • Review articles cover topics that have seen significant development or progress in recent years, with comprehensive depth and a balanced perspective. (frontiersin.org)
  • Review articles should have the following format: 1) Abstract, 2) Introduction, 3) Subsections relevant for the subject, 4) Discussion. (frontiersin.org)
  • Mini Review articles cover focused aspects of a current area of investigation and its recent developments. (frontiersin.org)
  • Usually scientific articles are published in journals that are refereed or peer reviewed. (lu.se)
  • The review refers to published peer-reviewed articles dealing with all types of work interruption among pregnant women. (bvsalud.org)
  • Consistently, research shows that code review produces software with fewer defects, which aligns with the emphasis on working software. (smartbear.com)
  • Visit the IES website to see a detailed agenda for the May event and to learn more about the work of the Reading for Understanding Research Initiative. (ed.gov)
  • It will allow researchers, journals, universities, funders, teachers, journalists, and the general public to ensure:- Transparency: Ensure research meets minimum transparency standards appropriate to the article type and employed methodologies. (oercommons.org)
  • Reviews should present a complete overview of the state of the art (and should not merely summarize the literature), as well as discuss the following: 1) Different schools of thought or controversies, 2) Fundamental concepts, issues, and problems, 3) Current research gaps, 4) Potential developments in the field. (frontiersin.org)
  • I learnt the advanced data analysis techniques and the ways of writing a research article according the standard of international peer-reviewed journals. (eawag.ch)
  • ABSTRACT The EMHJ was established in 1995 to provide a peer-reviewed platform for health professionals to share their research with the scientific community. (who.int)
  • The objective of this review was to examine EMR public health research trends, as reflected by EMHJ publications in 20 years (1995-2014), through secondary data analysis. (who.int)
  • It is particularly targeted at editors working in countries that are seeking to develop their capacities to promote, conduct and disseminate research and to inform policy and practice. (who.int)
  • Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources. (lu.se)
  • In the current work, we closely examine box size effects in different systems varying from the solvation free energy of a small molecule to the kinetics of a protein conformational change. (elifesciences.org)
  • Finally, even when the main goal of my fellowship was scientific, the best thing that happened to me here, was the opportunity to meet, work, and enjoy time with amazing persons who have helped me every day even with the tiniest things. (eawag.ch)
  • 2. Please note that the involvement in the data analysis is explicitly stated, and that at least 50% working time devoted to data analysis over 12 months (6 months for Cryo-EM/ET) by a scientist in the group of the applicant or co-applicant is required for support. (lu.se)
  • As you'll learn in this paper, code review fully supports Agile tenets by promoting the development of working software, collaboration and interaction among teams, continuous attention to technical excellence and the ability to respond to change - all while maintaining a high level of quality. (smartbear.com)
  • The results were published in two peer-reviewed scientific journals and as a series of fact sheets designed to help fishermen find a comfortable PFD to work in on deck. (cdc.gov)
  • So how can code review support Agile processes? (smartbear.com)
  • Oct 6: Bioinformatics Peer review Support track (now including Cryo-EM/ET! (lu.se)
  • One of the national services offered by NBIS/SciLifeLab is the Bioinformatics Peer review Support track (a.k.a. (lu.se)
  • It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. (wjgnet.com)
  • This work has been carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2000) of the World Medical Association. (wjgnet.com)
  • Our study represents systematic work on the characterization of HpDGAT2s by integrating expression patterns, AST/TAG accumulation, functional complementation, and heterologous expression in yeast, plants, and algae. (researchsquare.com)
  • Causal Link Found Between T2D and Dementia A Mendelian randomization study in more than 300,000 mostly male US veterans found that those with type 2 diabetes were more likely to develop dementia, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer's disease. (medscape.com)
  • The second part of the project was an evaluation study of six modern PFDs designed to be worn by fishermen while working. (cdc.gov)
  • 400 fishermen in 4 different fishing vessel gear types were randomly assigned a PFD to wear for 30 days on deck with an identical evaluation form filled out after the first day and the last day. (cdc.gov)
  • For design and reporting, systematic reviews must conform to the reporting guidelines (e.g. (frontiersin.org)
  • Once you have submitted your work following the submission guidelines detailed above, you will be sent an email of receipt. (unitec.ac.nz)
  • Fiber types, asbestos potency, and environmental causation: a peer review of published work and legal and regulatory scientific testimony. (cdc.gov)
  • We aim to review and summarize the existing literature on NPD team performance and provide a sound foundation for practitioners to make evidence-based decisions by synthesizing and organizing the identified variables into a comprehendible, graphical framework. (utwente.nl)
  • Some article types, such as those that mention medicine, are section-specific. (frontiersin.org)
  • So why do so many software development teams resist adopting code review when industry titans attest to its success? (smartbear.com)
  • This stigma tainted the entire concept of code review, causing code reviews to be perceived as an impediment by Agile project teams. (smartbear.com)
  • What makes NPD teams work? (utwente.nl)
  • Using student talk to improve reading comprehension is just one of many supports that have been explored by the RfU teams in their extensive body of work over the past six years. (ed.gov)
  • They should cite original work or review previous work, giving proper credit. (aes.org)
  • Learn more about NIOSH's PFD work on the PFD Safety Page ). (cdc.gov)
  • Unlike Microsoft, Apple and Google are sticklers for code review, and their product quality reflects this added effort. (smartbear.com)
  • In addition to providing an overview of the work, the abstracts include links to RfU team websites and many of these have examples of their materials. (ed.gov)
  • Authors should submit a PDF including illustrations for review to the online submission and peer-review system . (aes.org)
  • all of the authors reviewed and approved the final draft. (wjgnet.com)
  • High Biomarker Level Plus Diabetes Predict Bad PCI Outcomes High platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and type 2 diabetes boosted the risk for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and stent thrombosis in people undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. (medscape.com)
  • Heart Rate Variability Could Track With Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Lower autonomic nervous system function was associated with worse beta-cell function. (medscape.com)
  • Could modifying risk factors for neurodegeneration ultimately help prevent and/or slow the onset of type 2 diabetes? (medscape.com)
  • A Review Paper is an overview or tutorial of an audio engineering topic. (aes.org)
  • Some Agile practitioners consider peer code review an unwelcome legacy that persists from the dark ages of waterfall development. (smartbear.com)
  • This paper demonstrates both how code reviews reinforce the key tenets that underlie Agile development philosophies, and also how code reviews can be conducted in a manner that aligns perfectly with Agile processes. (smartbear.com)
  • All applications are reviewed by the Association's Professional Certification Board and accepted applicants will be notified of their acceptance and the next steps in processing. (inspectorsgeneral.org)