Loading...
  • 2017
  • By considering 9,220 submissions and 18,525 reviews from 2010 to 2017, we measured changes both before and during the pilot and found that publishing reports did not significantly compromise referees' willingness to review, recommendations, or turn-around times. (nature.com)
  • Starting with 62,790 individual observations, including 9220 submissions and 18,525 completed reviews from 2010 to 2017, we estimated referee behavior before and during the pilot in a quasi natural experiment. (nature.com)
  • aims
  • Our study aims to fill this gap by presenting data on an open peer review pilot run at five Elsevier journals in different fields simultaneously, in which referees were asked to agree to publish their reports. (nature.com)
  • open
  • Recently, some journals, such as The EMBO Journal , eLife and those from Frontiers , have enabled various forms of pre-publication interaction and collaboration between referees, editors and in some cases even authors, with F1000 implementing advanced collaborative platforms to engage referees in post-publication open reviews. (nature.com)
  • These are all aspects that must be considered when assessing the viability and sustainability of open peer review. (nature.com)
  • Unlike pre-publication open interaction, post-publication or decoupled reviews, this form of openness neither requires complex management technologies nor it depends on external resources (e.g., a self-organized volunteer community). (nature.com)
  • The form included a small number of demographic profile questions and provided an unlimited amount of open text space for respondents to provide their views on the six questions being addressed by the Peer Review Expert Panel. (gc.ca)
  • How does Open Peer Review work? (biomedcentral.com)
  • What makes these scientific revelations so explosive is the source - J. Marvin Herndon, Ph.D. Not only has the highly experienced and well-regarded scientist utilized rigorous scientific methods to arrive at his firm conclusions, the research paper has been published in a prestigious, peer-reviewed open access journal. (chemtrailreport.com)
  • approaches
  • CIHR's Institutes collected feedback from their stakeholder communities, on the six questions posed to the Peer Review Expert Panel (PREP) using a variety of approaches, including a web form launched by CIHR, targeted focus groups, emails, and discussions during other meetings. (gc.ca)
  • trials
  • Sample 93 primary reports of randomised trials published in BMC -series medical journals in 2012. (bmj.com)
  • approach
  • ACMA members and others in industries that responsibly use styrene have long advocated for a NAS peer review as the best approach to clearing up questions about the potential for styrene to cause cancer. (acmanet.org)
  • We review suspected pathophysiology and discuss our treatment approach. (jddonline.com)
  • publication
  • Although most had a positive impact, some were inappropriate and could have a negative impact on reporting in the final publication. (bmj.com)
  • All content published within PAIN Reports is openly available online immediately upon publication. (blogspot.com)
  • journal
  • There were several themes at this meeting and one that struck home for me was the way that the functions of a typical peer-reviewed journal are beginning to be disaggregated and performed by different organisations at different stages in the life-cycle of an article. (elifesciences.org)
  • This could help, for example, in transferring reports from one journal to the next in the event that an article is rejected after peer review. (elifesciences.org)
  • One of the key parts of their proposal is that if a paper is sent for peer review, then the journal should commit to publishing the work. (elifesciences.org)
  • This explosive revelation was made through the peer reviewed International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. (chemtrailreport.com)
  • content
  • The web submission form data and reports of the Institute-led consultations were coded according to major themes through a content analysis. (gc.ca)
  • The main themes from the content analysis representing more than a third of web submission respndents (i.e., 30+ individual responses) or themes that appeared in more than half of the Institute-led consultation reports (i.e., in 7-12 reports) are presented below. (gc.ca)
  • quality
  • Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction's legal and regulatory framework for the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework. (oecd.org)
  • Instructions provided by EBSA to the peer reviewer pursuant to the OMB Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review. (dol.gov)
  • Peer Review Report - Completed pursuant to the OMB Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review and cited in the Regulatory Impact Analysis included in the Proposed Rule - Annual Reporting and Disclosure. (dol.gov)
  • research
  • 3 Clinical decisions are then made on the basis of this research evidence, so if it is misleading, by being incomplete, inaccurate, or poorly reported this has a direct impact on patient care. (bmj.com)
  • Estimates of the Burden for Filing Form 5500: The Change in Burden from the 1997 to the 1999 Forms - A 1999 report prepared for EBSA by Mathematica Policy Research, which documents cost estimates of prior reporting requirements and serves as the basis for the current unit cost estimates. (dol.gov)
  • form
  • This report synthesizes feedback from the web submission form and the Institute-led stakeholder consultations. (gc.ca)
  • Proposed Rule - Annual Reporting and Disclosure - The Proposed Rule would conform the Department's annual reporting regulations to the proposed changes to the Form 5500 Annual Return/Report. (dol.gov)
  • Notice of Proposed Forms Revisions - The Notice of Proposed Forms Revisions describes proposed changes to the Form 5500 Annual Return/Report for reporting years beginning on or after January 1, 2008, including a new Short Form 5500 (5500-SF) for eligible plans. (dol.gov)
  • work
  • All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum as relevant to its work, are being reviewed. (oecd.org)
  • study
  • Results Of the 93 trial reports, 38% (n=35) did not describe the method of random sequence generation, 54% (n=50) concealment of allocation sequence, 50% (n=46) whether the study was blinded, 34% (n=32) the sample size calculation, 35% (n=33) specification of primary and secondary outcomes, 55% (n=51) results for the primary outcome, and 90% (n=84) details of the trial protocol. (bmj.com)
  • analysis
  • Technical Appendix providing supporting documentation for the Regulatory Impact Analysis included in the Proposed Rule - Annual Reporting and Disclosure. (dol.gov)
  • Final
  • Additionally, a handful of the 29 members of the governing board do participate in the reviews, which come before final action by the board. (blogspot.com)
  • network
  • View the committees that members can join to grow our industry and network with their peers. (acmanet.org)
  • Find out about ACMA events where you can learn, network and connect with peers, potential customers and partners. (acmanet.org)
  • potential
  • Here we report two cases of nodule formation after treatment with two different hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers and review potential etiologies and therapeutic options. (jddonline.com)
  • questions
  • CIHR and its Institutes engaged stakeholders in providing input on the Peer Review Expert Panel's six questions. (gc.ca)
  • Programs
  • Some of those stakeholders consulted had applied, reviewed, or served as a Chair in the new funding programs. (gc.ca)