20232020Published in peer-reviewedSystematicManuscriptsPracticesRefereesScholarly journalEcosystemOutcomesAbstractResearch PapersReviewersPresentationsProgressMethodologyAnonymouslySubmissions20192022JournalJournalsContributionPublicationsProblematicArticlesCorrectionPublishProcessPracticeAbstractsCall for PaContributionsEditor'sOrganizationsPerspectivesEditorialGuidelinesArticleOpenWorkMethodsAcademicFieldLiterature reviewProposalsResultsCommentsProcedureSubmitCommunitySubmissionPracticalScientificConductFullDataFinalCase Reports
20231
- Tribology Online now welcomes papers to be presented at ITC Fukuoka 2023 . (tribology.jp)
20201
Published in peer-reviewed2
Systematic8
- To the best of our knowledge, no prior systematic review or meta-analysis has specifically focused on studies of longitudinal AVG interventions targeting increases in PA behaviors. (jmir.org)
- This protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42020204191). (jmir.org)
- We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify these differences. (bmj.com)
- To conduct a systematic review assessing the reach and effectiveness of peer support among hardly reached individuals, as well as peer support strategies used. (peersforprogress.org)
- A systematic review by Kuang et al found that sleep bruxism is more common in adults with sleep-related gastroesophageal reflux disease, restless leg syndrome, periodic limb movement during sleep, obstructive sleep apnea, REM behavior disorder, and sleep-related epilepsy than in the general population. (medscape.com)
- A systematic review with a meta-analysis of proportions was developed. (bvsalud.org)
- The study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. (lu.se)
- The role of psychosocial factors in the etiology of bruxism has been assessed by a recent systematic search of peer-reviewed papers (PubMed Database) dealing with bruxism and psychological/psychosocial factors. (medscape.com)
Manuscripts3
- Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review, typically to two or three reviewers. (scipio.ro)
- Manuscripts submitted to the Journal of the AES for publication are reviewed anonymously by members of the review board. (aes.org)
- Our journal plagiarism checker report can help weed out accidental plagiarism effectively from research manuscripts and reduce the chances of desk rejection. (editage.com)
Practices2
- Alternatives to common peer review practices have been put to the test, in particular open peer review, where the comments are visible to readers, generally with the identities of the peer reviewers disclosed as well, e.g. (wikipedia.org)
- We used the Ark infrastructure to support an ambitious collaboration with MIT to map the rich mesh of interconnection in the Internet, with a focus on congestion induced by evolving peering and traffic management practices of CDNs and access ISPs, including methods to detect and localize the congestion to specific points in networks. (caida.org)
Referees4
- Two main elements affect the bias in the peer process: The first element is that referees display homophily in their taste and perception of innovative ideas. (wikipedia.org)
- Brezis and Biruku show that this heterogeneity among referees will lead to seriously affect the whole peer review process, and will lead to main arbitrariness in the results of the process. (wikipedia.org)
- Our standard policy requires each paper to be reviewed by at least two Referees and the peer-review process is single-blind. (degruyter.com)
- The papers will be peer reviewed by at least two referees before they are accepted for publication. (tribology.jp)
Scholarly journal1
- 1 PeerJ is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal. (uncommondescent.com)
Ecosystem5
- We searched for examples of projects for natural resource management in the UK that had been labelled an "ecosystem approach, and then reviewed and compiled publically-available information about these. (hutton.ac.uk)
- Our initial synthesis and findings are presented in our main project report 'Exploring experiences of the Ecosystem Approach' from the list below. (hutton.ac.uk)
- In September 2015 we were invited to host an dialogue event on the Ecosystem Approach for the UK Natural Capital Initiative - the report below focuses on how we could respond to the challenges to better implement the Approach. (hutton.ac.uk)
- In parallel, we examined the peering ecosystem from an economic perspective, exploring fundamental weaknesses and systemic problems of the currently deployed economic framework of Internet interconnection that will continue to cause peering disputes between ASes. (caida.org)
- The aim of this focus paper is to inform policy and decision makers about what the NBS concept is, how it is used and interpreted in science and practice, as well as its relation to other ecosystem-based green concepts. (lu.se)
Outcomes5
- have shown that there is a low correlation between peer review outcomes and the future impact measured by citations. (wikipedia.org)
- We also published three position papers each aimed at optimizing different public policy outcomes in the face of a rapidly evolving information and communication technology landscape. (caida.org)
- CGIAR uses results indicators to allow aggregated portfolio reporting on: contribution to System Level Outcomes and SDGs, innovations, policies, partnerships, capacity development, Altmetric Attention Scores, and peer-reviewed publications. (cgiar.org)
- We systematically reviewed the impact of CHW interventions on health outcomes among older adults with complex health needs. (peersforprogress.org)
- We sought to systematically describe the effectiveness of community health worker interventions in improving patient reported outcomes and reducing healthcare utilization in the adult asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) populations in the U.S. (peersforprogress.org)
Abstract4
- All papers should be accompanied by up to six keywords and by a short abstract (150 words) outlining aims, main conclusions, and the methodology used. (sdabocconi.it)
- Full Papers and Work in Progress reports are proposed by submission of an abstract (up to 400 words), and the full text of the paper which must be no more than 4,000 words including, appendices and references. (tomw.net.au)
- Conference reports / proceedings - These are often published after the conference and collect the papers (as a summary or only an abstract). (lu.se)
- Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources. (lu.se)
Research Papers3
- Systemic literature reviews aiming at suggesting present gaps and future paths of research are also welcomed in the IJAM Research Papers section. (sdabocconi.it)
- The AES Journal seeks original unpublished research papers and engineering reports of archive quality on subjects related to the audio domain . (aes.org)
- The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. (thejcdp.com)
Reviewers15
- They underline that the ratings are not robust, e.g., changing reviewers can have a dramatic impact on the review results. (wikipedia.org)
- The second element leading to a high variance in the peer review process is that reviewers are not investing the same amount of time to analyze the projects (or equivalently are not with the same abilities). (wikipedia.org)
- Likewise, the recognition and recruitment of peer reviewers continues to be a significant issue in the field of scholarly publishing. (wikipedia.org)
- The present-day peer-review system evolved from this 18th-century process, began to involve external reviewers in the mid-19th-century, and did not become commonplace until the mid-20th-century. (wikipedia.org)
- For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us. (scipio.ro)
- We ask peer-reviewers to submit their reports via SCIPIO.ro online system by following the link provided in the editor's request for review. (scipio.ro)
- To save time for authors and peer-reviewers, only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for formal review. (scipio.ro)
- Reviewers are welcome to recommend a particular course of action, but they should bear in mind that the other reviewers of a particular paper may have different technical expertise and/or views, and the editors may have to make a decision based on conflicting advice. (scipio.ro)
- When reviewers agree to assess a paper, we consider this a commitment to review subsequent revisions. (scipio.ro)
- However, editors will not send a resubmitted paper back to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address the criticisms. (scipio.ro)
- On the basis of the reviewers' comments, the editor may request that the author make certain revisions which will allow the paper to be accepted for publication. (aes.org)
- We assign two reviewers to each paper, making sure that those reviewers have a degree of expertise in the subject matter dealt with in the article. (gla.ac.uk)
- The whole process is anonymous (or 'double blind') so reviewers will not know whose article they are reading, nor will authors know who reviewed their work. (gla.ac.uk)
- The reviewers will analyse the paper using the Peer Review Pack developed by eSharp . (gla.ac.uk)
- Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers. (mdpi.com)
Presentations1
- The conference will consist of technical presentations including refereed papers, Work-in-Progress (WiP) reports, poster sessions, and tutorials. (usenix.org)
Progress4
- A message from our Executive Management Team on CGIAR's 50th year of delivering achievements, our progress toward One CGIAR, and major contributions reported in 2021. (cgiar.org)
- You have successfully subscribed to the Peers for Progress Newsletter. (peersforprogress.org)
- Please use this form to be added to the Peers for Progress e-Newsletter mailing list. (peersforprogress.org)
- Peers for Progress Newsletters. (peersforprogress.org)
Methodology2
- In resolution EB107.R8, the Board also requested the Director-General to initiate a scientific peer review of the methodology for health systems' performance as part of the technical consultation process, including updating on methodology and new data sources relevant to the performance of health systems. (who.int)
- As a general guide, a full paper should include an introduction, literature review and methodology, results, discussion and conclusions. (tomw.net.au)
Anonymously1
- Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. (wikipedia.org)
Submissions6
- Authors of successful submissions will be able to make minor corrections to the paper before final submission. (tomw.net.au)
- All submissions will go through a peer review process to check their suitability for JAES. (aes.org)
- Due to the high volume of submissions, we cannot send papers out to review if they do not comply with our submission guidelines. (gla.ac.uk)
- Once the deadline for submissions has passed, all received papers are sent out for review. (gla.ac.uk)
- The papers will be peer reviewed in the same way as other submissions. (tribology.jp)
- The journal welcomes submissions of Technical Report from industry as well as academia in tribology and relevant fields. (tribology.jp)
20191
- 7-8 November 2019 to plan, conduct and report a wide variety of studies across different settings. (who.int)
20222
- Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/45243 , first published December 22, 2022 . (jmir.org)
- Tribology Online calls for papers from the 2022 JSME-IIP/ASME-ISPS Joint International Conference on Micromechatronics for Information and Precision Equipment . (tribology.jp)
Journal18
- Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference. (wikipedia.org)
- For a limited time, the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society is offering complimentary Open Access on all Review Papers. (aes.org)
- JAES is a hybrid journal publishing both Open Access and traditional papers, the latter being only available for subscribers, such as AES members. (aes.org)
- Our plagiarism checker report helps you identify passages in your manuscript that might be flagged by the journal for accidental plagiarism. (editage.com)
- Services like Editage's Journal Plagiarism Checker can ensure you get a plagiarism-free paper in just three simple steps. (editage.com)
- Open Computer Science is a fully peer-reviewed , open access, electronic-only journal publishing works of wide significance, originality and relevance. (degruyter.com)
- More detailed data from some of the Atlas chapters were also published December 6 in separate papers in the IDF journal Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, with more publications planned. (medscape.com)
- The peer-reviewed electronic journal "Tribology Online" is dedicated to facilitating global exchange of up-to-date information among tribologists and researchers in relevant fields through rapid publication of high-quality papers on all aspects of tribology: science and technology of lubrication, friction, wear, lubricants, tribo-materials, tribo-systems, and so on. (tribology.jp)
- The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP) is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. (thejcdp.com)
- Pre-prints - a draft to an article/paper that has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal. (lu.se)
- Usually these reports don't undergo the same quality control as scientific journal articles do, so the scientific weight might vary. (lu.se)
- In short the peer review means that a group of peers read and evaluate the paper to determine if it merits publication in that journal. (lu.se)
- Approximately 50% of conference papers get published as full journal articles within two years. (lu.se)
- By using tools like the ones presented below you can see whether a journal is peer- reviewed or not, if it has a high ranking within its subject area, etc. (lu.se)
- A database congaing bibliographic information and information about whether a journal is for example peer reviewed or Open Access. (lu.se)
- The ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) provides access to data that helps you evaluate and compare scholarly journals, using citation data drawn from over 8,400 journals from over 3,000 publishers worldwide. (lu.se)
- 1. Papers submitted to the Eastern Mediterranean the correct spelling of authors' names, full names of Health Journal (EMHJ) for publication must not have all authors should be provided in Arabic for papers been published, accepted for publication, or currently written in English or French. (who.int)
- We are now in the process of preparing an updated version which we eventually will submit to a peer-reviewed journal. (lu.se)
Journals7
- Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals. (wikipedia.org)
- The rules outlined on this page applies to the whole review practice of the journals. (scipio.ro)
- The following types of contribution to the journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Technical Reports, Analysis, Reviews and Insight articles. (scipio.ro)
- Our research is published in our discussion paper series and in peer-reviewed academic journals. (lse.ac.uk)
- We use iThenticate, the most trusted plagiarism checker by top peer-reviewed journals. (editage.com)
- Tribology Online is now indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals. (tribology.jp)
- Usually scientific articles are published in journals that are refereed or peer reviewed. (lu.se)
Contribution1
- Technical Report was added to the types of contribution, which should focus on development and application of novel and practical technology. (tribology.jp)
Publications1
- We ground the focus paper on a scientific literature review of peer-reviewed publications and a stakeholder analysis of Swedish actors at different societal levels and with different roles. (lu.se)
Problematic2
- Peer review is more problematic when choosing the projects to be funded since innovative projects are not highly ranked in the existing peer-review process. (wikipedia.org)
- Plus, we also go the extra measure and provide a report that highlights the problematic sections of your document, alongside an expert's comment on how they may individually affect the journal's evaluation. (editage.com)
Articles5
- Other contributed articles are not usually peer-reviewed. (scipio.ro)
- Nevertheless, articles published in these sections, particularly if they present technical information, may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the editors. (scipio.ro)
- This paper is the third of 3 review articles that form the background for a series of 5 interconnected studies of prescribing patterns and medication errors in the public and private primary health care sectors of Saudi Arabia. (who.int)
- Le présent article est le dernier de trois articles de synthèse qui constituent le contexte de recherche d'une série de cinq études interdépendantes sur les modes de prescription et les erreurs de médication dans les secteurs public et privé des soins de santé primaires en Arabie saoudite. (who.int)
- It does not accept Literature Review Articles, Hypothesis Papers, Commentaries, Opinion Pieces, Case Studies, Case Reports etc. which may instead be submitted to PeerJ Preprints . (uncommondescent.com)
Correction2
- One staff member on our research team reviews questionnaire responses and test results to try and spot things out of the ordinary that may need clarification or correction. (constantcontact.com)
- All forms of published correction may also be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the editors. (scipio.ro)
Publish1
- In the case of eLife, peer review is used not for deciding whether to publish an article, but for assessing its importance and reliability. (wikipedia.org)
Process11
- However, peer review does not prevent publication of invalid research, and as experimentally controlled studies of this process are difficult to arrange, direct evidence that peer review improves the quality of published papers is scarce. (wikipedia.org)
- Many studies have emphasized the problems inherent to the process of peer review. (wikipedia.org)
- Brezis and Birukou also show that the peer review process is not working properly. (wikipedia.org)
- The peer process is also in use for projects acceptance. (wikipedia.org)
- The peer-review process leads to conformity, i.e., the selection of less controversial projects and papers. (wikipedia.org)
- Other attempts to reform the peer review process originate among others from the fields of metascience and journalology. (wikipedia.org)
- Reformers seek to increase the reliability and efficiency of the peer review process and to provide it with a scientific foundation. (wikipedia.org)
- All papers are subject to a double blind refereeing process. (sdabocconi.it)
- IJAM Editorial team takes pride in our rigorous review process. (sdabocconi.it)
- How does the peer review process work? (gla.ac.uk)
- A film from Jönköping University about the scholarly publication process, different types of materials and peer-review. (lu.se)
Practice1
- Open access refers to the practice of making peer-reviewed scholarly research and literature freely available online to anyone interested in reading it at no cost and with limited restrictions with regards to reuse. (thejcdp.com)
Abstracts2
- Abstracts are subject to review by the ePortfolios Australia Conference 2010 Organising Committee. (tomw.net.au)
- Please submit papers and abstracts to [email protected] by the due date as detailed below. (tomw.net.au)
Call for Pa2
- The ePortfolios Australia Conference 2010 (Melbourne, 3 to 4 November 2010), has issued a call for papers on the use of electronic portfolios in the vocational education and training (VET), higher education (HE) and adult and community education (ACE) sectors. (tomw.net.au)
- For more information, please see the Call for Papers - Special Issue on Surface Texturing for Improving Tribological Properties . (tribology.jp)
Editor's1
- The standard time for full peer review is typically less than 90 days from receipt of a manuscript to the first Editor's decision. (sdabocconi.it)
Organizations1
- Research reports - usually published by universities, research institutes, companies, organizations or government authorities to present their research. (lu.se)
Perspectives1
- The culture of journalism involves a critical feature that makes journalism work: When researching and reporting a story, seek the other perspectives, those that for one reason or another come to a different conclusion than the perspective that may have initially gotten one's attention. (scienceblogs.com)
Editorial2
- The first record of an editorial pre-publication peer-review is from 1665 by Henry Oldenburg, the founding editor of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society at the Royal Society of London. (wikipedia.org)
- If our internal editorial review concludes a manuscript is not suitable for full peer review, then we usually have a decision for authors within 14 days after submission of a manuscript. (sdabocconi.it)
Guidelines1
Article2
- A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications. (mdpi.com)
- How peer review works, how you recognize a scholarly article and which elements must be included is described. (lu.se)
Open1
- Open Access papers published in JAES are freely available to read for all. (aes.org)
Work6
- Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. (wikipedia.org)
- Our last portion of this work also focused on the implications for monitoring and evaluation of environmental management projects, discussed in our third academic paper listed below. (hutton.ac.uk)
- The Group's report to the Director-General of its first meeting in December 2001 was presented to the Board at its 109th session in January 2002.2 The Scientific Peer Review Group has now completed its work and the executive summary of its report is annexed. (who.int)
- They should cite original work or review previous work, giving proper credit. (aes.org)
- How does the Plagiarism Check Report work? (editage.com)
- Whether they are accepted or rejected, authors will receive two fully annotated copies of their work as well as two detailed feedback reports. (gla.ac.uk)
Methods1
- Commonly reported activities in the "reporting of methods, with recipients asked to share the invitation data" category included developing internal situation with other Australian FETP alumni. (who.int)
Academic2
- Academic peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) academic field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. (wikipedia.org)
- Further analysis supported the development of outputs oriented to specific audiences, including academic papers - all outputs are listed below. (hutton.ac.uk)
Field4
- In general, to be acceptable, a paper should represent an advance in understanding likely to influence thinking in the field. (scipio.ro)
- Those papers judged by the editors to be of insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate are rejected promptly without external review (although these decisions may be based on informal advice from specialists in the field). (scipio.ro)
- As a result, reviews of literature in this field can become outdated, revealing the need for updated high-quality reviews that identify overarching insights. (jmir.org)
- Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. (mdpi.com)
Literature review1
- Last week the study "A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Lockdowns on COVID-19 Mortality" got a lot of attention in media. (lu.se)
Proposals1
- Scholarly peer review has been subject to several criticisms, and various proposals for reforming the system have been suggested over the years. (wikipedia.org)
Results2
Procedure1
- If the identities of authors are not revealed to each other, the procedure is called dual-anonymous peer review. (wikipedia.org)
Submit3
- Authors should submit a PDF including illustrations for review to the online submission and peer-review system . (aes.org)
- After papers have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, authors should submit the final source files including manuscript as LaTeX file, illustration files (as described below) and supplementary material such as author photographs and biographies. (aes.org)
- The successful authors will be asked to re-submit by a given deadline, after which their paper will be copy-edited. (gla.ac.uk)
Community2
- The project has been announced in the local papers and community centers, and this week marks the start of enrollment for expectant mothers. (constantcontact.com)
- Our primary responsibilities are to our readers and to the scientific community at large, and in deciding how best to serve them, we must weigh the claims of each paper against the many others also under consideration. (scipio.ro)
Submission1
- As part of your JAES submission, it is required to provide at least one suggestion for an expert who could review your manuscript (name and email address). (aes.org)
Practical1
- An Engineering Report must have practical value but need not contain theory. (aes.org)
Scientific1
- The Scientific Peer Review Group on Health Systems' Performance Assessment was set up by the Director-General at the end of October 2001. (who.int)
Conduct1
- They conduct data analysis using the de-identified data and put together summary data reports and graphs. (constantcontact.com)
Full1
- Full papers are subject to double blind peer-review as required by DEEWR. (tomw.net.au)
Data3
- This annual report summarizes CAIDA's activities for 2015, in the areas of research, infrastructure, data collection and analysis. (caida.org)
- This paper combines micro-level tax data, household surveys and national accounts data to provide consistent series of income distribution in Poland over the 2000-2018 period. (lse.ac.uk)
- Se calcularon las data collection handling and frecuencias encontradas y los datos de los hallazgos más frecuentes fueron resumidas en metaanálisis usando el método de analysis, writing, revision. (bvsalud.org)
Final3
- This final report of the Group, presented to the Director-General in April 2002, has been prepared with input from every member, and its conclusions and recommendations are unanimous. (who.int)
- Ending Stagnation, the final report of the Economy 2030 inquiry, sets out a serious strategy for ending Britain's relative decline. (lse.ac.uk)
- Choose a Publication Support Services pack or a custom pack with our Plagiarism Check Report and upload your final manuscript. (editage.com)
Case Reports1
- Joanna Briggs Institute tools for case series and case reports. (bvsalud.org)