Preferred peer reviewers. Medical search. Frequent questions

Reviewers remain anonymous and are not identified to applicants. (ed.gov)
Applicants must have experience of peer reviewing for at least two different social science journals. (copyscyl.org)
Applicants, peer reviewers and participants in the Reviewer Pathway programs are required to complete the questionnaire. (gc.ca)

Reviewers are held to high standards of writing and the paramount responsibility of preserving the integrity of the review (by omitting or reporting potential bias, or conflicts of interest). (ed.gov)
Regardless of the content under review, the AHR carefully selects reviewers, ensuring that they have already demonstrated sufficient expertise in the relevant field, and guarding carefully against potential conflicts of interest. (historians.org)

In an effort to find the best academic work, journal editors invite and consider critiques from several reviewers - typically a minimum of two or three - who are experts in their field. (chronicle.com)
Peer review is the cornerstone of research allocation decisions, but agencies typically base decisions on a simple average of peer review scores. (nber.org)
Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review, typically to two or three reviewers. (scipio.ro)
An accreditation decision about a specific health care organization is made following a periodic onsite evaluation by a team of peer reviewers, typically conducted every two to three years. (who.int)

Health sciences librarians contribute to systematic review production but little is known about their involvement in peer reviewing SR manuscripts. (biomedcentral.com)
This survey aimed to assess how frequently librarians are asked to peer review systematic review manuscripts and to determine characteristics associated with those invited to review. (biomedcentral.com)
Results indicated that 22% ( n = 63) of respondents had been asked by journal editors to peer review systematic review or meta-analysis manuscripts. (biomedcentral.com)
Respondents had peer reviewed manuscripts for 38 unique journals and believed they were asked because of their professional expertise. (biomedcentral.com)
Associate Editors (AE) for the Journal perform the primary assessment of manuscripts submitted to the Journal and make the determination as to whether manuscripts meet the standard for peer review. (aasurg.org)
This editor has 18 years of experience in peer reviewing and editing manuscripts for journals such the Journal of Physical Chemistry and the Journal of the Electrochemical Society. (agaperanchministries.org)
Manuscripts considered to be unsuitable for the journal will be rejected without peer review. (viamedica.pl)
Manuscripts deemed to have sufficient priority and quality will be forwarded to our external referees for peer review. (viamedica.pl)
Manuscripts written in poor English will be rejected without peer review. (viamedica.pl)
Historians of science such as Zuckerman and Merton (1971) analysis, carried out by the editorial team (desk review), which suggest that the idea of peer review/evaluation is old, probably has the prerogative to refuse manuscripts. (bvsalud.org)

Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium. (nih.gov)
However, those who have in some way directly assisted in or endorsed the publication, exhibition, editing, or preparation of a work (e.g., commented on portions of a book manuscript in draft) are excluded as potential reviewers and/or asked to recuse themselves. (historians.org)
In cases where one reviewer alone opposes publication, we may consult the other reviewers as to whether s/he is applying an unduly critical standard. (scipio.ro)
Reviewers are asked to provide formative feedback, even if an article is not deemed suitable for publication in the journal. (levylibrarypress.org)
10. All papers being considered for publication will be peer-reviewed. (who.int)
Scientific publication--which is possible to identify in the editorial flows journals that adopt peer evaluation become the preferred source of national and international scientific journals. (bvsalud.org)

Reviewer selection is determined for each grant competition through a needs analysis that assesses the overall pool of applications and one that ensures reviewers are broadly representative of the applicant pool. (ed.gov)
As noted in Question 21, this means that the information cannot be seen by other applicant participants or by peer reviewers, and it will only be seen by a small group of CIHR staff with the appropriate security clearance and access. (gc.ca)

Our 23 peer reviewed journals are driven by editors who are recognized experts and leaders in their respective research areas. (agu.org)
This page provides policies, resources and practical advice on ethical concerns that arise in scientific publishing for authors, reviewers, editors, and others. (agu.org)
Likewise, journal editors and authors often seek to improve the quality of published SRs and other evidence syntheses through peer review. (biomedcentral.com)
Editors should involve experienced librarians with peer review and we suggest some strategies to consider. (biomedcentral.com)
All forms of published correction may also be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the editors. (scipio.ro)
Nevertheless, articles published in these sections, particularly if they present technical information, may be peer-reviewed at the discretion of the editors. (scipio.ro)
Reviewers are welcome to recommend a particular course of action, but they should bear in mind that the other reviewers of a particular paper may have different technical expertise and/or views, and the editors may have to make a decision based on conflicting advice. (scipio.ro)
However, editors will not send a resubmitted paper back to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address the criticisms. (scipio.ro)
More, important, however, is the intensive "communication work" between editors and reviewers-a necessary communication to guarantee standardization and maintenance of quality. (qualitative-research.net)
This was not necessary and probably was meant to appease peer reviewers and editors. (medscape.com)

The SfN Reviewer Mentor Program is designed to help advanced graduate students, early postdocs, or other SfN members who feel they need more training, to get involved in peer review and to write strong, constructive manuscript reviews. (jneurosci.org)

Contact your mentor and decide on a bioRxiv preprint that has not yet been accepted at any peer-reviewed journal. (jneurosci.org)
Urogynecology is a monthly peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. (augs.org)
Thanks to the help of our authors, peer-reviewers and committed society members, Urogynecology will continue to be ahead of the curve as the journal continues to grow in impact and global reach. (augs.org)
For any general questions and comments about the peer-review process, the journal or its editorial policies that are not addressed here, we encourage reviewers to contact us. (scipio.ro)
We will systematically search electronic databases for peer-reviewed, published journal articles to identify appropriate studies in collaboration with a health science librarian. (bmj.com)
All articles submitted to a LLP journal are initially assessed by an editor, who decides whether or not the article fits the scope of the journal and is suitable for peer-review. (levylibrarypress.org)
The Internet is calling into question one of academia's sacred rites: the peer- reviewed journal article. (inthemedievalmiddle.com)
The Editorial Board reserves the right to accept or reject any paper based on the reviewers' comments, scientific rigor, and suitability for the journal. (who.int)
The WPSAR editorial team looks forward to working with readers, authors and reviewers to create a journal that is a hub for information sharing and is supportive of developing capacity for surveillance of and response to public health events. (who.int)
The Revista Odonto Ciência (Journal of Dental Science) adopts a blind expert peer review process. (bvsalud.org)
Contributions are sent to reviewers if they rigorously abide by the journal guidelines. (bvsalud.org)
The reviewers receive an e-mail with the abstract and login to the online system, where they access the journal guidelines and steps to send the review and recommendation to the editor. (bvsalud.org)

People are saying no to reviews because they don't want to participate in the marketplace of peer-reviewed journals that are on the backs of free labor. (chronicle.com)
Previous Editorial Board membership experience or significant experience as an ad-hoc reviewer for clinical and/or basic science journals is preferred. (aasurg.org)
The following types of contribution to the journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Technical Reports, Analysis, Reviews and Insight articles. (scipio.ro)
LLP journals can operate anonymized or open peer-review processes. (levylibrarypress.org)
Journals also have the option of releasing their peer-review comments alongside publications, either in an anonymized or open format. (levylibrarypress.org)
Whilst the press encourages open processes, journals are able to choose their preferred review option. (levylibrarypress.org)
The previous published reviews of prevalence and incidence of LBP studies were focused on evaluating peer-reviewed journals conducted via population-based longitudinal and cross-sectional designs. (springer.com)
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals. (dovepress.com)
He published more than 150 scientific articles on hip and knee arthroplasty in peer-reviewed journals. (amegroups.org)
Biomedical journals, which are the usual avenue for information dissemination, prefer to publish rigorous research studies. (who.int)

To save time for authors and peer-reviewers, only those papers that seem most likely to meet our editorial criteria are sent for formal review. (scipio.ro)
We try to evaluate the strength of the arguments raised by each reviewer and by the authors, and we may also consider other information not available to either party. (scipio.ro)
We may return to reviewers for further advice, particularly in cases where they disagree with each other, or where the authors believe they have been misunderstood on points of fact. (scipio.ro)
We are very aware, however, that reviewers are usually reluctant to be drawn into prolonged disputes, so we try to keep consultation to the minimum we judge necessary to provide a fair hearing for the authors. (scipio.ro)
Links to these sites and other useful resources are available under "Useful resources for authors and reviewers" (http://www.emro. (who.int)
Authors and reviewers are blind to each other. (bvsalud.org)

3. What are the qualifications and our expectations of peer reviewers? (ed.gov)

Peer reviewers will assess applications at their home or office and enter comments and scores for each application electronically into the Department's online eReader system. (ed.gov)
We expect reviewers to write thoughtful and engaging critiques that explain the basic argument of a book, assess its strengths and weaknesses, and place the work in historiographical context. (historians.org)
When reviewers agree to assess a paper, we consider this a commitment to review subsequent revisions. (scipio.ro)
Submissions considered suitable for peer-review are assigned to independent experts, who are asked to assess the article for clarity, validity, and sound methodology. (levylibrarypress.org)

The contractor worked closely with the Institute of Acoustics' AM working group, who in August 2016 recommended a preferred metric and methodology for quantifying and assessing the level of AM in a sample of wind turbine noise data . (epaw.org)

Non-selected peer reviewer applications remain in the reviewer database for future consideration. (ed.gov)
If you meet the above criteria and want to be added to our large and growing database of reviewers, please send a CV for consideration to [email protected] . (historians.org)

Over the year, many AOJ reviewers have made outstanding contributions to the peer review process. (amegroups.org)

The primary responsibilities of reviewers are to participate in mandatory program orientations and trainings, and to read and evaluate applications assigned to them. (ed.gov)
Selected reviewers score and evaluate applications using the U.S. Department of Education scoring rubric and selection criteria worksheets, technical review form, and training documents prepared for the panel discussion. (ed.gov)

Using a discrete choice experiment conducted with a large sample of active biomedical researchers, we find that-in contrast to funding agencies-scientists systematically prefer to fund projects with more reviewer dissensus. (nber.org)

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was applied to organize this systematic review. (dovepress.com)

Members who prefer to read printed paper are able to easily print select articles or entire issues. (augs.org)

If a school is looking to lease or purchase to support their proposed project please include enough evidence to provide the Peer Review Team with a clear picture of the schools' plans. (pacharters.org)
The second topic describes an analyses of 131 archived files (first drafts) of reviews published in FQS and the analyses of the e-mail contacts between the reviewers and the editorial team which accompany the peer review process. (qualitative-research.net)
It was undertaken by a research team lead by WSP Parsons Brinkerhoff, who are responsible for the overall editorial content of the report, and supported by three independent external reviewers. (epaw.org)

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy), COREQ (Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research), CARE (guideline for clinical case report), and the COCHRANE handbook (for systematic reviews of interventions). (who.int)

In Dr. Vendittoli's opinion, a good reviewer must clearly identify the objectives of the study and offer comments that will enhance the content of the scientific article. (amegroups.org)
The final report addresses comments raised by three peer reviewers, appointed by DECC. (epaw.org)

On occasion, an emergency may hinder a reviewer from completing the review process. (ed.gov)
Effectively, these scholars are often not able to participate in the peer-review process because they can't afford to review for free. (chronicle.com)
Applications should follow the School Intention to Submit (ITS) / Supporting Grant Application (SGA) and Peer Review process, where these apply. (abdn.ac.uk)
Reviewers and potential reviewers should maintain the spirit of objectivity inherent in the review process. (historians.org)
AEs oversee the entire review process by first choosing quality reviewers, then determining the integrity and accuracy of the reviews submitted, and then making a final decision on the status of the manuscript (revise, accept, reject). (aasurg.org)
The AE role is critical to maintaining the integrity of the peer review process and ultimately ensuring a high standard of excellence for the JSR . (aasurg.org)
We aim to make the review process as efficient as possible, whilst maintaining a high quality of reviewer feedback. (levylibrarypress.org)
Since then, peer review has become a predominant method of the peer review process or referee system. (bvsalud.org)

Now we have the reviewing process exposed in a single issue of SQ. But it is still peer reviewed. (inthemedievalmiddle.com)
Through the process of preparing a manuscript, and the subsequent peer review and editing of the manuscript, trainees will have an opportunity to improve their understanding of their work. (who.int)

Conflict of interest exists when an author (or the author's institution), reviewer, or editor has financial or personal relationships that inappropriately influence (bias) his or her actions (such relationships are also known as dual commitments, competing interests, or competing loyalties). (bvsalud.org)

One explanation for their conservatism is the way the agencies use peer review of scientific proposals. (nber.org)
The position affords members the opportunity to contribute at a very high level to the quality of the peer-reviewed scientific surgical literature and to join a group of individuals with strong ties and interest in academic surgery. (aasurg.org)
The reviewer should avoid including personal preferences and instead propose a systematic structure that meets the scientific needs. (amegroups.org)

As FQS Reviews began we preferred finding reviewers by posting on different listservs to inform others about review copies of books and other media. (qualitative-research.net)

We prefer that they do so in a way that addresses readers outside the confines of their own area of specialization. (historians.org)

Interacts, serve as peer reviewers and advisors to one another, and provides feedback to the faculty regarding the quality and direction of the fellowship training program. (postdocjobs.com)
To Dr. Vendittoli, the quality of a peer review committee, combined with the supervision of the editor, is a guarantee of the newspaper's reputation and its long-term survival. (amegroups.org)

Reliance on unpaid labor also means some scholars are inadvertently left out of the reviewer pool altogether. (chronicle.com)

Completion of the questionnaire is mandatory and required prior to peer review, but each question includes the option "prefer not to answer. (gc.ca)

The author is usually one of the original reviewers. (karger.com)

invitations to review are based on independent staff judgments about the appropriate match between material and reviewer. (historians.org)
Peer review is like democracy, the saying goes, despite its flaws, it's the best involves judgments that would affect others. (bvsalud.org)

Each reviewer must commit to the panel schedule and provide detailed, objective, constructive, and timely written reviews for each assigned application. (ed.gov)
We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). (nih.gov)
Results will be collated and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews: PRISMA-Scoping Reviews. (bmj.com)

As you may remember, this policy was developed as part of NIH efforts to enhance peer review. (nih.gov)
Intentionally falsifying information, for example, suggesting reviewers with a false name or email address, will result in rejection of your manuscript and may lead to further investigation in line with our misconduct policy. (biomedcentral.com)

Reviewers are expected to have earned a Ph.D. or its equivalent (such as a J.D. or Th.D.) or to have a record of appropriate scholarship. (historians.org)
We also prefer a potential reviewer to have published a peer-reviewed article and to have published a review elsewhere, as well as to be at work on a major piece of historical scholarship of some form (this can include museum exhibits, websites, films, and other genres). (historians.org)
A few days ago, I FB'd a link to a New York Times article on new models of digital peer reviewing for scholarship, which discusses the recent Shakespeare Quarterly experiment (also discussed here at ITM), as well as the " Becoming Media " issue of Postmedieval that Jen Boyle and I are editing. (inthemedievalmiddle.com)

Reviewers are then selected for competitions based on education and experience specific to each grant competition. (ed.gov)

If a paper qualifies for peer review, the AEs assign experts in the field of study to review the manuscript. (aasurg.org)

Reviewers should be comfortable reading a large volume of material in a defined period of time and be capable of providing in-depth individual analysis, and/or participating in small group discussions about the applications. (ed.gov)

Methods: Eight social science, medical, and communication databases and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed papers published in English. (researchgate.net)
peer-reviewed papers published in English. (researchgate.net)

Reviewers must be actively registered in the G5 system. (ed.gov)
We ask peer-reviewers to submit their reports via SCIPIO.ro online system by following the link provided in the editor's request for review. (scipio.ro)

If it's wrong, you have a 99% chance that Google (or your preferred search engine) will correct you. (securitycatalyst.com)

The questionnaire has been expanded to provide CIHR with data that it can use to understand how its programs and peer review processes are being accessed within underrepresented groups. (gc.ca)

Archaeologists should strive to carry out their work to the highest professional standards recognised by their peers. (e-a-a.org)
In recent years, his work was presented more than 325 times at peer-reviewed congresses, and he was invited on more than 225 occasions as speaker. (amegroups.org)

Based on the reviewer reports the editor will make a decision to for ask for revisions, accept or reject the submission. (levylibrarypress.org)

If you wish to do so, please provide institutional email addresses where possible, or information which will help the Editor to verify the identity of the reviewer (for example an ORCID or Scopus ID). (biomedcentral.com)
We therefore ask that reviewers should be willing to provide follow-up advice as requested. (scipio.ro)
All reviewers must provide a competing interests statement prior to returning their review feedback. (levylibrarypress.org)

According to Nature , the number of submitted articles across several fields increased in the middle of lockdown, and reviewer requests rose along with them. (chronicle.com)
Other contributed articles are not usually peer-reviewed. (scipio.ro)

During submission you may enter details of anyone who you would prefer not to review your manuscript. (biomedcentral.com)
Reviewers also are required to file a Conflict of Interest Statement when reviewing a submission. (bvsalud.org)

Interested persons must be deemed qualified for a particular reading, indicate their availability for a reading, and be confirmed as selected before they actually are considered to be a reviewer for a program. (ed.gov)

You may suggest potential peer reviewers for your manuscript. (biomedcentral.com)

Check out Security Catalyst Office Hours to meet your peers and celebrate the good, help each other, and figure out your best next step. (securitycatalyst.com)

Of respondents who had declined to peer review (32%, n = 20), the most common explanation was "not enough time" (60%, n = 12) followed by "lack of expertise" (50%, n = 10). (biomedcentral.com)

Alternate reviewers are compensated for their time spent on the competition review. (ed.gov)
Is It Time to Pay Peer Reviewers? (chronicle.com)

Membership in the American Historical Association is neither a requirement for nor a guarantee of selection as a reviewer. (historians.org)

Selected peer reviewers will receive a copy of each assigned application electronically. (ed.gov)

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment7

Psychiatry and Psychology10

Phenomena and Processes1

Disciplines and Occupations7

Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena5

Technology, Industry, Agriculture1

Humanities2

Information Science18

Named Groups1

Health Care13

Applicants3

Conflicts of inter2

Typically4

Manuscripts10

Publication6

Applicant2

Editors10

Involved in peer review1

Journal12

Journals10

Authors6

Expectations1

Assess4

Methodology1

Consideration2

Contributions1

Evaluate2

Systematically1

Systematic review1

Printed paper1

Team3

Clinical1

Comments2

Review process8

Process2

Author's1

Scientific3

Inform1

Readers1

Quality2

Scholars1

Mandatory1

Author1

Judgments2

Reviews3

Policy2

Scholarship3

Experience1

Assign1

Applications1

Papers2

System2

Search1

Questionnaire1

Work2

Reports1

Provide3

Articles2

Submission2

Program1

Potential1

Meet1

Expertise1

Time2

Selection1

Receive1