Peer reviewer for science peer reviewed. Medical search. Frequent questions

The Acta Journals are delighted to announce the recipients of the 2023 Outstanding Reviewer awards for excellence in reviewing throughout the calendar year of 2022. (materialstoday.com)

Reviewers not only help to select the content to be published but also are expected to provide meaningful comments that can improve the quality of the manuscripts they review. (psychologicalscience.org)
By incorporating reviewers' comments and suggestions, authors can improve their manuscripts and even develop new research ideas. (psychologicalscience.org)
Since our publishing philosophy at the Baishideng Publishing Group (BPG) is to discover and disseminate salient and timely knowledge, we only accept manuscripts that adhere to the ethical guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and which pass strict single-blind peer review. (wjgnet.com)
We match reviewers to submissions based on keywords in our online peer review system, ScholarOne Manuscripts . (computer.org)
We are happy to announce that Prof. Dr. Dirk Lewandowski (Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany), Prof. Dr. Loet Leydesdorff (Amsterdam School of Communications Research at the University of Amsterdam, Netherlands) & Prof. Dr. Isabella Peters (ZBW Leibniz Information Centre for Economics & Kiel University, Germany) will speak about their experiences from the reviewers point of view and hand out advice on writing better journal manuscripts. (asist.org)
Do you already have some questions in mind that you always wanted to ask your journal manuscripts reviewers? (asist.org)
Manuscripts submitted for publication in Bentham Science journals are subjected to single blind peer-review, except for a selected number of patent journals where double blind review is followed. (benthamscience.com)
All manuscripts submitted to Bentham Open (BO) are peer-reviewed by members of the journals' editorial board, expert reviewers, and the editor-in-chief. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)
All submitted manuscripts received by the Editorial Office will be initially checked by a Managing Editor before the manuscripts are sent for peer-review to decide whether they are correctly formatted/prepared, follow the ethical policies of the journal and also fit the scope of the journal, and whether they are scientifically sound. (techscience.com)
Manuscripts that do not meet the journal's ethics policy or do not qualify the standards or do not fit the scope of the journal will be rejected before peer-review. (techscience.com)
Editor(s) will make initial decisions, and qualified manuscripts will be sent for peer-review. (techscience.com)
All manuscripts considered for publication in our journals, including invited papers, go through a stringent and thorough peer-review procedure. (techscience.com)
The Revista Odonto Ciência (Journal of Dental Science) welcomes manuscripts written in English or Portuguese languages. (bvsalud.org)

I received the Global Peer Review Awards from Web of Science in 2019, and the Outstanding Contribution Awards from Elsevier in 2017. (google.com)
He also co-developed the curriculum for the Pharmacology & Toxicology Master of Science degree program that was launched in 2019. (utmb.edu)

Join us in celebrating our outstanding peer reviewers for 2022. (rsc.org)

Please return your reviews by October 13, 2017 to Barbara MacKenzie at [email protected] . (cdc.gov)

The three most common modifications to which the term is applied are: Open identities: Authors and reviewers are aware of each other's identity. (wikipedia.org)
Also in 1999, the British Medical Journal moved to an open peer review system, revealing reviewers' identities to the authors but not the readers, and in 2000, the medical journals in the open access BMC series published by BioMed Central, launched using open peer review. (wikipedia.org)
It is imperative that reviewers do not reveal their identities to the author(s) of papers they are reviewing. (computer.org)
Bentham follows a double-blind peer review process where the identities of both the reviewer and author are kept undisclosed to each other, ensuring anonymity and maintaining confidentiality throughout the entire review procedure. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)
The procedure is single blind in nature, meaning that the reviewers know the identities of the authors of the work that they are assessing, but the authors do not know the identities of the reviewers. (techscience.com)

Publons allows reviewers to track their peer review contributions. (psychologicalscience.org)
Publons Academy and Nature Masterclass provide free peer-review training courses. (psychologicalscience.org)
LONDON , Sept. 7, 2018 /CNW/ -- Publons - the leading scholarly peer review platform, today launched the Global State of Peer Review report , the largest ever study of peer review. (newswire.ca)
The report brings together novel results of a survey of 11k+ global researchers alongside data from Publons, ScholarOne , and Web of Science . (newswire.ca)

The anonymity of reviewers ensures objective and unbiased assessment of the manuscript by reviewers. (benthamscience.com)
RBP editorial policy is guided by double-blind peer review, ensuring the anonymity of authors and reviewers during the evaluation process. (bvsalud.org)

That is, reviewers should evaluate whether an article is appropriate for a certain journal, based on factors such as its submission guidelines and, for some journals, reviewer guidelines or additional information in the invitations sent to potential reviewers. (psychologicalscience.org)
citation needed] Several other journals published by the BMJ Group allow optional open peer review, as does PLoS Medicine, published by the Public Library of Science. (wikipedia.org)
Most prominently, these include the judging and scoring of the accuracy and justifiability of peer reviews, and concurrent usage of a single peer review round by several participating journals. (wikipedia.org)
Geographical peer review disparity is harming the development of non-Western researchers - fewer review invitations mean fewer opportunities to see the latest research trends, learn what journals are looking for in a great manuscript, make professional connections with journal editors, and develop critical analysis skills. (newswire.ca)
Reviewers also return their peer reviews faster for more prestigious journals, as median days to complete a review reduces as JIF increases. (newswire.ca)
Acta Materialia, Inc. is dedicated to supporting and recognizing the journals´ reviewers. (materialstoday.com)
Supported by Elsevier, we publish high impact peer-reviewed journals, organize academic conferences, broadcast educational webinars and so much more. (materialstoday.com)
Finally, he is reviewer for a variety of scientific journals, industry and government bodies. (uu.nl)
He (co-) published more than 130 articles in peer-reviewed journals, and currently has an H-index of 49 (Scopus). (uu.nl)
Papers that are focused primarily on water engineering and treatment technologies or on the environmental behaviour of engineered nanomaterials would be better suited to our sister journals, Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology and Environmental Science: Nano . (rsc.org)
See more details about the scopes of the Environmental Science journals . (rsc.org)
Furthermore he is an associate editor of Online Information Review and serves frequently as a reviewer for various journals. (asist.org)
She reviews for a couple of international journals and conferences, e.g. (asist.org)
I also serve as a regular reviewer for about 30 mainstream journals and 8 flagship conferences across the domains of Robotics, artificial intelligence, and Control. (google.com)
Minimally, this is an inefficient use of scarce resources, including space in journals and the time of authors, editors, and reviewers. (uaf.edu)
She is a regular reviewer for international journals in the fields of art history, geography and art education. (ncl.ac.uk)
All Tech Science Press (TSP) journals are peer-reviewed journals. (techscience.com)
He has published 62 peer-reviewed journal articles and has served as a reviewer for over 25 scientific journals. (utmb.edu)
As a biostatistician and epidemiologist, Dr Bahnassy made significant contributions to science publishing globally / regionally, having published over 100 papers in different peer-reviewed journals. (who.int)
and a senior peer reviewer for several journals and research centres. (who.int)
The demand for peer review is also increasing owing to an increase in scientific production and proliferation of new scientific journals. (medscape.com)
He is critical of the current way in which research is typically classified as credible: publications in the right journals and peer review. (lu.se)
The past two decades have seen vast changes in the world of health science journals, including greater awareness of the role of journals in reporting research, advancing patient treatment and care, educating health professionals, and helping to bridge the communication gap between researchers and policy-makers. (bvsalud.org)
This manual is targeted at the editors of health science journals, whether in the field of medicine, nursing and allied health, public health, social health, environmental health or other health- related areas. (bvsalud.org)
Manual for editors of health science journals / WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean p. (bvsalud.org)
Health science journals are an important element in health systems. (bvsalud.org)
Since the mid 1990s, both the WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean and editors of biomedical and other health science journals have sought to raise the quality and profile of journals in the Region. (bvsalud.org)
Scientific journals must predominantly publish the result of original scientific research with regard to experimental, theoretical and observational aspects related to the Health Sciences area, and include descriptive analysis and/or inference of own data. (bvsalud.org)

Before sending any manuscript to reviewers, Bentham Open seeks consent from potential reviewers and editorial board members about their availability and willingness to review the paper. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)
Editor(s) may consider assigning a manuscript to reviewers whom the authors suggest. (techscience.com)

Between 2004 and 2007, authors solicited input on the draft report Public Health Implications of Great Lakes Areas of Concern from both peer reviewers and expert reviewers. (cdc.gov)

Expert review is a process that includes independent assessment of the scientific merit of research by experts in other federal or state agencies that are knowledgeable in the subject matter addressed in a publication. (cdc.gov)
Peer review is the process by which outside experts in a particular subject area assess the scientific rigor, validity, and other measures of quality to determine whether a scientific article meets the standards for publication," according to Amy Drew, the APS director of publications. (psychologicalscience.org)
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) provides ethical guidelines for peer reviewers. (psychologicalscience.org)
At APS, after an author submits a manuscript, the Editor in Chief determines whether or not it should be considered for possible publication and, if so, assigns the article to a Senior Editor, who assigns and coordinates with an appropriate Action Editor to determine whether the manuscript should be sent out for review. (psychologicalscience.org)
As with Philica, reviewers cannot suppress publication, but in contrast to Philica, no reviews are anonymous and no article is published without being reviewed. (wikipedia.org)
If the authors proceed with publication of their article despite critical comments, readers can clearly see any negative comments along with the names of the reviewers. (wikipedia.org)
Here, we provide the information you need to successfully peer-review for an IEEE Computer Society publication. (computer.org)
We assign three or more reviewers per submission according to the publication and/or the article's topic. (computer.org)
IEEE requires that reviewers treat the contents of papers under review as confidential information not to be disclosed to others before publication. (computer.org)
reviewers who provide timely, thorough peer-review reports receive vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC of their next publication in any MDPI journal, in appreciation of the work done. (mdpi.com)
Regarding the second point, Bentham conducts independent peer review on all papers submitted for publication. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)
The decision regarding publication is based on a minimum of two reviewers' comments and may take one of four forms. (techscience.com)
Cureus provides an equitable, efficient publishing and peer reviewing experience without sacrificing publication times. (cureus.com)
Peer review is an essential component of the publication process. (medscape.com)

Publishers recommend that reviewers review COPE Ethical Guidelines to provide quality unbiased review reports. (benthamscience.com)
A brief description on ethical guidelines is given in the 'Instructions for Authors' of every journal published by Bentham Science . (benthamscience.com)
Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers. (techscience.com)
Contributions are sent to reviewers if they rigorously abide by the journal guidelines. (bvsalud.org)
The reviewers receive an e-mail with the abstract and login to the online system, where they access the journal guidelines and steps to send the review and recommendation to the editor. (bvsalud.org)

For his commitment to education and mentoring, please join the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences in celebrating Dr. Green as the December 2020 GSBS Focus on Mentoring designee. (utmb.edu)

Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts strongly prefers significant contributions whose results can be generalised to other systems, especially studies that characterise chemical processes (e.g. chemical and (micro)biological transformations and transport) as well as those that address contaminant impacts on ecosystems and human health. (rsc.org)
Whenever necessary, the National Selection Committee may request peers to confirm the predominance of original contributions. (bvsalud.org)

CDC and ATSDR believe the Great Lakes report should contain high-quality science and information that can guide future research, policy-making, and personal health decisions. (cdc.gov)
Peer review is a process that involves independent assessment of the scientific merit of research by panels of experts who provide written assurance that their reviews are free of real or perceived conflicts of interest. (cdc.gov)
Peer review of research projects at the CDC and ATSDR helps provide confidence to management, academic and other partners, various branches of government, and the public that federal funds appropriated for research will support rigorous science. (cdc.gov)
Journal peer review has often been the subject of research especially its practices, but most studies focus on isolated aspects and isolated contexts, and rarely have reviewer perceptions and understandings of what is involved in judging quality been explored and compared by discipline. (edu.au)
This thesis contributes to the emerging literature on how judgments occur in the context of research assessment and offers a framework to evaluate the effectiveness of journal peer review, to detect imbalances in the system, and to inform reviewer development. (edu.au)
Peer review has two main purposes: (a) to filter out research of poor quality or content that does not fit within the scope of a particular journal, and (b) to improve the quality of journal articles. (psychologicalscience.org)
In 1999, the open access journal Journal of Medical Internet Research was launched, which from its inception decided to publish the names of the reviewers at the bottom of each published article. (wikipedia.org)
To stay informed about the latest news and research in the sciences and Intelligent Design, visit Evolution News . (uncommondescent.com)
File PhotoThe peer-review system of the German Research Foundation (DFG) is unique, as proposals are reviewed by experts nominated and elected by the scientific community. (the-scientist.com)
The internal review component involved a sequential process beginning with experts internal to Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada and expanding to other government departments (Natural Resources Canada, National Research Council, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada). (canada.ca)
My research expertise is in the areas of marine renewable energy, physical and numerical modelling of violent free surface flow and wave-structure interaction, have published over 240 peer-reviewed papers and secured over £27 million in research funding, working with industrial and academic collaborators. (plymouth.ac.uk)
Reviewer for international funding bodies (Singapore Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR), Science & Engineering Research Council (SERC), German Academic Exchange Service), Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, NOW. (plymouth.ac.uk)
He has a background in chemistry and environmental science, and joined the staff of E&R in 2001 as PhD student, doing extensive research on the technological development and associated cost reductions of several renewable energy technologies, including onshore and offshore wind farms, biomass CHP plants in Sweden and biogas plants in Denmark. (uu.nl)
Elsevier has partnered with leading science organizations and Economist Impact for a global collaboration to understand the impact of the pandemic on confidence in research - and identify areas for action to support researchers. (elsevier.com)
Since 2011 he has been Director of Research and Development of Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Department of Music. (hslu.ch)
Dirk Lewandowski is a Professor of Information Research & Information Retrieval at Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Germany. (asist.org)
Since 2006 he has been Honorary Research Fellow at the Virtual Knowledge Studio of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences and since 2007 Honorary Fellow of SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research of the University of Sussex. (asist.org)
In her research she studies social media and Web 2.0 (with focus on user generated content), Science 2.0, scholarly communication on the social web, altmetrics, knowledge management and information retrieval. (asist.org)
PloS One, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Aslib Proceedings, Webology, Social Information Research, International Symposium of Information Science, Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science and Technology. (asist.org)
Bentham Science seeks to disseminate research and therefore stipulates that the public deposition of data is as per the followed standards (for example gene sequences, microarray expression data, and structural studies). (benthamscience.com)
Dividing research findings into the smallest publishable units might increase an investigator's total number of publications, but works against the interests of science. (uaf.edu)
his projects were supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province and Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, Zhejiang Province, China.he also participating in National High Technology Research and Development Program of China, and Project of Transgenic Crops, China. (omicsonline.org)
he got taken first prize for the excellent research paper awarded by Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province in 2004 and 7 China invention patents.he took part in compiling 4 books related to my research and have more than 50 scientific publications. (omicsonline.org)
The seminar brings together an audience of senior scientists (similar to grant reviewers) to provide constructive feedback on the research objectives and design. (ohsu.edu)
Dr Gina Mohammed is a research scientist and international science consultant in plant physiology. (creation.com)
Unlock discounted publishing that highlights your organization and the peer-reviewed research and clinical experiences it produces. (cureus.com)
Many people, perhaps journalists in particular, take peer review as a guarantee of good research, but peer reviewers mainly convey theoretical arguments and rarely demand to examine the data behind the study. (lu.se)
2014 - 2015 Assistant Head of Dept. of Health Sciences (research strategy). (lu.se)

These individuals send their reviews to the Action Editor, who then makes the decision to accept the manuscript, reject it, or ask the authors to revise it, taking into account the reviewers' and editor's comments before resubmitting it. (psychologicalscience.org)
Also ensure that your recommendations and reviews are aligned-if your review only mentions positive aspects and then recommends a rejection, it is not helpful for the authors. (psychologicalscience.org)
This is in contrast to the traditional peer review process where reviewers remain anonymous to anyone but the journal's editors, while authors' names are disclosed from the beginning. (wikipedia.org)
Open reports Open peer review may be defined as making the reviewers' reports public, instead of disclosing them to the article's authors only. (wikipedia.org)
This may include publishing the rest of the peer review history, i.e. the authors' replies and editors' recommendations. (wikipedia.org)
If authors can find three members of the Editorial Board who will each return a report or will themselves solicit an external review, the article will be published. (wikipedia.org)
Authors have the opportunity to withdraw their article, to revise it in response to the reviews, or to publish it without revision. (wikipedia.org)
They post papers alongside public reports from reviewers, and the authors of a paper apparently are not obligated to modify the paper in response to the reviewers' critiques. (sott.net)
In order to avoid authors' academic misconduct, we do not allow the authors to recommend the reviewers for their papers and instead we select reviewers with expertise in the relevant field from our database of editorial board members and highly influential scientists. (wjgnet.com)
The manuscript publishing process of the BPG is founded upon a clear definition of the relationship between authors, peer reviewers and our staff. (wjgnet.com)
Authors must provide human and animal rights statement, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, clinical trial registration statement, institutional animal care and use committee statement, animal care and use statement, biostatistics statement, conflict-of-interest statement, and data sharing statement. (wjgnet.com)
Single blind reviewing maintains the identity of the reviewers, not disclosing their names to the authors. (benthamscience.com)
Bentham Science encourages authors to publish detailed protocols as supporting information online. (benthamscience.com)
Suggest alternative reviewers (optional) if the reviewers decline the review invitation based on their field of expertise not being directly relevant to the article scope, their busy schedule, or any potential conflict of interest with the authors. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)
During peer-review, referencing citations of the authors' own or his/her coworkers' publications must be avoided. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)
Authors may be asked to make minor or even major revisions before a handling editor decides whether to proceed with subsequent rounds of peer review. (techscience.com)
In particular, scholars who have published joint work with any of the authors two years prior to submission of the manuscript or who are currently collaborating with any researchers at any of the authors' institutions are not eligible to serve as reviewers. (techscience.com)
In this case as well, the authors must provide a point-by-point response or rebuttal to the comments, and the revised version is sent to the same reviewer for further comment. (techscience.com)
Authors and reviewers are blind to each other. (bvsalud.org)

Correspondence between the members of the journal's editorial office and the reviewers is kept confidential. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)
At least two independent experts who are not part of the journal's editorial staff take part in the peer-review procedure. (techscience.com)

Role: scholarly review. (utah.edu)

Results of the peer review process should therefore be without inherent bias and can be viewed as fair and just by applicants. (cdc.gov)
The participants expressed a strong sense of faith in peer review as well as a tolerance of its deficiencies, and generally conceded that little could be changed in the process. (edu.au)
In the APS webinar The Basics of Peer Review , Drew was joined by Becca White, the APS peer review manager, alongside Robert L. Goldstone , editor in chief of Current Directions in Psychological Science , and Erin B. Tone , associate editor for Clinical Psychological Science , to share their experiences involving the process of peer review and tips for engaging in meaningful peer review. (psychologicalscience.org)
Drew and White explained the peer-review process and what happens "behind the scenes. (psychologicalscience.org)
Open peer review is the various possible modifications of the traditional scholarly peer review process. (wikipedia.org)
Open participation: The wider community (and not just invited reviewers) are able to contribute to the review process. (wikipedia.org)
These modifications are supposed to address various perceived shortcomings of the traditional scholarly peer review process, in particular its lack of transparency, lack of incentives, wastefulness, bullying and harassment. (wikipedia.org)
In June 2006, Nature launched an experiment in parallel open peer review: some articles that had been submitted to the regular anonymous process were also available online for open, identified public comment. (wikipedia.org)
How efficient is the peer review process? (newswire.ca)
One of the major findings is that researchers from emerging regions are under-represented in the peer review process. (newswire.ca)
The report is set up and designed to answer the burning questions of the peer review process. (newswire.ca)
To preserve the integrity of the review process, the peer review administrator can communicate any necessary information anonymously to the author on behalf of the reviewer. (computer.org)
The peer-review of a manuscript is a confidential process. (benthamscience.com)
Offered through the Human Investigations Program , this course provides insight into the peer-reviewed journal process in clinical medicine and surgery. (ohsu.edu)
All original articles, reviews, and other types of papers published in CMC go through the peer-review process. (techscience.com)
The Revista Odonto Ciência (Journal of Dental Science) adopts a blind expert peer review process. (bvsalud.org)
All submission and review process use an Open Journal System version. (bvsalud.org)
The submission version for review is a modified PDF file of the original word file with removal or masking of all content that could jeopardize the blind review process. (bvsalud.org)

I was selected as regular Fundings/Grants reviewer for EPSRC, NIHR and NSFC. (google.com)

Open reports: Review reports are published alongside the relevant article (rather than being kept confidential). (wikipedia.org)
The comments generated during peer review remain confidential and may only be disclosed with the express agreement of the reviewer. (techscience.com)

Each year, our Soft Matter editorial team recognises peer reviewers who have gone above and beyond. (rsc.org)
Furthermore she is on the editorial board of the international peer-reviewed journal Webology. (asist.org)
Members of the editorial board and Bentham's reviewer panel are also invited to share their opinion. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)

Access to the full-text version of the manuscript is provided to the agreed reviewers via our online system ( https://bentham.manuscriptpoint.com/manuals/index.html) . (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)

Dick, G. J. Genomic Approaches in Earth and Environmental Sciences (Wiley Blackwell, 2018). (nature.com)

It does not accept Literature Review Articles, Hypothesis Papers, Commentaries, Opinion Pieces, Case Studies, Case Reports etc. which may instead be submitted to PeerJ Preprints . (uncommondescent.com)
She studied German Linguistics, German Literature, and Information Science at the Heinrich Heine University in Düsseldorf. (asist.org)
Position your organization as a thought leader and deliver relevant, peer-reviewed literature directly to potential customers with a Cureus publishing competition. (cureus.com)
It takes me at least 2-3 hours to do a thoughtful peer review, more if I need to consult the literature. (medscape.com)
LILACS - Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, coordinated by BIREME, is a regional index that establishes the bibliographic control of the scientific and technical health literature, produced and published in the countries of the Latin American and Caribbean Region from 1982 onwards. (bvsalud.org)

In 2011, Peerage of Science, an independent peer review service, was launched with several non-traditional approaches to academic peer review. (wikipedia.org)

Meet Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts Editor-in-Chief and board members. (rsc.org)
A review report provides the editor-in-chief/senior editor with an expert opinion on the quality of the manuscript under consideration. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)

Peer input is essential to put the article's findings into context for the reader. (medscape.com)
Peer reviewers not only rate an article's quality, but also make suggestions for improvement. (medscape.com)

2 PeerJ does not publish in the Physical Sciences, the Mathematical Sciences, the Social Sciences, or the Humanities (except where articles in those areas have clear applicability to the core areas of Biological, Medical or Health sciences). (uncommondescent.com)
The Journal also seeks to publish articles on new conceptual models, innovative technology, alternative procedures or treatment to reduce disease burden in the general population or specific groups, thus contributing to translating science into practice and social development. (bvsalud.org)

They indicated that learning to review was a continuous cycle where formal training would not work, and there was also a pressing need to recognise reviewers' contribution formally and appropriately, especially by their employing institutions. (edu.au)
Every one of our peer reviewers makes a significant contribution to great science. (rsc.org)

In 2010, the BMJ began publishing signed reviewer's reports alongside accepted papers, after determining that telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted publicly did not significantly affect the quality of the reviews. (wikipedia.org)
It's essentially up there and published, and they can say, 'we have reviewed the reviewer's comments, and we thank them for it. (sott.net)
To use our online peer-review system module, please read the reviewer's manual or watch the tutorial. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)

I also held academic positions as a Visiting Fellow at Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China and Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China. (google.com)

Accept or decline review invitation based on the title and abstract. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)

Now the papers have been published as reviewed preprints in the journal eLife (see here , here , and here ) - alongside peer review. (sott.net)

She also underscored the importance of reviews following civility and ethics principles, including confidentiality, disclosure of conflicts of interest or competing interest, and a respectful tone. (psychologicalscience.org)
In any case, the reviewers must have no conflicts of interest. (techscience.com)

It found that researchers from the USA , UK and Japan review significantly more than reviewers from emerging regions , especially when compared with how much relative peer review demand (by way of manuscript submissions) these regions generate (1.95 reviews/submission among established regions compared to 0.66 reviews/submission in emerging regions). (newswire.ca)
According to the subtitle, "High-profile researchers say the small-brained Homo naledi exhibited advanced behaviours such as burials, but peer reviewers say there's no evidence. (sott.net)
Basic, clinical and population science researchers. (ohsu.edu)

Since 2011 Vee has been on the AHRC Peer Review Council and in 2016 she joined the strategic peer-review council. (ncl.ac.uk)

Open participation Open peer review may be defined as allowing self-selected reviewers to comment on an article, rather than (or in addition to) having reviewers who are selected by the editors. (wikipedia.org)
Editors tend to invite reviewers from their own geographical regions much more than chance would predict. (newswire.ca)
Editors send more review invitations now than five years ago. (newswire.ca)
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers. (mdpi.com)
Experienced reviewers and editors from information science and related fields will answer your questions and give you advice on how to improve your journal submissions and increase your manuscript's chance to be published. (asist.org)
Regarding the first point, editors may recommend the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript by conducting the scope review themselves, based on their knowledge and experience, or they may take assistance and advice from other experts in the field. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)

A high standard of science guides CDC/ATSDR internal review and clearance processes. (cdc.gov)
CDC/ATSDR provided peer and expert review comments received on this report before 2008 to the Institute of Medicine−an independent, unbiased, authoritative source of science-based health information−to assist in the IOM's review of CDC/ATSDR's decision to take more time to improve the scientific quality of the report before releasing it to the public. (cdc.gov)
At the November 1994 ATSDR Board of Scientific Counselors meeting, the quality and appropriateness of ATSDR health studies were reviewed. (cdc.gov)

At that time the papers had not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal, yet the team promoted these claims to the media with the punchline that this evidence, as ABC News interpreted it, "erases the idea of human exceptionalism. (sott.net)
These reviews are extremely doubtful about the papers' claims, and multiple voices in the scientific community have been harshly critical. (sott.net)
The article quotes a paleoarchaeologist who reviewed one of the eLife papers, stating: "there just wasn't any science in the paper ultimately. (sott.net)
The papers' peer reviews, posted on 12 July, come to much the same conclusion about the scientific evidence. (sott.net)
I could not find a single reviewer who accepted the claims of the papers. (sott.net)
You may use the public comments section of the review form to include your thoughts, if any, regarding the differences between the two papers. (computer.org)
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts publishes high quality papers in all areas of the environmental chemical sciences, including chemistry of the air, water, soil and sediment. (rsc.org)
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts also invites papers that bridge between environmental chemistry and sustainability topics, such as life cycle assessment, materials flow analysis, and environmental decision making. (rsc.org)

If so, the Action Editor seeks the advice of reviewers who are experts in the field or can otherwise contribute to improving the manuscript quality. (psychologicalscience.org)

While several rounds of peer and expert review of the draft report were conducted, many important reviewer comments were not adequately addressed. (cdc.gov)

The study addresses a number of questions: How are the principles and practices of peer review defined within education and the physical sciences? (edu.au)

The knowledge that articles were simultaneously being subjected to anonymous peer review may also have affected the uptake. (wikipedia.org)
It considers articles in the Biological Sciences, Medical Sciences, and Health Sciences. (uncommondescent.com)
External reviewers are selected from PubMed and WOS, depending on the field of expertise relevant to the articles' scope. (openchemicalengineeringjournal.com)
It also publishes articles on related sciences of interest for the psychodramatic community. (bvsalud.org)

third-party source needed] In the social sciences, there have been experiments with wiki-style, signed peer reviews, for example in an issue of the Shakespeare Quarterly. (wikipedia.org)

My own publications have benefited from reviewers' helpful critiques. (medscape.com)

Peer review and expert review are methods of improving scientific quality of publications. (cdc.gov)
Expert review helps ensure that policy statements and scientific claims are rigorous and consistent with work conducted by other agencies. (cdc.gov)
Scientific collaborator in US National Science Foundation Project "Climate Variability from North African Tree Rings" (Project coordinators: Prof. M. Hughes and Prof. R. Touchan). (uni-giessen.de)
Scientific collaborator in US National Science Foundation Project "Middle East climate variability from tree ring" (Project coordinators: Prof. M. Hughes and Prof. R. Touchan). (uni-giessen.de)
The problem, therefore, is not merely that science is being used illegitimately to promote a materialistic worldview, but that this worldview is actively undermining scientific inquiry, leading to incorrect and unsupported conclusions about biological and cosmological origins. (uncommondescent.com)
As the scientific information and additional references provided in your Notice did not raise sufficient uncertainty or doubt in the scientific considerations underlying the proposed Order to warrant the establishment of a Board of Review, I am denying your request to establish a Board of Review. (canada.ca)
Our data science expertise and trusted content help companies ensure business-critical decisions are reliable and actionable, transforming validated data into scientific insights at every stage of the innovation workflow. (elsevier.com)
BACKGROUND: Disaster citizen science, or the use of scientific principles and methods by 'non-professional' scientists or volunteers, may be a promising way to enhance public health emergency preparedness (PHEP) and build community resilience. (cdc.gov)

NIOSH will review all individual comments from the peer reviewers and post a list of proposed additions to the Federal Register for public comment. (cdc.gov)
We are requesting that as a peer reviewer, you review the list of drugs that NIOSH suggests be added to the list or not added to the list and provide your evaluations and comments on the Word document provided. (cdc.gov)
The self-selected reviewers may or may not be screened for their basic credentials, and they may contribute either short comments or full reviews. (wikipedia.org)
These reviewers provided expert comments and input into the report. (canada.ca)
elements of peer review including how to review and how to respond to reviewers' comments. (ohsu.edu)
The paper is in principle accepted based on the reviewers' comments. (techscience.com)
The paper is to be accepted after it has undergone minor revisions specified in the reviewers' comments. (techscience.com)
I have even been in the "top 10%" of reviewers-an achievement probably more dependent on timely submission of my comments rather than any extraordinary insights. (medscape.com)

In your Notice of Objection, you raised the issue that the Science Assessment of Plastic Pollution was published without a complete view of the best available science. (canada.ca)
In addition, the draft Science Assessment was peer-reviewed, both internally within the Government of Canada and externally by leading experts in the field. (canada.ca)
The draft Science Assessment was also subject to a 90-day public comment period. (canada.ca)
You also raised concerns that the exposure scenarios in the Science Assessment of Plastic Pollution were not based on peer reviewed data. (canada.ca)
As described above, all references cited in the Science Assessment, including those on exposure, were peer-reviewed and validated against a set of qualitative criteria. (canada.ca)
In your Notice of Objection, you included a technical review of selected references in the Science Assessment, which indicated that the evidence of human health impacts of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is equivocal, and that vinyl represents a minor component of plastic pollution. (canada.ca)
He also coordinated the course 'Toolbox 1 - environmental assessment and management approaches' in the sustainable business and innovation (SBI) master, and involved in several courses of the Energy Science master. (uu.nl)

Peer review "is one of the most important things we do as scholars," Tone said. (psychologicalscience.org)

She has published widely in this area and is a regular contributor to international peer-reviewed conferences. (ncl.ac.uk)

This study used a holistic approach and a mixed methods design, drawing on journal editorials and policies, surveys and an interview with experienced Australian reviewers, and their review reports, to gain insight into peer review across and within contrasting disciplines of education and physics and chemistry. (edu.au)
As with the BMJ, the reviewers' names are included on the peer review reports. (wikipedia.org)

While writing a review, "context is key," Drew explained. (psychologicalscience.org)

What do we know about the quality of peer review? (newswire.ca)
While a longer review does not imply a higher quality review, this word count difference might explain some of the difference in invitation rates between regions. (newswire.ca)
the elected representatives will be responsible for quality control and for writing funding recommendations based on the initial reviews. (the-scientist.com)
Peer review - and reviewers - is the bedrock of quality and integrity in science. (elsevier.com)

Health Sciences, Dalby/Lund, and other departments at LU. (lu.se)

So parts of scholarly communication are speeding up, but other parts are clogging the system and it is getting harder to find suitable reviewers. (newswire.ca)
It adapts a system that has long been in practice, albeit without [legitimacy]," says Jahn, who currently chairs the review committee in biology. (the-scientist.com)
Therefore, you need an account in the system to become a reviewer. (computer.org)

Expeditious review may be requested in the cover letter to the editor and will be considered in selected cases, e.g., submissions related to patents. (bvsalud.org)

Please inform the peer review administrator of any possible concurrent submission. (computer.org)
Learn how they can get recognition for their reviews on their Web of Science Reviewer Profile via our submission systems. (springer.com)
Reviewers also are required to file a Conflict of Interest Statement when reviewing a submission. (bvsalud.org)

In light of the protracted nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, countries may wish to conduct periodic reviews during the event so they can continue to reflect on the ongoing response and revise national and subnational response strategies and plans as needed. (who.int)

Please note that we only list outstanding reviewers who have opted in to having their names published in this recognition. (rsc.org)
Our partnership with the Web of Science Reviewer Recognition Service makes it easy for your journal's reviewers to showcase their peer review activities. (springer.com)

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment15

Psychiatry and Psychology30

Phenomena and Processes1

Disciplines and Occupations14

Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena28

Technology, Industry, Agriculture1

Humanities4

Information Science27

Named Groups5

Health Care32

Geographicals2

20231

Manuscripts13

20192

20221

20171

Identities5

Publons4

Anonymity2

Journals28

Manuscript to reviewers2

Expert reviewers1

Publication14

Guidelines5

20201

Contributions2

Research28

Authors19

Journal's editorial2

Scholarly review1

Process18

EPSRC1

Confidential2

Editorial3

Https1

20181

Literature5

Independent peer review1

Editor in ch2

Article's2

Publish2

Contribution2

Reviewer's3

Chinese Academy1

Abstract1

Alongside1

Conflicts of inter2

Researchers3

20161

Editors6

ATSDR3

Papers8

Seeks1

Rounds of peer1

Physical sciences1

Articles4

Social sciences1

Critiques1

Scientific8

Comments8

Assessment7

Scholars1

CONFERENCES1

Reports2

Context1

Quality4

Health Sciences1

System3

Submissions1

Submission3

Pandemic1

Recognition2