Peer reviewed scientific journal. Medical search. Frequent questions

These free online courses empower authors and reviewers to prepare and submit strong manuscripts, avoid common errors, and navigate the peer review process. (acs.org)
This involves evaluation by at least two independent, expert peer reviewers. (koyauniversity.org)
We value the diverse expertise of our peer reviewers, and their valuable feedback helps us maintain the highest standards of academic excellence and integrity. (koyauniversity.org)
All research articles and most other article types undergo thorough peer review by at least two independent, expert reviewers. (koyauniversity.org)
The selection of peer reviewers is based on various factors, including expertise, reputation, recommendations, and absence of conflicts of interest. (koyauniversity.org)
Peer reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive, and evidence-based evaluations of the manuscript's scientific merit, methodology, and significance. (koyauniversity.org)
Reviewers are encouraged to follow the ethical guidelines for peer reviewers set forth by COPE. (koyauniversity.org)
The identities of reviewers and authors are kept confidential throughout the review process. (koyauniversity.org)
We value the contributions of our peer reviewers and recognize their invaluable service. (koyauniversity.org)
As part of our appreciation program, we provide opportunities for peer reviewers to receive recognition through ORCID and Publons, where they can showcase their verified peer review activities. (koyauniversity.org)
We encourage peer reviewers to raise any concerns or questions they may have during the review process, as well as to adhere to the guidelines and conventions specified in our Peer Review Policy. (koyauniversity.org)
Selecting the right peer reviewers is crucial to ensure the quality and integrity of the publication process. (koyauniversity.org)
Editors are responsible for securing a minimum of two peer reviewers for manuscripts reporting primary research or secondary analysis of primary research. (koyauniversity.org)
In a modern variant on Gogol's Dead Souls , some scientists have been caught sending their papers for peer review to non-existent reviewers, complete with a curriculum vitae and an e-mail address…There are even companies in China, apparently, that will help scientists to manufacture bogus peer reviews. (skepticaldoctor.com)
A rating instrument was devised with 36 concrete and 2 overall quality indicators ( Table 12 ), partly based on the evaluation criteria in scientific journals' instructions for reviewers. (peerreviewcongress.org)
2 Blinding reviewers to the authors and the origin of the manuscript or requiring them to sign the peer review report had no effect on the detection rate for errors. (bmj.com)
3 Using reviewers suggested by authors over those selected by editors failed to improved the quality of peer review for journals. (bmj.com)
CSR holds 1,600 review meetings a year, involving about 18,000 reviewers from the scientific community. (nih.gov)
Peer review--as we know it today-- board and ad hoc reviewers (Cruz et al. (bvsalud.org)

P2PInfect was first documented by Unit 42 in July 2023 as a peer-to-peer malware that breaches Redis instances using a remote code execution flaw on internet-exposed Windows and Linux systems. (lifeboat.com)

ABSTRACT This systematic review evaluated the extent of HIV/AIDS research conducted in Jordan related to behavioural and/or social outcomes. (who.int)
Scopus is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature and quality web sources. (lu.se)
1) Published in a peer-reviewed journal, or presented as a peer-reviewed abstract at a scientific meeting. (bvsalud.org)

Overall, by exploring the concept of PPR as an enhancement to traditional peer review processes, this article aims to shed light on its potential benefits and challenges. (e-jemed.org)
In conclusion, post-publication review has the potential to enhance traditional peer review processes by facilitating broader participation, promoting transparency, and identifying errors or discrepancies in published research. (e-jemed.org)
7 Thirty two proposals for funding from the McGill University Health Center Research Institute were assessed by two competing processes: a traditional review committee of 11 members and independent reviews from a committee member and content expert. (bmj.com)
The authors of a study of 248 grant proposals compared two similar peer review processes for ranking proposals. (bmj.com)
CSR has experienced many changes in a short amount of time, and Richard has demonstrated extraordinary leadership abilities as CSR continues to evaluate its trans-NIH peer review processes by putting improved and more efficient procedures in place so the NIH can fund the most promising research. (nih.gov)
Documenting the scientific case for design and limitations of blind processes. (uncommondescent.com)
Some prominent journals have developed enhanced review processes for dual-use pathogen research. (thebulletin.org)

November 26, 2018 - NIH & AHRQ Announce Upcoming Updates to Application Instructions and Review Criteria for Research Grant Applications. (nih.gov)
This occurred in the context of the expansion of scientific research, technological development, professional specialties, and demands for publication (Tennant, 2018). (bvsalud.org)
That is, the ability of scientific journals to self-regulate themselves, a select and restricted editorial committee (Horbach & Halffman, especially in the conduct of an editorial process that promotes the 2018). (bvsalud.org)
The opinions produced by the other qualitative and quantitative aspects of scientific publications, evaluators or referees have significantly contributed to the editor's this system is considered essential in maintaining the integrity conviction--either by rejecting or accepting the manuscript for of the editorial process (Horbach & Halffman, 2018). (bvsalud.org)

Advance your career with professional development resources, educational tools, free access to 50 ACS journal articles, and more! (acs.org)
ACS Editors' Choice® is a collection designed to feature scientific articles of broad public interest. (acs.org)
One potential solution to address these issues is post-publication review (PPR), which involves assessing and critiquing published articles after they have been made available to the scientific community. (e-jemed.org)
By making the review process public and allowing for open discussion and debate about published articles, PPR encourages accountability among authors and helps identify any conflicts of interest or ethical concerns that may have been overlooked during the initial peer review. (e-jemed.org)
With an increasing number of articles being published every year, it may become difficult to handle large amounts of feedback effectively without overwhelming authors or diluting the quality of reviews. (e-jemed.org)
At Aro, all research articles and most other article types undergo a thorough peer review process. (koyauniversity.org)
At Aro, we uphold a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and credibility of the articles we publish. (koyauniversity.org)
Disclaimer: Articles on International Educational Scientific Research Journal have been previewed and authenticated by the Authors before sending for the publication. (iesrj.com)
They rated 60 randomly selected journal articles from the Swedish Gender Studies List of more than 12,000 publications about sex and gender across many disciplines (eg, gender studies [GS], sociology, history, medicine, and psychology) published between 2000 and 2010. (peerreviewcongress.org)
3. Söderlund T, Madison G. Objectivity and realms of explanation in academic journal articles concerning sex/gender: a comparison of gender studies and the other social sciences. (peerreviewcongress.org)
NIOSH publishes more than 200 journal articles and documents each year. (cdc.gov)
Most journals are highly specialized, although some of the oldest journals such as Science and Nature publish articles and scientific papers across a wide range of scientific fields. (wikipedia.org)
Scientific journals contain articles that have been peer reviewed, in an attempt to ensure that articles meet the journal's standards of quality and scientific validity. (wikipedia.org)
Articles in scientific journals are mostly written by active scientists such as students, researchers, and professors. (wikipedia.org)
Articles with original research are meant to share it with others in the field, review articles give summaries of research that has already been done, and perspective articles give researchers' views on research that their peers performed. (wikipedia.org)
Scientific journal articles are not usually read casually like a person would read a magazine. (wikipedia.org)
Whereas magazine articles can be read in a more casual manner, reading an article in a scientific periodical requires a lot more concentration. (wikipedia.org)
Articles in scientific journals can be used in research and higher education. (wikipedia.org)
Scientific articles allow researchers to keep up to date with the developments of their field and direct their own research. (wikipedia.org)
The impact of articles and journals is often assessed by counting citations (citation impact). (wikipedia.org)
Schoolbooks and textbooks have been written usually only on established topics, while the latest research and more obscure topics are only accessible through scientific articles. (wikipedia.org)
Academic credentials for promotion into academic ranks are established in large part by the number and impact of scientific articles published. (wikipedia.org)
These guidelines apply to peer reviewed journal articles and presentations at scientific congresses. (bmj.com)
Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. (tu-berlin.de)
He has published 30 peer reviewed scientific journal articles, most related to neurocognition in primates. (nih.gov)
Usually these reports don't undergo the same quality control as scientific journal articles do, so the scientific weight might vary. (lu.se)
Journal articles - a common way for researchers to reach out with their findings and scientific work is to write an article for a journal in within their field. (lu.se)
Usually scientific articles are published in journals that are refereed or peer reviewed. (lu.se)
Approximately 50% of conference papers get published as full journal articles within two years. (lu.se)
If you want current information it might be a good idea to consult publications that occur early in the publication process, such as for example conference proceedings or journal articles, since books take longer to publish. (lu.se)

Peer review is an essential step in the publication process, providing critical evaluation and constructive feedback on submitted manuscripts. (koyauniversity.org)
Upon submission, manuscripts are first assessed for completeness and then sent to an Editor who determines their suitability for peer review. (koyauniversity.org)
The debate on the quality and integrity of scientific production, Gradually, this evaluation influenced decisions on acceptance or which has been accentuated in recent years, has been associated rejection of manuscripts submitted to academic journals that, with studies on the quality and relevance of scientific publications. (bvsalud.org)
In a way, this expansion represented the democratization evaluation of merit, originality, reliability of sources, data, analysis of the evaluation process and, on the other hand, it signaled that and results, theoretical foundation, and quality of scientific writing there would be a diversity of opinions that needed to be taken into of manuscripts submitted to the appreciation of their editorial account during this process. (bvsalud.org)
Historians of science such as Zuckerman and Merton (1971) analysis, carried out by the editorial team (desk review), which suggest that the idea of peer review/evaluation is old, probably has the prerogative to refuse manuscripts. (bvsalud.org)

It will promote African publishing by encouraging writers to publish in their country or regional journals. (who.int)
3) Have only a handful of scientists who back the denier side, of whom few have published or conducted research in any relevant climate science field, much less publish any papers in reputable journals debunking AGW. (climateshifts.org)

Peer review reports should be in English and provide constructive evaluations of the authors' work, specifically regarding the appropriateness of methods, accuracy of results, and support for conclusions. (koyauniversity.org)
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD1 immunotherapy at 23 Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI) centres. (bvsalud.org)

Currie HAL, Martin NF, Garcia GE, Davis FM and Kemp PS (2020), "A mechanical approach to understanding the impact of the nematode Anguillicoloides crassus on the European eel swimbladder" , Journal of Experimental Biology. (southampton.ac.uk)
Since 2020, he has been subject editor of the journal Zootaxa for Tenebrionidae. (routledge.com)

Through this rigorous process, we ensure that only high-quality and impactful research is published in our journal. (koyauniversity.org)
But she's still skeptical of the lack of peer review process, and wonders why these respected academics didn't pursue more rigorous studies of the evidence. (popsci.com)

The journal is intended as a medium which rapidly publishes conference and workshop proceedings, provided that all contributions are original and peer reviewed. (tu-berlin.de)
ECEASST is an open access on-line journal, i.e. it provides unlimited access to all contributions which are published electronically only. (tu-berlin.de)

In order to illustrate the need for PPR, consider a hypothetical scenario where a prominent journal publishes an article on a groundbreaking medical treatment claiming remarkable success rates in patients with a specific disease. (e-jemed.org)
Please note that ECEASST publishes only special issues devoted to specific scientific events or topics, and does not handle individual submissions. (tu-berlin.de)
also publishes reviews, news, and commentary on significant developments in the photonics field. (lifeboat.com)

Scientific journal peer review serves as a crucial component in ensuring the quality and validity of published research. (e-jemed.org)
The scientific quality instrument seems promising in terms of high reliability and convergent validity and can be used in any type of design (eg, experimental, cross-sectional, correlational, or descriptive) to assess overall and specific dimensions of scientific quality. (peerreviewcongress.org)
In addition, the Board recognized that certain types of health studies require a higher level of scientific rigor to ensure validity and reasonable precision in making inferences about cause and effect relationships. (cdc.gov)

ATSDR will submit a more detailed report of these analyses and findings to a peer-reviewed, scientific journal for publication. (cdc.gov)
In academic publishing, a scientific journal is a periodical publication intended to further the progress of science, usually by sharing findings from research with readers. (wikipedia.org)
They have not, however, published any of it in peer-reviewed scientific journals, which makes experts skeptical of the findings. (popsci.com)
Ric Gillespie, executive director of TIGHAR, tells Popular Science that he doesn't care as much about peer review as he does about communicating his group's findings to the public in a clear way. (popsci.com)
Why were the Turinese summarily dismissing scientific findings? (shroudstory.com)

The authors of a Cochrane review found little empirical evidence to support the use of editorial peer review as a mechanism to ensure quality of biomedical research. (bmj.com)

The LSRO staff and Co-Project Officers met with the Expert Consultants between December 1993 and March 1995 to obtain background information on the NNMRRP, to review analyses of NNMRRP data prepared for this report, and to review drafts of the report. (cdc.gov)

Outcomes of this program are both scientific publications in international peer-review journals and formal. (lu.se)
Outcomes of this program are both scientific publications in international peer-review journals and formal postdoctoral degree attainment by the research trainees. (lu.se)

The peer review process may be conducted using different models, including open, transparent, or anonymized peer review, depending on the journal's specific policies. (koyauniversity.org)

Because of super-specialization, the authors of papers themselves are nowadays often asked to suggest referees for peer review of their own work, but this, of course, leaves an opening for the practice of fraud. (skepticaldoctor.com)

This section lists the research outputs like peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals and conference proceedings related to 3D X-ray Histology generated by our group. (southampton.ac.uk)
Being primarily a medium for publishing proceedings of conferences and workshops on EASST-related topics, such as the satellite events of ETAPS and further EASST-supported conferences, this journal shall also be opened up for special issues on specific topics. (tu-berlin.de)

That is, of scientific publications, including the Impact Factor (Nassi- when the authors were (or are) not identified either. (bvsalud.org)

A catalogue of quality controlled scientific and scholarly journals that is Open Access from all over the world and within in a large range of subject and language. (lu.se)
The ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR) provides access to data that helps you evaluate and compare scholarly journals, using citation data drawn from over 8,400 journals from over 3,000 publishers worldwide. (lu.se)
A film from Jönköping University about the scholarly publication process, different types of materials and peer-review. (lu.se)
What is a scholarly journal article? (lu.se)
How peer review works, how you recognize a scholarly article and which elements must be included is described. (lu.se)
The characteristics of scholarly journals, trade or professional journals and popular magazines are described and can easily be compared. (lu.se)

ECEASST is indexed in Scopus and DBLP , and listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) . (tu-berlin.de)

Scheiermann P, Herzog F, Siebenhofer A, Strametz R, Weberschock T. Intravenous versus inhalational anaesthesia for pediatric inpatient surgery - A systematic review and meta-analysis. (iesrj.com)

We strive for diversity in peer reviewer selection, considering geographical regions, gender identities, racial/ethnic groups, and other demographics. (koyauniversity.org)
Editorial decisions should be based on peer reviewer comments that meet these criteria, rather than on short, superficial reports lacking a rationale. (koyauniversity.org)
Each manuscript should be reviewed by at least one reviewer not suggested by the author. (koyauniversity.org)
It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the managing and the guest editor, the peer reviewer, and the society of EASST. (tu-berlin.de)

Traditional peer review typically involves a small group of experts who may have their own biases or limitations. (e-jemed.org)
Peer review is like democracy, the saying goes, despite its flaws, it's the best involves judgments that would affect others. (bvsalud.org)

About CSR: CSR organizes the peer review groups that evaluate the majority of grant applications submitted to NIH. (nih.gov)
In short the peer review means that a group of peers read and evaluate the paper to determine if it merits publication in that journal. (lu.se)
It's a good way to start when you are looking at a new journal and want to evaluate its quality. (lu.se)

A fairly convoluted (but interesting none the less) paper just got published in PNAS by Anderegg et al (2010) looking at climate change and scientific credibility (more coverage by the Guardian here ). (climateshifts.org)

This article examines the concept of PPR as an enhancement to the traditional peer review process within scientific journals. (e-jemed.org)
Reading an article in a scientific journal usually entails first reading the title, to see if it was related to the desired topic. (wikipedia.org)
Each such journal article also becomes part of the permanent scientific record. (wikipedia.org)
An essential part of a scientific article is citation of earlier work. (wikipedia.org)
This article is reviewed by a team of registered dietitians and medical doctors with extensive, practical clinical and public health experience. (healthcanal.com)
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. (tu-berlin.de)
Cross and Wright's article is the only peer-reviewed study on the subject, "which is not a good record to have if you're making a scientific point," says Corthals. (popsci.com)
Pre-prints - a draft to an article/paper that has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal. (lu.se)

ACS Authoring Services provides pre- and post-publication assistance to help you excel at communicating your scientific research to the world. (acs.org)
Another challenge is managing the volume of post-publication reviews. (e-jemed.org)
Developing efficient systems for organizing, prioritizing, and responding to post-publication reviews will be essential for successful implementation. (e-jemed.org)
However, the traditional pre-publication peer review process has faced criticism regarding its limitations and potential biases. (e-jemed.org)
Our peer review process follows the principles outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (koyauniversity.org)
High scientific quality produces knowledge and is continuously assessed by the scientific community in multiple ways (eg, reviews, seminars, committees that control funding, publication of research results, and selection of individuals for awards, employment, and other positions). (peerreviewcongress.org)
There are thousands of scientific journals in publication, with one estimate from 2012 indicating that there were 28,100 that were active, and many more have been published at various points in the past (see list of scientific journals). (wikipedia.org)
Note that we require our guest editors to conform to the guideline for editors that has been developed by Committee on Publication Ethics ( COPE ) and that the review process must be based on blind or double-blind peer reviews. (tu-berlin.de)
ECEASST recognises its responsibilities and conforms to the guideline ( see here ) of the Committee on Publication Ethics ( COPE ), a charitable organization that provides a forum for scientific journal editors and publishers to discuss issues relating to the integrity of the work submitted to or published in their journals. (tu-berlin.de)
Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data to show that (i) 97-98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers. (climateshifts.org)
Scientific publication--which is possible to identify in the editorial flows journals that adopt peer evaluation become the preferred source of national and international scientific journals. (bvsalud.org)

In contrast, PPR opens up the review process to a larger pool of researchers, practitioners, and interested individuals who can provide additional insights, alternative interpretations, and critical evaluations. (e-jemed.org)
Existing reviews and primary studies were cross-referenced for further citations, and unpublished literature and ongoing trials were searched by contacting experts and active researchers in the field. (who.int)
ECEASST is a fully refereed journal and provides a forum for practitioners, educators and researchers for disseminating innovative research in the area of software and system technology. (tu-berlin.de)
For policymakers, the studies underscore a long-standing problem: How to encourage as much scientific and technological progress as possible, giving researchers broad leeway and allowing them to share their results widely, while placing restrictions on research that might be too risky to pursue or to share widely. (thebulletin.org)
This indicates that the bulk of UE researchers on the most prominent multisignatory statements about climate change have not published extensively in the peer-reviewed climate literature. (climateshifts.org)
ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers. (climateshifts.org)

The peer review process plays a critical role in ensuring the quality and integrity of scientific research. (e-jemed.org)
1,2 So how valid and reliable are they, and what weight do academics attach to different features of the research in their assessment of scientific quality? (peerreviewcongress.org)
Considerable research shows poor quality in peer review for scientific journals. (bmj.com)
They also have an in-house scientific advisory board to ensure the quality and efficacy of their supplements. (healthcanal.com)
At the November 1994 ATSDR Board of Scientific Counselors meeting, the quality and appropriateness of ATSDR health studies were reviewed. (cdc.gov)

A peer-reviewed scientific journal testing the scientific merit of intelligent design. (uncommondescent.com)

This review aims to provide an overview of the strategies implemented to overcome ICI resistance and/or define subgroups of patients with MSS or dMMR mCRC who may benefit from immunotherapy. (bvsalud.org)

At the same time, intelligent design (ID) offers a promising scientific alternative to materialistic theories of biological and cosmological evolution - an alternative that is finding increasing theoretical and empirical support. (uncommondescent.com)

Rossides C, Pender SLF and Schneider P (2021), "3D cyclorama for digital unrolling and visualisation of deformed tubes" , Scientific Reports. (southampton.ac.uk)

4 A short training programme to improve peer review had a slight effect, which disappeared after six months. (bmj.com)

If necessary, an alternative member of the Editorial Board is assigned to oversee the review process to avoid conflicts of interest. (koyauniversity.org)
Please explain your ideas and send the Call for Papers for your event including information about the subject, kind of submissions, review process, programm committee, and time schedule. (tu-berlin.de)
Dr. Austin is in the process of publishing these results in standard journals and is now seeking to explain the dynamics of the burial process. (icr.org)
Authors can bypass the editorial and peer review process adopted by credentialed scientific journals. (thebulletin.org)
For information to be accepted as part of the scientific record, experts generally agree that it should go through a process of peer review, wherein specialists who don't have stock in the work's success review its data for accuracy. (popsci.com)
He also admits to some distrust in the peer review process. (popsci.com)
Corthals points out that even though scientific publishing can be a very difficult process, it exists for good reason. (popsci.com)
Since then, peer review has become a predominant method of the peer review process or referee system. (bvsalud.org)

Autistic individuals must undergo the same testing and fulfill the driving requirements mandated by their state or country, just like their non-autistic peers. (healthcanal.com)

The contribution you may want to submit has to satisfy certain standards: The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor). (tu-berlin.de)

Among other things, scientific journals' papers' authors are experts who must cite everything (and have a bibliography). (wikipedia.org)

Grant funding agencies strive to support the best scientific research. (bmj.com)
This is why scientific consensus, from multiple studies, is what we strive for, not just one paper with amazing results. (skepchick.org)

To live up to the changes in the scientific and technological world it changed its name and shape several times. (degruyter.com)

11 Similarly, a study of proposals submitted to the National Science Foundation re-reviewed 75 funded and 75 not funded grant proposals, and for 25% of proposals the funding decision changed. (bmj.com)
Continental Journal of Nursing Science (CJNSci) is an international, peer-reviewed, scientific journal. (who.int)
Applicants are encouraged to contact the appropriate NCCIH Scientific/Research contact for the area of science for which they are planning to develop an application prior to submitting to this FOA. (nih.gov)
Library and information science ( LIS ) is the scientific study of issues related to libraries and the information fields. (wikipedia.org)
The problem, therefore, is not merely that science is being used illegitimately to promote a materialistic worldview, but that this worldview is actively undermining scientific inquiry, leading to incorrect and unsupported conclusions about biological and cosmological origins. (uncommondescent.com)
Launched in January 2007, the journal focuses on the field of photonics, which includes research into the science and technology of light generation, manipulation, and detection. (lifeboat.com)
Gillespie recognizes that peer review is necessary for gaining the acceptance of the scientific community, but he doesn't necessarily think peer review equals good science. (popsci.com)

Directing research funds to the right research projects: a review of criteria used by research organisations in Australia in prioritising health research projects for funding. (peerreviewcongress.org)

This incident demonstrated how flaws in the existing peer review system can lead to significant consequences. (e-jemed.org)

Our peer review policy is designed to maintain the highest standards of scientific integrity and promote the advancement of knowledge in various fields. (koyauniversity.org)

In a scientific research group or academic department it is usual for the content of current scientific journals to be discussed in journal clubs. (wikipedia.org)
is a prestigious, peer-reviewed scientific journal that is published by the Nature Publishing Group. (lifeboat.com)

The Journal, Chief Editor and the editorial board are not entitled or liable to either justify or responsible for inaccurate and misleading data if any. (iesrj.com)

Under this FOA, trials must be designed so that results, whether positive or negative, will provide information of high scientific utility and will support decisions about further development or testing of the natural product. (nih.gov)

The submission file must be a PDF created using the templates found under https://journal.ub.tu-berlin.de/public/template/ . (tu-berlin.de)

Conclusions Allocating funding for scientific research in health and medicine is costly and somewhat random. (bmj.com)

He has published about 70 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals and several book chapters. (routledge.com)
He has co-authored eight monographs and published more than 130 scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals. (routledge.com)
Eminent journals and peer-reviewed academic papers are supposed to convince us of scientific truth. (skepchick.org)

According to a new study published in a respected CANCER journal. (homeopathic.com)
He has been published in 13 journals, including "The Professional Geographer" and "International Journal of Cancer. (wpi.edu)

At Aro, we are committed to maintaining the highest ethical standards in peer review and promoting a culture of integrity, diversity, and inclusion. (koyauniversity.org)

This journal is meant to present primary results achieved in this field. (tu-berlin.de)
It is the oldest German journal in the field of information technology. (degruyter.com)
Such a field will usually be represented by one or more scientific journals, where peer-reviewed research is published. (wikipedia.org)

Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals. (dovepress.com)
A database congaing bibliographic information and information about whether a journal is for example peer reviewed or Open Access. (lu.se)
Ornis Svecica is an open access, peer-reviewed scientific journal published in English and Swedish by BirdLife Sweden. (lu.se)

A new twist would be for the rivals of those scientists to pay for bad reviews. (skepticaldoctor.com)
He leads CSR's 450 scientists and administrative staff, overseeing their efforts to manage 80,000 incoming NIH grant applications a year and review the majority of them in CSR peer review groups. (nih.gov)
Although preliminary estimates from published literature and expert surveys suggest striking agreement among climate scientists on the tenets of anthropogenic climate change (ACC), the American public expresses substantial doubt about both the anthropogenic cause and the level of scientific agreement underpinning ACC. (climateshifts.org)

Based on recommendations from the scientific editors of ACS Journals. (acs.org)
In such cases, editors may make a decision based on one peer review report, ensuring it meets the required standards outlined below. (koyauniversity.org)

This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) encourages applications for investigator-initiated, early phase, clinical trials of natural products (i.e., botanicals, dietary supplements, and probiotics), which have a strong scientific premise to justify further clinical testing. (nih.gov)

But protestations about limiting academic enquiry have helped limit past efforts to control how dual-use research is published in journals. (thebulletin.org)

One study 10 estimated that 38 416 reviews per grant would be required to get a high precision for the peer review and selection of grants from the National Institutes of Health. (bmj.com)

International Journal of Health Professions. (zhaw.ch)

This increased transparency can contribute to building trust within the scientific community and with the general public. (e-jemed.org)
The Daubert guidelines transfer the onus of responsibility from the general scientific community ( Frye ) to the bench. (americanbar.org)
The project was successful beyond all expectation in helping resolve the apparent conflict between the billions of years estimated by the conventional scientific community for the age of the earth and the thousands of years stated in the Bible. (icr.org)
A peer-reviewed study isn't always true, good, or without controversy in the scientific community, but this basic vetting is considered a bare minimum requirement for having your research taken seriously. (popsci.com)

Setting Grant review panels of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. (bmj.com)

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment6

Psychiatry and Psychology16

Disciplines and Occupations19

Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena21

Technology, Industry, Agriculture3

Humanities5

Information Science57

Named Groups5

Health Care20

Publication Characteristics1

Geographicals3

Reviewers19

20231

Abstract3

Processes7

20184

Articles30

Manuscripts5

Publish2

Methods2

20202

Rigorous2

Contributions2

Publishes3

Validity3

Findings5

Cochrane1

Analyses1

Formal2

Journal's1

Referees1

Proceedings2

Publications1

Scholarly6

DOAJ1

Systematic review1

Reviewer4

Involves2

Evaluate3

Credibility1

Article8

Publication11

Researchers6

Quality5

Merit1

Aims1

Empirical1

20211

Programme1

Process8

Undergo1

Contribution1

Authors1

Strive2

Technological1

Science7

Criteria1

Flaws1

Advancement1

Group2

Editorial1

Support1

Https1

Conclusions1

Papers3

CANCER2

Ethical1

Field3

Open3

Scientists3

Editors2

Premise1

Research is published1

Precision1

International1

Community4

Medical1