Peer reviewed anonymously peer reviewed. Medical search. Frequent questions

From the review request page, administrators send an email message to requested reviewers. (bepress.com)

To begin the review process for a manuscript, navigate to its Submission Details page and click Reviewers in the left-hand sidebar. (bepress.com)
Further peer review of your revised manuscript may be needed. (rsc.org)
At APS, after an author submits a manuscript, the Editor in Chief determines whether or not it should be considered for possible publication and, if so, assigns the article to a Senior Editor, who assigns and coordinates with an appropriate Action Editor to determine whether the manuscript should be sent out for review. (psychologicalscience.org)
These individuals send their reviews to the Action Editor, who then makes the decision to accept the manuscript, reject it, or ask the authors to revise it, taking into account the reviewers' and editor's comments before resubmitting it. (psychologicalscience.org)
After papers have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, authors should submit the final source files including manuscript as LaTeX file, illustration files (as described below) and supplementary material such as author photographs and biographies. (aes.org)
As part of your JAES submission, it is required to provide at least one suggestion for an expert who could review your manuscript (name and email address). (aes.org)
When you submit a manuscript to a journal or to a conference, you do not know who reviews your manuscript. (lemire.me)
Manuscript acquisition and peer review are time consuming but rewarding. (author-me.com)
Prepare your manuscript using the following order and format then click on the submit article link to create an account and upload your manuscript for review. (purdue.edu)
Instead of reviewing a manuscript in secret for the Editor of a journal, each reviewer simply publishes his review (typically of a paper he wishes to recommend) to his SP network subscribers. (frontiersin.org)
The reviewers are PhD level researchers or other expert parties external to the editing board and independent in relation to the manuscript to be reviewed. (tsv.fi)
Both for published and unpublished reviewed manuscripts, the recorded data must include the following information: the date when the manuscript was received, names of authors and name of manuscript, names of reviewers as well as opinions issued by the reviewers, and decisions on the publication and the dates of these decisions. (tsv.fi)
Offering a manuscript for publication is also considered to be the author's declaration of consent to the scholarly publisher's peer-review practices. (tsv.fi)
The peer review process is done anonymously by reviewers with expertise in the area of knowledge of each manuscript as well as experts in methodology or statistics, as determined by the Editorial board, which works towards maintaining an efficient editorial process in order for the manuscripts to be published as soon as possible. (elsevier.es)
The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. (teknokrat.ac.id)

To adjust the number of desired reviewers for all manuscripts, navigate to the Configuration page for the publication and enter the maximum number of required reviews. (bepress.com)
Reviewers not only help to select the content to be published but also are expected to provide meaningful comments that can improve the quality of the manuscripts they review. (psychologicalscience.org)
Manuscripts submitted to the Journal of the AES for publication are reviewed anonymously by members of the review board. (aes.org)
We match reviewers to submissions based on keywords in our online peer review system, ScholarOne Manuscripts . (computer.org)
Manuscripts of the full-length articles should be between 4000-8000 words (inclusive of works cited and endnotes - please do not use footnotes) and the Reviews must not exceed a word limit of 2000. (upenn.edu)
The publisher must keep regular hardcopy or electronic records of the key review information and documents related to the manuscripts accepted for the review process. (tsv.fi)
All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). (revistaneurocirugia.com)

Peer review is more problematic when choosing the projects to be funded since innovative projects are not highly ranked in the existing peer-review process. (wikipedia.org)

Publications can take advantage of either single-blind or double-blind peer review using robust tools for managing reviewer lists and turnaround time. (bepress.com)
Increasingly, due to concerns with biases and homophily , journals and conferences are moving to a double-blind peer review where you have to submit your paper without disclosing your identity. (lemire.me)
All contributions will be sent anonymously to the Board of Reviewers for blind peer-review, evaluation and approval/rejection. (upenn.edu)
Submissions with typographical and grammatical errors will be evaluated in an overview of the paper/article before the blind peer-review process, and if found in excess, shall be returned to the author(s) or rejected - the discretion of the Editorial Board is final in this regard. (upenn.edu)

By default, the email includes how long the reviewer has to respond to the request, the review due date, and a link to a page where the reviewer either accepts or declines to review. (bepress.com)
To preserve the integrity of the review process, the peer review administrator can communicate any necessary information anonymously to the author on behalf of the reviewer. (computer.org)
When agreeing to review an article or book a reviewer is also consenting to the peer-review practices and their documentation. (tsv.fi)

Publons Academy and Nature Masterclass provide free peer-review training courses. (psychologicalscience.org)
The Publons Academy is a free, online peer review training course for early career researchers. (fems-microbiology.org)

Many studies have emphasized the problems inherent to the process of peer review. (wikipedia.org)
In the APS webinar The Basics of Peer Review , Drew was joined by Becca White, the APS peer review manager, alongside Robert L. Goldstone , editor in chief of Current Directions in Psychological Science , and Erin B. Tone , associate editor for Clinical Psychological Science , to share their experiences involving the process of peer review and tips for engaging in meaningful peer review. (psychologicalscience.org)

Alternatives to common peer review practices have been put to the test, in particular open peer review, where the comments are visible to readers, generally with the identities of the peer reviewers disclosed as well, e.g. (wikipedia.org)
Such comments suggest an urgent need to reconsider review practices. (stir.ac.uk)
The following report considers the diverse range of practices that constitute peer review in both publishing and institutional structures, examining the history of peer review, and evaluating how innovative alternative models aim to resolve pressures on the current system. (stir.ac.uk)

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) provides ethical guidelines for peer reviewers. (psychologicalscience.org)
Here you send each article to at least three reviewers and ask them to fill out a set of guidelines regarding qualities that you d like them to review. (author-me.com)
Review submissions should follow the same guidelines as research articles but not exceed six pages double spaced or 1,500 words. (purdue.edu)
Each entry will be peer-reviewed and anonymously judged by influential jury panel of professional academics, prominent press members, and established professionals by following a set of strict guidelines. (tuvie.com)
When applying for the label, the publishers also undertake to promote, in their own publishing activities, the principles of the peer-review instructions issued by the Finnish Association of Scholarly Publishing (in Finnish only) as well as the Responsible conduct of research guidelines (pdf) published by the Advisory Board on Research Integrity (TENK). (tsv.fi)
Methodology and design: Systematic review that follows the guidelines of the PRISMA declaration. (bvsalud.org)

A recent report by the GWPF that had been through the same unofficial peer review process, was promoted as "thoroughly peer-reviewed" by influential columnist Matt Ridley - a senior figure in the organisation. (theecologist.org)

Peer review has two main purposes: (a) to filter out research of poor quality or content that does not fit within the scope of a particular journal, and (b) to improve the quality of journal articles. (psychologicalscience.org)
Peer review involves sending articles out anonymously for review by experts on the subject. (psywww.com)
In addition to research articles we welcome book reviews from graduate students in their respective areas of expertise. (purdue.edu)
Articles submitted to the Journal of Contemporary Anthropology will be anonymously reviewed by Ph.D. students with expertise in the corresponding subfield. (purdue.edu)
A selected-papers (SP) network is a network in which researchers who read, write, and review articles subscribe to each other based on common interests. (frontiersin.org)
I show how the SP network can greatly improve review and dissemination of research articles in areas that are not well-supported by existing journals. (frontiersin.org)
The label will indicate that the peer-review of articles and books has been performed in line with the quality and ethical criteria imposed by the academic community. (tsv.fi)
The label can refer to the entire volume if it only includes peer-reviewed texts or to individual articles if the volume includes both peer-reviewed and non-reviewed texts. (tsv.fi)
The translation of the findings into future policy planning will include the production of a series of peer-reviewed articles, presentation of the findings at relevant eHealth conferences and preparation of policy reports to the international organisations aiming to strengthen national capacity for better-informed eHealth architecture. (bmj.com)
Articles in press are accepted, peer reviewed articles that are not yet assigned to volumes/issues, but are citable using DOI. (elsevier.es)
All articles are anonymously peer reviewed by members of the Editorial Board. (bvsalud.org)
Results: 11 articles with methodological quality between 5-10 points according to the systematic review evaluation instrument or randomized clinical trial, respectively, are included. (bvsalud.org)

Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals. (wikipedia.org)
In particular, our discussion of peer review for publications emphasises practice in scholarly journals, as that is largely where discussion in scholarly and other literature focuses. (stir.ac.uk)

Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference. (wikipedia.org)
It may be useful for the editor to involve other peer reviewers, editorial board members, or experts in the relevant field (anonymously as to the complainant and if possible as to the identity of the complained-about authors), using standard peer review procedures, to review the texts (especially if the allegation is a more complex form of plagiarism). (elsevier.com)
Next, the lessons are reviewed, anonymously, by law faculty on the CALI Editorial Board. (cali.org)

Peer review tools are available in all Digital Commons publication types except image galleries. (bepress.com)
These are all the people who have reviewed for the publication in the past, as well as any new reviewers designated to appear on this list. (bepress.com)
If more reviewers are requested than are required, reviewers who have not responded to the request will be notified automatically that the publication no longer requires their review when the required number of reviewers have committed. (bepress.com)
However, peer review does not prevent publication of invalid research, and as experimentally controlled studies of this process are difficult to arrange, direct evidence that peer review improves the quality of published papers is scarce. (wikipedia.org)
The first record of an editorial pre-publication peer-review is from 1665 by Henry Oldenburg, the founding editor of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society at the Royal Society of London. (wikipedia.org)
The first peer-reviewed publication might have been the Medical Essays and Observations published by the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1731. (wikipedia.org)
Peer review is the process by which outside experts in a particular subject area assess the scientific rigor, validity, and other measures of quality to determine whether a scientific article meets the standards for publication," according to Amy Drew, the APS director of publications. (psychologicalscience.org)
Here, we provide the information you need to successfully peer-review for an IEEE Computer Society publication. (computer.org)
IEEE requires that reviewers treat the contents of papers under review as confidential information not to be disclosed to others before publication. (computer.org)
Drummond Rennie, deputy editor of Journal of the American Medical Association is an organizer of the International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, which has been held every four years since 1986. (ethnography.com)
Nevertheless, peer review does often add to the seriousness of academic publication. (ethnography.com)
Once the SP network reviewers complete their review decisions, the authors can invite any journal editor they want to consider these reviews and initial audience size, and make a publication decision. (frontiersin.org)
Respectively, the publisher in question will describe on the publication channel's website their own peer-review process and, after receiving user rights, declare their undertaking to adhere to the requirements imposed on the use of the label. (tsv.fi)
The label should be printed in the publication in a way to unambiguously indicate which writings have been peer-reviewed. (tsv.fi)
Given the parameters of our study, alongside an evolving environment for peer review, and our own wish to experiment with peer review modes, this report is offered for post-publication peer review. (stir.ac.uk)

The intuition behind open peer review is that if your reviews are published, you will be kept in check and may get punished if you are too biased. (lemire.me)

Peer reviewers with the cloak of anonymity permit insecure scientists the chance to level the artillery at potential competitors. (ethnography.com)
Better still, imagine if all the vitriol the aspiring had - under the cover of anonymity - themselves delivered their peers, were to come back to bite them in this manner. (upenn.edu)

A written review usually follows a certain structure that helps the editor to ultimately answer the question: Should this particular article be published in this particular journal? (psychologicalscience.org)
Developed together with world renowned researchers, peer reviewers, journal editors and Nobel Laureates, it will help you practice and master the core competencies of peer review, and connect you with editors at elite journals. (fems-microbiology.org)
For a limited time, the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society is offering complimentary Open Access on all Review Papers. (aes.org)
To be published in a top-quality journal using peer review, an article must make a notable contribution to the field. (psywww.com)
IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society follows an expedited peer review schedule and therefore requests reviews within one week. (computer.org)
In addition, by submitting material to Journal of Contemporary Anthropology , the author is stipulating that the material is not currently under review at another journal (electronic or print) and that he or she will not submit the material to another journal (electronic or print) until the completion of the editorial decision process at Journal of Contemporary Anthropology . (purdue.edu)
Princeton professor William Happer laid out details of an unofficial peer review process run by the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a UK climate sceptic think tank, and said he could ask to put an oil-funded report through a similar review process, after admitting that it would struggle to be published in an academic journal. (theecologist.org)
The journal also invites reviews of texts, reference books and scholarly work related to the discipline. (upenn.edu)
Vacunas is a peer-reviewed journal supported by an advisory board of experts in the field of vaccinology. (elsevier.es)
Asked to share her own 'horror stories' in peer review for the Times Higher Education, Susan Bassnett comments that 'it seems like a fine idea for work submitted to a journal, publisher or funding body to be assessed anonymously by independent experts', but fears peer review 'has grown into a monster' as a result of an increasing volume of work requiring review, with detrimental effects for both authors and reviewers. (stir.ac.uk)

She also underscored the importance of reviews following civility and ethics principles, including confidentiality, disclosure of conflicts of interest or competing interest, and a respectful tone. (psychologicalscience.org)
We will obtain informed consent from each participant and collect data anonymously to maintain confidentiality. (bmj.com)

With Maven, you can learn alongside a group of peers, building a sense of community and support as you progress through the course material. (freshlearn.com)

2-4 Despite this, there is limited information in the peer-reviewed literature on the behaviour of seasonal influenza outbreaks in day schools. (who.int)
It is important to know the views of medical students as these may affect their future behaviour towards patients and peers. (who.int)

If the identities of authors are not revealed to each other, the procedure is called dual-anonymous peer review. (wikipedia.org)
The peer reviewing activity informs the project proposal procedure. (reap.ac.uk)

Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. (wikipedia.org)

Butchard D, Rowberry S, Squires C & Tasker G (2017) Peer Review in Practice. (stir.ac.uk)
These include the selection and crediting of reviewers, the role of peer review in creative practice, the advent of paid review platforms, and the use of metrics as an alternative means of quantifying research value and impact. (stir.ac.uk)

So why would we not want to hide the identity of the researchers during peer review despite the apparent advantages? (lemire.me)

All submissions will go through a peer review process to check their suitability for JAES. (aes.org)

Data regarding patients' characteristics, admission modality, stay duration, reason for admission, and discharge modality was anonymously collected from patients' registers. (bvsalud.org)

If included, the system will prompt administrators to solicit the number of reviews indicated. (bepress.com)
If completed, the system will prompt reviewers to complete their reviews in the number of days indicated. (bepress.com)
Scholarly peer review has been subject to several criticisms, and various proposals for reforming the system have been suggested over the years. (wikipedia.org)
The present-day peer-review system evolved from this 18th-century process, began to involve external reviewers in the mid-19th-century, and did not become commonplace until the mid-20th-century. (wikipedia.org)
Authors should submit a PDF including illustrations for review to the online submission and peer-review system . (aes.org)
They have a screening system called peer review . (psywww.com)
Some journals do not use the peer review system at all. (psywww.com)
These pathologies reflect the petrification of peer review from what it started as (informal discussions of a colleague's latest report in a club meeting) into a rigid system of assumptions inherited from outdated distribution and communication models (ink-on-paper printing press and postal mail). (frontiersin.org)
Peer review started out as a PULL model (i.e., each person decides what to receive - concretely, which talks to attend), but petrified into a PUSH model (i.e., a centralized distribution system decides what everyone else should receive). (frontiersin.org)
Most of Brandeis' peer institutions do not have a comparable system. (brandeis.edu)

Publons allows reviewers to track their peer review contributions. (psychologicalscience.org)

They are peers of the scientists who submit the article, people in the same field with similar expertise. (psywww.com)
Editors and scientists alike insist on the pivotal importance of peer review. (ethnography.com)

Publications such as series and journals offer some peer review settings on the Configuration screen, under the Review heading. (bepress.com)
I present a three phase plan for building a basic SP network, and making it an effective peer review platform that can be used by journals, conferences, users of repositories such as arXiv, and users of search engines such as PubMed. (frontiersin.org)
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals. (dovepress.com)

Nobody is advocating that research papers be published anonymously as a rule. (lemire.me)
Current peer review suffers from systemic blind spots, bottlenecks, and inefficiencies that retard the advance of research in many areas. (frontiersin.org)
Introduction Peer review constitutes one of the more paradoxical elements of academic research and dissemination: it is common for academics to complain about unhelpful feedback from their latest review, but the process is simultaneously seen as one of the bedrocks of assuring the quality of research. (stir.ac.uk)
Peer review is an expansive topic, and our research has revealed a number of fruitful avenues for future evaluation which we have not been able to cover in detail here. (stir.ac.uk)

Use the review history link in the Status column if you wish to see a reviewer's activity for that submission only. (bepress.com)

You may use the public comments section of the review form to include your thoughts, if any, regarding the differences between the two papers. (computer.org)
Canvas DocViewer does not support anonymous comments, so it cannot be used for annotated feedback on assignments with anonymous peer reviews. (instructure.com)

Academic peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) academic field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. (wikipedia.org)
Likewise, the recognition and recruitment of peer reviewers continues to be a significant issue in the field of scholarly publishing. (wikipedia.org)
In offering additional advice to peer reviewers, Tone suggested starting young and reviewing as often as you can, to benefit not only the field but also reviewers themselves. (psychologicalscience.org)

Also ensure that your recommendations and reviews are aligned-if your review only mentions positive aspects and then recommends a rejection, it is not helpful for the authors. (psychologicalscience.org)

PhD students submit their thesis for review without hiding their name. (lemire.me)
Peer review allows students to clarify their own ideas as they explain them to classmates and as they formulate questions about their classmates' writing. (draftlessig.org)
If students need an internship, they can browse hundreds of internship reviews from classmates to get leads. (brandeis.edu)
Alternatively, students who just completed internships can share their experience anonymously with others. (brandeis.edu)
It made perfect sense to create a tool that allows students to review their internship experiences and provides a platform for other students to benefit from their perspective. (brandeis.edu)
Students can also write their own completely anonymous reviews in about five to ten minutes to help get the word out about great or not-so-great internship experiences and even give advice to future interns at their internship site. (brandeis.edu)
The online database already contains nearly 650 reviews for Brandeis students, by Brandeis students. (brandeis.edu)
In order to encourage student participation, Hiatt is raffling off $50 gift cards each month to students who write reviews. (brandeis.edu)
Student Union President Herbie Rosen '12 also encourages students to write reviews. (brandeis.edu)
If an assignment is anonymously graded, students will not be able to view instructor annotations until the assignment is unmuted or assignment grades have been posted. (instructure.com)

They underline that the ratings are not robust, e.g., changing reviewers can have a dramatic impact on the review results. (wikipedia.org)

The intuition behind double-blind review is that it is harder to discriminate against people if you do not know their name and affiliation. (lemire.me)

The are then allocated draft project proposals from two other participants to review. (reap.ac.uk)
After peer reviewing of the draft project proposals participants produce the final proposal. (reap.ac.uk)

Reviewers are responsible for removing all identifiers from supporting materials that they submit as part of their review. (computer.org)

I begin by briefly outlining the problems in existing peer review that this proposal aims to resolve. (frontiersin.org)

I would say take the feedback model pretty much as presented in the peer model and deliver it as casually as possible. (manager-tools.com)
Along the way, you will have the opportunity to work on group projects and get feedback from your peers and instructors. (freshlearn.com)
Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form . (umich.edu)
The peer review exercise is both a learning process within the TALON course, as it is a productive way of providing participants with rich feedback on their own project proposals, and a way of raising awareness amongst academic staff of the benefits of peer review as they experience this activity from a student perspective. (reap.ac.uk)

Methods and analysis This study will use a mixed-methods design consisting of four phases: (1) item generation through review of evidences and experts' opinions, (2) face and content validity of the questionnaire, (3) determination of a range of possible scenarios for each item included in the questionnaire and (4) evaluation of reliability. (bmj.com)
Where we include links to social networking services such as LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook, you may use these links to enable you to share content with your peers or networks or review information that we post on social media. (stinson.com)

Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. (wikipedia.org)
They should cite original work or review previous work, giving proper credit. (aes.org)

have shown that there is a low correlation between peer review outcomes and the future impact measured by citations. (wikipedia.org)
It does so with a particular focus on peer review in the Arts and Humanities (in connection with the AHRC Academic Book of the Future project), while looking at wider disciplinary and publishing considerations. (stir.ac.uk)
I hope my review can make the search a little easier for future Brandeisians looking for the kinds of things I did. (brandeis.edu)

But people are concerned about their reviews or the reviews of their papers being published. (lemire.me)

Some anonymous yahoos out in peer-review land accused me of the above transgression and more. (ethnography.com)

Please inform the peer review administrator of any possible concurrent submission. (computer.org)
Each review submission should include a CV within the uploaded document, which outlines your experience in relation to topics explored in the book. (purdue.edu)
No part of the document with the submission should contain the author's name(s) or credentials, in order to facilitate confidential peer reading. (upenn.edu)
The submission and peer reviewing is completed through Moodle workshop activity software. (reap.ac.uk)

if review of a paper requires synthesis - combining the different expertise of the authors and reviewers in order to determine what assumptions and criteria are valid for evaluating it - both of the previous assumptions can fail badly ( Lee, 2006 ). (frontiersin.org)
These are faculty CALI pays to do reviews and many are authors of CALI Lessons themselves, so they understand the medium. (cali.org)

In the case of eLife, peer review is used not for deciding whether to publish an article, but for assessing its importance and reliability. (wikipedia.org)
How do you write a peer reviewed article summary? (draftlessig.org)

A Review Paper is an overview or tutorial of an audio engineering topic. (aes.org)
It is expected that no one with access to a paper under review will make any inappropriate use of the special knowledge that access provides. (computer.org)
Do not use material from a paper you have reviewed. (computer.org)
Do not distribute copies of a paper you have been asked to review unless the material is already public. (computer.org)
My neurology paper may be bold, but that review was not enough to get the paper actually accepted for a long time. (ethnography.com)
This phoenix of a paper actually went through six years of peer reviews, in the process collecting a range of laudatory and insulting reviews. (ethnography.com)

It is somehow believed that "peer review" is the gold standard of academic achievement. (ethnography.com)
However, it is rare to see a scholarly examination of the process, and this report sets out to address this by evaluating key aspects of academic discussion of peer review. (stir.ac.uk)
The Education Enhancement Team at the University of Strathclyde have incorporated peer review as an activity for participants submitting project proposals in the Teaching and Learning Online (TALON) module for the Post-graduate Certificate in Advanced Academic Studies. (reap.ac.uk)

Peer review sustains science," Goldstone added, noting that reviewers should make their reviews as helpful as they can. (psychologicalscience.org)
We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller. (ethnography.com)
Turn on Track ChangesOpen Microsoft Word.Choose the Review tab at the top of the document.Either click the Track Changes button (PC) or toggle the Track Changes switch (Mac).Make sure that you change 'Simple Markup' to 'All Markup' from the drop down bar next to Track Changes. (draftlessig.org)

Brezis and Birukou also show that the peer review process is not working properly. (wikipedia.org)
Brezis and Biruku show that this heterogeneity among referees will lead to seriously affect the whole peer review process, and will lead to main arbitrariness in the results of the process. (wikipedia.org)
Imagine if scholars applying for promotion, instead of strutting their stuff - publications, praise from various quarters - were obliged to show their betters and/or peers all the worst things that had ever been written or said of them, whether anonymously or otherwise. (upenn.edu)

Since all impact assessment, reviews, and revisions are complete, this decision process should be short. (frontiersin.org)
They complete the peer review activity in small groups following completion of TALON (part 1) - a 6 week course delivered online. (reap.ac.uk)

These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. (fems-microbiology.org)
Below are links to other pages on this website we recommend you review as you learn about what type of care your loved one may need. (lymphoma.org.au)

Diseases2

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment12

Psychiatry and Psychology59

Phenomena and Processes1

Disciplines and Occupations1

Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena29

Information Science11

Named Groups6

Health Care23

Geographicals1

Requested reviewers1

Manuscript15

Manuscripts7

Ranked in the existing peer-revie1

Blind peer-review4

Reviewer3

Publons Academy2

Process of peer review2

Practices3

Guidelines6

Influential1

Articles12

Scholarly journals2

Editorial board3

Publication15

Open peer1

Anonymity2

Journal10

Confidentiality2

Alongside1

Behaviour2

Procedure2

Findings1

Practice2

Researchers1

Submissions1

Duration1

System10

Contributions1

Scientists2

Journals3

Research4

Reviewer's1

Comments2

Field3

Rejection1

Students10

Robust1

Double-blind1

Draft2

Submit1

Aims1

Feedback4

Content2

Work2

Future3

Papers being pub1

Anonymous1

Submission4

Authors2

Article2

Paper6

Academic3

Make3

Show3

Complete2

Website2