Manuscripts anonymously peer reviewed. Medical search. Frequent questions

When agreeing to review an article or book a reviewer is also consenting to the peer-review practices and their documentation. (tsv.fi)
Our peer reviewer can only evaluate what the authors chose to include in the manuscript. (ijisem.com)
It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society. (teknokrat.ac.id)
Authors have the right to communicate to the editor if they do not wish their manuscript to be reviewed by a particular reviewer because of potential conflicts of interest. (analchemres.org)
Blind peer review - means the identity of the reviewer is not disclosed to the author(s). (tplondon.com)
As a member of the Editorial Review Board or as an ad hoc reviewer invited to review, you will be asked to anonymously review manuscripts submitted to our journals . (tplondon.com)
The manuscript will be sent to the reviewer anonymously. (asasijournal.id)
As a peer reviewer for a Science j ournal , you are part of a valued community. (blacktheme.net)
Reviews should be constructive and courteous , and the reviewer should respect the intellectual independence of the author. (blacktheme.net)
To preserve the integrity of the review process, the peer review administrator can communicate any necessary information anonymously to the author on behalf of the reviewer. (computer.org)
These papers sometimes contain notes written by Mortensen as the peer reviewer. (northwestern.edu)
In the event that a reviewer has a conflict of interest, that reviewer may still review only if the nature of the conflict is prominently disclosed alongside the review. (bioverlay.org)

All submissions will go through a peer review process to check their suitability for JAES. (aes.org)
After a peer-review process, the resulting papers, along with the overview papers which summarize all submitting data, were published in the special issues of the Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. (wikipedia.org)
The peer review process is done anonymously by reviewers with expertise in the area of knowledge of each manuscript as well as experts in methodology or statistics, as determined by the Editorial board, which works towards maintaining an efficient editorial process in order for the manuscripts to be published as soon as possible. (elsevier.es)
Respectively, the publisher in question will describe on the publication channel's website their own peer-review process and, after receiving user rights, declare their undertaking to adhere to the requirements imposed on the use of the label. (tsv.fi)
The process can be carried out either anonymously or openly. (tsv.fi)
The publisher must keep regular hardcopy or electronic records of the key review information and documents related to the manuscripts accepted for the review process. (tsv.fi)
The privacy policy of the scholarly publisher must take into account the documentation of the peer-review process. (tsv.fi)
It is not necessary to compile a separate privacy policy for the peer-review process. (tsv.fi)
By this publication approach, our peer review process will identify fraudulent data before publication. (ijisem.com)
Editors, authors and reviewers are required to keep confidential all details of the editorial and peer review process on submitted manuscripts. (ijisem.com)
In addition, by submitting material to Journal of Contemporary Anthropology , the author is stipulating that the material is not currently under review at another journal (electronic or print) and that he or she will not submit the material to another journal (electronic or print) until the completion of the editorial decision process at Journal of Contemporary Anthropology . (purdue.edu)
2) The peer review process used for both the literature and the Report can only determine the acceptability of the papers for publication. (masterresource.org)
For example, if a submission only includes 2,000 words, whereas the minimum requirement of words is 7,000 words, the submission will not enter the peer review process and shall be rejected. (rug.nl)
The whole review process depends on receiving referees comments and revising the manuscripts based on these comments to the author. (analchemres.org)
As the journal is peer-reviewed, a double-blind reviewed process will be followed. (lipi.go.id)
The accepted articles will be available online following the peer-reviewing process. (lipi.go.id)
Once a manuscript is submitted via EJEST's online submission process, in order to ensure consistency with the mission and focus of the publication, it is first reviewed by the editors to ensure compliance with all the requirements. (dpublication.com)
Upon passing the editorial stage, a manuscript is sent for a double-blind peer-review process. (dpublication.com)
The review process normally takes less than 6 weeks. (rj4allpublications.com)
A thorough but fast and responsive peer review process will support you in developing your paper and ensuring the quality of your finished work. (powersystems.technology)
We value peer review which is a process where peer experts evaluate the quality of others' work. (tplondon.com)
Peer review also ensures the integrity of the publishing process. (tplondon.com)
Perhaps one of the greatest added value of the peer review process is that it gives authors access to expert opinions in the field as well as useful critical insight into the methods and models used (or can be used) in the study. (tplondon.com)
If you are preparing an article or other scholarly manuscript to submit to a peer-reviewed journal or other publication, journal editors may request that you grant reviewers access private media or projects as part of the manuscript submission and review process. (duke.edu)
Submissions with typographical and grammatical errors will be evaluated in an overview of the paper/article before the blind peer-review process, and if found in excess, shall be returned to the author(s) or rejected - the discretion of the Editorial Board is final in this regard. (upenn.edu)
The review process is conducted anonymously, and Science journal editors do not disclose the identity of reviewers. (blacktheme.net)
Because our process directly mirrors academic peer review other than the stage of submission, one could imagine that our assessments may be useful to journals when they select which papers to send out for review. (bioverlay.org)
Associate editors guide each manuscript through the review process. (bioverlay.org)
The peer review process uses a blind review system, which preserves the identity of the authors and reviewers. (bvsalud.org)
If reviewers or editors raise suspicions or observe stage indicators, the article will be removed from the review process and filed. (bvsalud.org)

Full details of these submission types are given on the AES Journal Manuscript Types page. (aes.org)
Authors should submit a PDF including illustrations for review to the online submission and peer-review system . (aes.org)
As part of your JAES submission, it is required to provide at least one suggestion for an expert who could review your manuscript (name and email address). (aes.org)
The deadline for manuscript submission is 15 September 2018. (essenglish.org)
Please note that we accept submissions of short original essays and articles (1,500 to 2,500 words at the time of submission, NOT including tables, figures and references) that are peer-reviewed by several members of our team like regular research papers. (iafor.org)
Each review submission should include a CV within the uploaded document, which outlines your experience in relation to topics explored in the book. (purdue.edu)
Notice: If the author(s) decide to submit a paper which is already submitted, they must cancel the first submission and then submit the manuscript elsewhere. (richt.ir)
Only those submissions that most likely the fulfil the journal's submission requirements will be sent to the peer reviewers. (rug.nl)
Submissions that do not fulfil the submission requirements will be rejected without any peer review. (rug.nl)
Each submission that is sent for formal review will undergo a double-blinded peer review. (rug.nl)
Reviewers are required to provide their decision within 60 days from the submission of a paper for their review. (dpublication.com)
Submitting a manuscript to a journal published by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences implies that all contributors listed as authors have read and agreed to the content of the submitted work and that the submission observes the policies of the journal. (ac.ir)
Every submission reporting a research must include a statement to verify that ethics approval was sought for the study (or a statement that it was not required and why), including the name of the ethics committee(s) or institutional review board(s), the reference number/ID of the approval(s), and a statement that participants gave informed consent before participating. (ac.ir)
If a study has not been granted ethics committee approval prior to commencing, retrospective ethics approval usually cannot be obtained and it may not be possible to consider the submission for peer review. (ac.ir)
No part of the document with the submission should contain the author's name(s) or credentials, in order to facilitate confidential peer reading. (upenn.edu)
Simultaneous submission of the same manuscript for publication in other journals is not allowed and the work should not have been published previously. (upenn.edu)
Manuscripts are received with the understanding that the research reported was conducted within the human subject research with family environments and use policy of the KHEA (see Submission Guidelines) and according to applicable national laws. (her.re.kr)
Papers should be contributed to FER along with a letter verifying that the authors have not committed plagiarism (including self-plagiarism), or duplicate publication, and have not manipulated or used fraudulent data (refer to the template of Author's confirmation regarding research ethics in the Brief Instructions for Manuscript Submission on the website). (her.re.kr)
After manuscript submission, if the status of any author must be changed (adding to, removing from, or reordering the list of authors), all of the authors must sign agreement and written permission must be sought from the Editor-in-Chief. (her.re.kr)
Please inform the peer review administrator of any possible concurrent submission. (computer.org)

For a limited time, the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society is offering complimentary Open Access on all Review Papers. (aes.org)
Manuscripts submitted to the Journal of the AES for publication are reviewed anonymously by members of the review board. (aes.org)
Vacunas is a peer-reviewed journal supported by an advisory board of experts in the field of vaccinology. (elsevier.es)
Consistently ranked in the top 12 of its category in the Thomson Scientific Journal Citation Reports, Theoretical Criminology is a major interdisciplinary, international, peer reviewed journal for the advancement of the theoretical aspects of criminological knowledge. (sagepub.com)
Authors can publish papers separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions by acknowledging that the manuscripts have been published for the first time in Journal of Arts and Education . (teknokrat.ac.id)
The statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the editor-in-chief, the peer reviewers, the associate editors, authors and the publisher. (teknokrat.ac.id)
The publication of an article in the peer-reviewed journal Journal of Arts and Education is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. (teknokrat.ac.id)
Articles submitted to the Journal of Contemporary Anthropology will be anonymously reviewed by Ph.D. students with expertise in the corresponding subfield. (purdue.edu)
2-3-Simoltaneus submitting of the translated version of a manuscript that is already submitted in another journal is allowed if the editors in chief are aware of the situation. (richt.ir)
The Groningen Journal of International Law is a peer-reviewed journal. (rug.nl)
All manuscripts will be acknowledged upon presenting to the Journal office, provided that all stated requirements are met. (analchemres.org)
The Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities (JISSH) aims to provide a peer-reviewed platform and authoritative source of information for the exchange of ideas and research among social sciences and humanities scholars interested in Indonesian Studies and/or Global and Area Studies within global south perspectives. (lipi.go.id)
The articles submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) peer-reviewers and check for originality and plagiarism. (lipi.go.id)
EJEST is a peer-reviewed journal with a key objective to provide the academic and industrial group of people a medium for presenting original research and applications related to Engineering Science, Technology and Application. (dpublication.com)
The Internet Journal of Restorative Justice (IJRJ) is a double-blind, peer-reviewed journal. (rj4allpublications.com)
We may produce a manuscript based on the response from the community to be published in a peer-reviewed journal. (polarnetwork.org)
Transnational Press London follows a rigorous peer review policy for all publications (books, journal articles, book chapters, reports) and other publishing projects. (tplondon.com)
Submitted manuscripts are reviewed by the Journal editor or associate editors or area editors. (tplondon.com)
Meanwhile, the editor of Pharmacy advances jounal has the right to decide which submitted manuscripts to the journal should be published. (unar.ac.id)
Simply generate the appropriate temporary access links, ensure they are valid for long enough for review to be completed, and then send the temporary access links to the journal editor so they can forward them on to appropriate reviewers. (duke.edu)
Journal of Integrated and Advanced Engineering (JIAE) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published 2 (two) times a year, in March and September. (asasijournal.id)
Journal of Integrated and Advanced Engineering (JIAE) is a peer-reviewed international journal. (asasijournal.id)
When an author submits a manuscript to a journal for publication, the editor will request a number of experts in the field (typically 2-4) to anonymously review the work. (usm.edu)
All papers submitted must be in ESA format ( http://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1939-9170/resources/author-guidelines-ecy.html ), any deviation from this format will be noted in your review and if they persist in the final draft of your paper will result in points taken off. (usm.edu)
IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies (online ISSN: 2757-9549), published by The English Language and Literature Research Association of Turkey (IDEA), is an electronically published, international, double-anonymous p eer-reviewed, semi-annual journal for English literary studies. (idea.org.tr)
Studies conducted outside the areas indicated above are out of the scope of IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies , and they are not accepted for review. (idea.org.tr)
Since IDEAS: Journal of English Literary Studies claims no fees for article review or printing and for access to articles, it has no source of income. (idea.org.tr)
It is an international open access, scholarly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal publishing theoretically innovative and methodologically diverse research in the fields of gender studies, sexualities, and feminism. (salasika.org)
This section will sometimes consist of review essays on a number of recent publications in a particular field or area of relevance to the journal (1000 words). (salasika.org)
All articles will be peer-reviewed double-blind and will be submitted electronically to the journal ([email protected]). (salasika.org)
The journal also invites reviews of texts, reference books and scholarly work related to the discipline. (upenn.edu)
Selected papers will be published in the February 2020 issue of *Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research* (Print ISSN: 1351-1610 Online ISSN: 1469-8412), an international peer-reviewed journal indexed in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), ASSIA, and Scopus. (msu.edu)
FER) is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal of home economics. (her.re.kr)
The journal uses 'CrossCheck' to check for plagiarism in submitted manuscripts. (her.re.kr)
Manuscripts submitted to FER should not have been published in any other domestic or international academic journal or non-academic publication, and should not be simultaneously submitted to another journal for consideration. (her.re.kr)
If it is found that a manuscript has been submitted simultaneously to FER and another journal or that duplicate publication has occurred, the author(s) will be notified and sanctions will be imposed. (her.re.kr)
However, if the degree candidate has co-advisors, or if the published thesis or dissertation will list more than one advising professor, then all the advisors may be listed as co-authors of the journal manuscript. (her.re.kr)
Only some of the papers submit ted to a Science journal are reviewed in depth. (blacktheme.net)
Science journal editors share reviews with the authors, and possibly with other reviewers and Board of Reviewing Editors. (blacktheme.net)
I nstructions specific to each journal , including guidelines for particular article types and information on how to access the manuscripts and submit your review , are at the relevant journal page below. (blacktheme.net)
JASAL is a peer-reviewed journal, published online by the Association for the Study of Australian Literature. (edu.au)
IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society follows an expedited peer review schedule and therefore requests reviews within one week. (computer.org)

A submitted manuscript is first checked by an assistant editor to evaluate the formate (conformity with the given template) and identifying plagiarism. (unar.ac.id)
The formatted manuscript and the plagiarism result are then sent to an editor by the editor-in-chef. (unar.ac.id)
Every submitted manuscript which passes this step will be checked to identify any plagiarism before being reviewed by reviewers. (asasijournal.id)

Pharmacy advances jounal uses double-blind review, which involves sending manuscripts to reviewers anonymously. (unar.ac.id)

We are now 32 teachers and scholars from various countries, always eager to help, and willing to review the submissions we receive. (iafor.org)
All submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed by the experts in the corresponding area. (ijisem.com)
Submissions from the Editor-in-Chief will undergo independent peer-review and will be submitted to another Editor for his decision on acceptance. (ijisem.com)
Review submissions should follow the same guidelines as research articles but not exceed six pages double spaced or 1,500 words. (purdue.edu)
All submissions will be reviewed anonymously by at least three independent referees. (analchemres.org)
The editors ensure that all submissions are refereed anonymously by two readers in the relevant field. (salasika.org)
We match reviewers to submissions based on keywords in our online peer review system, ScholarOne Manuscripts . (computer.org)

All of this is done anonymously, so when the reviews are done they can be sent in part to the author in a revision request. (author-me.com)

Manuscripts should describe original work unpublished elsewhere and not being considered for publication elsewhere. (aes.org)
After papers have been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication, authors should submit the final source files including manuscript as LaTeX file, illustration files (as described below) and supplementary material such as author photographs and biographies. (aes.org)
Both for published and unpublished reviewed manuscripts, the recorded data must include the following information: the date when the manuscript was received, names of authors and name of manuscript, names of reviewers as well as opinions issued by the reviewers, and decisions on the publication and the dates of these decisions. (tsv.fi)
Offering a manuscript for publication is also considered to be the author's declaration of consent to the scholarly publisher's peer-review practices. (tsv.fi)
The label should be printed in the publication in a way to unambiguously indicate which writings have been peer-reviewed. (tsv.fi)
However, the Editors alone are responsible for every final decision on publication of manuscripts. (studiapolitica.eu)
Manuscripts are accepted on a rolling basis but must be received by April 15th to be considered for publication in the same year. (purdue.edu)
The final decision whether the manuscript is accepted for publication is under the authority of editor-in-chief with regard from the editorial board. (lipi.go.id)
editor reports the selection and reviews scripts clearly and accurately to the author based on accuracy, completeness, and clarity of reporting of result research and its development, including editing techniques and the use of guidelines for publication and screenwriting. (unib.ac.id)
When reviewing manuscripts prior to publication, many scientists become frustrated by identifying the same minor issues repeatedly. (uwaterloo.ca)
Transnational Press London follows a blind peer review policy in selecting the books for publication. (tplondon.com)
Science in general relies heavily on the peer review system to assess the quality of papers authors submit for publication. (usm.edu)
The editor collects the reviews, makes a decision about the fate of the paper (reject, request a revised version from the authors, or accept for publication) and returns it to the author. (usm.edu)
All manuscripts submitted to FER should abide by research and publication ethics policies of Instruction for Authors. (her.re.kr)
Here, we provide the information you need to successfully peer-review for an IEEE Computer Society publication. (computer.org)
IEEE requires that reviewers treat the contents of papers under review as confidential information not to be disclosed to others before publication. (computer.org)
Referee Reports, boxes 74-77 and 1977-2012, contains reports on articles submitted for publication review and assessed anonymously. (northwestern.edu)

Participants were allowed to submit multiple predictions through the D3R website, either anonymously or with research affiliation. (wikipedia.org)

When applying for the label, the publishers also undertake to promote, in their own publishing activities, the principles of the peer-review instructions issued by the Finnish Association of Scholarly Publishing (in Finnish only) as well as the Responsible conduct of research guidelines (pdf) published by the Advisory Board on Research Integrity (TENK). (tsv.fi)
Here you send each article to at least three reviewers and ask them to fill out a set of guidelines regarding qualities that you d like them to review. (author-me.com)
Note that if you fail to follow these guidelines the editor(s) may reject you manuscript resulting in no grade (0). (usm.edu)

Open peer review - both reviewer's and author(s) names are disclosed. (tplondon.com)
In addition, the reviewer's comments are also sent anonymously to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses. (unar.ac.id)
Then, the editor is expected to evaluate the revised manuscript and take a decision by considering the reviewer's recommendation, among several possibilities such as: require major or minor revision, rejected, or accepted. (unar.ac.id)

Reviewers must maintain confidentiality of manuscripts. (ijisem.com)

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. (teknokrat.ac.id)

1-5-Editors-in-chief have to check manuscripts for any kind of misconduct. (richt.ir)
A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. (asasijournal.id)

The authors should ensure that the manuscript is submitted in final form. (studiapolitica.eu)
Attachment 2: Anonymised Manuscript without authors' details for peer review. (rj4allpublications.com)
We rely on the TAB members to not only provide content themselves, but to also represent their companies and their profession as they review and edit technical content from other authors and experts. (powersystems.technology)
The assistant editor handling the paper will also check for comments that disclose the reviewers' identity before sending the review to authors. (unar.ac.id)
Even when a study has been approved by a research ethics committee or institutional review board, editors may ask authors for more detailed information about the ethics of the work. (ac.ir)
All authors, including the corresponding author, must be members of the KHEA, and any researchers throughout the world can submit a manuscript if the scope of the manuscript is appropriate. (her.re.kr)
After the manuscript has been submitted, the first and corresponding authors cannot be changed without a specific reason. (her.re.kr)
Authors do not know that papers are selected and sent out for review, and journals should not consider manuscripts that we selected for biOverlay as published. (bioverlay.org)
Conflicts of interest with the authors of manuscripts must be disclosed. (bioverlay.org)
After this stage, the Associate Editor will forward the submitted article to two reviewers, members of the Editorial Board and / or external reviewers, whose evaluations will be subsequently, and anonymously, passed on to the authors. (bvsalud.org)

Each year our journals receive over 1000 manuscripts. (tplondon.com)
The review should be no more than 1000 words in length. (salasika.org)

Our volunteer team of associate editors decides which manuscripts will be reviewed based on their own interests. (bioverlay.org)
Submitted manuscripts will be assigned by our Scietific Editor-in-chief to one of the Associate Editors for assessment. (bvsalud.org)

All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). (revistaneurocirugia.com)
The journals published by Transnational Press London are subject to double-blind peer review , except The Commentaries and The Agonist , which follow the editorial review and blind review. (tplondon.com)
Double-blind peer review - means neither the author(s) nor the reviewers know the identity of each other. (tplondon.com)

The publisher must send the referees' comments to the author(s) of the manuscript. (tsv.fi)
For in-depth review, at least two outside referees are consulted. (blacktheme.net)

Certainty of loading or rejection of the manuscript will be notified in writing. (unib.ac.id)
The final responsibility for decisions of acceptance or rejection of a submitted manuscript lies with the editor. (blacktheme.net)

If you are not qualified to evaluate a component of the research, you should inform the editor in your review. (blacktheme.net)

With the collaboration of editors and reviewers, IJISEM Journals can ensure that the manuscripts we publish are among the most important in their respective disciplines. (ijisem.com)
The JISSH seeks to publish high-quality research papers, review articles, and book reviews that make a contribution to knowledge through the application and development of theories, new data exploration, and/or scientific analysis of salient policy issues. (lipi.go.id)
We publish research papers of theoretical and empirical nature as well as book reviews, article reviews and commentaries. (rj4allpublications.com)
Once all reviews are received, the editors make a decision whether to publish, request revisions, or reject the manuscript. (tplondon.com)
In this type of review practice, often journals are expected to publish the reviewers' names alongside the article. (tplondon.com)

Since the SAMPL2 challenge, all participants have been invited to attend the SAMPL workshops and submit manuscripts to describe their results. (wikipedia.org)
Prepare your manuscript using the following order and format then click on the submit article link to create an account and upload your manuscript for review. (purdue.edu)
Reviewers are responsible for removing all identifiers from supporting materials that they submit as part of their review. (computer.org)
There is no way to directly submit work to us for review. (bioverlay.org)

Any such potential conflicts of interest should be stated on the manuscript title page. (her.re.kr)
Reviewers with conflicts of interest thus may not review anonymously. (bioverlay.org)

For Review Papers, there will be no charge up to 20 pages, but $100 will be charged per extra page starting from page 21. (aes.org)
The class anonymously exchanges papers and review prior to turning them in for grading. (escholarship.org)
Our dedicated team of editors and graphic design professionals is committed to developing your manuscripts into impactful papers that will grab attention of the readers both visually and through their content. (powersystems.technology)
All papers must cite relevant peer reviewed literature, using proper citation format in the text and literature cited sections. (usm.edu)
Papers can not cite ANY non peer reviewed literature for any reason. (usm.edu)
You may use the public comments section of the review form to include your thoughts, if any, regarding the differences between the two papers. (computer.org)

All manuscripts submitted are initially screened by the editorial panel for scope, relevance, and scientific quality. (lipi.go.id)

Just as you wish prompt evaluations of your own research, please return your reviews within the time period specified when you were asked to review the paper. (blacktheme.net)
Objective: To compare the quality of data provided by remote endoscopic and external nasal examination with those by in-person evaluations for rhinoplasty and functional nasal surgery, measured by detectability of anatomic features, and to assess associated patient experience measured by reported ease, discomfort, and likelihood of peer recommendation. (bvsalud.org)

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. (teknokrat.ac.id)
Remove information from the article that might identify the author and save the manuscript in Word doc. (purdue.edu)
The author of the article is given the opportunity to make improvements (revision) of the manuscript on the basis of recommendations / suggestions from bestari partners or editors. (unib.ac.id)
If you are willing to analyse resulting data and provide inputs to the planned manuscript as an author, please respond to all questions of the survey and do not forget to mention your name and email id on the question 1 and 2. (polarnetwork.org)
Editorial review - means the work is reviewed by one or more editors who are experts in the field and the identity of the reviewing editor(s) is not disclosed to the author(s). (tplondon.com)
The author then acts on those reviews to revise the paper for resubmission or repeat part of the study or analyses if necessary. (usm.edu)

If we do so, all the responses will be used anonymously without revealing the personal identity of anyone responding to this survey. (polarnetwork.org)
JASAL also welcomes review articles (up to 4000 words) and responses to previously published material (up to 2000 words). (edu.au)

Manuscripts of the full-length articles should be between 4000-8000 words (inclusive of works cited and endnotes - please do not use footnotes) and the Reviews must not exceed a word limit of 2000. (upenn.edu)

Articles in press are accepted, peer reviewed articles that are not yet assigned to volumes/issues, but are citable using DOI. (elsevier.es)
The label will indicate that the peer-review of articles and books has been performed in line with the quality and ethical criteria imposed by the academic community. (tsv.fi)
The label can refer to the entire volume if it only includes peer-reviewed texts or to individual articles if the volume includes both peer-reviewed and non-reviewed texts. (tsv.fi)
Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. (teknokrat.ac.id)
In addition to research articles we welcome book reviews from graduate students in their respective areas of expertise. (purdue.edu)
We will also call upon you to review and edit the technical components of articles within your area of expertise from time to time. (powersystems.technology)
Unfortunately, some articles are desk rejected prior to peer review for various reasons. (tplondon.com)

The students also write three formal manuscripts in teams of four with students from all three sections. (escholarship.org)
however, they do provide an opportunity to ask peers that you respect for their formal thoughts on scholarly contributions. (bioverlay.org)

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. (teknokrat.ac.id)
Here you become an editor and you can reserve the right to create a preface and conclusion and even include a few of your own epic manuscripts. (author-me.com)
All manuscripts are reviewed anonymously by the best partner (reviewers) appointed by the editor in his field of expertise. (unib.ac.id)
the editor is neutral in selecting and screening manuscript. (unib.ac.id)
All manuscripts will be submitted for peer-review to the Editor, who will assign it to a selected member of the Editorial Review Board, and independent outside review. (her.re.kr)
Please do not share the manuscript with any colleagues without the explicit permission of the editor. (blacktheme.net)
Once the reviews have been performed, the associate editor compiles the reviews and summarizes the contribution of the work. (bioverlay.org)

Every submitted article in our journals is reviewed by at least two experts in the subject area. (tplondon.com)

Our Peer review is designed to choose technically valid research of significant interest. (ijisem.com)
The abstract should be a single paragraph of 200 words or less that briefly describes the research question addressed, the analytical and theoretical approach, and the major findings of the manuscript. (studiapolitica.eu)
Research has shown that activities such as group projects and peer review are helpful in addressing this challenge in other contexts. (escholarship.org)
Any research institution that receives federal support for research involving human participants must have access to an institutional review board (IRB) . (pressbooks.pub)
The purpose of the IRB is to review proposals for research that involves human participants. (pressbooks.pub)
Manuscripts may cover official business of the Korean Home Economics Association (KHEA) and results of new and original research, dealing primarily with food and nutrition, clothing and textiles, children and families, family resources and consumption, and housing. (her.re.kr)
It must be stated in the manuscript that informed consent has been provided for relevant research methods. (her.re.kr)
Reviews should be objective assessments of the research. (blacktheme.net)
Start by identifying the type of manuscript (such as research, tutorial, survey, or case study). (computer.org)
It publishes original works with up to 25 pages, in the form of: Research reports, Essays, Literature reviews and Experience reports. (bvsalud.org)

Each manuscript requires an abstract of no more than 200 words. (rj4allpublications.com)

IJISEM Journals administer an effective review system. (ijisem.com)
The decision on whether to proceed to peer review in such cases is at the discretion of the journals' editors. (ac.ir)
Like academic journals, we perform peer review of scientific literature. (bioverlay.org)

Received manuscripts are validated immediately, and the decision will be taken according to the peer reviewers' comments. (ijisem.com)

Manuscript acquisition and peer review are time consuming but rewarding. (author-me.com)

Editors in the Science family greatly appreciate the time spent in preparing a review and will consult you on a revision of a manuscript only if they believe the paper has been substantially improved but still requires expert input. (blacktheme.net)

In my case, correcting common errors and inconsistencies became so repetitive that I gradually compiled recurring concerns into a single document, allowing rapid copy/paste/editing of these comments into reviews whenever needed. (uwaterloo.ca)
While there is no grade assigned based on the quality of the first version of the paper, the better this version is the more useful the peer review comments will be. (usm.edu)
editors at Science j ournals reserve the right to edit out comments that will hinder constructive discussion of manuscripts. (blacktheme.net)

The submitted manuscript should comply with the grammar rules and related scholarly literature. (idea.org.tr)
Manuscripts that do not comply with the Style Guide may be rejected by the editors. (edu.au)

Editorial Board members typically review five to ten manuscripts per year, and ad hoc reviewers are invited to review as needed. (tplondon.com)

Works cited should be included in the manuscript and not in a separate document. (upenn.edu)
Essay manuscripts must be between 4500 and 6000 words (excluding endnotes and list of works cited), double-spaced in Times New Roman 12pt. (edu.au)

The book proposals are reviewed by two external reviewers and the manuscript is reviewed by the editors. (tplondon.com)

A complete manuscript is evaluated by at least two reviewers who are competent to assess the material. (aes.org)

A paper that is resubmitted may be reviewed a second (or third) time before publishing. (usm.edu)

Instead, nonfiction publishers agree that peer review is the answer. (author-me.com)

They should cite original work or review previous work, giving proper credit. (aes.org)
Individuals who agree to referee the work are asked to review one or more aspects of the work. (bioverlay.org)
The fact that we have or have not reviewed a manuscript is not a judgement of quality or of the broad importance of the work. (bioverlay.org)
They are responsible for selecting work to review, obtaining reviews from appropriate scientists, and summarizing reviews as well as each manuscript's contributions. (bioverlay.org)

Book Series editors both screen the initial proposals and the final manuscripts. (tplondon.com)
Your grade will reflect both the quality of your reviews and the quality of your final draft. (usm.edu)

You can now anonymously share access to private media and private projects by generating temporary links if you have edit access to a media record or are a project manager. (duke.edu)
Do note that these temporary links will grant reviewers the ability to anonymously access your media or projects, but they will not hide your identity from those reviewers. (duke.edu)
It is expected that no one with access to a paper under review will make any inappropriate use of the special knowledge that access provides. (computer.org)

Do not distribute copies of a paper you have been asked to review unless the material is already public. (computer.org)

Finally, both providers blindly reviewed a video recording of each virtual exam four weeks later and rated their findings. (bvsalud.org)

Organisms2

Diseases1

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment12

Psychiatry and Psychology22

Phenomena and Processes2

Disciplines and Occupations14

Anthropology, Education, Sociology and Social Phenomena18

Technology, Industry, Agriculture1

Humanities15

Information Science38

Named Groups5

Health Care22

Publication Characteristics1

Geographicals2

Reviewer12

Process30

Submission20

Journal42

Plagiarism3

Reviewers anonymously1

Submissions7

Done anonymously1

Publication17

Either anonymously1

Guidelines3

Reviewer's3

Confidentiality1

Evaluates1

Misconduct2

Authors10

10002

Associate editors2

Double blind3

Referees2

Rejection2

Evaluate1

Publish5

Submit4

Conflicts of inter2

Papers6

Scope1

Evaluations2

Author6

Responses2

20001

Articles7

Formal2

Editor7

Article1

Research10

Abstract1

Journals3

Decision1

Acquisition1

Revision1

Comments3

Comply2

Typically1

Works Cited2

External reviewers1

Assess1

Time1

Publishers1

Work4

Final2

Access3

Copies1

Findings1