• All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). (revistaneurocirugia.com)
  • Manuscripts submitted for review are evaluated anonymously by two scholars. (studiapolitica.eu)
  • Pharmacy advances jounal uses double-blind review, which involves sending manuscripts to reviewers anonymously. (unar.ac.id)
  • Editors, authors and reviewers are required to keep confidential all details of the editorial and peer review process on submitted manuscripts. (ijisem.com)
  • Received manuscripts are validated immediately, and the decision will be taken according to the peer reviewers' comments. (ijisem.com)
  • Authors can submit manuscripts in the form of research articles or book reviews. (seabs.ac.id)
  • Revised manuscripts returned later than three months will be considered a new submission and reviewed again by other peer reviewers. (seabs.ac.id)
  • These manuscripts will be sent to at least two reviewers anonymously by applying Double Blind Peer-Review . (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • Manuscripts that have been revised can be resubmitted a maximum of 6 weeks from the time the revision has been given and attach the results of the articles that have been corrected into the system for further review directly to the Reviewer. (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • Each submitted article is read at least by an editor, for an initial review, and if it is considered to be attuned with the editorial policy and a minimum quality level, authors are invited to submit their manuscripts online via the Editorial Manager system. (skeneproject.it)
  • Suitable manuscripts are sent for peer-review anonymously in a time period of 15 days from the date of reception of the article. (lipi.go.id)
  • Manuscripts submitted to Ekonomik Yaklasim should contain original research that have neither been published nor sent for review to any type of publication. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • Join the conversation about this journal Manuscripts are not published anonymously or pseudonymously and must have no more than 3 authors. (netlify.app)
  • JID reviews all manuscripts anonymously as such we request that authors remove all identifying information (including your name, affiliation, and acknowledgments) from the manuscript, file name and footnotes. (journalofinternaldisplacement.org)
  • Authors whose manuscripts receive 1-2 review reports of 'accept with minor revisions' will be contacted by the Managing Editor with an email detailing the requested revisions and providing a link to the review reports. (edu.au)
  • Authors whose manuscripts receive 1-2 review reports of 'major revisions required' will be contacted by the Managing Editor with an email detailing the requested revisions. (edu.au)
  • Authors whose manuscripts receive 2 rejections at peer review will have their manuscript rejected. (edu.au)
  • Field Note submissions should follow the same guidelines as research articles, but not exceed 12 pages double spaced or 3,000 words. (purdue.edu)
  • Double-blind peer review is the gold standard process used to assess submissions to many academic journals and conferences. (mijrd.com)
  • All submissions are double-blind peer-reviewed by the experts in the corresponding area. (ijisem.com)
  • Submissions from the Editor-in-Chief will undergo independent peer-review and will be submitted to another Editor for his decision on acceptance. (ijisem.com)
  • All submissions are anonymously assessed by the Society's Editorial Advisory Board and at least two expert reviewers. (ed.ac.uk)
  • We can accept submissions with low-resolution images for peer review but authors will be asked to send press-ready images for publication in the journal. (ed.ac.uk)
  • Only those submissions that most likely the fulfil the journal's submission requirements will be sent to the peer reviewers. (rug.nl)
  • Submissions that do not fulfil the submission requirements will be rejected without any peer review. (rug.nl)
  • The editors ensure that all submissions are refereed anonymously by two readers in the relevant field. (salasika.org)
  • Our journal uses a journal management system that allows for any paper submitted through our Submissions page to be sent anonymously to a reviewer. (linguaculture.ro)
  • Submissions will undergo a single-blind review process (author identities are known to reviewers). (uni-kassel.de)
  • Solicited / Open Submissions, Indexed, Double Blind Peer Reviewed. (skeneproject.it)
  • All submissions will undergo a double blind peer review process by at least two reviewers. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • The Journal of Internal Displacement is a peer-review Journal as such submissions are double-blinded and subject to an internal and external review process. (journalofinternaldisplacement.org)
  • All published submissions have been anonymously reviewed by at least two referees. (edu.au)
  • All papers are reviewed anonymously by the Board members via a double-blind peer review process. (wikipedia.org)
  • Clearly, we believe that we can effectively combat undesirable prejudices in hiring since most employers do not hire based on a double-blind process. (lemire.me)
  • In addition, by submitting material to Journal of Contemporary Anthropology , the author is stipulating that the material is not currently under review at another journal (electronic or print) and that he or she will not submit the material to another journal (electronic or print) until the completion of the editorial decision process at Journal of Contemporary Anthropology . (purdue.edu)
  • In a double-blind peer review, the identities of both the reviewers and authors are concealed from each other throughout the review process. (mijrd.com)
  • The review process normally takes less than 6 weeks. (rj4allpublications.com)
  • The review process of articles will be made anonymously through the double-blind system, ensuring mutual anonymity of reviewers and authors. (uv.es)
  • By this publication approach, our peer review process will identify fraudulent data before publication. (ijisem.com)
  • Once a manuscript is submitted via EJEST's online submission process, in order to ensure consistency with the mission and focus of the publication, it is first reviewed by the editors to ensure compliance with all the requirements. (dpublication.com)
  • Upon passing the editorial stage, a manuscript is sent for a double-blind peer-review process. (dpublication.com)
  • The manuscript assessment process will be conducted by two reviewers anonymously (double-blind peer review). (seabs.ac.id)
  • The review process in this journal employs a double-blind peer-review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa. (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • In the review process, the article will be reviewed by at least two reviewers to ensure the quality of the article. (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • In the review process, the reviewers ensure the quality of the articles of its title, abstract, discussion and conclusion. (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • The time required for the manuscript review process from the reviewer's response is 3-6 weeks. (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • For example, if a submission only includes 2,000 words, whereas the minimum requirement of words is 7,000 words, the submission will not enter the peer review process and shall be rejected. (rug.nl)
  • Contributors may still request to submit their work anonymously for the peer review process, but this will not be a requirement. (xenharmonikon.org)
  • Articles will be published online when the review process is complete. (xenharmonikon.org)
  • LINGUACULTURE papers are submitted to a double blind peer-review process , in which both the authors and the reviewers remain anonymous. (linguaculture.ro)
  • Depending on the topic and the availability of external reviewers, the peer-review process may take from 2 weeks to 2 months . (linguaculture.ro)
  • The peer reviewing process will be managed exclusively by the Executive Editor or the General Editors by email and the reviews will be uploaded anonymously on the platform. (skeneproject.it)
  • Our journal employs the double-blind peer review process , in which both reviewers and authors remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process. (skeneproject.it)
  • Any identifying information is stripped from the document before the review process is initialised. (skeneproject.it)
  • The Journal strictly adheres to the rules of the double-blind review process. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • The author is informed about the result of the process of peer-reviewing by the editor who conducted the general editorial review. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • Peer reviewers help the editorial team in decision-making if required, anonymously supporting the author in raising the scientific level of the scholarly work during the process of collegial revision (double-blind review). (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • As the journal is peer-reviewed, a double-blind reviewed process will be followed. (lipi.go.id)
  • The accepted articles will be available online following the peer-reviewing process. (lipi.go.id)
  • The decision to submit in either English or Turkish does not affect the outcome of the review process or the chance that the article is accepted. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • The editors may commission additional reviews as part of the editorial process. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • To ensure that every manuscript submitted to the International Journal of Population Issues undergoes a fair, unbiased, and high-quality peer review process, the International Journal of Population Issues employs a double-blind peer review process. (litpam.com)
  • The articles that are in the process of being reviewed and not published should never be used by the editor without the written consent of the authors. (ac.ir)
  • Providing guidance to guest editors, authors, and reviewers on everything that they are expected to consider in a peer review process. (ac.ir)
  • The article review process is to be done anonymously. (ac.ir)
  • Queries about submission issues, peer review process, or the status of your manuscript should be sent to Sarvagnan Subramanian ([email protected]). (netlify.app)
  • The peer-review process ensures that articles submitted represent the best scholarship currently available. (journalofinternaldisplacement.org)
  • The review process is strictly confidential and should be treated as such by reviewers. (journalofinternaldisplacement.org)
  • The review process of AEECA2024 is double-blind. (aeeca.com)
  • The technical program committee will perform a shrinking process for the submitted paper about the scope and tracks of the conferences prior to the review process. (aeeca.com)
  • AEECA2024 guarantees that the entire peer review and publication process is meticulous and objective. (aeeca.com)
  • Journal of Waste Recycling journal employs a double-blind review process. (imedpub.com)
  • Authors who receive 1 rejection and 1 major/minor revisions will have their peer review reports assessed by the Managing Editor, who may elect to ask the author for revisions as per the process above or reject the manuscript (in consultation with the Editor-in-Chief). (edu.au)
  • If member of the Editorial Board submits an Article, a Discussion Note, or is commissioned to write a review, then s/he will not be involved, in any way, in the assessment process. (edu.au)
  • The journal is published quarterly and observes a double-blind peer-review process. (a-asr.org)
  • Reviewers should not accept reviews if anonymity is breached or a conflict of interest exists. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • Due to the journal's review policy (Double-Blind), the anonymity of the judges and authors should be maintained. (ac.ir)
  • Each submission that is sent for formal review will undergo a double-blinded peer review. (rug.nl)
  • No, each reviewer conducts an independent review and the editor synthesizes their feedback. (mijrd.com)
  • Our peer reviewer can only evaluate what the authors chose to include in the manuscript. (ijisem.com)
  • The decision of the Editorial Team will be sent to the scriptwriter along with the results of the review from the Bestari Reviewer / Partner. (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • The manuscript will be sent to the reviewer anonymously. (asasijournal.id)
  • Does the peer reviewer recommend the study for publication in the Journal? (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • In the invitation letter, the editor may ask the potential reviewer for the suggestion of an alternative reviewer, when he or she declines to review. (radenintan.ac.id)
  • If the reviews differ widely between both reviewers, the handling editor may invite an additional reviewer so as to obtain an extra opinion before making a decision. (radenintan.ac.id)
  • If the editor so decides, the manuscript is sent to the peer reviewers. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • If the author addresses these required changes, the modified manuscript is sent to the same peer reviewers again for their professional opinions. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • Authors will receive page proof for review before the manuscript is sent to the publication editor. (litpam.com)
  • Editors invite experts in the paper's research area to review based on their qualifications and past performance. (mijrd.com)
  • All contributions submitted to IJISEM journals that are selected for peer review are sent to at least one, but usually two independent reviewers, selected by the editors. (ijisem.com)
  • Acceptance of a manuscript depends on the suitability of the manuscript with the aim and scope of this journal, the assessment by editors, the recommendation of peer reviewers, and corrections by the author (according to the evaluation notes from reviewers and editors). (seabs.ac.id)
  • This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (ASASI). (asasijournal.id)
  • It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society. (asasijournal.id)
  • Issue editors are responsible for making suggestions and finding the most suitable peer-reviewers among specialists on the topic under discussion, but they are expected to consult the Editorial Board on such matters. (linguaculture.ro)
  • Even when a study has been approved by a research ethics committee or institutional review board, editors may ask authors for more detailed information about the ethics of the work. (ac.ir)
  • The decision on whether to proceed to peer review in such cases is at the discretion of the journals' editors. (ac.ir)
  • Further expert advice may be sought in case there is strong disagreement among peer reviewers and/or Editors. (skeneproject.it)
  • During general editorial review, one of the editors examines the submitted manuscript based on general requirements, namely academic suitability, morality, and uniqueness. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • Decisions on the acceptance of papers, revision of contributions, additional reviews or re-reviews and copy editing are solely the responsibility of the editors in agreement with the publisher, and are final. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • Submission of manuscript - review by the Editors for academic quality and alignment of manuscript with the scope and aims of the journal. (edu.au)
  • The peer reviewers are scholars who have expertise in biblical studies, systematic theology, and practical ministry studies. (seabs.ac.id)
  • The Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities (JISSH) aims to provide a peer-reviewed platform and authoritative source of information for the exchange of ideas and research among social sciences and humanities scholars interested in Indonesian Studies and/or Global and Area Studies within global south perspectives. (lipi.go.id)
  • When an article is submitted to the JID, the Editor-in-Chief sends it out to a minimum of 2 other scholars in the same field (the author's peers) to get their opinion on the quality of the scholarship, its relevance to the field, its appropriateness for the journal, and whether its critical analysis in rigorous enough to warrant acceptance for publication). (journalofinternaldisplacement.org)
  • Each review submission should include a CV within the uploaded document, which outlines your experience in relation to topics explored in the book. (purdue.edu)
  • Reviewers are required to provide their decision within 60 days from the submission of a paper for their review. (dpublication.com)
  • First, the manuscript will be reviewed by the editor (desk-review) based on the Submission Readiness Checklist . (seabs.ac.id)
  • The revised manuscript should be uploaded to the online submission interface by clicking "Upload File" from the Revisions section of the Review task window. (seabs.ac.id)
  • Furthermore, each submission will be reviewed by one of the senior program committee members. (uni-kassel.de)
  • Every submission reporting a research must include a statement to verify that ethics approval was sought for the study (or a statement that it was not required and why), including the name of the ethics committee(s) or institutional review board(s), the reference number/ID of the approval(s), and a statement that participants gave informed consent before participating. (ac.ir)
  • If a study has not been granted ethics committee approval prior to commencing, retrospective ethics approval usually cannot be obtained and it may not be possible to consider the submission for peer review. (ac.ir)
  • Regardless of article category, your submission will be subject to double-blind peer-review by two or more researchers with expert knowledge in the field. (netlify.app)
  • Submission To 1 st Editorial Decision Papers published in Ambio fall into four main categories: Research article, Review, Perspective, Comment. (netlify.app)
  • Each submission is anonymously reviewed by an average of three independent reviewers, to ensure the final high standard and quality of submitted papers. (aeeca.com)
  • There are four possible editorial decisions: accepted, revisions required, resubmit for review, and rejected. (seabs.ac.id)
  • The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double Blind Review). (asasijournal.id)
  • 4. Critical review of literature: analytical and critical review with original and relevant contributions to the field of psychosocial and educational processes. (bvsalud.org)
  • Some journals use single-blind reviews where authors are anonymous but reviewers are known. (mijrd.com)
  • 3. Do authors receive all the reviews? (mijrd.com)
  • Attachment 2: Anonymised Manuscript without authors' details for peer review. (rj4allpublications.com)
  • The assistant editor handling the paper will also check for comments that disclose the reviewers' identity before sending the review to authors. (unar.ac.id)
  • Neither the peer reviewers nor the authors shall be acquainted with each other to ensure personal and institutional independence. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • Review results will be made available to the authors anonymously. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • Finally, the editor reviews the results of all reviews and sends his/her final opinion to the authors. (ac.ir)
  • The reviews should be objective and neutral within a standard framework and on the other hand, the observations and judgments should be presented with solid arguments so that the authors can use them to improve the article. (ac.ir)
  • Authors, reviewers and conference Chairs will be asked to indicate their understanding and acceptance of the Publishing Policy on Conflict of Interest in Publication when items are submitted and reviewed. (aeeca.com)
  • Each article submitted is the responsibility of one member of the editorial board or of the international scientific committee, who undertakes to have it evaluated by two peers who are experts in the field and who evaluate it anonymously. (imedpub.com)
  • The journal features articles, notes, book reviews, and recent legal developments in Hong Kong as well as mainland China. (wikipedia.org)
  • In addition to research articles we welcome book reviews from graduate students in their respective areas of expertise. (purdue.edu)
  • Articles submitted to the Journal of Contemporary Anthropology will be anonymously reviewed by Ph.D. students with expertise in the corresponding subfield. (purdue.edu)
  • Articles will be subject to a preliminary review by the editorial board that will check whether the article meets the thematic and formal criteria laid down in the rules of publication. (uv.es)
  • Submitted articles are sent to editorial review and peer review. (ijisem.com)
  • All articles will be peer-reviewed double-blind and will be submitted electronically to the journal ([email protected]). (salasika.org)
  • Unlike some peer-reviewed publications, we will not be charging a fee to publish articles. (xenharmonikon.org)
  • Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. (asasijournal.id)
  • Articles by the editorial staff: double blind peer reviewed. (skeneproject.it)
  • This Section includes articles on theatre practice or practice-based research as well as shorter pieces such as artists' writings, interviews, performance and book reviews, festival reports, etc. (skeneproject.it)
  • The JISSH seeks to publish high-quality research papers, review articles, and book reviews that make a contribution to knowledge through the application and development of theories, new data exploration, and/or scientific analysis of salient policy issues. (lipi.go.id)
  • The articles submitted to this journal will be peer-reviewed by at least 2 (two) peer-reviewers and check for originality and plagiarism. (lipi.go.id)
  • We invite you to submit articles, review articles and book reviews that fit within the aims and scope of our journal. (pan.pl)
  • Folia Orientalia publishes original research articles, review articles and book reviews in English, French or German. (pan.pl)
  • Articles submitted to the journal are first reviewed by the editor or their successors. (ac.ir)
  • Reviewed articles are treated confidentially by Journal of Waste Recycling editorial board members and reviewers. (imedpub.com)
  • In addition, the reviewer's comments are also sent anonymously to the corresponding author to take the necessary actions and responses. (unar.ac.id)
  • The new Xenharmonikon moves from an informal print journal to a single-blind peer-reviewed publication. (xenharmonikon.org)
  • The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Journal of Integrated and Advanced Engineering (JIAE) is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. (asasijournal.id)
  • is a peer-reviewed publication. (skeneproject.it)
  • Each paper considered suitable is shipped to two independent peer reviewers who are experts in their field and ready to assess the precise qualities of the work. (imedpub.com)
  • The review is then submitted to the journal, with a recommendation to accept, or reject it, or else with a request for revision (usually flagged as either major or minor) before it is reconsidered. (radenintan.ac.id)
  • So why would we not want to hide the identity of the researchers during peer review despite the apparent advantages? (lemire.me)
  • Selected papers will be published in the February 2020 issue of *Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research* (Print ISSN: 1351-1610 Online ISSN: 1469-8412), an international peer-reviewed journal indexed in the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), ASSIA, and Scopus. (msu.edu)
  • Prepare your manuscript using the following order and format then click on the submit article link to create an account and upload your manuscript for review. (purdue.edu)
  • We publish research papers of theoretical and empirical nature as well as book reviews, article reviews and commentaries. (rj4allpublications.com)
  • If so, the item will be submitted to a double-blind peer review, by at least two specialists in the subject area of the article. (uv.es)
  • 2. Request significant changes in the article (which will prompt a second review by the same evaluators or by others). (uv.es)
  • The reviewers will review the submitted article that follow the guidelines and template of the journal provided. (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • Each article is subject to rigorous double-blind peer review. (pan.pl)
  • There are five sections such as original article, book review, erratum, special issue and other. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • Papers published in Ambio fall into four main categories: Research article, Review, Perspective, Comment. (netlify.app)
  • All text should be set in 12-point Times New Roman, double-spaced, left-aligned. (ed.ac.uk)
  • The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor for initial screening to the journal aims and scope and similarity level by using the Plagiarism Checker Engine. (teknokrat.ac.id)
  • Every submitted manuscript which passes this step will be checked to identify any plagiarism before being reviewed by reviewers. (asasijournal.id)
  • We expect the book chosen for review to be published within the last five years. (purdue.edu)
  • The minimum length is 5000 words, and a book review of at least 1000 words. (seabs.ac.id)
  • Peer review ensures an independent assessment and accuracy of the results described. (ijisem.com)
  • Ensures double-blind if necessary repeated peer-review of the submitted papers. (ru.lv)
  • The review should be no more than 1000 words in length. (salasika.org)
  • This section will sometimes consist of review essays on a number of recent publications in a particular field or area of relevance to the journal (1000 words). (salasika.org)
  • Correspondence related to peer-review and peer reviewers' reviews are archived by the Editor-in-chief. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • Nobody is advocating that research papers be published anonymously as a rule. (lemire.me)
  • Our Peer review is designed to choose technically valid research of significant interest. (ijisem.com)
  • EJEST is a peer-reviewed journal with a key objective to provide the academic and industrial group of people a medium for presenting original research and applications related to Engineering Science, Technology and Application. (dpublication.com)
  • It is an international open access, scholarly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal publishing theoretically innovative and methodologically diverse research in the fields of gender studies, sexualities, and feminism. (salasika.org)
  • General guidelines include one-inch margins, double spaced, 12 pt. (purdue.edu)
  • It applies the COPE Code of Conduct and Best Practice Editorial Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. (litpam.com)
  • The manuscript will either receive a desk rejection (the reason will be communicated with the author) or be sent on for peer review. (edu.au)
  • Increasingly, due to concerns with biases and homophily , journals and conferences are moving to a double-blind peer review where you have to submit your paper without disclosing your identity. (lemire.me)
  • The revised paper may be sent out for another round of reviews. (mijrd.com)
  • That means that each paper will be evaluated completely anonymously by two or more reviewers. (dpublication.com)
  • Any paper for which an SPC makes a convincing argument about how it addresses the symposium's goals will be accepted independent of the overall review score. (uni-kassel.de)
  • Review results are merged in a file as Paper Review Form . (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • Every submitted paper is reviewed anonymously by 2-3 reviewers. (ru.lv)
  • Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes so as to build a detailed point-by-point review. (radenintan.ac.id)
  • The editor further sends the generally reviewed manuscript to two academically qualified experts from the relevant branch/field of law, who then provide their professional opinions about the manuscript. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • He or she can work in conjunction with the other co-editor, members of the editorial board, peer reviewers, and experts in the field. (imedpub.com)
  • The peer-reviewers will be completely external to the editorial board and the publisher, the Universitat de València. (uv.es)
  • General editorial review. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • Note: The editorial team specifies its inability to pay remunerations for peer review, but it does issue a certificate of participation in the peer-review on request. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. (asasijournal.id)
  • The editor mediates all interactions between the author(s) and peer reviewers. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • After receiving the professional opinions of peer reviewers, the editor makes the decision regarding the publishing of the manuscript. (uni-miskolc.hu)
  • After the manuscript passes the initial assessment by the editor-in-chief, it must be assessed anonymously by two external reviewers selected by an assigned associate editor. (litpam.com)
  • The Editor-in-Chief and handling editor considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. (radenintan.ac.id)
  • However, where only minor changes were requested this follow-up review might be done by the handling editor. (radenintan.ac.id)
  • The Groningen Journal of International Law is a peer-reviewed journal. (rug.nl)
  • Journal of Integrated and Advanced Engineering (JIAE) is a peer-reviewed international journal. (asasijournal.id)
  • An electronic, international, peer-reviewed, MLA-indexed, EBSCO-distributed journal for studies in Renaissance/early modern literature & culture. (blogspot.com)
  • To be clear, what they found was the reverse of what they were expecting: blinding interviews made things slightly worse for women. (lemire.me)
  • When you submit a manuscript to a journal or to a conference, you do not know who reviews your manuscript. (lemire.me)
  • PhD students submit their thesis for review without hiding their name. (lemire.me)
  • These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. (a-asr.org)
  • But people are concerned about their reviews or the reviews of their papers being published. (lemire.me)
  • Reviewers will receive all reviews in order to re-review resubmitted papers. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)
  • Comments are sent to the author anonymously. (mijrd.com)
  • Journal of Integrated and Advanced Engineering (JIAE) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal published 2 (two) times a year, in March and September. (asasijournal.id)
  • Ekonomik Yaklasim is a double blind peer-reviewed journal that employs economics to analyze issues in business, consumer behavior, public policy, history and politics. (ekonomikyaklasim.org)