• These reviewers provided expert comments and input into the report. (canada.ca)
  • Peer reviewer comments are generally insightful and help me improve my manuscript. (editage.com)
  • The article processing charge (APC) is payable when a manuscript is accepted after peer review, before it is published. (sagepub.com)
  • First of all, I would like to thank for inviting me to review the manuscript entitled "Model Comparisons between Canonical Vine Copulas and Meta-Gaussian for Agricultural Drought Forecasting over China" for possible publication in HESS. (copernicus.org)
  • I return comments on the above-referenced manuscript. (copernicus.org)
  • Note: In order to assure a blind peer review process, the title page should be the only part of the manuscript containing author identification. (bvsalud.org)
  • While most participants appeared satisfied with the overall quality of peer reviewer comments they had encountered, many reported difficulty in addressing peer reviewer comments and unhappiness with the some aspects of how peer reviews are conducted. (editage.com)
  • Peer reviewer comments are generally clear and easy to understand. (editage.com)
  • Wherever appropriate, reviewer comments were included in the finalized guidelines published in Kidney International . (medscape.com)
  • Pediatricians participated in a HIPAA compliant blind peer review process on a web platform developed to provide the American Board of Pediatrics maintenance of certification. (ojp.gov)
  • However, it was the second most commonly desired area of change , after publication delay: poor peer review quality and processes featured in 24% of author responses to a question asking them what changes they would like to see in academic publishing. (editage.com)
  • We have acknowledged these comments and reviewed our processes in relation to this paper and relating to EQUATOR guidance in general. (virology.ws)
  • Wolters Kluwer Health, the division responsible for the Medknow journals, "is committed to rigorous adherence to the peer-review processes and policies that comply with the latest recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Association of Medical Editors," a Wolters Kluwer representative states in an e-mail. (scienceblogs.com)
  • FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. (dot.gov)
  • We review plan operations, compare plan activity to industry benchmarks, and provide input as appropriate on ways to improve internal processes and help clients evolve systems to handle new requirements. (aafcpa.com)
  • Also, the objectives are supported by participating in the process of producing scientific knowledge through participating in conferences, peer review processes, publication work and the production of a thesis. (lu.se)
  • Each case cycle is reviewed by one of four experts in child abuse who received training in a uniform evaluation process. (ojp.gov)
  • Open peer review is the various possible modifications of the traditional scholarly peer review process. (wikipedia.org)
  • Open participation: The wider community (and not just invited reviewers) are able to contribute to the review process. (wikipedia.org)
  • These modifications are supposed to address various perceived shortcomings of the traditional scholarly peer review process, in particular its lack of transparency, lack of incentives, wastefulness, bullying and harassment. (wikipedia.org)
  • This is in contrast to the traditional peer review process where reviewers remain anonymous to anyone but the journal's editors, while authors' names are disclosed from the beginning. (wikipedia.org)
  • In June 2006, Nature launched an experiment in parallel open peer review: some articles that had been submitted to the regular anonymous process were also available online for open, identified public comment. (wikipedia.org)
  • NIH needs to make life easier for everyone involved in the peer review process - a not surprising conclusion of the agency's peer review working group, which it announced today (February 21) after reviewing thousands of suggestions from stakeholders. (the-scientist.com)
  • BMJ Open not only defended publication of the paper without ethical review but, in the process of doing so, made false claims about the paper's methodology while simultaneously accusing me of disseminating misinformation. (virology.ws)
  • The internal review component involved a sequential process beginning with experts internal to Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada and expanding to other government departments (Natural Resources Canada, National Research Council, and Fisheries and Oceans Canada). (canada.ca)
  • Yesterday my former PhD advisor, Sam Madden, wrote a blog post consisting of a passionate defense for the status quo in the peer review process (though he does say that the review quality needs to be improved). (blogspot.com)
  • A few days ago, I publicly supported his fifth suggestion (eliminating the review process altogether) on Twitter. (blogspot.com)
  • The review process does the community a favor in making sure that these bad papers do not get published. (blogspot.com)
  • In resolution EB107.R8, the Board also requested the Director-General to initiate a scientific peer review of the methodology for health systems' performance as part of the technical consultation process, including updating on methodology and new data sources relevant to the performance of health systems. (who.int)
  • Then, and now, these data truly demonstrate how you, our peer reviewers, are the lifeline of the scientific process. (nih.gov)
  • Due to a large volume of submissions, CLCWeb is experiencing significant delays to the review and publication process. (purdue.edu)
  • The facilities and efficiency of the school, in addition the school was very prompt with the whole application process. (studentdoctor.net)
  • The meetings and the web forum included opportunities for public comment on the review process. (fl.us)
  • In addition to a full-time staff of 24, approximately 500 academics and professional economists participate in Heartland's peer-review process as policy advisors and more than 300 elected officials serve on its Legislative Forum. (heartland.org)
  • The only way they'd get through a review process is if there was negligible review and the papers were basically rubber-stamped. (scienceblogs.com)
  • Since then, peer review has become a predominant method of the peer review process or referee system. (bvsalud.org)
  • Once the article is considered to be adequately formatted, it will be sent to two external reviewers for evaluation (peer review process) according to the following criteria: originality, clinical and/or scientific relevance, methodology employed and analysis of results. (bvsalud.org)
  • The peer review process is blind (authors names are not disclosed). (bvsalud.org)
  • Between September and November 2021, the STAC reviewed the White Paper and other available scientific information, considered public comment, and deliberated on whether there is a reasonable basis to recommend the addition of uterine cancer to the List. (cdc.gov)
  • You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. (medscape.com)
  • Peer reviewers usually provide their feedback in a constructive and actionable way. (editage.com)
  • Judgement and approach · be able to make peer-reviews with constructive comments in oral and written form. (lu.se)
  • Stomatos publishes original articles (experimental research), literature reviews and case reports in the field of dentistry and related fields. (bvsalud.org)
  • In 2010, the BMJ began publishing signed reviewer's reports alongside accepted papers, after determining that telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted publicly did not significantly affect the quality of the reviews. (wikipedia.org)
  • This only extends the delay between submission and the actual conference by 4 months --- today there is usually an 8 month delay while papers are being reviewed, and camera-ready papers are being prepared. (blogspot.com)
  • Sam's point #3: Eliminating the review system will discourage people from working hard on their papers. (blogspot.com)
  • Authors also have the option to submit their papers for double anonymous and transparent peer review. (azocleantech.com)
  • Papers will normally be sent to two reviewers who will comment on its suitability for publication. (sal.org.uk)
  • Following peer review, authors of accepted papers or papers accepted conditionally receive from the journal readers' comments in a composite evaluation. (purdue.edu)
  • Authors of papers evaluated by readers against publication do not receive readers' comments. (purdue.edu)
  • In addition to comments on the paper following the evaluation template, readers are encouraged to suggest current scholarship for the improvement of the paper and to check for potential oversight by authors of papers with regard to the appropriate citation of sources and previous publications of similar topic/theme. (purdue.edu)
  • Students are expected to carry out a literature review using scientific databases, read scientific papers and then produce an Extended Essay on that topic. (manchester.ac.uk)
  • Synopses comprise case series papers and concise reviews of infectious diseases or closely related topics, with preference given to reviews of new and emerging diseases. (cdc.gov)
  • Updates include the addition of current, peer-reviewed scientific references. (provisioneronline.com)
  • As the scientific information and additional references provided in your Notice did not raise sufficient uncertainty or doubt in the scientific considerations underlying the proposed Order to warrant the establishment of a Board of Review, I am denying your request to establish a Board of Review. (canada.ca)
  • With regard to the non-scientific issues raised in your Notice of Objection, these are being considered alongside other comments received on the proposed Order and will be addressed in the Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement that is published with the final Order. (canada.ca)
  • The Group's report to the Director-General of its first meeting in December 2001 was presented to the Board at its 109th session in January 2002.2 The Scientific Peer Review Group has now completed its work and the executive summary of its report is annexed. (who.int)
  • The Scientific Peer Review Group on Health Systems' Performance Assessment was set up by the Director-General at the end of October 2001. (who.int)
  • Dr. Richard Nakamura is director of the NIH Center for Scientific Review . (nih.gov)
  • Last year we highlighted a new section of the NIH Data Book that provides statistics about peer review across NIH, including peer review organized by the Center of Scientific Review as well as peer review organized by NIH institutes and centers. (nih.gov)
  • During 2014 nearly 24,000 reviewers participated in more than 2,500 peer review meetings to assess the scientific and technical merit of NIH applications, and many of those reviewers participated in multiple meetings. (nih.gov)
  • Peer review service is part of a researcher's overall contribution to the scientific enterprise, and workplace incentives and evaluations are opportunities to acknowledge individuals who serve when asked. (nih.gov)
  • The bulk of the unit consists of an individual Extended Essay and an Oral Presentation on a scientific topic, and a small group peer review exercise. (manchester.ac.uk)
  • Scientific writing to enable production of a comprehensive literature review. (manchester.ac.uk)
  • After receipt of the requests, the Administrator directed the WTC Health Program's Science Team to review the available scientific evidence of an association between uterine cancer and 9/11 exposures. (cdc.gov)
  • Based on the STAC's recommendation and the scientific literature, including the White Paper, the Administrator has determined that the available information provides a sufficient evidentiary basis to propose the addition of uterine cancer to the List. (cdc.gov)
  • In addition, ACS joined with a number of leading scientific societies in June 2016 to send a letter to policymakers on the science of climate change. (acs.org)
  • ACS is a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related information and research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. (acs.org)
  • ACS does not conduct research, but publishes and publicizes peer-reviewed scientific studies. (acs.org)
  • The proposed reservation is summarized in a report that the District voluntarily had reviewed by a scientific peer review panel. (fl.us)
  • These experts reviewed all scientific or technical data, methodologies, models, and scientific and technical assumptions used to support development of the proposed reservation. (fl.us)
  • is a prestigious, peer-reviewed scientific journal that is published by the Nature Publishing Group. (lifeboat.com)
  • The goal was to create a credible but mundane scientific paper, one with such grave errors that a competent peer reviewer should easily identify it as flawed and unpublishable. (scienceblogs.com)
  • At the November 1994 ATSDR Board of Scientific Counselors meeting, the quality and appropriateness of ATSDR health studies were reviewed. (cdc.gov)
  • In addition, the Board recognized that certain types of health studies require a higher level of scientific rigor to ensure validity and reasonable precision in making inferences about cause and effect relationships. (cdc.gov)
  • journal editors in promoting good scientific writing, the rights and responsibilities of medical journal editors, peer 1. (who.int)
  • Scientific publication--which is possible to identify in the editorial flows journals that adopt peer evaluation become the preferred source of national and international scientific journals. (bvsalud.org)
  • In 2011, Peerage of Science, an independent peer review service, was launched with several non-traditional approaches to academic peer review. (wikipedia.org)
  • After the receipt and consideration of comments from the public and reviews by independent peer reviewers, the Administrator will make a final determination about whether to add uterine cancer to the List and will publish a final rule responding to the comments and peer reviews. (cdc.gov)
  • In addition, the draft Science Assessment was peer-reviewed, both internally within the Government of Canada and externally by leading experts in the field. (canada.ca)
  • The draft Science Assessment was also subject to a 90-day public comment period. (canada.ca)
  • In addition to being subjected to peer review, FDA should release the study data, and accompanying analysis, in draft form for public comment. (thecre.com)
  • CDC personnel then developed a draft document based on those reviews. (cdc.gov)
  • The rulemaking published in the Federal Register on May 10, 2022 proposes the addition of uterine cancer to the List of WTC-Related Health Conditions (List). (cdc.gov)
  • The rulemaking is available for public review and comment for 45 days beginning on May 10, 2022 and ending on June 24, 2022. (cdc.gov)
  • The study concludes that peer review with interventions customized to address quality issues improved the quality of the assessment and documentation of child sexual abuse evaluations. (ojp.gov)
  • I can assure you that in preparing the Science Assessment, the current state of science regarding plastic pollution was reviewed and the assessment presented a thorough summary of the science available in the peer-reviewed literature at the time it was written. (canada.ca)
  • You also raised concerns that the exposure scenarios in the Science Assessment of Plastic Pollution were not based on peer reviewed data. (canada.ca)
  • As described above, all references cited in the Science Assessment, including those on exposure, were peer-reviewed and validated against a set of qualitative criteria. (canada.ca)
  • In your Notice of Objection, you included a technical review of selected references in the Science Assessment, which indicated that the evidence of human health impacts of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is equivocal, and that vinyl represents a minor component of plastic pollution. (canada.ca)
  • Meetings conducted by the peer review panel occurred November 15 and 21 and December 17, 2019. (fl.us)
  • If authors can find three members of the Editorial Board who will each return a report or will themselves solicit an external review, the article will be published. (wikipedia.org)
  • In the Editage survey report , we had noted divided opinions on peer review. (editage.com)
  • In addition, ICAO took part in the UN Environment Management Group (EMG) peer review team for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and contributed to drafting the Peer Review Report of the IMF, which included recommendations and related comments. (icao.int)
  • The District prepared a response to the initial peer review report and an updated reservation report. (fl.us)
  • The review panel subsequently prepared a final peer-review report for the Governing Board. (fl.us)
  • Review the current status of medical journals in the region and outline guidelines for a successful journal, and requirements needed to be an editor or peer EMAME Taskforce Report . (who.int)
  • Findings of previous similar surveys, such as the one by the Publishing Research Consortium and the follow-up Sense about Science study, had shown that respondents from non-Anglophone countries tended to have more positive views about peer review than those from Anglophone countries. (editage.com)
  • The same is true of BMJ's unwillingness to address the problems with the 2011 school absence study in BMJ Open , which was exempted from ethical review on the false grounds that it was service evaluation and not research. (virology.ws)
  • At issue: The quality of reviews of research paper submissions in the database community is deteriorating rapidly. (blogspot.com)
  • Environmental Research: Food Systems is the latest addition to IOPP's expanding Environmental Research Series which is now made up of eight OA journals. (azocleantech.com)
  • NIH examined the peer review service records of scientists with current research project grant (RPG) support and who have received a total of $1M or more in total costs from NIH in the last 5 years. (nih.gov)
  • By encouraging NIH-funded investigators to serve on peer review and advisory groups, together we can promote a culture of sharing and service that maximizes the potential and promise of biomedical research. (nih.gov)
  • Adapting the Personal Development Review (PDR) form and guidance to research staff, in order to enable better engagement and productive career and development conversations to take place between research staff and their line managers. (qub.ac.uk)
  • Bringing together research staff interested in organising community-building events for their peers as a new Postdoc Society. (qub.ac.uk)
  • Ensuring research staff are welcomed in their School, Centre, or Faculty (postdoc induction, buddy scheme, meeting with a rep...) and provided with appropriate opportunities to network with peers, present their research (symposium, seminar. (qub.ac.uk)
  • Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) is an established peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the Three Rs - the reduction, refinement and replacement of animals in research and testing. (sagepub.com)
  • In addition to replacement, the journal also features research that aims to reduce or refine in vivo experiments that are still carried out, as well as advocating for changes to global animal use policies. (sagepub.com)
  • ATLA is a peer-reviewed journal, intended to cover all aspects of the development, validation, implementation and use of alternatives to laboratory animals in biomedical research and toxicity testing. (sagepub.com)
  • Heartland has published more than 140 peer-reviewed policy studies and scores of policy briefs, Research & Commentary collections, and booklets. (heartland.org)
  • In addition to the general introduction to ontological and epistemological debates in the social sciences, the students get acquainted with organisational tools and methodological approaches in social research including a related range of specific methods and techniques. (lu.se)
  • In addition, research involving humans should be in accordance with Resolution 196/96 of the Brazilian National Health Council or equivalent, and should provide information on the availability of written consent provided by the patient. (bvsalud.org)
  • This article presents a study that assessed the impact of interventions associated with ongoing expert peer review on the quality of child abuse medical providers' written and photograph documentation in child sexual abuse cases. (ojp.gov)
  • Among the effective interventions are those that are peer-led. (thaidietpills.com)
  • Peer-led interventions for overweight and obesity in children have been found to be effective in multiple studies. (thaidietpills.com)
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 studies found that peer-led interventions resulted in a significant reduction in body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage. (thaidietpills.com)
  • In addition, these interventions resulted in significant improvements in diet and physical activity behaviors. (thaidietpills.com)
  • The mechanisms by which peer-led interventions work are not fully understood, but may include positive peer influence, modeling of healthy behaviors, and social support. (thaidietpills.com)
  • Peer-led interventions may be a promising approach, as they are delivered by peers who are more likely to be trusted and respected by children and adolescents. (thaidietpills.com)
  • However, based on the systematic review (discussed in Appendix C) of the limited epidemiological studies and the high-quality animal studies, ATSDR concluded that hepatic and developmental effects are presumed health effects in humans. (cdc.gov)
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of peer-led programs for overweight and obesity in children. (thaidietpills.com)
  • The results were less than encouraging - only 5% of authors agreed to participate in the experiment, and only 54% of those articles received comments. (wikipedia.org)
  • The knowledge that articles were simultaneously being subjected to anonymous peer review may also have affected the uptake. (wikipedia.org)
  • With his letter submitting the CNP REDON protocol for review, Dr. Clifton D. Crutchfield included copies of two peer-reviewed articles from industrial-hygiene journals describing the accuracy and reliability of the proposed protocol (Exs. (osha.gov)
  • We are grateful to Stereophile for the opportunity to address some frequently repeated technical questions appearing in comments to articles. (stereophile.com)
  • guest-edited issues are thematically cohesive and include an introduction, articles, and if relevant, book review articles on the topic of the issue. (purdue.edu)
  • For these reviews and tables, published abstracts and peer- reviewed journal articles were considered. (cdc.gov)
  • He has published over 1300 peer-reviewed articles, with more than 300,000 citations. (medscape.com)
  • Literature review articles will be accepted exceptionally, based on the importance of the subject described. (bvsalud.org)
  • All articles submitted to Stomatos are submitted to peer review. (bvsalud.org)
  • Since this year's theme for Peer Review Week is " Quality in Peer Review ," we would like to share in some detail the author perspectives on peer review we gathered in our survey and how they varied based on region or discipline. (editage.com)
  • Towards the end of this article, we list aspects of peer review that respondents wanted changes in and pose questions to initiate discussions on review quality. (editage.com)
  • In addition, AAFCPAs' triennial peer review includes a sampling of our work in employee benefit plan quality. (aafcpa.com)
  • Members of AAFCPAs' ERISA Audit Practice are active participants with the MA Society of CPAs' ERISA Accounting & Auditing Committee and the AICPA's Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center, which allows us to learn and engage with like-minded peers and stay at the forefront of ERISA developments. (aafcpa.com)
  • In addition, the consultants evaluated the quality of evidence supporting the answers based on the number and types of studies and the quality of those studies. (cdc.gov)
  • Also in 1999, the British Medical Journal moved to an open peer review system, revealing reviewers' identities to the authors but not the readers, and in 2000, the medical journals in the open access BMC series published by BioMed Central, launched using open peer review. (wikipedia.org)
  • In February 2006, the journal Biology Direct was launched by BioMed Central, adding another alternative to the traditional model of peer review. (wikipedia.org)
  • Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC) is a peer-reviewed open access journal which focuses on the treatment of AIDS around the globe. (sagepub.com)
  • It is an exclusively on-line, open-access, and peer reviewed journal. (biomedcentral.com)
  • The journal has been criticised for not detecting these issues during editorial and peer review. (virology.ws)
  • or (2) an article published in a peer-reviewed industrial-hygiene journal describing the protocol, and explaining how test data support the accuracy and reliability of the protocol. (osha.gov)
  • The journal operates single-blind peer-review. (sal.org.uk)
  • between editor and authors is made via email, including the final comments or decision of the journal s editorial board (accepted, rejected or revisions needed). (bvsalud.org)
  • Authors have the opportunity to withdraw their article, to revise it in response to the reviews, or to publish it without revision. (wikipedia.org)
  • Overall, the paper is well written and structured, and I support the publication of this work after major revision based on the comments below. (copernicus.org)
  • Students are expected to produce a comprehensive literature review (5 pages in length) on a topic that interests them. (manchester.ac.uk)
  • 2-4 Despite this, there is limited information in the peer-reviewed literature on the behaviour of seasonal influenza outbreaks in day schools. (who.int)
  • Submissions of all types undergo peer review and the majority will require all of the components appearing in the bulleted list that follows. (cdc.gov)
  • In addition, whether there is adequate characterization of human exposure at a sufficient level to assess health effects should be determined before a health study is considered. (cdc.gov)
  • You will be writing one course paper and one exam paper, participate in seminar discussions and make a peer review. (lu.se)
  • In addition, in this letter, authors should provide clear information on the presence (or absence) of any conflicts of interest concerning publication of the submitted article. (bvsalud.org)
  • The findings of this review suggest that peer-led programs are an effective intervention for overweight and obesity in children. (thaidietpills.com)
  • RECENT FINDINGS: We present and critically review the allergenic relevance of pollen and food defensins. (bvsalud.org)
  • Open reports Open peer review may be defined as making the reviewers' reports public, instead of disclosing them to the article's authors only. (wikipedia.org)
  • citation needed] Several other journals published by the BMJ Group allow optional open peer review, as does PLoS Medicine, published by the Public Library of Science. (wikipedia.org)
  • Instead of having your paper reviewed by three people in private, every problem, every flaw in logic, every typo is immediately out there in the public for people to look at and comment on. (blogspot.com)
  • Most prominently, these include the judging and scoring of the accuracy and justifiability of peer reviews, and concurrent usage of a single peer review round by several participating journals. (wikipedia.org)
  • The conference sessions covered topics on medical from WAME, James Tumwine from FAME and Andrew journals in the Region, editorship, peer review and Herxheimer from the Cochrane Collaboration presented publications, e-journalism and indexing, medical ethics and their experience and guidance for the future of EMAME. (who.int)
  • Looking closer at the data, if one day of peer review service per year would be considered a reasonable expectation for service, then currently fewer than half of these funded scientists (45%) achieve that level of service. (nih.gov)
  • In addition, the collection of some data for certain subjects never occurred. (medscape.com)
  • In addition, 2014 data from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health found that people with opioid use disorder have a 40%-60% elevated risk for suicidal ideation compared with people who reported no opioid use disorder. (medscape.com)
  • Does peer review still work the way it is meant to? (editage.com)
  • Finally, apart from having short recaps about their own original work, these authors also comment on their work contributed to the development of the field. (biomedcentral.com)
  • In addition to the replacement of animals, it also covers work that aims to reduce the number of animals used and refine the in vivo experiments that are still carried out. (sagepub.com)
  • ATSDR staff, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) staff and other government agencies review each profile prior to that document's publication. (cdc.gov)
  • Peer review has attracted the lion's share of attention in recent discussions around whether the academic publishing system is broken. (editage.com)
  • A system which passed through known-good or known-included licenses but flagged new ones or unapproved ones for manual review would be fine. (mozilla.org)
  • Historians of science such as Zuckerman and Merton (1971) analysis, carried out by the editorial team (desk review), which suggest that the idea of peer review/evaluation is old, probably has the prerogative to refuse manuscripts. (bvsalud.org)
  • To ensure authors' anonymity following standards of double-blind peer review, the abstract and the text of the paper must not indicate the name and/or institution of the author. (purdue.edu)
  • In addition, a web forum was also established for peer review panel communication. (fl.us)
  • The peer review panel, consisting of Darcy Bullock of Purdue University, Dan Middleton of Texas Transportation Institute, and Tom Urbanik of the University of Tennessee, provided peer review and advice based on their use and testing of sensors. (dot.gov)
  • also publishes reviews, news, and commentary on significant developments in the photonics field. (lifeboat.com)
  • When we asked respondents to rank eight problems in academic publishing according to the urgency with which they need to be addressed, peer review did not feature among the top five. (editage.com)
  • As is standard in U.S. scholarship, peer review is performed on a voluntary basis as part of a scholar's academic profile. (purdue.edu)
  • So with service in mind, today we published an NIH Guide Notice reiterating our expectation that NIH-supported PIs will serve as reviewers when asked and calling on awardee institutions to encourage their researchers in accepting invitations to serve on peer review and advisory groups. (nih.gov)
  • It seems we need a review committee at least for that. (blogspot.com)
  • There are quarterly scheduled peer committee reviews of the NCC for planned updates. (nets.org.au)
  • In addition, specific questions about the protocol are given below. (cdc.gov)
  • Several studies and some large-scale global surveys focusing on peer review have been conducted over the past ten years in attempts to answer these questions, and these have shed light on how different aspects of peer review are perceived by authors and peer reviewers. (editage.com)
  • Reviewed questions online and practiced with my peers. (studentdoctor.net)
  • Please use this form to submit your questions or comments on how to make this article more useful to clinicians. (medscape.com)
  • Some MIT students created a computer-generated paper accepted to a non-reviewed session of the Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics conference. (computationalcomplexity.org)
  • When other cancer types were added to the List in 2012 and subsequent years, insufficient evidence was found to support the addition of uterine cancer under the WTC Health Program's Policy and Procedures for Adding Types of Cancer to the List of WTC-Related Health Conditions . (cdc.gov)
  • Explore these technologies yourself and read what has been written about them in peer-reviewed and other publications, * understand how these systems relate to your learning goals * construct your assignments to align with learning goals and the availability of these systems, and * include an explicit policy regarding AI/LLM assistance in your syllabus. (mitadmissions.org)
  • This may include publishing the rest of the peer review history, i.e. the authors' replies and editors' recommendations. (wikipedia.org)
  • If the authors proceed with publication of their article despite critical comments, readers can clearly see any negative comments along with the names of the reviewers. (wikipedia.org)
  • In addition, we have received clarifications from the authors which are under editorial consideration. (virology.ws)
  • Well, if you want to engineer something to make it less manual, I'm not going to stop you :-) But the idea of random bits of code with random licenses ending up in Firefox without review is not a winner. (mozilla.org)
  • Whenever conflictive comments/decisions are received from the two reviewers, the editor will make the final decision. (bvsalud.org)
  • The third and final cycle includes summary comments from the reviewer. (ojp.gov)
  • The protocol affects, in addition to general industry, OSHA respiratory protection standards for shipyard employment and construction. (osha.gov)
  • Gastrointestinal symptoms, in addition to constitutional and respiratory symptoms, were common. (who.int)
  • Commenting is limited to medical professionals. (medscape.com)
  • In addition to understanding the immune response and clinical symptoms, allergy diagnosis and management depend strongly on the precise identification of the elicitors of the IgE-mediated allergic reaction. (bvsalud.org)
  • In addition to the published KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hepatitis in CKD, there are 3 additional global clinical practice guidelines in nephrology currently under development. (medscape.com)
  • In addition, the working group suggested that amended applications lose their "special status," and be considered as "new", meaning applicants no longer need to respond to or incorporate reviewers' suggestions, and reviewers no longer have to look over previous reviewers' comments. (the-scientist.com)
  • To help aid in evaluating the level of performance, external benchmarking and peer-group comparison may be used. (medscape.com)
  • In addition to amending the Standard to include the CNP REDON protocol, this rulemaking makes several editorial and non-substantive technical revisions to the Standard associated with the CNP REDON protocol and the previously approved CNP protocol. (osha.gov)
  • Open reports: Review reports are published alongside the relevant article (rather than being kept confidential). (wikipedia.org)
  • Open participation Open peer review may be defined as allowing self-selected reviewers to comment on an article, rather than (or in addition to) having reviewers who are selected by the editors. (wikipedia.org)
  • If you are submitting an essay for consideration, it may take up to a year or more to receive peer-review comments. (purdue.edu)