Bladder-wall and pelvic-plexus stimulation with model microstimulators: Preliminary observations.
(49/220)
Severe urinary retention is not a common condition, but may occur following some pelvic surgeries or other medical conditions. Electrical stimulation of the bladder has been examined as a means of managing this difficult problem. We conducted preliminary investigations in cats to prove the hypothesis that pelvic-plexus (bladder-neck) stimulation would produce greater micturition response with reduced side effects, such as animal movement or discomfort, than bladder-wall stimulation with electrodes implanted higher on the bladder wall. We used model microstimulators that mimic the look and function of commercial microstimulators, but that we constructed. We instrumented four female cats during a survival surgery. Animals recovered well and studies were conducted over a 1-month period in the conscious animal and under anesthesia. We performed a variety of studies with different stimulation parameters and electrode locations to evaluate our hypothesis. In the active animal, we supplied only low currents, but two animals responded to stimulation with bladder contractions and voiding. Following anesthesia, higher stimulating currents resulted in greater bladder contractions during stimulation in two of the three animals. In two cases, pelvic-plexus (bladder-neck) stimulation induced greater micturition responses than direct bladder-wall stimulation. In conclusion, we learned from these preliminary observations that stimulation at the pelvic plexus (bladder neck) may induce a better micturition response than stimulation higher on the bladder-wall. Newly available commercial microstimulators should be further studied for the treatment of urinary retention. (+info)
Intermittent bladder urinary retention in a young woman. An unusual presentation of partial urethral duplication.
(50/220)
A singular case of female accessory urethra associated to a mobile bladder stone with an unusual clinical presentation is reported. The role of perineal ultrasound is emphasized as a useful diagnostic tool to study female urethra in a static and dynamic setting, including cases of partial or complete urethral duplication. (+info)
Moderately T2-weighted images obtained with the single-shot fast spin-echo technique: differentiating between malignant and benign urinary obstructions.
(51/220)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a distinction could be made between benign and malignant urinary obstructions in moderately T(2)-weighted images obtained with the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Forty-four lesions in 39 patients with urinary obstruction were evaluated with the single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) technique with an effective TE of 90-100 ms and without fat saturation. Benign and malignant lesions were compared for the presence of ureteral wall thickening and a signal intensity relative to the proximal ureteral wall. Statistically significant differences were found between benign and malignant lesions in both morphologic change (P<0.0001) and signal intensity of the lesions at the obstruction position (P<0.0001). The combination of wall thickening and increased signal intensity as a predictor of malignant disease yielded a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 100%. Neither increased signal intensity nor wall thickening as a predictor of benign disease yielded a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 88%. The moderately T(2)-weighted SSFSE technique without fat saturation can accurately distinguish between benign and malignant urinary obstructions. (+info)
Recurrent prostatic stromal tumour of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) presenting with urinary retention 6 Years after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP).
(52/220)
CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old Chinese male with previously diagnosed prostatic stromal tumour of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP) presented with urinary retention 6 years after transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: Cystoscopy showed a papillary tumour of the prostatic urethra causing near-complete obstruction. Repeat TURP was performed. He has been asymptomatic since. CONCLUSION: There has been fewer than 100 cases of this lesion reported worldwide. Definitive treatment is not well established. Longterm follow-up to monitor progression and possible recurrence is required, and repeat TURP or radical surgery may be necessary. (+info)
Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention. Evidence from published data.
(53/220)
This review examines the evidence from published data concerning the tolerability (indicated by the incidence of nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention), of three analgesic techniques after major surgery; intramuscular analgesia (i.m.), patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and epidural analgesia. A MEDLINE search of publications concerned with the management of postoperative pain and these indicators identified over 800 original papers and reviews. Of these, data were extracted from 183 studies relating to postoperative nausea and vomiting, 89 relating to sedation, 166 relating to pruritus, and 94 relating to urinary retention, giving pooled data which represent a total of more than 100,000 patients. The overall mean (95% CI) incidence of nausea was 25.2 (19.3-32.1)% and of emesis was 20.2 (17.5-23.2)% for all three analgesic techniques. PCA was associated with the highest incidence of nausea but the emesis was unaffected by analgesic technique. There was considerable variability in the criteria used for defining sedation. The overall mean for mild sedation was 23.9 (23-24.8)% and for excessive sedation was 2.6 (2.3-2.8)% for all three analgesic techniques (significantly lower with epidural analgesia). The overall mean incidence of pruritus was 14.7 (11.9-18.1)% for all three analgesic techniques (lowest with i.m. analgesia). Urinary retention occurred in 23.0 (17.3-29.9)% of patients (highest with epidural analgesia). The incidence of nausea and excessive sedation decreased over the period 1980-99, but the incidence of vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention did not. From these published data it is possible to set standards of care after major surgery for nausea 25%, vomiting 20%, minor sedation 24%, excessive sedation 2.6%, pruritus 14.7%, and urinary retention requiring catheterization 23%. Acute Pain Services should aim for incidences less than this standard of care. (+info)
Acute urinary retention secondary to carcinoma of the prostate. Is initial channel TURP beneficial?
(54/220)
Over a 2-year period patients presenting with acute urinary retention secondary to locally advanced prostate carcinoma (stage T3/T4) were randomized to one of two treatments. Ten patients underwent channel transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and bilateral orchidectomy, 12 patients underwent bilateral orchidectomy alone. Treatment by channel TURP and bilateral orchidectomy was complicated by difficulties in voiding in four patients, one requiring a further TURP. Ten of the 12 patients were voiding well one month following bilateral orchidectomy alone. Only two patients in this group required TURP. In patients with acute urinary retention secondary to prostate carcinoma, in whom hormonal manipulation is thought appropriate due to bulk of local tumour or metastatic disease, channel TURP may confer extra morbidity and therefore be held in reserve for those patients unable to void after hormonal manipulation. (+info)
Recurrent vesicourethal stenosis after radical prostatectomy: how to treat it?
(55/220)
Vesicourethral anastomotic stricture and urinary incontinence are severe complications of radical prostatectomy because they cause great impact in the quality of life. Three patients that presented these complications after prostate radical surgery were assessed retrospectively. To treat the stenosis of the vesicourethral anastomosis an urolume was placed and later on, an artificial sphincter AMS 800 was implanted to treat the resulting urinary incontinence. (+info)
A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
(56/220)
Epidural analgesia is considered by many to be the best method of pain relief after major surgery. It is used routinely in many thoracic surgery centres. Although effective, side-effects include hypotension, urinary retention, incomplete (or failed) block, and, in rare cases, paraplegia. Paravertebral block (PVB) is an alternative technique that may offer comparable analgesic effectiveness and a better side-effect profile. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of all relevant randomized trials comparing PVB with epidural analgesia in thoracic surgery. Data were abstracted and verified by both authors. Studies were tested for heterogeneity, and meta-analyses were done with random effects or fixed effects models. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was used for numerical outcomes and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes, both with 95% CI. We identified 10 trials that had enrolled 520 thoracic surgery patients. All of the trials were small (n<130) and none were blinded. There was no significant difference between PVB and epidural groups for pain scores at 4-8, 24 or 48 h, WMD 0.37 (95% CI: -0.5, 121), 0.05 (-0.6, 0.7), -0.04 (-0.4, 0.3), respectively. Pulmonary complications occurred less often with PVB, OR 0.36 (0.14, 0.92). Urinary retention, OR 0.23 (0.10, 0.51), nausea and vomiting, OR 0.47 (0.24, 0.53), and hypotension, OR 0.23 (0.11, 0.48), were less common with PVB. Rates of failed block were lower in the PVB group, OR 0.28 (0.2, 0.6). PVB and epidural analgesia provide comparable pain relief after thoracic surgery, but PVB has a better side-effect profile and is associated with a reduction in pulmonary complications. PVB can be recommended for major thoracic surgery. (+info)