Differential incorporation of uracil DNA glycosylase UNG2 into HIV-1, HIV-2, and SIV(MAC) viral particles. (65/428)

We have previously reported that the host uracil DNA glycosylase UNG2 enzyme is incorporated into HIV-1 virions via a specific association with the viral integrase (IN) domain of Gag-Pol precursor. In this study, we investigated whether UNG2 was packaged into two phylogenetically closely related primate lentiviruses, HIV-2(ROD) and SIV(MAC239). We demonstrated by GST-pull-down and coprecipitation assays that INs from HIV-1, HIV-2(ROD), and SIV(MAC239) associated with UNG2, although the interaction of UNG2 with HIV-2(ROD) IN and SIV(MAC239) IN was less strong than with HIV-1 IN. We then showed by Western blotting that highly purified HIV-2 and SIV(MAC) viral particles did not incorporate host UNG2, contrasting with the presence of UNG2 in HIV-1 viral particles. Finally, we showed that HIV-1/SIV chimeric viruses in which residues 6 to 202 of HIV-1 IN were replaced by the SIV counterpart were impaired for packaging of UNG2, indicating that the incorporation of host UNG2 into viral particles is the hallmark of the HIV-1 strain. Moreover, we found that HIV-1/SIV IN chimeric viruses were deficient for viral propagation.  (+info)

Importance of uracil DNA glycosylase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mycobacterium smegmatis, G+C-rich bacteria, in mutation prevention, tolerance to acidified nitrite, and endurance in mouse macrophages. (66/428)

Uracil DNA glycosylase (Ung (or UDG)) initiates the excision repair of an unusual base, uracil, in DNA. Ung is a highly conserved protein found in all organisms. Paradoxically, loss of this evolutionarily conserved enzyme has not been seen to result in severe growth phenotypes in the cellular life forms. In this study, we chose G+C-rich genome containing bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mycobacterium smegmatis) as model organisms to investigate the biological significance of ung. Ung deficiency was created either by expression of a highly specific inhibitor protein, Ugi, and/or by targeted disruption of the ung gene. We show that abrogation of Ung activity in P. aeruginosa and M. smegmatis confers upon them an increased mutator phenotype and sensitivity to reactive nitrogen intermediates generated by acidified nitrite. Also, in a mouse macrophage infection model, P. aeruginosa (Ung-) shows a significant decrease in its survival. Infections of the macrophages with M. smegmatis show an initial increase in the bacterial counts that remain for up to 48 h before a decline. Interestingly, abrogation of Ung activity in M. smegmatis results in nearly a total abolition of their multiplication and a much-decreased residency in macrophages stimulated with interferon gamma. These observations suggest Ung as a useful target to control growth of G+C-rich bacteria.  (+info)

A novel uracil-DNA glycosylase family related to the helix-hairpin-helix DNA glycosylase superfamily. (67/428)

Cytosine bases can be deaminated spontaneously to uracil, causing DNA damage. Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG), a ubiquitous uracil-excising enzyme found in bacteria and eukaryotes, is one of the enzymes that repair this kind of DNA damage. To date, no UDG-coding gene has been identified in Methanococcus jannaschii, although its entire genome was deciphered. Here, we have identified and characterized a novel UDG from M.jannaschii designated as MjUDG. It efficiently removed uracil from both single- and double-stranded DNA. MjUDG also catalyzes the excision of 8-oxoguanine from DNA. MjUDG has a helix-hairpin-helix motif and a [4Fe-4S]-binding cluster that is considered to be important for the DNA binding and catalytic activity. Although MjUDG shares these features with other structural families such as endonuclease III and mismatch-specific DNA glycosylase (MIG), unique conserved amino acids and substrate specificity distinguish MjUDG from other families. Also, a homologous member of MjUDG was identified in Aquifex aeolicus. We report that MjUDG belongs to a novel UDG family that has not been described to date.  (+info)

Enzymology of base excision repair in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum. (68/428)

DNA of all living organisms is constantly modified by exogenous and endogenous reagents. The mutagenic threat of modifications such as methylation, oxidation, and hydrolytic deamination of DNA bases is counteracted by base excision repair (BER). This process is initiated by the action of one of several DNA glycosylases, which removes the aberrant base and thus initiates a cascade of events that involves scission of the DNA backbone, removal of the baseless sugar-phosphate residue, filling in of the resulting single nucleotide gap, and ligation of the remaining nick. We were interested to find out how the BER process functions in hyperthermophiles, organisms growing at temperatures around 100 degrees C, where the rates of these spontaneous reactions are greatly accelerated. In our previous studies, we could show that the crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum has at least three uracil-DNA glycosylases, Pa-UDGa, Pa-UDGb, and Pa-MIG, that can initiate the BER process by catalyzing the removal of uracil residues arising through the spontaneous deamination of cytosines. We now report that the genome of P. aerophilum encodes also the remaining functions necessary for BER and show that a system consisting of four P. aerophilum encoded enzymes, Pa-UDGb, AP endonuclease IV, DNA polymerase B2, and DNA ligase, can efficiently repair a G.U mispair in an oligonucleotide substrate to a G.C pair. Interestingly, the efficiency of the in vitro repair reaction was stimulated by Pa-PCNA1, the processivity clamp of DNA polymerases.  (+info)

The base substitution fidelity of DNA polymerase beta-dependent single nucleotide base excision repair. (69/428)

Damaged DNA bases are removed from mammalian genomes by base excision repair (BER). Single nucleotide BER requires several enzymatic activities, including DNA polymerase and 5',2'-deoxyribose-5-phosphate lyase. Both activities are intrinsic to four human DNA polymerases whose base substitution error rate during gap-filling DNA synthesis varies by more than 10,000-fold. This suggests that BER fidelity could vary over a wide range in an enzyme dependent manner. To investigate this possibility, here we describe an assay to measure the fidelity of BER reactions reconstituted with purified enzymes. When human uracil DNA glycosylase, AP endonuclease, DNA polymerase beta, and DNA ligase 1 replace uracil opposite template A or G, base substitution error rates are +info)

Suppressed catalytic activity of base excision repair enzymes on rotationally positioned uracil in nucleosomes. (70/428)

The majority of DNA in eukaryotic cells exists in the highly condensed structural hierarchy of chromatin, which presents a challenge to DNA repair enzymes in that recognition, incision, and restoration of the original sequence at most sites must take place within these structural constraints. To test base excision repair (BER) activities on chromatin substrates, an in vitro system was developed that uses human uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), apyrimidinic/apurinic endonuclease (APE), and DNA polymerase beta (pol beta) on homogeneously damaged, rotationally positioned DNA in nucleosomes. We find that UDG and APE carry out their combined catalytic activities with reduced efficiency on nucleosome substrates ( approximately 10% of that on naked DNA). Furthermore, these enzymes distinguish between two different rotational settings of the lesion on the histone surface, showing a 2- to 3-fold difference in activity between uracil facing "toward" and "away from" the histones. However, UDG and APE will digest such substrates to completion in a concentration-dependent manner. Conversely, the synthesis activity of pol beta is inhibited completely by nucleosome substrates and is independent of enzyme concentration. These results suggest that the first two steps of BER, UDG and APE, may occur "unassisted" in chromatin, whereas downstream factors in this pathway (i.e., pol beta) may require nucleosome remodeling for efficient DNA BER in at least some regions of chromatin in eukaryotic cells.  (+info)

Structure and specificity of the vertebrate anti-mutator uracil-DNA glycosylase SMUG1. (71/428)

Cytosine deamination is a major promutagenic process, generating G:U mismatches that can cause transition mutations if not repaired. Uracil is also introduced into DNA via nonmutagenic incorporation of dUTP during replication. In bacteria, uracil is excised by uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDG) related to E. coli UNG, and UNG homologs are found in mammals and viruses. Ung knockout mice display no increase in mutation frequency due to a second UDG activity, SMUG1, which is specialized for antimutational uracil excision in mammalian cells. Remarkably, SMUG1 also excises the oxidation-damage product 5-hydroxymethyluracil (HmU), but like UNG is inactive against thymine (5-methyluracil), a chemical substructure of HmU. We have solved the crystal structure of SMUG1 complexed with DNA and base-excision products. This structure indicates a more invasive interaction with dsDNA than observed with other UDGs and reveals an elegant water displacement/replacement mechanism that allows SMUG1 to exclude thymine from its active site while accepting HmU.  (+info)

Complexes of the uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor protein, Ugi, with Mycobacterium smegmatis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis uracil-DNA glycosylases. (72/428)

Uracil, a promutagenic base, appears in DNA either by deamination of cytosine or by incorporation of dUMP by DNA polymerases. This unconventional base in DNA is removed by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG). Interestingly, a bacteriophage-encoded short polypeptide, UDG inhibitor (Ugi), specifically inhibits UDGs by forming a tight complex. Three-dimensional structures of the complexes of Ugi with UDGs from Escherichia coli, human and herpes simplex virus have shown that two of the structural elements in Ugi, the hydrophobic pocket and the beta1-edge, establish key interactions with UDGs. In this report the characterization of complexes of Ugi with UDGs from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a pathogenic bacterium, and Mycobacterium smegmatis, a widely used model organism for the former, is described. Unlike the E. coli (Eco) UDG-Ugi complex, which is stable to treatment with 8 M urea, the mycobacterial UDG-Ugi complexes dissociate in 5-6 M urea. Furthermore, the Ugi from the complexes of mycobacterial UDGs can be exchanged by the DNA substrate. Interestingly, while EcoUDG sequestered Ugi into the EcoUDG-Ugi complex when incubated with mycobacterial UDG-Ugi complexes, even a large excess of mycobacterial UDGs failed to sequester Ugi from the EcoUDG-Ugi complex. However, the M. tuberculosis (Mtu) UDG-Ugi complex was seen when MtuUDG was incubated with M. smegmatis (Msm) UDG-Ugi or EcoUDG(L191G)-Ugi complexes. The reversible nature of the complexes of Ugi with mycobacterial UDGs (which naturally lack some of the structural elements important for interaction with the beta1-edge of Ugi) and with mutants of EcoUDG (which are deficient in interaction with the hydrophobic pocket of Ugi) highlights the significance of both classes of interaction in formation of UDG-Ugi complexes. Furthermore, it is shown that even though mycobacterial UDG-Ugi complexes dissociate in 5-6 M urea, Ugi is still a potent inhibitor of UDG activity in mycobacteria.  (+info)