When do developing countries adopt managed care policies and technologies? Part I: Policies, experience, and a framework of preconditions.
(25/316)
OBJECTIVE: For developing countries with constrained economic resources, managed care holds out the promise of being able to control healthcare costs and reduce unnecessary utilization. However, little empirical evidence has been gathered about when managed care techniques can be applied to these countries and no framework considers the macroeconomic context. We propose a straightforward method to evaluate the economic and policy environment of a developing country to assess when managed care might be introduced. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Analysis of available developing country health system and healthcare spending data, review of the available literature, and authors' experience evaluating healthcare reforms in developing countries. RESULTS: Many countries have implemented managed care techniques, which are driven by policy efforts to increase quality or to control costs. Successful implementation of managed care, however, appears to depend on five major preconditions. One precondition is an adequately developed formal wage sector in which patients have a sufficient ability to pay for healthcare services. Another is an adequate labor supply of trained professionals to support managed care administration, foster competition, and use available information technology. CONCLUSIONS: Although managed care encompasses a range of incentives and arrangements, implementation in developing countries appears to depend on attaining macroeconomic preconditions. (+info)
Assessing population health care need using a claims-based ACG morbidity measure: a validation analysis in the Province of Manitoba.
(26/316)
OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of an Adjusted Clinical Group (ACG)-based morbidity measure to assess the overall health service needs of populations. Data Sources/Study Setting. Three population-based secondary data sources: registration and health service utilization data from fiscal year 1995-1996; mortality data from vital statistics reports from 1996-1999; and Canadian census data. The study included all continuously enrolled residents in the universal health care plan in Manitoba. STUDY DESIGN: Using 60 small geographic areas as the units of analysis, we compared a population-based "ACG morbidity index," derived from individual ACG assignments in fiscal year 1995-1996, with the standardized mortality ratio (ages < 75 years) for 1996-1999. Key variables included a population-based socioeconomic status measure and age- and sex-standardized physician utilization ratios. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: The ACGs were assigned based on the complement of diagnoses assigned to persons on physician claims and hospital separation abstracts. The ACG index was created by weighting the ACGs using average health care expenditures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The ACG morbidity index had a strong positive linear relationship with the subsequent rate of premature death in the small areas of Manitoba. The ACG index was able to explain the majority of the relationships between mortality and both socioeconomic status and physician utilization. CONCLUSIONS: In Manitoba, ACGs are closely related to premature mortality, commonly accepted as the best single indicator for health service need in populations. Issues in applying ACGs in settings where needs adjustment is a primary objective are discussed. (+info)
Health care reform: lessons from Canada.
(27/316)
Although Canadian health care seems to be perennially in crisis, access, quality, and satisfaction in Canada are relatively high, and spending is relatively well controlled. The Canadian model is built on a recognition of the limits of markets in distributing medically necessary care. Current issues in financing and delivering health care in Canada deserve attention. Key dilemmas include intergovernmental disputes between the federal and provincial levels of government and determining how to organize care, what to pay for (comprehensiveness), and what incentive structures to put in place for payment. Lessons for the United States include the importance of universal coverage, the advantages of a single payer, and the fact that systems can be organized on a subnational basis. (+info)
Universal health care: lessons from the British experience.
(28/316)
Britain's National Health Service (NHS) was established in the wake of World War II amid a broad consensus that health care should be made available to all. Yet the British only barely succeeded in overcoming professional opposition to form the NHS out of the prewar mixture of limited national insurance, various voluntary insurance schemes, charity care, and public health services. Success stemmed from extraordinary leadership, a parliamentary system of government that gives the winning party great control, and a willingness to make major concessions to key stakeholders. As one of the basic models emulated worldwide, the NHS-in both its original form and its current restructuring-offers a number of relevant lessons for health reform in the United States. (+info)
The health care system under French national health insurance: lessons for health reform in the United States.
(29/316)
The French health system combines universal coverage with a public-private mix of hospital and ambulatory care and a higher volume of service provision than in the United States. Although the system is far from perfect, its indicators of health status and consumer satisfaction are high; its expenditures, as a share of gross domestic product, are far lower than in the United States; and patients have an extraordinary degree of choice among providers. Lessons for the United States include the importance of government's role in providing a statutory framework for universal health insurance; recognition that piecemeal reform can broaden a partial program (like Medicare) to cover, eventually, the entire population; and understanding that universal coverage can be achieved without excluding private insurers from the supplementary insurance market. (+info)
Insights from health care in Germany.
(30/316)
German Statutory Health Insurance (national health insurance) has remained relatively intact over the past century, even in the face of governmental change and recent reforms. The overall story of German national health insurance is one of political compromise and successful implementation of communitarian values. Several key lessons from the German experience can be applied to the American health care system. (+info)
Health reform in Brazil: lessons to consider.
(31/316)
US analysts and decisionmakers interested in comparative health policy typically turn to European perspectives, but Brazil-notwithstanding its far smaller gross domestic product and lower per capita health expenditures and technological investments-offers an example with surprising relevance to the US health policy context. Not only is Brazil comparable to the United States in size, racial/ethnic and geographic diversity, federal system of government, and problems of social inequality. Within the health system the incremental nature of reforms, the large role of the private sector, the multitiered patchwork of coverage, and the historically large population excluded from health insurance coverage resonate with health policy challenges and developments in the United States. (+info)
Health care reform in South Korea: success or failure?
(32/316)
South Korea is one of the world's most rapidly industrializing countries. Along with industrialization has come universal health insurance. Within the span of 12 years, South Korea went from private voluntary health insurance to government-mandated universal coverage. Since 1997, with the intervention of the International Monetary Fund, Korean national health insurance (NHI) has experienced deficits and disruption. However, there are lessons to be drawn for the United States from the Korean NHI experience. (+info)