Early experience with simulated trauma resuscitation.
(1/81)
Although trauma resuscitation is best taught through direct exposure with hands-on experience, the opportunities for this type of teaching in Canada are limited by the relatively low incidence of serious injury and the consolidation of trauma care to a small number of centres. Simulators have been used extensively outside the health care environment and more recently have been used by anesthetists to simulate intraoperative crises. In this paper early experience using a realistic mannequin, controlled by a remote computer, that simulates a variety of physiologic and injury specific variables is presented. The resource implications of simulated resuscitation are reviewed, including one-time and operating costs. Simulated trauma resuscitation may be an educational alternative to "real-life" trauma resuscitation, but careful evaluation of the benefits and resource implications of this type of teaching through well-designed research studies will be important. (+info)
Design and implementation of a training programme for general practitioners in emergency surgery and obstetrics in precarious situations in Ethiopia.
(2/81)
Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) has been implementing medical assistance programs in Ethiopia since 1994, including the rehabilitation of health structures and the supply of drugs and medical equipment. In 1995, the serious shortage of surgeons in Ethiopia prompted MSF to add a programme to train general practitioners to perform surgery in the Woldya region. The results of the relevant feasibility study were encouraging. The programme's design is based on recent educational data and MSF's experience with introducing transcultural training in countries where unstable conditions prevail. The training programme is currently being studied by the Ethiopian Health Ministry for use as a model for training general practitioners in surgery throughout the country. (+info)
Watson Jones Lecture. The organisation of trauma services in the UK.
(3/81)
To provide a high level of orthopaedic trauma care, education and research, across the country, trauma services in the UK require modification. Good information is necessary prior to formulating ideas and proposals. Trauma care provision must be considered comprehensively at both the national and local levels. As a first step, it is important to know just how many acute hospitals there are in the country. It is also important to know about the distribution of surgical specialities and the number of consultant orthopaedic surgeons staffing those hospitals. (+info)
Optimal use of resources for the treatment and prevention of injuries.
(4/81)
Injuries are an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Although accidental injury rates have been declining throughout the twentieth century in the UK, this pattern has been variable. For example, in young adults aged 15-24 years there has been no improvement and, when deliberate injuries are included, the picture is worsening. Although there is little evidence that road traffic accident case fatality rates have been improving, there is some evidence that improvements in trauma care have been responsible for reducing injury death rates in children. Thus, although there have been considerable successes in the primary prevention of accidents, and the secondary prevention of injuries in accidents, there is an important role for tertiary prevention, that is in the prevention of avoidable outcomes through good trauma care. (+info)
Organisation of hospital responses for the trauma epidemic.
(5/81)
The caseload of the Department of Surgery (Baragwanath Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa) is characterised by a singularly heavy trauma component. Penetrating injuries account for the majority of cases. The management of penetrating trauma is not as demanding as that of blunt trauma, yet the sheer number of cases, over the past four decades, has imposed a clinical burden that has never been met by commensurate resources. The organisation of the hospital and departmental responses has manifested itself on two different levels. The first one is the structural and functional deployment of insufficient staff, facilities and equipment to cope as flexibly as possible with the trauma epidemic. The second one is the gradual adaptation of the clinical management philosophy to ensure that the best possible quality of care is provided to the majority of trauma victims, with the full knowledge that better resources would sometimes have elicited a different clinical approach. (+info)
What do trainees think about advanced trauma life support (ATLS)?
(6/81)
Advanced trauma life support (ATLS) has become a desirable or even essential part of training for many surgeons and anaesthetists, but aspects of the ATLS course have attracted criticism. In the absence of published data on the views of trainees, this study sought their opinions in a structured questionnaire, which was completed by trainees in accident and emergency (A & E) (26), anaesthetic (82), general surgical (26), orthopaedic (42) and other (5) posts in different hospitals (response rate 66%). Of the trainees, 78% had done an ATLS course and, of these, 83% considered ATLS a 'major advantage' or 'essential' for practising their proposed specialty--100% for A & E, 94% for orthopaedics, 92% for general surgery, and 75% for anaesthetics. ATLS was considered a major curriculum vitae (CV) advantage by 94%, 85%, 50%, and 45%, respectively. Over 90% had positive attitudes towards ATLS, and 74% selected 'genuine improvement of management of trauma patients' as the most important reason for doing the course: 93% thought ATLS saved lives. Of the respondents, 83% thought that all existing consultants dealing with trauma patients should have done the course, and 41% thought it offered major advantages to doctors not involved in trauma. Funding problems for ATLS courses had been experienced by 14% trainees. This survey has shown that most trainees view ATLS positively. They believe that it provides genuine practical benefit for patients, and very few regard ATLS primarily as a career advantage or mandate. (+info)
Paediatric prehospital care: postal survey of paramedic training managers.
(7/81)
BACKGROUND: The process of prehospital care continues to develop in the UK. AIMS: To evaluate the availability of important paediatric resuscitation equipment in emergency ambulances and the extent of paramedic training in paediatric emergency medicine. METHODS: Postal survey of paramedic training managers. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 41 (93%) training managers. No trust provided all of the equipment listed. Facemasks and self inflating bags (of appropriate sizes for all children) are provided by 32% and 42% of trusts respectively. Less than one third carry paediatric oximeter probes. Of the respondents, 16 (39%) trusts provide less than eight hours training in paediatric emergency medicine and five (12%) offer no training at all. Ongoing education varies from none to regular yearly updates. CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics seem ill prepared to deal with paediatric emergencies. Important deficiencies in the provision of equipment and training are noted. The results of this survey provide information against which improvements can be measured. (+info)
Classifications in routine use: lessons from ICD-9 and ICPM in surgical practice.
(8/81)
OBJECTIVE: Classifications of diagnoses and procedures are very important for the economical as well as the quality assessment of surgical departments. They should reflect the morbidity of the patients treated and the work done. The authors investigated the fulfillment of these requirements by ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases: 9th Revision) and OPS-301, a German adaptation of the ICPM (International Classification of Procedures in Medicine), in clinical practice. DESIGN: A retrospective study was conducted using the data warehouse of the Surgical Center II at the Medical Faculty in Essen, Germany. The sample included 28,293 operations from the departments of general surgery, neurosurgery, and trauma surgery. Distribution of cases per ICD-9 and OPS-301 codes, aggregation through the digits of the codes, and concordance between the classifications were used as measurements. Median and range were calculated as distribution parameters. The concentration of cases per code was graphed using Lorenz curves. The most frequent codes of diagnoses were compared with the most frequent codes of surgical procedures concerning their medical information. RESULTS: The total number of codes used from ICD-9 and OPS-301 went up to 14 percent, depending on the surgical field. The median number of cases per code was between 2 and 4. The concentration of codes was enormous: 10 percent of the codes were used for about 70 percent of the surgical procedures. The distribution after an aggregation by digit was better with OPS-301 than with ICD-9. The views with OPS-301 and ICD-9 were quite different. CONCLUSION: Statistics based on ICD-9 or OPS-301 will not properly reflect the morbidity in different surgical departments. Neither classification adequately represents the work done by surgical staff. This is because of an uneven granularity in the classifications. The results demand a replacement of the ICD-9 by an improved terminological system in surgery. The OPS-301 should be maintained and can be used at least in the medium term. (+info)