Surgical time and motion: the intermediate equivalent revisited. (57/346)

The relationship between operative time, the intermediate equivalent value (IEV) and the complexity of common general surgical operations was examined. Correlation was found between the BUPA schedule values for procedures categorized as intermediate and major, but complex major vascular reconstruction and oesophagogastric resection for cancer occupied significantly more theatre time than the four intermediate equivalents allocated by the Collins or BUPA schedule. Moreover, anaesthetic preparation time for complex major surgery in the latter surgical subspecialities contributed at least one further intermediate value. Re-evaluation of the ideal IEV weighting of all surgical operations including anaesthetic input from larger similar audits would allow more accurate audits of surgeons' work-load, and also facilitate transparent intensive management of operating theatre resource.  (+info)

Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? (58/346)

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the amount of time required for a primary care physician to provide recommended preventive services to an average patient panel. METHODS: We used published and estimated times per service to determine the physician time required to provide all services recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), at the recommended frequency, to a patient panel of 2500 with an age and sex distribution similar to that of the US population. RESULTS: To fully satisfy the USPSTF recommendations, 1773 hours of a physician's annual time, or 7.4 hours per working day, is needed for the provision of preventive services. CONCLUSIONS: Time constraints limit the ability of physicians to comply with preventive services recommendations.  (+info)

Installing and implementing a computer-based patient record system in sub-Saharan Africa: the Mosoriot Medical Record System. (59/346)

The authors implemented an electronic medical record system in a rural Kenyan health center. Visit data are recorded on a paper encounter form, eliminating duplicate documentation in multiple clinic logbooks. Data are entered into an MS-Access database supported by redundant power systems. The system was initiated in February 2001, and 10,000 visit records were entered for 6,190 patients in six months. The authors present a summary of the clinics visited, diagnoses made, drugs prescribed, and tests performed. After system implementation, patient visits were 22% shorter. They spent 58% less time with providers (p < 0.001) and 38% less time waiting (p = 0.06). Clinic personnel spent 50% less time interacting with patients, two thirds less time interacting with each other, and more time in personal activities. This simple electronic medical record system has bridged the "digital divide." Financial and technical sustainability by Kenyans will be key to its future use and development.  (+info)

Is the National Service Framework standard for thrombolytic therapy achievable in a rural area? (60/346)

The National Service Framework (NSF) for coronary heart disease requires that patients with acute myocardial infarction should start thrombolytic therapy within 60 min of the patient making contact with the National Health Service. In an audit of 700 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, patients' first contact was most commonly with a general practitioner (GP) (505/700; 72 per cent), who attended on 88 per cent (446/505) of occasions when they were called. In 93 per cent (255/284) of cases where both GP and an ambulance attended, the GP arrived first, by 25 min (median). In the final audit period, median call-to-thrombolysis time was 90 min (26 per cent < or = 60). We conclude that with existing physical and personnel resources in this semi-rural area of Northern Ireland, the NSF standard for thrombolytic treatment is unlikely to be met in a majority of cases unless GPs adopt prehospital thrombolysis.  (+info)

Patient problems, advanced practice nurse (APN) interventions, time and contacts among five patient groups. (61/346)

PURPOSE: To describe patient problems and APN interventions in each of five clinical trials and to establish links among patient problems, APN interventions, APN time and number of contacts, patient outcomes, and health care costs. DESIGN AND METHODS: Analysis of 333 interaction logs created by APNs during five randomized controlled trials: (a) very low birthweight infants (n = 39); (b) women with unplanned cesarean birth (n = 61), (c) high-risk pregnancy (n = 44), and (d) hysterectomy (n = 53); and (e) elders with cardiac medical and surgical diagnoses (n = 139). Logs containing recordings of all APN interactions with participants, APN time and type of patient contact were content analyzed with the smallest phrase or sentence representing a "unit." These units were then classified using the Omaha Classification System to determine patient problems and APN interventions. Groups were compared concerning total amount of APN time, number of contacts per patient, and mean length of time per APN contact. All studies were conducted in the United States. FINDINGS: Groups with greater mean APN time and contacts per patient had greater improvements in patients' outcomes and greater health care cost savings. Of the 150,131 APN interventions, surveillance was the predominant APN function in all five patient groups. Health teaching, guidance, and counseling was the second most frequent category of APN intervention in four of the five groups. In all five groups, treatments and procedures accounted for < 1% of total APN interventions. Distribution of patient problems (N = 150,131) differed across groups reflecting the health care problems common to the group. CONCLUSIONS: Dose of APN time and contacts makes a difference in improving patient outcomes and reducing health care costs. Skills needed by APNs in providing transitional care include well-developed skills in assessing, teaching, counseling, communicating, collaborating, knowing health behaviors, negotiating systems, and having condition-specific knowledge about different patient problems.  (+info)

Formative evaluation of a men's health center. (62/346)

We describe an innovative approach for evaluating a men's health center. Using observation and interview, we assessed patient flow, referral patterns, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of the services' usefulness. Student assistants designed evaluation tools, hired and trained research assistants, supervised data collection, interacted with city and center officials, analyzed data, and drafted a report. To ensure patient confidentiality and anonymity, we designed an innovative observation system. The men had unique perceptions of family, requiring culturally sensitive approaches to engage them in the study. Of patients reporting to the center, 20.3% received referral services. Average satisfaction level was 5.2 (scale = 1-10). Perceived benefits to the family for 23% of respondents included cost savings, improved access, and higher service quality.  (+info)

Feasibility of neuroprotective agent administration by prehospital personnel in an urban setting. (63/346)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Studies have demonstrated the importance of early stroke treatment. If a neuroprotective agent (NA) clinical trial is successful, the greatest benefit might be attained with early prehospital administration. This study determined the potential reduction in time to treatment of stroke patients when NAs were administered in the prehospital setting. METHODS: Twenty-three urban emergency medical services (EMS) agencies participated in this study. Prehospital personnel completed a stroke assessment checklist on any potential stroke victim. The checklist collected clinical inclusion/exclusion criteria for NA administration and event/decision times. Patients meeting the hypothetical clinical inclusion criteria were enrolled into this study. Time data included scene arrival/departure, emergency department (ED) arrival, and estimated time of theoretical NA administration. The reduction in time to stroke treatment was calculated as the difference between the time of ED arrival and the reported time of NA administration. The t test and simple linear regression were used to probe for differences in treatment time reduction between selected subgroups. EMS personnel's ability to obtain informed consent for theoretical NA administration was calculated. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled in this study; of these, 75 were deemed eligible for hypothetical NA administration and had complete time data. On average, EMS personnel documented the theoretical time of NA administration at 12.04+/-2.07 minutes before arrival at the ED (17.06+/-1.74 minutes when the NA was given on scene [n=43]; 6.65+/-1.14 minutes when the NA was given en route [n=32]). CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital NA administration can potentially significantly reduce the time to first intervention in stroke patients.  (+info)

An exploratory cost analysis of performing hospital-based concurrent utilization review. (64/346)

OBJECTIVE: To determine the costs associated with conducting concurrent utilization review, a utilization management strategy widely used by the managed care industry. STUDY DESIGN: A production process model focusing on resource utilization. SUBJECTS: The 29 clinical services of a 500-bed academic health center were aggregated into 9 clinical groups. A random sample of at least 15 reviews per group was studied. METHODS: Time sampling and cost analysis methods were used to determine the cost to the hospital of conducting utilization review. Component activities of the process were identified and analyzed to determine differences among clinical services and among the component tasks of the utilization review process. RESULTS: In 12 months, 13 126 reviews were completed in an average of 15 minutes 41 seconds. Across clinical groups, the average total time of each review ranged from 11 minutes 18 seconds (medical group) to 19 minutes 4 seconds (pediatrics group). Significant differences existed among clinical service groups for the activity of preparing for conducting the review, with the pediatrics group spending more time than the cardiology and oncology groups. The total cost of the process was nearly dollar 166 000 annually. The average cost per review was dollar 11, the average cost per patient-day denied was dollar 478, and the average cost per patient denial was dollar 1592. CONCLUSIONS: These figures are conservative in that they do not include the payer component of the costs, which could be as high as the hospital provider cost. Given a denial rate of < 2% and the high cost of the process, it may be beneficial to investigate alternative processes for conducting utilization review.  (+info)