Efficacy and safety of alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in diffuse connective tissue diseases in children: a prospective multicenter study.
(33/478)
OBJECTIVE: Osteopenia/osteoporosis is being increasingly reported as a complication of many chronic diseases, even in children. In this preliminary study, we evaluated the effect of an oral bisphosphonate (alendronate) on bone mass in children with diffuse connective tissue diseases. METHODS: Thirty-eight children with low bone mass were treated with alendronate for 1 year; 38 children who had the same primary disorders as the study patients but in a less severe form served as untreated control patients. We were also able to evaluate changes in bone mass (before and after alendronate) in 16 of the treated patients whose bone mineral density (BMD) had been routinely measured before the present study was initiated. RESULTS: BMD increased by a mean +/- SD of 14.9 +/- 9.8% (P < 0.002 versus baseline) in the treated patients (reaching the normal range in 13 patients), while the BMD was 2.6 +/- 5% (not significant versus baseline) in the control group (15 had a decrease). Most interestingly, there was a large increase in BMD (15.3 +/-9.9%) after alendronate therapy in the 16 children who had their BMD followed up in the year before the study, during which time they had shown little increase in BMD (1.03 +/- 6.3%), and often a decrease. Considering their condition, increases in the height of all patients was satisfactory. No new fractures were observed after alendronate therapy was initiated. CONCLUSION: Bisphosphonates can be considered essential components of the treatment of secondary osteoporosis, not only in adults, but also in pediatric patients. Alendronate has a positive effect on secondary osteopenia/osteoporosis in children with connective tissue diseases. (+info)
A cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options for patients with methotrexate-resistant rheumatoid arthritis.
(34/478)
OBJECTIVE: Recently, new treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) have become available. Given the wide variability in efficacy and costs among these different treatment options, we sought to determine their cost-effectiveness (CE) in order to guide policy in different cost-constrained settings. METHODS: We performed a CE analysis comparing 6 treatment options for patients with MTX-resistant RA: 1) etanercept + MTX, 2) etanercept monotherapy, 3) cyclosporine + MTX, 4) triple therapy (hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and MTX), 5) continuation of MTX monotherapy, and 6) no second-line agent. A decision model was used with a time horizon of 6 months. We used 2 measures of effectiveness based on published clinical trial data: the American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria (ACR 20); and a weighted average of proportions of patients achieving responses of ACR 70, ACR 50, and ACR 20 (ACR 70 weighted response [ACR 70WR]). Incremental CE ratios were calculated as the additional cost per patient achieving either outcome, compared with the next least expensive option. To help interpret CE relative to these RA-specific outcomes, we conducted a separate, "reference" CE analysis of MTX use in MTX-naive RA patients, using the same outcomes. RESULTS: In our reference analysis, MTX therapy for MTX-naive RA cost $1,100 per ACR 20 outcome and $1,500 per ACR 70WR, compared with no second-line agent. In our base-case analysis with either outcome, MTX continuation, cyclosporine + MTX, and etanercept monotherapy cost more, but either were not more efficacious or had a higher incremental CE ratio than the next most expensive option (i.e., they were dominated). Therefore, these options were not cost-effective. The least expensive option, triple therapy, cost 1.3 times more per patient with ACR 20 outcome ($1,500/ACR 20) and 2.1 times more per ACR 70WR ($3,100/ACR 70WR) than MTX therapy for MTX-naive RA. The most efficacious option, the combination of etanercept and MTX, cost 38 times more per patient with ACR 20 outcome ($4,600/ACR 20) and 23 times more per ACR 70WR ($34,800/ACR 70WR) than MTX therapy for MTX-naive RA. Overall, the results of extensive sensitivity analyses did not substantially affect these results. CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicates that if 15 mg/week MTX is cost-effective for achieving ACR 20 or ACR 70WR in MTX-naive RA over a 6-month period, then most likely so is triple therapy in MTX-resistant RA. Whether etanercept + MTX is cost-effective depends on whether $34,800/ACR 70WR (or $42,600/ACR 20) over a 6-month period is considered acceptable. (+info)
Efficacy and safety of diacerein in osteoarthritis of the knee: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Diacerein Study Group.
(35/478)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of diacerein, a drug with interleukin-1beta--inhibitory activity in vitro, in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A total of 484 patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee OA were enrolled in this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study group with 3 diacerein dosages of 50 mg/day, 100 mg/day, and 150 mg/day (administered twice daily). RESULTS: In the intent-to-treat population, 100 mg/day diacerein (50 mg twice daily) was significantly superior (P < 0.05) to placebo using the primary criterion (visual analog scale [VAS] assessment of pain on movement). Significant improvement (P < 0.05) was also observed for the secondary criteria, which included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC), the WOMAC subscores, and the VAS assessment of handicap. In patients treated with diacerein dosages of 50 mg/day and 150 mg/day, favorable but not significant results were observed for the primary criterion. The best daily dosage of diacerein, calculated from the effect on the VAS assessment of pain on movement, was 90.1 mg. In the per-protocol population, the analysis of the primary criterion showed significant dose-dependent differences (P < 0.05) between each of the 3 diacerein dosages and the placebo. No differences were observed among the 3 diacerein groups. A significantly higher incidence (P < 0.05) of adverse events (AEs), as well as a higher rate of dropoout due to AEs, was observed in patients treated with 150 mg/day diacerein versus those treated with placebo, 50 mg/day diacerein, or 100 mg/day diacerein. Mild-to-moderate transient changes in bowel habits were the most frequent AEs, increasing with the dosage. CONCLUSION: Diacerein, a drug for the treatment of OA, was shown to be an effective treatment for symptoms in patients with knee OA. Taking into account both efficacy and safety, the optimal daily dosage of diacerein for patients with knee OA is 100 mg/day (50 mg twice daily). (+info)
Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a combined oral formulation of eniluracil, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies.
(36/478)
BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and feasibility of a combined oral formulation of 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and eniluracil (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina), an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The rationale for developing a combined eniluracil/5-FU formulation oral dosing form is to simplify treatment with these agents, which has been performed using separate dosing forms, and decrease the probability of severe toxicity and/or suboptimal therapeutic results caused by inadvertently high or conversely insufficient 5-FU dosing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial was a randomized, three-way crossover bioequivalence study of three oral dosing forms of eniluracil/5-FU tablets in adults with solid malignancies. Each period consisted of two days of treatment and a five- to seven-day washout phase. Eniluracil at a dose of 20 mg, which results in maximal DPD inactivation, was administered twice daily on the first day and in the evening on the second day of each of the three treatments. On the morning of the second day, all patients received a total eniluracil dose of 20 mg orally and a total 5-FU dose of 2 mg orally as either separate tablets (treatment A) or combined eniluracil/5-FU tablets in two different strengths (2 tablets of eniluracil/5-FU at a strength (mg/mg) of 10/1 (treatment B) or 8 tablets at a strength of 2.5/0.25 (treatment C)). The pharmacokinetics of plasma 5-FU, eniluracil, and uracil, and the urinary excretion of eniluracil, 5-FU, uracil, and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL), were studied. To determine the bioequivalence of the combined eniluracil/5-FU dosing forms compared to the separate tablets, an analysis of variance on pharmacokinetic parameters reflecting eniluracil and 5-FU exposure was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with advanced solid malignancies had complete pharmacokinetic studies performed during treatments A, B, and C. The pharmacokinetics of eniluracil and 5-FU were similar among the three types of treatment. Both strengths of the combined eniluracil/5-FU dosing form and the separate dosing forms were bioequivalent. Mean values for terminal half-life, systemic clearance, and apparent volume of distribution for oral 5-FU during treatments A/B/C were 5.5/5.6/5.6 hours, 6.6/6.6/6.5 liters/hour, and 50.7/51.5/50.0 liters, respectively. The intersubject coefficient of variation for pharmacokinetic variables reflecting 5-FU exposure and clearance in treatments ranged from 23% to 33%. The urinary excretion of unchanged 5-FU over 24 hours following treatments A, B, and C averaged 52.2%, 56.1%, and 50.8'%, of the administered dose of 5-FU, respectively. Parameters reflecting DPD inhibition, including plasma uracil and urinary FBAL excretion following treatments A, B, and C were similar. Toxicity was generally mild and similar following all three types of treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and eniluracil were similar and met bioequivalence criteria following treatment with the separate oral formulations of 5-FU and eniluracil and two strengths of the combined formulation. The availability of a combined eniluracil/5-FU oral dosing form will likely simplify dosing and decrease the probability of severe toxicity or suboptimal therapeutic results caused by an inadvertent 5-FU overdose or insufficient 5-FU dosing in the case of separate oral formulations, thereby enhancing the overall feasibility and 0therapeutic index of oral 5-FU therapy. (+info)
Low-dose fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in elderly patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia refractory to conventional therapy.
(37/478)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In recent years fludarabine alone or in combination with other drugs has been reported to be effective in the treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), both as first line and salvage therapy. Among the different combination regimens, the association of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide has shown a considerable therapeutic efficacy, although a relevant number of infectious complications have been described, particularly in elderly patients. The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy, the toxicity, and the incidence of infectious episodes of a regimen combining lower doses of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in elderly patients with B-CLL refractory to conventional therapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty patients with progressive B-CLL with a median age of 75 years (4 in stage B and 16 in stage C) and refractory to conventional therapy were enrolled in this study. The combination regimen was as follows: fludarabine 15 mg/m2/day i.v. [max 25 mg] and cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2/day i.v. for four days. RESULTS: All patients enrolled were evaluable for response. Three out of 20 (15%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR), 14/20 (70%) a partial response (PR) with an overall response rate (CR+PR) of 85%, according to National Cancer Institute-Working Group response criteria. Three patients were considered resistant. In four out of 20 patients (20%), a severe neutropenia (neutrophils < 0.5x10(9)/L) occurred and one of them developed an infectious complication which required treatment with systemic antibiotics and granulocyte colony- stimulating factor (G-CSF). Non-hematologic toxicity was negligible in all patients but one, who despite a adequate therapy with allopurinol and hydration, experienced a tumor lysis syndrome with transient but severe renal impairment. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The association of low-dose fludarabine and cyclophosphamide appeared to be effective in this subset of B-CLL patients, reproducing a similar overall response rate obtained with other fludarabine-based combination therapies. In addition, in this group of elderly patients, toxic side effects were negligible and infectious complications remarkably low. (+info)
Pharmacokinetics of ethionamide administered under fasting conditions or with orange juice, food, or antacids.
(38/478)
This study was conducted in order to (i) determine the effect of food, orange juice, or antacids on the absorption of a single oral 500-mg dose of ethionamide (ETA) in healthy volunteers, including an assessment of bioequivalence, and (ii) determine ETA population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. The pharmacokinetics of ETA in serum was determined for 12 healthy males and females in a randomized, four-period crossover study. Volunteers received single 500-mg doses of ETA either on an empty stomach (reference) or with food, orange juice, or antacids. Serum samples were collected for 48 h and assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Data were analyzed by noncompartmental and population methods. Mean test/reference ratios and 90% confidence intervals were determined. No statistically significant differences were seen in the maximum concentration of ETA (C(max)), time to maximum concentration (T(max)), or area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) between the four treatments (P > 0.05 by analysis of variance). The least-squares mean ratios (with confidence intervals in parentheses) for C(max) were 105% (81.2 to 135%) after orange juice, 94% (72.8 to 121%) after food, and 88% (68.4 to 114%) after antacids. The least-squares mean ratios (with confidence intervals is in parentheses) for AUC(0-infinity) were 91% (72.7 to 115%) after orange juice, 96% (76.4 to 121%) after food, and 95% (75.5 to 120%) after antacids. The mean T(max) was slightly prolonged following antacid or food administration (2.3 to 2.6 h) compared to administration on an empty stomach or with juice (1.7 to 1.9 h). The median population PK parameters were as follows: K(a) = 0.37 to 0.48 h(-1), V/F = 2.0 to 2.8 liters/kg, CL/F = 56.5 to 72.2 liters/h, and terminal half-life = 1.7 to 2.1 h, where K(a) is the absorption rate constant, V is the volume of distribution, and CL is clearance. The PK behavior of ETA was not significantly modified by the different conditions studied. Mean ratios for AUC ranged from 0.91 to 0.96 for the orange juice, food, and antacid treatments, indicating a minimal effect on relative bioavailability. ETA can, therefore, be administered with food if tolerance is an issue. (+info)
Therapeutic substitution of cimetidine for nizatidine was not associated with an increase in healthcare utilization.
(39/478)
OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in healthcare utilization resulting from a formulary switch to cimetidine from nizatidine at the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of administrative and clinical data 6 months before and 6 months after the therapeutic substitution. METHODS: The 704 patients who were switched from nizatidine to cimetidine were included in the study. Administrative data included total and primary care clinic visits, emergency room visits, gastrointestinal (GI)-related radiological studies, and GI endoscopic procedures. Discharge summaries were examined, and rates of total and GI-related hospitalizations were calculated. RESULTS: There was no evidence of increased utilization of healthcare resources during the 6 months after the formulary switch. Estimated monthly pharmaceutical savings for the Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System were $7260. CONCLUSIONS: A formulary switch from nizatidine to cimetidine can be accomplished at significant pharmaceutical cost savings, and this retrospective study suggests that this can be done without increasing other aspects of healthcare resource utilization. (+info)
Efficacy of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a six-week controlled study with comparison against placebo and against a conventional nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug.
(40/478)
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term efficacy of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase 2-specific inhibitor, in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: The study was a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 3 treatment arms: placebo, ketoprofen 100 mg twice daily, and celecoxib 100 mg twice daily. Patients who had AS according to the modified New York criteria, without peripheral synovitis and with active disease (pain > or =40 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale [VAS] and an increase in pain of at least 30% after nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug withdrawal) were eligible for study. Primary outcome measures were change in pain intensity (VAS) and change in functional impairment (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [BASFI]). RESULTS: Of the 246 randomized patients, 76 were allocated to receive placebo, 90 ketoprofen, and 80 celecoxib. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups at study entry. During the 6 weeks of the study, the decrease in pain and functional impairment was greater in the active treatment groups than in the placebo group, with a trend in favor of celecoxib when the 2 active treatments were compared. The mean changes were -13 mm, -21 mm, and -27 mm (P = 0.006) for pain and 1, -6, and -12 (P = 0.0008) for BASFI score in the placebo, ketoprofen, and celecoxib groups, respectively. During treatment, the number of patients reporting epigastric pain was 6 (8%), 13 (14%), and 10 (13%) in the placebo, ketoprofen, and celecoxib groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirm the clinically relevant antiinflammatory effect of celecoxib at a 200-mg daily dosage, with significant improvement of both pain and function in patients with AS. (+info)