Welfare reform and the perinatal health and health care use of Latino women in California, New York City, and Texas.
(57/437)
OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed changes in the financing of prenatal care and delivery, the use of prenatal care, and birth outcomes among foreign-born vs US-born Latino women following enactment of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) in August 1996. METHODS: We used a pre-post design with a comparison group. The sample consisted of resident Latinas in California, New York City, and Texas who delivered a live infant in 1995 or 1998. RESULTS: The proportion of births to Latinas that initiated prenatal care in the first 4 months of pregnancy increased for all foreign-born Latinas in California, New York City, and Texas between 1995 and 1998 (P <.05). Except for non-Dominicans in New York City, there was no increase in the proportion of low- or very-low-birthweight births among foreign-born vs US-born Latinas in the 3 localities between 1995 and 1996. CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence from vital statistics in California, New York City, and Texas that PRWORA had any substantive impact on the perinatal health and health care utilization of foreign-born relative to US-born Latinas. (+info)
TennCare--Medicaid managed care in Tennessee in jeopardy.
(58/437)
TennCare, the statewide Medicaid managed care system implemented in Tennessee on January 1, 1994, sought to reduce state and federal healthcare expenditures while enhancing access to and quality of care. TennCare currently covers 1.32 million enrollees (25% of the citizens of Tennessee), including more than 520,248 citizens previously not covered by health insurance. It is one of the largest Medicaid managed care enterprises in the nation and the only program to cover uninsurables regardless of income. Utilization of preventive and primary care services has increased, and selected measures of quality of care have improved. Program costs from 1994 through 1998 rose at a rate below that of overall US Medicaid costs during the same period, resulting in modest savings. However, managed care plans, hospitals, and individual providers continue to report substantial fiscal losses, and managed care organizations--including the 3 largest plans in the program--have closed, been placed under receivership, or threatened to withdraw from the market. Furthermore, safety net hospitals, academic medical centers, and community mental health programs have fared financial cutbacks that have limited their ability to serve the remaining uninsured as well as the insured. Because of these fiscal difficulties, the TennCare program is now in significant jeopardy despite its important clinical successes. Major structural and fiscal changes will be required if the program is to continue to enhance services and remain financially viable. This report focuses on TennCare's successes and failures to offer lessons for Medicaid managed care programs nationwide. (+info)
Timing of insurance coverage and use of prenatal care among low-income women.
(59/437)
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between timing of insurance coverage and prenatal care among low-income women. METHODS: Timeliness of prenatal care initiation and adequacy of number of visits were studied among 5455 low-income participants in a larger cross-sectional statewide survey of postpartum women in California during 1994-1995. RESULTS: Although only 2% of women remained uninsured throughout pregnancy, one fifth lacked coverage during the first trimester. Rates of untimely care were highest (> or =64%) among women who were uninsured throughout their pregnancy or whose coverage began after the first trimester; rates were lowest (about 10%) among women who obtained coverage during the first trimester. Women who first obtained Medi-Cal coverage during pregnancy were at low risk of having too few visits. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of prenatal coverage should be considered in research on the relationship between coverage and care use among low-income women. Earlier studies that relied solely on principal payer information, without data on when coverage began, may have led to inaccurate inferences about lack of coverage as a barrier to prenatal care. (+info)
Targeting communities with high rates of uninsured children.
(60/437)
Data from the first two rounds of the Community Tracking Study household survey show that coverage expansions through the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) have virtually eliminated differences across communities in children's eligibility for public or private health coverage. Nevertheless, some communities continue to have very high rates of uninsured children, in large part because of lower participation rates in public programs and higher costs for employer-sponsored coverage. Participation in SCHIP may increase in high-uninsurance communities as the new programs mature, although low participation rates in public programs prior to SCHIP suggest that enrollment barriers may still be greater in such communities. (+info)
Changes in related drug class utilization after market withdrawal of cisapride.
(61/437)
BACKGROUND: Recent Food and Drug Administration-mandated and company-initiated withdrawals of drug products from the marketplace have had an impact on utilization in related drug classes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of withdrawal of the prokinetic agent cisapride (Propulsid) on utilization of other gastrointestinal (GI) agents. STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal, retrospective study using electronic prescription data from a state-funded geriatric prescription benefit program. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prescription claims for 2644 patients using cisapride between January 10, 2000, and October 1, 2000, were analyzed with respect to points in time at which (1) prospective drug utilization review edits were implemented denying reimbursement of cisapride because of drug interactions, (2) the manufacturer announced its intent to cease production, and (3) the agent was withdrawn from the market. Prevalence of use, claims volume, and expenditures were compared for cisapride, proton pump inhibitors, histamine-2 receptor antagonists, and the prokinetic agent metoclopramide during these periods. RESULTS: Use of cisapride decreased precipitately even before implementation of a "medical exception only" reimbursement policy. After the change in policy, metoclopramide use increased, although this increase was not proportional to cisapride's decline. Although total GI expenditures declined within the cisapride cohort, this change had little impact on overall program GI expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: The loss of cisapride did not significantly affect program-wide costs for GI drugs. However, the withdrawal of cisapride appears to have resulted in increased use of metoclopramide, a medication with a more serious adverse effect profile than cisapride. Further study is needed to evaluate the long-term clinical impact of such therapy changes. (+info)
Safety-net institutions buffer the impact of Medicaid managed care: a multi-method assessment in a rural state.
(62/437)
OBJECTIVES: This project used a long-term, multi-method approach to study the impact of Medicaid managed care. METHODS: Survey techniques measured impacts on individuals, and ethnographic methods assessed effects on safety-net providers in New Mexico. RESULTS: After the first year of Medicaid managed care, uninsured adults reported less access and use (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34, 0.64) and worse barriers to care (OR = 6.60; 95% CI = 3.95, 11.54) than adults in other insurance categories. Medicaid children experienced greater access and use (OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.21, 3.72) and greater communication and satisfaction (OR = 3.64; 95% CI = 1.13, 12.54) than children in other insurance categories; uninsured children encountered greater barriers to care (OR = 6.29; 95% CI = 1.58, 42.21). There were no consistent changes in the major outcome variables over the period of transition to Medicaid managed care. Safety-net institutions experienced marked increases in workload and financial stress, especially in rural areas. Availability of mental health services declined sharply. Providers worked to buffer the impact of Medicaid managed care for patients. CONCLUSIONS: In its first year, Medicaid managed care exerted major effects on safety-net providers but relatively few measurable effects on individuals. This reform did not address the problems of the uninsured. (+info)
Do enrollees in 'look-alike' Medicaid and SCHIP programs really look alike? State Children's Health Insurance Program.
(63/437)
The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), passed by Congress in 1997, has been implemented by states in many different forms, thus creating many natural experiments about insurance coverage for low-income children. In Georgia, SCHIP children are enrolled in a Medicaid look-alike program, PeachCare for Kids, with nearly the same administrative rules and providers as in the Medicaid program. Comparing the experiences of PeachCare and Medicaid children thus allows us to examine the impact of population differences on utilization and satisfaction. We find that Medicaid children, controlling for many demographic characteristics, report both less use of services and lower satisfaction with services used. Evidence presented here supports three possible explanations for these differences: Medicaid families are less familiar with and supportive of systems requiring use of an assigned primary care physician, the families face more nonprogram barriers to using care, and physicians have different responses to the two programs. (+info)
Is reimbursement for childhood immunizations adequate? evidence from two rural areas in colorado.
(64/437)
OBJECTIVE: To assess adequacy of reimbursement for childhood vaccinations in two rural regions in Colorado, the authors measured medical practice costs of providing childhood vaccinations and compared them with reimbursement. METHODS: A "time-motion" method was used to measure labor costs of providing vaccinations in 13 private and public practices. Practices reported non-labor costs. The authors determined reimbursement by record review. RESULTS: The average vaccine delivery cost per dose (excluding vaccine cost) ranged from $4.69 for community health centers to $5.60 for private practices. Average reimbursement exceeded average delivery costs for all vaccines and contributed to overhead in private practices. Average reimbursement was less than total cost (vaccine-delivery costs + overhead) in private practices for most vaccines in one region with significant managed care penetration. Reimbursement to public providers was less than the average vaccine delivery costs. CONCLUSIONS: Current reimbursement may not be adequate to induce private practices to provide childhood vaccinations, particularly in areas with substantial managed care penetration. (+info)