Do-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students.
(65/212)
OBJECTIVES: To study the attitudes of both medical and non-medical students towards the do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision in a university in Hong Kong, and the factors affecting their attitudes. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey conducted in the campus of a university in Hong Kong. Preferences and priorities of participants on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in various situations and case scenarios, experience of death and dying, prior knowledge of DNR and basic demographic data were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 766 students participated in the study. There were statistically significant differences in their DNR decisions in various situations between medical and non-medical students, clinical and preclinical students, and between students who had previously experienced death and dying and those who had not. A prior knowledge of DNR significantly affected DNR decision, although 66.4% of non-medical students and 18.7% of medical students had never heard of DNR. 74% of participants from both medical and non-medical fields considered the patient's own wish as the most important factor that the healthcare team should consider when making DNR decisions. Family wishes might not be decisive on the choice of DNR. CONCLUSIONS: Students in medical and non-medical fields held different views on DNR. A majority of participants considered the patient's own wish as most important in DNR decisions. Family wishes were considered less important than the patient's own wishes. (+info)
A good death.
(66/212)
The Institute of Medicine defines a good death a "one that is free from avoidable death and suffering for patients, families and caregivers in general accordance with the patients' and families' wishes." The current system creates barriers to reducing the stress and suffering that accompany a patient's end of life. Data and eHealth technology, if it were more accessible, could help patients, families, and caregivers to cope with end of life issues. (+info)
Respiratory controversies in the critical care setting. Should noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation be used in all forms of acute respiratory failure?
(67/212)
Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) has been a major advance in the management of acute respiratory failure. Over the past decade alone, NPPV has been the subject of over 1,500 scientific papers, including 14 meta-analyses. NPPV's utility in many clinical settings has been well established, with demonstration in randomized trials of lower intubation rate, mortality, hospital stay, and advantages in other important clinical outcomes. However, it is still used in a minority of patients with acute respiratory failure. While there probably are situations in which NPPV is commonly under-utilized, there are other situations in which it is unlikely to be of benefit or likely to inflict harm. This paper debates the data for and against the more widespread application of NPPV. It will assist the clinician to identify both good and poor candidates for NPPV and thereby devote respiratory care resources where they will be most effective, and optimize patient outcomes. (+info)
End-of-life care in children: the Brazilian and the international perspectives.
(68/212)
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the medical practices and the end-of-life care provided to children admitted to pediatric intensive care units in different parts of the globe. SOURCES: Articles on end-of-life care published during the last 20 years were selected from the PubMed, MEDLINE and LILACS databases, with emphasis on studies of death in pediatric intensive care units in Brazil, Latin America, Europe and North America, using the following keywords: death, bioethics, pediatric intensive care, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and life support limitation. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: Publications on life support limitation (LSL) are concentrated in North America and Europe. In North American pediatric intensive care units there is a greater incidence of LSL (approximately 60%) than in Europe or Latin America (30-40%). These differences appear to be related to cultural, religious, legal and economic factors. Over the last decade, LSL in Brazilian pediatric intensive care units has increased from 6 to 40%, with do not resuscitate orders as the most common method. Also of note is the low level of family participation in the decision-making process. A recent resolution adopted by the Federal Medical Council (Conselho Federal de Medicina) regulated LSL in our country, demystifying a certain apprehension of a legal nature. The authors present a proposal for a protocol to be followed in these cases. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of LSL with children in the final phases of irreversible diseases has ethical, moral and legal support. In Brazil, these measures are still being adopted in a timid manner, demanding a change in behavior, especially in the involvement of families in the decision-making process. (+info)
Intensive care unit cultures and end-of-life decision making.
(69/212)
PURPOSE: Prior researchers studying end-of-life decision making (EOLDM) in intensive care units (ICUs) often have collected data retrospectively and aggregated data across units. There has been little research, however, about how cultures differ among ICUs. This research was designed to study limitation of treatment decision making in real time and to evaluate similarities and differences in the cultural contexts of 4 ICUs and the relationship of those contexts to EOLDM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethnographic field work took place in 4 adult ICUs in a tertiary care hospital. Participants were health care providers (eg, physicians, nurses, and social workers), patients, and their family members. Participant observation and interviews took place 5 days a week for 7 months in each unit. RESULTS: The ICUs were not monolithic. There were similarities, but important differences in EOLDM were identified in formal and informal rules, meaning and uses of technology, physician roles and relationships, processes such as unit rounds, and timing of initiation of EOLDM. CONCLUSIONS: As interventions to improve EOLDM are developed, it will be important to understand how they may interact with unit cultures. Attempting to develop one intervention to be used in all ICUs is unlikely to be successful. (+info)
Management of end stage cardiac failure.
(70/212)
Optimum heart failure medication and an increasing array of interventions have had an enormous effect on morbidity and mortality over the past 10 years. However, patients with end stage disease can still be highly symptomatic. Moreover, such patients are disadvantaged compared with patients with malignant disease. They are less likely to have an understanding of their illness or have access to supportive care. They are also less likely to have the opportunity to plan for care with regard to death and dying. There is increasing demand that the multi-professional clinical team gain good communication and supportive care skills, and that appropriate access to specialist palliative care services is available. (+info)
End-of-life decision-making in respiratory intermediate care units: a European survey.
(71/212)
A survey was performed on behalf of the European Respiratory Society to assess end-of-life practices in patients admitted to European respiratory intermediate care units and high dependency units over a 6-month period. A 33-item questionnaire was sent by e-mail to physicians throughout Europe and the response rate was 28 (29.5%) out of 95. A total of 6,008 patients were admitted and an end-of-life decision was taken in 1,292 (21.5%). The mortality rate in these patients was 68% (884 out of 1,292). The patients received similar proportions of withholding of treatment (298 (23%) out of 1292), do-not-resuscitate or do-not-intubate orders (442 (34%) out of 1,292) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation as the ceiling of ventilatory care (402 (31%) out of 1,292). Withdrawal of therapy was employed in 149 (11%) out of 1,292 patients and euthanasia in one. Do-not-intubate/do-not-resuscitate orders were more frequently used in North compared with South Europe. All of the 473 competent patients directly participated in the decision, whereas, in 722 (56%) out of 1,292 cases, decision-making was reported to be shared with the nurses. In European respiratory intermediate care units and high dependency units, an end-of-life decision is taken for 21.5% of patients admitted. Withholding of treatment, do-not-intubate/do-not-resuscitate orders and noninvasive mechanical ventilation as the ventilatory care ceiling are the most common procedures. Competent patients are often involved, together with nurses. (+info)
End-of-life decision making in 42 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
(72/212)
OBJECTIVE: To determine when end-of-life issues were discussed with patients afflicted with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of ALS patients referred to the neuromuscular clinic at Georgetown University Hospital. Patients were seen by a pulmonologist and a neurologist at the initial diagnosis or referral, and every 2-3 months thereafter. End-of-life discussions were addressed at each visit. Other variables recorded included the amount of time afflicted with ALS, serial pulmonary function test results, and the subjective level of bulbar dysfunction. RESULTS: We saw 43 patients (age range 39-94 y) between June 1999 and September 2004. One patient was on a ventilator at the initial visit, and was therefore excluded from the study. Discussion about the patients' end-of-life care preferences were initiated at the first pulmonary visit with 40 patients. With 2 patients, end-of-life decisions were discussed at the second office visit. Twenty-five patients chose do-not-resuscitate and do-not-intubate (DNR/DNI) orders after the initial end-of-life discussion with the pulmonologist. Five other patients chose DNR/DNI orders during subsequent clinic visits. Four patients were still undecided at their last clinic visit. Six patients were lost to follow-up before a decision was made. Two patients requested full ventilatory support. Both the forced vital capacity and the level of bulbar dysfunction were not statistically different between the patients who chose DNR/DNI and the patients who were either undecided or requested full ventilatory support. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions about end-of-life care are often delayed in patients with ALS. These patients' final decisions seem to be independent of their level of respiratory insufficiency or bulbar function, and most related to the physician addressing end-of-life care decisions in a timely manner. (+info)