The right to choose parenthood among HIV-infected women and men. (9/26)

 (+info)

Avoiding transgenerational risks of mitochondrial DNA disorders: a morally acceptable reason for sex selection? (10/26)

 (+info)

Normative discourses on the desire to have children. (11/26)

 (+info)

The African Women's Protocol: bringing attention to reproductive rights and the MDGs. (12/26)

 (+info)

Conflicts between conservative Christian institutions and secular groups in sub-Saharan Africa: ideological discourses on sexualities, reproduction and HIV/AIDS. (13/26)

 (+info)

Sexual, reproductive health needs and rights of young people with perinatally acquired HIV in Uganda. (14/26)

BACKGROUND: Numbers of young people with perinatally acquired HIV is growing significantly. With antiretroviral drugs, children who get infected at birth with HIV have an opportunity to graduate into adolescence and adulthood. This achievement notwithstanding, new challenges have emerged in their care and support needs. The most dynamic being, their sexual and reproductive health needs and rights (SRHR). OBJECTIVES: This paper aimed at establishing the gaps at policy, program and health systems level as far as addressing sexual and reproductive health needs of young people who have lived with HIV since infancy is concerned. METHODS: This paper is based on a desk review of existing literature on sexual and reproductive health needs and rights of young positives. RESULTS: The results indicate young positives are sexually active and are engaging in risky sexual encounters. Yet, existing policies, programs and services are inadequate in responding to their sexual and reproductive health needs and rights. CONCLUSION: Against these findings, it is important, that policies specifically targeting this subgroup are formulated and to make sure that such policies result in programs and services that are youth friendly. It is also important that integration of Sexual Reproductive Health (SRH) and HIV services is prioritized.  (+info)

A legal-ethical analysis of reproductive endocrinologists' right to refuse ovulation induction to patients with diminished ovarian reserve. (15/26)

 (+info)

Approaching 4 decades of legislation in the national family planning program: an analysis of Title X's history from 1970 to 2008. (16/26)

 (+info)