Carpal instability associated with fracture of the distal radius. Incidence, influencing factors and pathomechanics. (49/394)

134 fractures of the distal radius in 132 patients are reviewed to determine the incidence and influencing factors of coexisting carpal in stability. By measurement and analysis of the changes in carpal angles and joint spaces, carpal instability was discovered in 41 fractures, an incidence of 30.6%. Six patterns of instability were observed, including dorsal intercalated segmental instability (DISI), scapholunate dissociation, dorsal and palmar translocations, volar intercalated segmental instability (VISI) and ulnar carpal translocation. Accompanying carpal instability was more often seen in elderly patients. To a certain extent, the patterns of instability were related to the type of fracture and palmar tilt angle (PTA) values. DISI was often seen in fractures with PTA smaller than -15 degrees, while scapholunate dissociation was seen in fractures with PTA between -5 degrees and -20 degrees. The possible pathomechanics of the accompanying carpal instability were deduced based on the kinematics and influencing factors indicated in this study.  (+info)

Open reduction and internal fixation of comminuted fractures of the radial head using low-profile mini-plates. (50/394)

Between 1996 and 2000, we treated ten patients with severely comminuted fractures of the radial head using low-profile mini-plates. Their mean age was 42 years (24 to 71). Three fractures were Mason type III and seven were Mason-Johnston type IV. At a mean follow-up of 28.5 months (15 to 44), all fractures had united. The plates were removed in nine patients. No patient had difficulty with daily activities or symptoms of instability of the elbow. The mean range of flexion of the elbow was from 7 degrees to 135 degrees, with 74 degrees of supination and 85 degrees of pronation. According to the Broberg and Morrey functional elbow index, the mean score was 90.7 points (73 to 100), and the outcome was excellent in three patients, good in six and fair in one. These results compare favourably with those reported previously. The technique is applicable to severely comminuted fractures of the radial head which otherwise would require excision.  (+info)

Conservative treatment in intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: a study on the functional and anatomic outcome in elderly patients. (51/394)

Fractures of the distal radius are common among elderly patients. Although the indications for surgical treatment are clearly defined, there are patients who will not consent to an operation, even when it is indicated. Inevitably, these cases will require conservative treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between the functional and anatomic stati of these patients. One hundred and eight patients, with intra-articular distal radial fractures, who had been treated non-surgically, were investigated in this study. Functional and anatomic assessments were also performed. The mean follow up period was 39.5 months. The mean age of the subjects was 73.9 years. Although 25.9% of the patients had fair and poor anatomic scores, 88.9% were considered to have good and excellent functional results.  (+info)

Pain and disability reported in the year following a distal radius fracture: a cohort study. (52/394)

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures are a common injury that cause pain and disability. The purpose of this study was to describe the pain and disabilities experienced by patients with a distal radius fracture in the first year following fracture. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 129 patients with a fracture of the distal radius was conducted. Patients completed a Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation at their baseline clinic visit and at 2, 3, 6 and 12 months following their fracture. The frequency/severity of pain and disabilities reported was described at each time point. RESULTS: The majority of patients experienced mild pain at rest and (very) severe high levels of pain with movement during the first two-months following distal radius fracture. This time is also associated with (very) severe difficulty in performing specific functional activities and moderate to severe difficulty in four domains of usual activity. The majority of recovery occurred within six-months, but symptoms persisted for a small minority of patients at one-year following fracture. Patients had the most difficulty with carrying ten pounds and pushing up from a chair. Resumption of usual personal care and household work preceded, and was more complete, than work and recreational participation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the normal course of recovery following a distal radius fracture is one where severe symptoms subside within the first two-months and the majority of patients can be expected to have minimal pain and disability by six-months following fracture. This information can be used when planning interventions and assessing whether the progress of a patient is typical of other patients.  (+info)

From evidence to best practice in the management of fractures of the distal radius in adults: working towards a research agenda. (53/394)

BACKGROUND: Fracture of the distal radius is a common clinical problem, particularly in older white women with osteoporosis. We report our work towards evidence-based and patient-centred care for adults with these injuries. METHODS: We developed a systematic programme of research that built on our systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness of treatment interventions for these fractures. We devised schemata showing 'typical' care pathways and identified over 100 patient management questions. These depicted the more important decisions taken when progressing along each care pathway. We compiled a comprehensive document summarising the evidence available for each decision point from our reviews of randomised trials of treatment interventions. Using these documents, we undertook a formal and structured consultation process involving key players, including a patient representative, to obtain their views on the available evidence and to establish a research agenda. The resulting feedback was then processed and interpreted, using systematic methods. RESULTS: Some evidence from 114 randomised trials was available for 31 of the 117 patient management questions. However, there was sufficient evidence to base some conclusions of effectiveness for particular interventions in only five of these. Though only 60% of those approached responded, the responses received from the consultation group were often comprehensive and provided important insights into treatment practice and policy. There was a clear acceptance of the aims of the project and, aside from some suggestions for the more explicit inclusion of secondary prevention and management of complications, of the care pathways scheme. Though some respondents stressed that randomised trials were not always appropriate, there was no direct overall criticism of the evidence document and underlying processes. We were able to identify important core themes that underpin management decisions and research from the feedback of the consultation exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this project is an important advance towards evidence-based and patient-centred management of adults with distal radial fractures. It exposes the serious deficiency in the available evidence but also provides a template for further action. As well as being a valuable basis for viewing and informing current practice, the insights gained from this project should inform a future research agenda.  (+info)

Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of supracondylar fracture of the humerus and ipsilateral fracture of the forearm in children. (54/394)

We treated 22 children with a supracondylar fracture of the humerus and an ipsilateral fracture of the forearm by closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. There were four Gartland type-II and 18 Gartland type-III supracondylar fractures of the humerus. There were fractures of both bones of the forearm in 16 and of the radius in six. Both the supracondylar and the distal forearm fractures were treated by closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. The mean follow-up time was 38.6 months. At the latest follow-up there were 21 excellent or good results and one fair result. There were no cases of delayed union, nonunion or malunion. Five nerve injuries were diagnosed on admission and all recovered spontaneously within eight weeks. No patient developed a compartment syndrome.  (+info)

Colles' fracture; a method of maintaining reduction. (55/394)

A major difficulty in the treatment of Colles' fracture is maintenance of reduction. Wedging of the cast, a procedure used in dealing with other orthopedic conditions, was adapted to the treatment of Colles' fracture and was employed in 23 cases. In most of them the method was effective in preventing displacement.  (+info)

Nancy nailing of diaphyseal forearm fractures. Single bone fixation for fractures of both bones. (56/394)

We identified 25 children (10 girls and 15 boys) who had been treated with single bone intramedullary fixation for diaphyseal fractures of both forearm bones. Their mean age was 10.75 years (4.6 to 15.9). All had a good functional outcome. We conclude that in selected children, single bone intramedullary nailing is a suitable method of treatment for diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the forearm.  (+info)