What is the significance of macrosomia? (17/539)

This commentary/review briefly considers the diverse criteria recommended for classification of overweight infants. Macrosomia continues to be a vexing problem for both obstetricians and pediatricians. Among the various techniques possible for use in assessing body composition, none are more practical than body weight relative to gestational age. The criteria for normative data from large populations are reviewed. The stringent definition, i.e., exceeding +2 SD of an appropriate normative population, is reaffirmed. Using these criteria, infants of diabetic mothers showed a significant relationship of body weight to fetal hyperinsulinemia.  (+info)

Maternal predictors of perinatal mortality: the role of birthweight. (18/539)

BACKGROUND: Many maternal characteristics increase the risk for perinatal death. To locate potential sites for intervention, it is important to identify these risk factors and examine how much of the excess mortality is explained by infants' low birthweight. METHODS: Data on all newborns in Finland born between 1991 and 1993 (N = 199,291, of which 1461 were perinatal deaths) were obtained from the Medical Birth Register. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for background variables, both including and excluding infants' birthweight. The percentage reduction in odds ratios after adjustment for infants' birthweight was used to estimate the contribution of infants' low birthweight to the excess mortality. RESULTS: After adjusting confounding factors, increased risk for perinatal death was found for eight maternal characteristics. In the following the increased risk is given as odds ratios and the proportions of the excess mortality explained by infants' low birthweight are in parentheses: in-vitro fertilization 4.12 (> 100%); earlier stillbirth 3.43 (87%); higher maternal age, from 1.21 to 3.08 (38-99%); maternal diabetes 2.87 (50%); lower socioeconomic status, from 1.30 to 1.70 (27-44%); smoking during pregnancy 1.45 (> 100%); single mother 1.44 (50%); first birth 1.36 (75%). CONCLUSIONS: Excess mortality due to maternal risk factors occurred mainly through their tendency to cause low birthweight. However, the excess mortality associated with low socioeconomic status, single motherhood, and diabetes was mediated by other mechanisms in addition to low birthweight.  (+info)

Usefulness of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. (19/539)

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy in type 1 diabetes is associated with an increased risk of developing pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been used to screen for preeclampsia in nondiabetic pregnancy. To date, there are no data regarding ABPM during pregnancy in normotensive type 1 diabetic women. This study sought to establish blood pressure (BP) profiles for pregnant type 1 diabetic women using ABPM and determine whether the BP pattern can define a population at risk for developing PIH. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ABPM was carried out for one 24-h period during each trimester--in the first trimester between weeks 7 and 12, in the second trimester between weeks 20 and 24, and in the third trimester between weeks 30 and 34--in 22 normotensive pregnant type 1 diabetic and 10 pregnant nondiabetic women. RESULTS: The incidence of PIH was fourfold greater in type 1 diabetic women than in control subjects. Diabetic women showed higher daily diastolic BP in the third trimester compared with nondiabetic pregnant women. Diabetic women who developed PIH in the third trimester showed significantly higher BP profiles throughout gestation than those who remained normotensive. Receiver operator characteristics curves for nighttime systolic BP showed the best predictive capacity for PIH, with a cutoff > 105 mmHg (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the early increase of BP in patients who will develop PIH and suggests that nighttime systolic BP >105 mmHg in the second trimester is a useful predictor of PIH. ABPM may be useful in screening for PIH in pregnant diabetic women.  (+info)

Diabetes in pregnancy and cesarean delivery. (20/539)

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of diabetes during pregnancy on cesarean delivery and to determine whether the association between diabetes during pregnancy and cesarean delivery is mediated by birth weight. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: South Carolina 1993 birth certificates were matched through a unique identifier with infant and maternal hospital discharge records for the same year, yielding a total study population of 42,071 singleton births. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were determined for the association between diabetes in pregnancy and cesarean delivery through multiple logistic regression, controlling for maternal age, race, education, number of prenatal care visits, length of gestation, birth weight, and a number of medical indications. RESULTS: Of the study population, 0.7% were pregnancies complicated by preexisting diabetes, 2.9% were pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes, and 23.4% were cesarean deliveries. After controlling for confounders, including birth weight, cesarean delivery was strongly associated with both preexisting diabetes (OR [95% CI] 6.20 [4.47-8.61]) and gestational diabetes (1.71 [1.41-2.07]). The estimates remained essentially unchanged without birth weight in the model, and were substantially higher in analyses restricted to deliveries without common medical indications for cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Both preexisting and gestational diabetes increase the risk for cesarean delivery, independent of the effect of birth weight. The association is markedly greater among women without other medical indications for cesarean delivery. The increased risk of cesarean delivery for women with diabetes is mediated through other factors, which may include practice patterns and physician referrals to high-risk care.  (+info)

Neonatal diabetes mellitus and cerebellar hypoplasia/agenesis: report of a new recessive syndrome. (21/539)

Classical neonatal diabetes mellitus is defined as hyperglycaemia occurring within the first six weeks of life in term infants. Cerebellar agenesis is rare. We report three cases of neonatal diabetes mellitus, cerebellar hypoplasia/agenesis, and dysmorphism occurring within a highly consanguineous family. This constellation of abnormalities has not previously been described. Two of these cases are sisters and the third case is a female first cousin. The pattern of inheritance suggests this is a previously undescribed autosomal recessive disorder. Prenatal diagnosis of the condition in this family was possible by demonstration of the absence of the cerebellum and severe IUGR.  (+info)

Adverse effects of hyperglycemia on kidney development in rats: in vivo and in vitro studies. (22/539)

Congenital malformations occur more frequently in the offspring of diabetic mothers. These in vivo and in vitro studies investigate the potential adverse effects of hyperglycemia on kidney development in the rat. Female rats were made hyperglycemic throughout gestation with a single injection of streptozotocin (STZ) on day 0 of gestation, or for a short period encompassing the early stage of renal organogenesis by infusing glucose from gestational days 12-16. Kidney development in the pups was assessed by determining the total number of nephrons formed in the kidney. The number of nephrons was significantly reduced (10-35%) in the pups from STZ-treated dams, as a function of hyperglycemia. There were also fewer nephrons in pups from dams given glucose infusion whose hyperglycemia was transiently higher on day 13 of gestation. The in vitro experiments were done on metanephroi removed from 14-day-old fetuses and grown for 6 days in medium containing 0, 6.9, 13.8, or 27.5 mmol/l glucose. The development of explants grown in 0, 13.8, and 27.5 mmol/l glucose was impaired compared with that of explants grown in the 6.9 mmol/l control medium, showing that the glucose concentration must be closely controlled to ensure optimum in vitro metanephros development. Thus, exposure to hyperglycemia in utero can cause a nephron deficit, which in turn may have renal consequences later in life.  (+info)

Twice daily versus four times daily insulin dose regimens for diabetes in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial. (23/539)

OBJECTIVE: To compare perinatal outcome and glycaemic control in two groups of pregnant diabetic patients receiving two insulin regimens. DESIGN: Randomised controlled open label study. SETTING: University affiliated hospital, Israel. PARTICIPANTS: 138 patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and 58 patients with pregestational diabetes mellitus received insulin four times daily, and 136 patients with gestational diabetes and 60 patients with pregestational diabetes received insulin twice daily. INTERVENTION: Three doses of regular insulin before meals and an intermediate insulin dose before bedtime (four times daily regimen), and a combination of regular and intermediate insulin in the morning and evening (twice daily regimen). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal glycaemic control and perinatal outcome. RESULTS: Mean daily insulin concentration before birth was higher in the women receiving insulin four times daily compared with twice daily: by 22 units (95% confidence interval 12 to 32) in patients with gestational diabetes and by 28 units (15 to 41) in patients with pregestational diabetes. Glycaemic control was better with the four times daily regimen than with the twice daily regimen: in patients with gestational diabetes mean blood glucose concentrations decreased by 0.19 mmol/l (0.13 to 0.25), HbA(1c) by 0.3% (0.2% to 0.4%), and fructosamine by 41 micromol/l (37 to 45), and adequate glycaemic control (mean blood glucose concentration <5.8 mmol/l) was achieved in 17% (8% to 26%) more women; in patients with pregestational diabetes mean blood glucose concentration decreased by 0.44 mmol/l (0.28 to 0.60), HbA(1c) by 0.5% (0.2% to 0.8%), and fructosamine by 51 micromol/l (45 to 57), and adequate glycaemic control was achieved in 31% (15% to 47%) more women. Maternal severe hypoglycaemic events, caesarean section, preterm birth, macrosomia, and low Apgar scores were similar in both dose groups. In women with gestational diabetes the four times daily regimen resulted in a lower rate of overall neonatal morbidity than the twice daily regimen (relative risk 0.59, 0.38 to 0.92), and the relative risk for hyperbilirubinaemia and hypoglycaemia was lower (0.51, 0.29 to 0.91 and 0.12, 0.02 to 0.97 respectively). The relative risk of hypoglycaemia in newborn infants to mothers with pregestational diabetes was 0.17 (0.04 to 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Giving insulin four times rather than twice daily in pregnancy improved glycaemic control and perinatal outcome without further risking the mother.  (+info)

Are conventional targets for metabolic control sufficient to prevent fetal macrosomia during diabetic pregnancy? (24/539)

We report the case of a 26 year-old woman, with an uncomplicated type 1 IDDM of 17 yr duration followed for her first pregnancy. At conception, HbA1c (measured by HPLC) was 6.5% and fructosamine was 280 u.mol.l (normal range below 285). During the follow-up, 15-days-interval frutosamine never exceeded the normal range and HbA1c values were under 6.5% excepted in the third trimester (7.0 +/- 0.8%) coinciding with a bad control of the 2 hours post-prandial blood glucose. A fetal macrosomy was discovered at 34 weeks of gestation and a heavy-for-date 4680 g baby was delivered by caesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation. Our case report outlines again the need to achieve the recommended target of metabolic control for the diabetic pregnant woman (blood preprandial glucose: 3.9-5.6 mM; post-prandial 2 h < 6.7 mM) specially during the third trimester of pregnancy. The use of computer databases might be helpful for precise monitoring during this narrow window period.  (+info)