Clinical experiences of undergraduate dental students in pediatric dentistry at Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland.
(58/136)
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the number and range of clinical procedures completed by undergraduate dental students in pediatric dentistry in Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Ireland, and to compare the number of procedures undertaken with the subsequent examination scores. The work comprised a retrospective audit of clinical logbooks for all of the undergraduate dental students in one cohort through their fourth and fifth clinical years between 2004 and 2006. Thirty-four quantitative logbooks were audited. Students had seen a total of 1,031 patients, and each student had completed a full course of dental treatment for an average of twenty-two children. Students completed means of 30.2 restorative procedures for children, fourteen in deciduous dentition (range six to twenty-eight), and seventeen in permanent dentition (range seven to twenty-eight). Continuity of education and care (measured through children having their treatment fully completed by the same student) was 72 percent. A moderate positive correlation between levels of clinical experience and exam score was identified. All students gained experience in management of child patients with students providing care for an average of thirty children and a minimum of nineteen. (+info)
Light transmittance characteristics and refractive indices of light-activated pit and fissure sealants.
(59/136)
We examined the light transmittance characteristics and refractive indices of light-activated pit and fissure sealants. Five commercial pit and fissure sealants and human enamel were studied, along with the CIE L*a*b* color values of the materials and enamel. The light transmittance spectra of the pit and fissure sealants showed a similar trend to the enamel, especially at wavelengths below 530 nm. The average light transmittance values from 400 to 500 nm of the materials at 0.5-mm-thick ranged from 10.0% to 40.4%. The refractive indices at 589.3 nm ranged from 1.504 to 1.546, and were approximately 4-8% lower than that of enamel. The measurements for the surface hardness of materials indicate that the light-attenuating effect of enamel and the material itself reduced the polymerization efficiency of the material. For all materials, chromatic a* showed negative and b* showed positive values, as did enamel. Significant differences in light transmittance characteristics and refractive indices between the materials and enamel may affect color matching between them. (+info)
General practitioners' use of caries-preventive agents in adult patients versus pediatric patients: findings from the dental practice-based research network.
(62/136)
BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors tested the frequency of dentists' recommendations for and use of caries-preventive agents for children as compared with adults. METHODS: The authors surveyed 467 general dentists in the Dental Practice-Based Research Network who practice within the United States and treat both pediatric and adult patients. They asked dentists to identify the percentage of their patients for whom they had administered or recommended dental sealants, in-office and at-home fluoride, chlorhexidine rinse and xylitol gum. RESULTS: Dentists were less likely to provide adult patients than pediatric patients with in-office caries-preventive agents. However, the rate at which they recommended at-home preventive regimens for the two groups of patients was similar. Dentists with a conservative approach to caries treatment were the most likely to use and recommend the use of caries-preventive agents at similar rates in adults as in children. In addition, dentists in practices with a greater number of patients who had dental insurance were significantly more likely to provide in-office fluoride or sealants to adult patients than to pediatric patients. CONCLUSION: General dentists use in-office caries-preventive agents more commonly with their pediatric patients than with their adult patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: General dentists should consider providing additional in-office caries-preventive agents for their adult patients who are at increased risk of experiencing dental caries. (+info)
Preferences for caries prevention agents in adult patients: findings from the dental practice-based research network.
(63/136)