Experiences of ethnic minority primary care physicians with managed care: a national survey.
(65/3874)
OBJECTIVES: To determine if ethnic minority physicians experience more barriers in acquiring and maintaining managed care contracts than white physicians, and to determine if the physician's perceptions of his or her ability to provide appropriate care to patients varies with physician ethnicity. STUDY DESIGN: Using a national sample, we identified 4 research areas germane to this topic and analyzed them by physician ethnic group. METHODS: Analysis involved a pre-existing data set from a national survey that employed a random sampling approach to achieve reasonably accurate national population estimates with acceptable margins of error (95% CI = +/- 2). RESULTS: A total of 1032 primary care physicians completed the survey (response rate of 48%). After controlling for confounding variables, we found that Asian physicians have the most difficulty keeping managed care contracts. Type of practice varies with physician ethnicity, and solo practitioners have more problems securing contracts than physicians in other types of practices. Board-certified physicians are more likely to have managed care contracts than those who are not. Latino physicians have significantly fewer managed care patients than primary care physicians who are white, African American, or Asian. The perceptions of the physicians of their ability to deliver appropriate care overall did not vary by ethnicity, but 2 major subcategories of this item did vary by physician ethnicity: quality of care, and limitations to providing care. CONCLUSIONS: Although we did not find overwhelming evidence of discrimination against ethnic minority physicians, differences in rates of termination, type of practice, board certification rates, and managed care affiliation were related to physician ethnicity. (+info)
At the coalface, but on the receiving end.
(66/3874)
In dealing with patients the doctor is very often paternalistic. No more so than when the patient is unable to help him--or herself. Modern technology allows people to be kept alive in "intensive care" where they often become an "object" at the centre of proceedings. Fortunately for them, most patients who survive intensive care cannot remember the experience though this does not mean that they were not suffering at the time. There is a strong case for explaining things as much as possible and for making practical procedures as tolerable as possible. The relatives and families of the seriously ill often have great difficulty in understanding what is happening to their loved ones and, in these situations, suffer a great deal of stress and foreboding regarding the ultimate outcome of their illness. The stress on the staff who may become "attached" to their patients often shows through as an indifferent attitude. Peter remembers three out of fourteen days in intensive care and Jane, his wife, remembers the whole experience. Here we tell our stories in the hope that they may help our medical and nursing colleagues to manage better the patients under their care in this situation. (+info)
The 'pill scare': the responses of authorities, doctors and patients using oral contraception.
(67/3874)
In October 1995, the regulatory authority in the UK issued a warning about an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in women taking third-generation combined oral contraceptives. This was done before publication of the scientific papers involved, and resulted in a huge media 'pill scare'. The manner in which the information was released has been criticised, as many doctors did not receive their 'Dear Doctor' letter from the regulatory authority until after media reporting. The result of the scare has been a loss of confidence in the oral contraceptive pill in general, and a rise in abortion rates. (+info)
Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer.
(68/3874)
BACKGROUND: Cancer is the second leading cause of death in children, after accidents. Little is known, however, about the symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer. METHODS: In 1997 and 1998, we interviewed the parents of children who had died of cancer between 1990 and 1997 and who were cared for at Children's Hospital, the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, or both. Additional data were obtained by reviewing medical records. RESULTS: Of 165 eligible parents, we interviewed 103 (62 percent), 98 by telephone and 5 in person. The interviews were conducted a mean (+/-SD) of 3.1+/-1.6 years after the death of the child. Almost 80 percent died of progressive disease, and the rest died of treatment-related complications. Forty-nine percent of the children died in the hospital; nearly half of these deaths occurred in the intensive care unit. According to the parents, 89 percent of the children suffered "a lot" or "a great deal" from at least one symptom in their last month of life, most commonly pain, fatigue, or dyspnea. Of the children who were treated for specific symptoms, treatment was successful in 27 percent of those with pain and 16 percent of those with dyspnea. On the basis of a review of the medical records, parents were significantly more likely than physicians to report that their child had fatigue, poor appetite, constipation, and diarrhea. Suffering from pain was more likely in children whose parents reported that the physician was not actively involved in providing end-of-life care (odds ratio, 2.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 6.7). CONCLUSIONS: Children who die of cancer receive aggressive treatment at the end of life. Many have substantial suffering in the last month of life, and attempts to control their symptoms are often unsuccessful. Greater attention must be paid to palliative care for children who are dying of cancer. (+info)
Infected physicians and invasive procedures: national policy and legal reality.
(69/3874)
Recent reports of the transmission of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV from physicians to patients during invasive procedures have again raised the question of whether physicians infected with bloodborne pathogens should perform invasive procedures that place patients at risk, and if so, under what conditions. Attempts to formulate a national policy on this subject must consider the competing interests of the patient's welfare versus the physician's livelihood. A review of the legal aspects of this topic is provided to assist policy makers and to serve as a foundation for the recommended establishment of a multidisciplinary committee to develop a uniform national policy. Both legal and medical realities call for the formulation of a clear policy to guide those who must make the decisions on this issue. (+info)
Physician attitudes, self-estimated performance and actual compliance with locally peer-defined quality evaluation criteria.
(70/3874)
BACKGROUND: Physicians' agreement with quality evaluation criteria, and estimates of their own and their colleagues' compliance with these criteria were compared with actual compliance. METHODS: Physicians practicing in 10 health centers in Spain defined 13 quality evaluation criteria for two patient conditions (upper respiratory infections and high serum cholesterol). Compliance with criteria was measured by an external team, using random samples of medical records stratified by condition in each health center (n= 1,000). Concurrently, physicians were surveyed regarding agreement with the criteria, and were asked to estimate their own and their health center's rate of compliance with these criteria. RESULTS: Agreement ratings varied from 5.9 to 9.1 on a 10-point scale. Actual compliance rates ranged from 1.8 to 91.7% of records. Agreement correlated significantly with self-reported compliance but not with actual compliance. Estimates of one's own and one's health center compliance were positive and significantly correlated for all criteria, but were significantly higher for oneself than for one's health center for six of 13 criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation in physicians' agreement on quality criteria and in actual performance reveal a lack of clear guidelines. Agreement on criteria did not always translate into compliance with criteria. Physicians tended to rate their own performance as better than the average of their peers, suggesting that aggregate data may not influence physicians to change. Self-estimate of one's own or one's colleagues performance is not a good proxy for actual performance so that peer ratings are of dubious value for performance appraisal. (+info)
Patient participation in medical decision-making: a French study in adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for early breast cancer.
(71/3874)
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is increasingly advocated as an ideal model. However, very few studies have tested the feasibility of giving patients the opportunity to participate in the choice of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women, with non-metastatic breast cancer, eligible for non-intensified adjuvant chemotherapy attending our hospital were proposed two administrations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a sequential and a concomitant one. Two patient-questionnaires were used to elicit motivations for their choice and their degree of comfort with the process of decision-making and one questionnaire to test physicians' ability to predict patients' choice. RESULTS: Participation rate in the study was 75.3% (n = 64). Majority (64%) of patients chose the concomitant treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with a lower level of education, who discussed the choice with social circle, and who most feared side-effects were more likely to choose the sequential treatment. Physicians were able to predict patients' choice in 66% of cases. 89% of patients declared that they were fully satisfied with having participated in the choice of treatment and 79% supported shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Results are in favour of promoting active participation of cancer-patients in medical decision-making. The adequate degree of such participation remains however to be elicited and tested for therapeutic choices implying more difficult trade-offs between quantity and quality of life. (+info)
Physician impact on the total cost of care.
(72/3874)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Physicians' efforts at cost containment focus on decreased resource utilization and reduced length of stay. Although these efforts appear to be appropriate, little data exist to gauge their success. As such, the goal of this study is to determine trauma service cost allocations and how this information can help physicians to contain costs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors analyzed the costs for 696 trauma admissions at a level I trauma center for fiscal year 1997. Data were obtained from the hospital costing system. Costs analyzed were variable direct, fixed direct, and Indirect costs. Together, the fixed and indirect costs are referred to as "hospital overhead." Total Cost equals variable direct plus fixed direct plus indirect costs. RESULTS: The mean variable, fixed, and indirect costs per patient were $7,998, $3,534, and $11,086, respectively. Mean total cost per patient was $22,618. CONCLUSION: The 35% variable direct cost represents the percentage of total cost that is typically under the immediate influence of physicians, in contrast to the 65% of total cost over which physicians have little control. Physicians must gain a better understanding of cost drivers and must participate in the operations and allocations of institutional fixed direct and indirect costs if the overall cost of care is to be reduced. (+info)