Myeloperoxidase attracts neutrophils by physical forces. (49/84)

 (+info)

How cats lap: water uptake by Felis catus. (50/84)

 (+info)

Curvature recognition and force generation in phagocytosis. (51/84)

 (+info)

Injection force of SoloSTAR(R) compared with other disposable insulin pen devices at constant volume flow rates. (52/84)

BACKGROUND: Injection force is a particularly important practical aspect of therapy for patients with diabetes, especially those who have dexterity problems. This laboratory-based study compared the injection force of the SoloSTAR(R) insulin pen (SoloSTAR; sanofi-aventis) versus other available disposable pens at injection speeds based on the delivered volume of insulin released at the needle. METHOD: Four different prefilled disposable pens were tested: SoloSTAR containing insulin glargine; FlexPen(R) and the Next Generation FlexPen(R) (NGFP) (Novo Nordisk), both containing insulin detemir; and KwikPen(R) containing insulin lispro (Eli Lilly). All pens were investigated using the maximum dispense volume for each pen type [80 units (U) for SoloSTAR; 60 U for the other pens], from the free needle tip dispensing into a beaker. Twenty pens of each type were fitted with the recommended needles and tested at two dose speeds (6 and 10 U/s); each pen was tested twice. RESULTS: Mean plateau injection force and maximum injection force were consistently lower with SoloSTAR compared with FlexPen, NGFP, and KwikPen at both injection speeds tested. An injection speed of 10 U/s was associated with higher injection force compared with 6 U/s for all the pens tested (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SoloSTAR stands out because of its low injection force, even when compared with newer insulin pen devices such as the KwikPen and NGFP. This may enable patients, especially those with dexterity problems, to administer insulin more easily and improve management of their diabetes.  (+info)

Analysis of the injection force of solostar(R) compared with other disposable insulin pen devices at constant volume flow rates. (53/84)

Insulin pen devices have greatly enhanced the portability and accessibility to insulin therapy for millions of people with diabetes. Comparison research data should be reviewed thoroughly. In this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, the study presented by Thomas van der Burg is balanced in number of samples tested, same tensile meter, and identical units per second delivery rate into an open beaker. Mean plateau force of SoloSTAR(R) and KwikPen were significantly lower. KwikPen and SoloSTAR utilized 5-mm length 31-gauge (G) needles vs 6-mm 31G needles for FlexPen(R) and Next Generation FlexPen(R), perhaps skewing results in favor of shorter needles instead of device design. Individual understanding of correct insulin use, appropriate self-monitoring of blood glucose, vision and dexterity capability, and affordability of therapy must be considered first. SoloSTAR holds one unique market advantage, delivery of up to 80 units of insulin per injection.  (+info)

Soil does not explain monodominance in a Central African tropical forest. (54/84)

 (+info)

How dogs lap: ingestion and intraoral transport in Canis familiaris. (55/84)

 (+info)

Preparation and properties of asymmetric large unilamellar vesicles: interleaflet coupling in asymmetric vesicles is dependent on temperature but not curvature. (56/84)

 (+info)