Peer assessment of professionalism: a five-year experience in medical clerkship. (65/95)

 (+info)

Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected]. (66/95)

 (+info)

Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers. (67/95)

 (+info)

Mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction: the influences of patient-centered care and evidence-based medicine. (68/95)

 (+info)

Yoga for arthritis: a scoping review. (69/95)

 (+info)

Peer review - a safety and quality improvement initiative in a general practice. (70/95)

BACKGROUND: A general practice in inner city Melbourne (Victoria), committed to ensuring quality standards of clinical care, developed a process for peer review of their doctors' performance. The aim was to ensure that there was a robust and fair process for evaluation of doctor performance from both a safety point of view, and from the perspective of contribution to team based practice. OBJECTIVE: This article describes the process and outcomes of this appraisal process. DISCUSSION: From the springboard of weekly clinical meetings which address critical incidents and near misses, the practice doctors developed an annual process of formal performance review incorporating hard and soft indicators of clinical performance and compliance with professional and practice standards. This type of activity falls within the scope of quality improvement in general practice.  (+info)

Validity of two occlusal indices for determining orthodontic treatment needs of patients treated in a public university in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. (71/95)

 (+info)

Evaluation of physicians' professional performance: an iterative development and validation study of multisource feedback instruments. (72/95)

 (+info)